Chinese Satellite Crashes Into House 406
toggleflipflop writes "In China, a returning satellite crashed into a house. No one was hurt.
More details in this article. Apparently inhabited by an eternal optimist: 'The satellite landed in our home. Maybe this means we'll have good luck this year,' the tenant of the wrecked apartment was quoted as saying by the newspaper.
According to the People's Daily's article on the subject nothing seems to have gone wrong."
First Image (Score:5, Informative)
Re:First Image (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:First Image (Score:5, Informative)
Unless you're talking about the abuses perpetrated by Saddam Hussein at Abu Ghraib before the US occupation, you're manufacturing facts.
The prison abuse scandal broke in late April 2004 when CBS 60 Minutes II aired several photos showing abuse against US-held prisoners at Abu Ghraib. One year before that, April 2003, US forces were still in the process of securing the bulk of Iraq from whatever parts of the Baathist regime were still fighting at the time. Abu Ghraib and the other prison camps were not fully in place until late 2003, and the reports of prisoner abuse spanned the period from October to December 2003.
Amnesty International did request that an independent investigation be put in place as early as June 2003. They objected to the general conditions of the prison camps, but did not make accusations of violent torture at that time. However, even Cooperative Research [cooperativeresearch.org] notes that photos and other evidence of the abuses at Abu Ghraib were not leaked to the military until January 2004 and to the media in April 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_prisoner_
There is also no reason to believe that CBS would wait for months to break this story, as just a few months later they hastily broke another anti-Administration story that turned out to be false.
Re:First Image (Score:4, Interesting)
I'll agree with that statement. Even the CBS Bush document fiasco was the result of CBS journalists being fed information rather than digging up facts for themselves.
Well.... aside from at the local level, and that usually consists of "investigative journalists" harassing and trespassing on the property of some city councillor who was recently arrested for DUI.
Although I am sure we all agree wikipedia is the authoritative and infallible new source,
In the specific case I linked to in my previous post, the Abu Ghraib article was extensive and cited numerous other independent sources. It may not be infallible, but it's certainly as authoritative as any of the sources it cites.
Besides, blog journalism (or distributed or peer-to-peer journalism, if you prefer) is a new driving force in today's media, and it stands to change the way that journalism and politics in the US work between now and the 2008 election. Wikipedia is an extension of that concept.
Re:First Image (Score:5, Interesting)
Beijing, Oct. 15 (Xinhuanet) -- China has successfully retrieved its 20th recoverable satellite for scientific and technological experiments. The satellite's information capsule returned to earth Friday.
Link here. [xinhuanet.com]
Re:First Image (Score:5, Insightful)
they probably just reported what the government said, before finding out that something else had happened
Re:First Image (Score:4, Funny)
Re:First Image (Score:4, Insightful)
But your point in a certain sense is well taken, because obviously, the USA is a nominally free society whereas the PRC makes no claims of being one. No one in their right mind would literally mean that the governments of the PRC and the USA are similarly repressive; but then that's why my comparison was prefaced with a modifying "sometimes".
In the same way that the slogan, "The USA: better than North Korea" has no substantial value, comparing the state of civic liberties in the PRC to the USA and using the USA's better track record as an indication of superiority is a useless exercise. Of course the USA is better than the PRC where personal freedoms are concerned. This goes without saying.
What is productive is the same comparison made in the other direction. If the PRC fails to meet the USA's standards, no one is surprised; it is when the USA is either the same or inferior to a country like the PRC that we need to begin worrying.
Comparisons of the USA's current state of civic freedoms to the PRC, the DPRK, or Mussolini's Italy are all hyperbole and should be treated as such. The purpose of such comparisons is to underscore the inadvisability of taking such reforms to extremes. Our current erosion of the civil liberties, for example, smacks of totalitarianism. To illustrate the point, I might say that the USA's current standards of something or other are equivalent to the PRC's -- this is meant to alarm you, not instigate a "but the PRC is worse than we are in terms of x, y, and z."
In summary, my point was that the original poster's retort (which essentially was, "The USA is better than the PRC because we don't roll tanks over students") was an oversimplified, propaganda-worthy comparison. It was one of those facile categorizations like, "You're either with us or with the terrorists", or "Things are either good or evil, black or white".
This kind of on/off true/false binary logic demonstratably fails with most real world concepts.
While the Tiananmen square massacre was lamentable, to simply state the USA is better because we have not similarly silenced protesting students is overlooking the huge number of horrible things we have done.
The PRC has many flaws; no one I know denies this -- even the Chinese. But Americans for some reason are wont to deny their own country's significant blunders.
To much of the rest of the world, China did not invade Iraq, or destabilize the entire continent of Latin America for their personal gain, or fight largely hopeless proxy battles with the former USSR in order to stop the spread of communism, because after all, we can't have vassal states choosing their own leaders or system of government. Free elections were never held in South Vietnam because of overwhelming popular support for Ho Chi Minh, etc. We face the same problem now in Iraq -- sure, we can have democracy, but what kind of leaders will the Iraqis elect? Most likely an Islamofacist one.
China's great flaws are these: a poor human rights record and a lack of personal freedoms. Of course, the nation griping the most loudly about the former is one of the few in the developed world that still executes inmates on a regular basis, and is also the one that was responsible for use of torture in Iraq. We may not be in the same league as China in this regard, but to much of the rest of the world, we are seen as a bully criticizing another bully for similar actions.
Regarding its lack of personal freedoms: this mostly means that political speech is not universally protected. Otherwise, you are welcome to sa
Re:First Image (Score:3, Insightful)
Not a Fox News watcher then, are ya bud?
Re:First Image (Score:2)
Re:First Image (Score:3, Insightful)
There are millions of Chinese living outside China, and many of them talk to their relatives in China regularly on the phone.
Nothing wrong? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Nothing wrong? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Nothing wrong? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Nothing wrong? (Score:2)
next year (Score:5, Funny)
Re:next year (Score:4, Funny)
Re:next year (Score:3, Funny)
Well fuck it, if it means spending a ridiculous amount of money on defense, I'd rather sit safely at home while Optimus Prime takes enemy fire.
Re:next year (Score:3, Funny)
No thanks. (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally, I'd rather have bad luck and no bird shit on my head (or satellites in my house)
Re:No thanks. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:No thanks. (Score:5, Funny)
So, what if the bad luck was something like, um, a satellite falling through your roof?
JtM
Re:No thanks. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:No thanks. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:No thanks. (Score:3, Funny)
I could sell one of these things off ebay and buy me some sweet loving.
But I suspect that in China, the only sweet lovin' I'd get would be from them gubmint men in red.
Re:No thanks. (Score:2)
Mao Suits are grey.
Yes, yes, I know: they went out of style 25 years ago.
Re:No thanks. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:No thanks. (Score:2)
Quite. IIRC, my homeowner's insurance specifically disclaims responsibility for such events, in the same section where they say they aren't responsible for warlike actions or damage caused by nuclear blasts.
Re:No thanks. (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm not so sure that the People's Republic would be so forthcoming with a rebuild. Then again, if everyone's equal in a communist society, maybe t
Re:No thanks. (Score:2)
You don't remember it correctly, it's walking on it.
Uhhhh somehow I doubt he said that voluntarily.... (Score:3, Funny)
"The satellite landed in our home. Maybe this means we'll have good luck this year"....."oh look! the excess hydrazine is spilling from the ruptured fuel tanks! What gloriousness, the great revolution truly has delivered blessings from heaven upon us! A thousand thanks to you Wen Jiabao!"....."my family's belongings are pulverized and burning with such splendid red flame! such must be divine providence showing we have truly reaped the benefits of the Great Leap Forward! W
So.. (Score:5, Funny)
Finders Keepers..
Loosers Weepers..
Re:So.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So.. (Score:2)
Grammar Nazi alert (Score:2, Informative)
LOOSERS is not a word. You sound like a damn fool when you say it wrong.
lose = opposite of win or find
loose = opposite of tight
I don't understand (Score:5, Interesting)
"The landing technology of our country's satellites is very mature and the precision of the landing point is among the best in the world. Members of the public need not worry about this," it also said, quoting Chinese space experts.
Someone please explain this to me. Did they plan on crashing the thing into this guy's roof?
Re:I don't understand (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I don't understand (Score:2)
Methinks you're right. Places to put up a house or apartment are somewhat hard to come by and they will tend to pop up on any unoccupied piece of ground. Considering the damage done to the apartment building and not done to the returned piece of satellite, I'd guess that earthquakes are a much greater threat.
Re:I don't understand (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I don't understand (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I don't understand (Score:5, Funny)
Agreed. But the mail... (Score:3, Funny)
It's the mail service; the flyer explaining to the house owner that they were intending to land the capsule in his courtyard hadn't been received yet.
Re:I don't understand (Score:3, Insightful)
Allow me to translate that from government-speak: "Nothing to see here. Move along."
Re:I don't understand (Score:2)
Re:I don't understand (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, that was the exact purpose of the mission. You see the guy had been evading taxes, and well, the Chinese can be known to go a bit overboard when making a point. It was a two part mission really, to show how precisely they can land their satellites, and to remind the population that they had better pay their f*&#ing taxes. Any other bright questions you need answers to?
Re:I don't understand (Score:5, Interesting)
The main reason would that the Chinese parachute worked while the Genesis failed.
The other reason would be a weight budget -- the Genesis mission travelled much further [genesismission.org], so the energy (and cost) to propel any additional weight would be much more than for the Chinese mission. Thus, it probably wasn't overbuilt.
The third reason is the mission. The Genesis mission had to open up to expose its collectors [nasa.gov], while the chinese mission is a bit unknown. If it was a zero gravity research, its experiments probably didn't need exposure to space. If it produced a massive amount of data that couldn't be transmitted back, the data storage is usually easy to separate from the instruments (including film & camera). Anyone know what it was supposed to do?
it could get worse... (Score:5, Funny)
I'm too lazy, otherwise I would google some info about it. No doubt soe karma whore will do it below
Re:it could get worse... (Score:2, Informative)
http://mm.iit.uni-miskolc.hu/Data/Winx/stories/
Re:it could get worse... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:it could get worse... (Score:2)
Sigh. All I had in my day was a measly Death's head hawk moth...
(and we hadn't seen Silence of the Lambs - 20 years too early).
Re:it could get worse... (Score:5, Interesting)
"The strange accident of the MiG-23
04 July, 1989.
From the Soviet airbase near Kolobzreg at the seashore of the Baltic Sea in Poland a MiG-23 took off for a training flight. After the take off the pilot, Colonel Skurigin realised that the afterburner of his plane stopped and the power of the engine begun to fall. The altitude at this time was about 130-150 m and the pilot believed that the descending aircraft is unable to fly any longer. Without turning the engine off the pilot ejected and landed safely with his parachute. To the great astonishment of the ground crew the position of the plane fixed and it flew away to the West. The autopilot kept the last direction of the plane. The aircraft was not armed but the ammunition for the 23 mm machine gun was onboard. The phantom plane left the airspace of the former East Germany and violated the West German airspace where it was intercepted and escorted a pair of American F-15s. As the F-15s didn't get permission to fire they let the aircraft flew away. France also alerted its Mirage fighters being in readiness with permission to fire if the phantom plane was dangerous for French built-up areas. Eventually it was unnecessary because after some 900 km the MiG-23 ran out of fuel and crashed in the area of Kortrijk city in Belgium ( NW of Belgium ). A house was ruined due to the crash and a 18 years old young man was buried under the ruins and died."
Hmm... (Score:2, Funny)
"In China, a returning satellite crashed into a house"
They built a satellite designed to crash into a house? OK...
Definitely insured (Score:5, Funny)
Hmm, must have had good insurance... and a crappy house.
Re:Definitely insured (Score:2)
The roof is on fire! (Score:5, Funny)
Burn, motherf***er, burn!
Re:The roof is on fire! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:The roof is on fire! (Score:3, Funny)
Don't like stars? Ok, fine, you stupid-ass motherfucker.
I wonder... (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously, given China size, they should have been able to find a decent landing spot... it isn't THAT densely populated is it?
Re:I wonder... (Score:5, Interesting)
Maybe that explains it?
Re:I wonder... (Score:2, Insightful)
However, retrieving it from there might be a pain in the ass.
They probably aimed at a region not very far from the civilization, but they obviously missed.
Of course it was a spy satellite! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Of course it was a spy satellite! (Score:2)
And is an indication of ChiCom technological non-prowess.
A spiffy spysat would encrypt the images (triple 2048-bit ElGamal?) then beam them down to ground stations.
The chinese sure are optimists (Score:5, Insightful)
Obviously, (Score:5, Funny)
home's Feng Shui. As a bonus, it
also drove out all the evil spirits.
Give the man a break, already.
Re:The chinese sure are optimists (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course, he could actually think it's lucky. Who knows, maybe he stole some parts of it and is going to sell it on the black market. And the state might actually compensate him well for damages, since this is so high profile.
Misleading summary (surprise surprise) (Score:3, Informative)
Regardless, China probably figures that deorbiting satellites into sparsely populated areas is perfectly safe because really, if it takes out a family or two, well, there's more where they came from. (Note to angry reactionists: I'm Chinese.)
Re:Misleading summary (surprise surprise) (Score:5, Informative)
In Communist China..... (Score:5, Funny)
In Communist China the satellite lands on you!
Subcontracted... (Score:5, Funny)
Chinese Contractor: Here! We have parts left over from american space craft!
Chinese Space Agency: Well, don't just stand there, send them to us!
[3 Years Later]
Genesis: The ground sure is coming up fast! I wonder why my chutes have gon.... GAK!
[2 Month Later]
Chinese Space Craft: The ground sure is coming up fast! I wonder why my chutes have gon.... GAK!
Could have been worse (Score:2)
Political opposition (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe other countries will take notice and start expanding their space programs... just to drop "errant" pieces of spacecraft on dissenters.
That's better than the Russians! (Score:2, Insightful)
Obviously SOMETHING went wrong, and the Chineese Govt doesn't want to fess up.
There's nothing like good old government-controlled press. I'm glad to see communism is still alive and well.
Eternal optimist? Nah. (Score:5, Insightful)
'The satellite landed in our home. Maybe this means we'll have good luck this year.
Eternal optimist? I doubt it. I'm sure the villager bit his tongue, and wisely refrained from voicing his true opinion.
It's all relative. A broken roof is a minor inconvenience compared to ten years in prison for criticizing the government.
Re:Eternal optimist? Nah. (Score:4, Insightful)
Or maybe he was just thinking "What are the odds of me having something happen that's WORSE that my house being destroyed by a satellite this year?"
Friends and family (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Eternal optimist? Nah. (Score:3, Interesting)
It's all relative, like you said.
Learn more in JSR's space report (Score:5, Informative)
It tells us FSW 20 - The FSW recoverable satellite launched by China on Sep 27 returned to Earth at 0248 UTC on Oct 15, falling through the roof of a house in the village of Penglai, Sichuan province
Loony Toons.. (Score:5, Funny)
Now thats what I call DirecTV! (Score:4, Funny)
Ohhh (Score:3, Funny)
returning to earth....... (Score:3, Funny)
Not just the chinese (Score:3, Interesting)
Communist News Translation Service (Score:4, Funny)
Officials say that no one with families powerful enough to demand reperations from the government was hurt.
"The satellite landed in our home. Maybe this means we'll have good luck this year," the tenant of the wrecked apartment was quoted as saying by the newspaper.
"The satellite landed in our neighbor's home. Since the government is making us say we lived there, maybe they'll make sure we have good luck this year to keep us from blabbing."
For the benefit of the humor-impaired and tinfoil-hat crowd... I'm joking.
Smart guy (Score:2)
We get used to saying that kind of thing here in the US, but elsewhere, you just can't do that.
House for sale. (Score:5, Funny)
His quote was censored.. (Score:3, Funny)
Lucky? (Score:2, Funny)
Re-entry capsule: what's inside? (Score:5, Insightful)
That satellite from which this capsule was dropped off has been up there for only last 18 days. My guess is that it hasn't got anything to do with science and very much with military intelligence.
For good part of the cold war both US and USSR used capsules to relay back intel images as radio and camera technology was not yet enough mature to do the job right. The chinese might still be (atleast partially) using robust methods which are proven to work - same with their manned missions.
People managing their space program are definately calculating re-entry trajectories carefully so they know atleast approximately where the retrieval point is. No way they would drop a capsule by accident to populated areas.
I'd say it was a hastened retrieval of latest intelligence, someone needed those images very badly and was ready to take the risk.
Just my two cents.
What are the chances (Score:3, Insightful)
Astrology tradition (Score:5, Insightful)
of course it's lucky (Score:3, Funny)
Remembering history... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Out of luck (Score:2, Funny)
Sure they do, and the first prize is a baby boy.
Re:Out of luck (Score:2)
Re:Out of luck (Score:2)
Re:Validity of info? (Score:2)
And what purpose would destroying a house, taking a photograph of a fake satelite sitting in aforementioned house serve?
Re:Validity of info? (Score:2)
well, the funny thing about is that they say that their satellites drop where they intend them to drop...
Re:Validity of info? (Score:2, Insightful)
this didnt happen in the US, did it?
Re:You believe what you read? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Crappy Chinese-made products (Score:4, Insightful)