Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

50 'Nanosats' for Sputnik's 50th Anniversary 20

Posted by michael from the sputnik-sailed-giggling-through-the-sky dept.
Roland Piquepaille writes "Europe will launch 50 ultra-small satellites in 2007 to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Sputnik, the first artificial satellite of the Earth launched in October 1957. BBC News Online writes that each nanosatellite will weigh only about 1 kilogram and represent a single nation. Arianespace will launch all 50 of the nanosats in a single payload. The nanosats will stay in orbit for about 2 years and will perform experiments chosen and designed by each individual country. For the first time in history, 50 different countries will have the opportunity to do space research, and probably at little cost. In the future, similar clusters of nanosats could be launched for collaborative missions, acting as groups or swarms and having a single goal. Read more for selected excerpts and pointers to this future historic mission."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

50 'Nanosats' for Sputnik's 50th Anniversary More

50 'Nanosats' for Sputnik's 50th Anniversary

Comments Filter:

  • Shouldn't they split the payload up? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Bob Bitchen ( 147646 ) on Thursday October 14, 2004 @12:20PM (#10526254) Homepage
    Doesn't it seem a bit vulnerable to have them all launched together? I suppose it's cost-effective but it with the nature of rocketry doesn't it make more sense in the long run to split the payload up into separate smaller rocket launches?

    --
    job anyone?
    205dot180dot85dot15/co_jobs.html
    • It's not a big deal. There is only 50kg of stuff here (50 sats x 1kg), so they are most definitely not launching that payload by itself.

      Every rocket has certain balance and performance parameters that it has to meet. If a rocket can launch a payload of 25,000 pounds, but the payload slated for that rocket only weighs 20,000 pounds, they will fill out the remaining weight with ballast, typically water or other heavy material. Sometimes, instead of using ballast, other smaller payloads can hitch a ride on the rocket essentially "for free". Sometimes it's literally free, if the owners of the rocket are charitable. But "free" here means that there is no weight penalty to the rocket, because it would have been filled out with ballast anyway.

      • It's not a big deal. There is only 50kg of stuff here (50 sats x 1kg), so they are most definitely not launching that payload by itself.
        Plus about 1-2kg of support structure and 1kg of release hardware per nanosat, plus about 3-5kg of control & power systems for the release mechanism. Still trivial, but not to be ignored.
      • they will fill out the remaining weight with ballast, typically water

        What? Where did you hear this? The cost for every pound of payload weight is around $10,000+. As an example, the Pegasus saved several hundred thousand in costs by making the Delta wing stronger with lighter mounting. If the payload is lighter, they just vary the build of the grain (solid) of the rocket fuel or load less liquid fuel. This is part of the reason we use "staging", to drop weight as the missile gets higher, plus the fac

        • I didn't hear this. I read it. On the Internet.

          Ballast is routinely used as payload substitutes on missle tests and maiden flights. Surely you knew that. Undoubtedly you did.

          You probably also know that payloads and rockets can fall apart of they are subjected to G forces that are too high. You will be aware that if your payload is too light, and you remove propellant to adjust the target trajectory, your rocket gets even lighter. You can't throttle your rocket that much in practice, and the thing acceler
  • He's the king of self-promotion, so we know he has a chance of winning it.

  • 50 more objects for existing satellites to... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) ( 613870 ) on Thursday October 14, 2004 @12:34PM (#10526412) Journal
    ...collide with. I hope the idea of nanosats doesn't get too popular or it's going to get pretty scary trying to track all of the junk in orbit.
    • Hopefully, before they come into wide-spread use, their "swarming" behavior can be designed to recognize that End of Life is near, and gracefully dive into the atmosphere. Or else we will need to periodically launch swarms of "janitors" to find defunct nanosats, and haul them down....

    • I hope the idea of nanosats doesn't get too popular

      I suspect it already is. The amateur radio satellites, for example, aren't too much bigger than these. Here's a picture [amsat.org] of the most recently launched one, `Echo'. Looks like it's only about 8x as big as the ones that are to be launched ...

      Hopefully there will be at least one amateur radio satellite with the 50 they're going to launch -- this form factor would seem to be ideal.

  • I read the BBC piece and Piquepaille blog, but didn't see a list of countries. Did I miss it, and is the US counted among the 50 nations participating?

  • President Bush has announced... (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Allowing 50 rouge nations to launch nanosats is too risky. One of the sats might be from "the terrorists".

    Flame on! Defend America- Defeat Bush. And while your at it, defeat Kerry too. Nader for president!
  • I would think Europeans would be the last to send up more space junk for no reason other than to celebrate. Why don't they take their space tech and put it to good human-oriented causes, like curing cancer and fixing the mess the USA supposedly caused in Baghdad?

    (Go ahead, mark me a troll. I just had to get that off my chest.)
    • Maybe you should actually RTFA and conclude you are only blating alot of nonsense. Those nanosats are there for research, the celebration thing is a lucky coincidence.
    • typical american attitude, you made the mess, you clean it up. There's no point in having our younger generation maimed and killed when you still have lots left to send over there. It's your mess, you clean it up. If you guys run outa young folks to send over before you clean up the cia created mess (yes, the cia did sponsor saddam into power), well then I guess we know who won....

      • sigh (Score:1, Offtopic)

        by ChipMonk ( 711367 )
        "you made the mess, you clean it up"

        Yet, when we go in there to "clean it up", the UN et alia start jumping up and down "you can't do that, give inspections more time!" Bullshit.

        As far as "typical american attitude", again, you're missing the point. It's the typical liberal attitude I was highlighting. But I guess your hatred of the Prez can't see past that.
  • Now I can have a space linux cluster!

Slashdot Top Deals

Whoever dies with the most toys wins.

Close