Robot Eats Flies to Generate Power 410
ms47 writes "Interesting little story over at MSNBC today about 'robots that can be sent into dangerous or inhospitable areas to carry our remote industrial or military monitoring of, say, temperature or toxic gas concentrations.' The neat part is it's powered by 'catching flies and digesting them in special fuel cells.'"
Misread the title as (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Misread the title as (Score:5, Funny)
Or even how about "Robot Eats fat humans to Generate Power"?
Damned,
Re:Misread the title as (Score:3, Funny)
Stop being so anti-american [bbc.co.uk] YOU TERORIST!!!
Re:Sue, sue, sue (Score:3, Insightful)
It's not exactly unreasonable to assume that a place which sells food would have caloric content decent enough that one could reasonably eat said food and hope to either maintain a weight or gain very slowly.
Instead, Mcdonalds' portions have absolutely UNREASONABLE amounts of calories for the amount of food given, ie. I could make a standard hamburger at home which would have larger,
flesh eating robots are bad, mkay (Score:5, Funny)
Re: Misread the title as (Score:4, Funny)
Robot Eats, Flies to Generate Power (Score:4, Funny)
I misread the title as well (Score:5, Funny)
Attractive? (Score:5, Funny)
Something tells me it'll fit right in here. =)
A Poll? (Score:4, Funny)
Something tells me it'll fit right in here. =)
Fly Topping?
WD40
3-in-1
Marvel Mystery Oil
STP Oil Treatment
Liquid Wrench
10w30
Ehylene Glycol
Missing option: I eat my flies straight up, you insensitive clod!
Re:A Poll? (Score:3, Funny)
Makes me glad we don't have the CowboyNeal options anymore.
Re:A Poll? (Score:5, Funny)
They're called, "Flowers" (Score:5, Funny)
Hello, McFly! I think our photosynthetic brethren figured out the solution to this problem a few gazillion years ago. The answer is flowers!
It sounds like these researchers are already taking this behemoth [sfasu.edu] as their example. Great: I, for one, welcome our new Giant Corpse Flower overlords. But why not jump forward a few million years? A rose by any other name, you know.
On the other hand, nobody cares if the robot eats house flies. Butterflies might be another thing altogether. Won't someone please think of the Butterflies?
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:2, Funny)
Another win for plant-kind!
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:They're called, "Frogs" (Score:5, Funny)
and then use the frogs... (Score:2)
Mmm.... humans!
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:3, Informative)
Indeed. That may, in fact, be the very inspiration for this device, as flowers that attract flies and digest them smell like. .
Go figure.
KFG
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:2)
I never really understood why it is traditional to give a girl you like a plant's sexual organs anyways.
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:4, Informative)
Just in case you don't think the poster is serious: he's dead [luckymojo.com] serious [ncbuy.com].
Won't somebody think of the children^W butterflies^W raccoons?!
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:3, Informative)
Re:They're called, "Flowers" (Score:3, Interesting)
Overheard in a remote jungle... (Score:5, Funny)
"Heeeeelllp Meeeeee! Heeeeeellllp Meeee!"
Re:Overheard in a remote jungle... (Score:2)
/* caps not used due to slashdot bottage */
put list (" whaz wrong with PL/1?");
end;
Flies (Score:3, Funny)
Yep, sounds like like elementary school..
Re:Flies (Score:2)
Wait...
It's name (Score:5, Funny)
If they are going into toxic environments (Score:5, Funny)
But Toxic environments kill flies??? (Score:3, Interesting)
Either they were really desperate for a grant application, or there's something else going on here, like a very specialized military application (e.g. can't use a solar power collector because they're
Re:But Toxic environments kill flies??? (Score:5, Funny)
[/dumb]
Re:If they are going into toxic environments (Score:5, Funny)
Now what do I do? (Score:5, Funny)
Just another example of how technology is being used to take job opportunities away from me.
Wait... (Score:5, Funny)
OK, I lied. I think this is great! Animal rights zealots an fuck off.
LK
Re:Wait... (Score:2)
But seriously, if we could ever develop a nano-bug that dines on mosquitoes it would be a great day for mankind. Bye bye malaria!
Re:Wait... (Score:5, Insightful)
Everything has its place in the chain
Re:Wait... (Score:3, Funny)
I'd like someone to build a machine that honeypots mosquitos and ticks and destroys them. A pink, flesh-like substance that coats the robot and exudes CO2 and sweat-like vapor, walks on two stump-like legs coated with the same "flesh", and poisons parasit
Re:Wait... (Score:2, Funny)
Duh...That would be a problem.
LK
Stargate SG1 (Score:2)
The Matrix (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:The Matrix (Score:4, Funny)
nerd obligation #2: using any means necessary to defend use of #1
---
Get a free iPod, for real. Just Start an AOL trial, get verified (2 weeks), then cancel it! [freeipods.com]
No need to smell like shit... (Score:5, Interesting)
-Pinkoir
Re:No need to smell like shit... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:No need to smell like shit... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I'm not so sure. (Score:5, Interesting)
Because you're outgassing a suculent (to a mosquito) odor from your skin. It isn't just CO2, but compounds like octenol. Some genera are more strongly attracted to some compounds than others. Aedes and Ochlerotatus mosquitoes are particularly attracted to CO2, or so some of my entomological geek friends say.
Once they get close, mosquitoes are phototropic as well. Since they can see in the ifrared range, you're also like a walking lightbulb.
The way people seem to attract mosquitoes probably depends on two things: their skin sensitivity (sensitive people notice more) and their metabolic rate (which affects how smelly and bright they appear to the mosquito).
Trust me, I know too much about this stuff.
Hm (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hm (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hm (Score:5, Funny)
If the firmware is open-sourced, it will already attract SCO executives.
I can see the headlines already, "SCO sues robotic fly-eating overlords"
Load with MS software (Score:2)
An Ecoligical Disaster (Score:5, Funny)
Is this at all useful (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course the original is a really cool toy if you need an automated fly swatter.
Re:Is this at all useful (Score:2)
Gastrobots (Score:5, Informative)
Robots that have biotic stomachs are sometimes called 'Gastrobots'. There is a paper from MIT [mit.edu] on the subject. Another paper from some guy at USF [usf.edu] has this choice quote:
This is not a unique insight but it is funny if you misread it as "biological examples, e.g. Beer".
It can't just be me (Score:5, Funny)
Not to mention, making it "release and forget?" Yay! Invincible autonomous robot predators! WHEEEE!
To quoth Jeff Goldblum: This is the worst idea in a long, sad history of bad ideas.
Re:It can't just be me (Score:2)
It's self-limiting (Score:2, Funny)
Re:It can't just be me (Score:5, Interesting)
How about a robot that eats fish [216.239.41.104]? Now we just need to tweek a few settings, and it might be able to catch even bigger "fish"
Hmmmm (Score:5, Funny)
Too many potential jokes... (Score:2)
The first thing that popped into mind was "but can it catch the flies using a pair of chopsticks?"
Followed by "that would have to be one hell of a lot of flies!"
Then "what happens when it starts moving up the food chain and realized humans provide more enery and are easier to catch?"
Exactly how much tequila to you have to drink to come up with ideas like this?
"Hey! I got it! A fly eating, shit smelling robot! And I've even got an angle to sell it to the military! Barkeep? Anoth
where's that fuel cell (Score:2)
I smell BS.
Re:where's that fuel cell (Score:2)
My question is just how much sugar is in the skeleton of a insect that only has an exoskeleton to begin with....
Let us not forget phase I: (Score:3, Interesting)
See Intelligent Autonomous Systems Laboratory [uwe.ac.uk] for more information.
Slugbot, Ecobot... oddly enough I don't see a link to Ecobot II on there.
Would be nice to power cars. (Score:3, Funny)
Ron Popeil ripoff (Score:2)
Soon to be sued by RonCo [ronco.com] for infringing on their "set it and forget it" trademark.
Killing Robots (Score:5, Insightful)
But seriously, I don't like this. Just because some animals are too weak to defend themselves, doesn't give us the right to kill them. Nor does it give us the right to build a robot that kills them. It's not like that robot couldn't be powered by other means.
Re:Killing Robots (Score:3, Insightful)
We don't have the rights to kill animals...
We don't have the rights to kill plants...
Oops, I just killed some tiny single-celled organism by breathing!
Oh no; I'm no longer sick. I must have killed the virus/bacteria trying to kill me!
I should just kill myself and get it over with.
.
.
.
Do I have the rights to do that?
--
Please realize that rights are the sole domain of humans.
Re:Killing Robots (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Killing Robots (Score:3, Insightful)
Humans are just very intelligent animals, and the fly-eating robot is just a (very abstracted) result of our drive to stay alive.
Re:Killing Robots (Score:3, Funny)
Actually, he's a fly hugging hippie.
I'm waiting for the RonCo ads now (Score:2)
I can see it already. "Plug in this miracle of a bug-zapper outside your home and it will generate power while it clears away those annoying pests!" Seriously, though, that would be a kinda cool gadget to have around. Maybe they could also branch out into ant and roach traps. Pest control AND micropower in one convenient device.
Geeze. I can't figure out if I'm being silly or serious now.
uberfrog (Score:4, Funny)
Flies have been used before (Score:5, Interesting)
Hmmmm (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:3, Funny)
Bender? (Score:3, Funny)
Fly swatters (Score:2)
Re:Fly swatters (Score:2)
On the plus side, this will also dissuade enemies from trying to explode them...
I wonder if it could eat other bugs.... (Score:3, Insightful)
matrix (Score:2)
what flies (Score:2)
sure some do (eg scorpions take radiation well)
but still made me think for a sec
So? (Score:2)
Now for the headlines... (Score:2)
Project Home Page (Score:3, Informative)
-Lucas
Doesn't sound all that practical... (Score:3, Interesting)
If humans and other mammals do not want to or cannot live/work in these environments, why would insects find a locally dangerous or inhospitable habitat inviting? I don't of many common flies that can withstand high temperatures or toxic gas concentrations and be in a local environment in a large enough population to sustain the energy needs of a robot.
What scientists should be doing is finding ways that allow mammals to live/work in these toxic environments. For example, parasitic worms, the adult intestinal cestode, Hymenolepis diminuta, lives in the intestines of its host; it does not have a digestive system or any means of ingesting food from the host. It acquires its nutrients simply by absorbtion through the cellular membranes. More interestingly, these parasitic helminths have mitochondria that utilizes fumurate as the final electron pair acceptor with concommitant generation of succinate as the end product of its energy metabolism. Translation: This worm's mitochondria operate ANAEROBICALLY whereas the mitochondria in humans and other mammals operate aerobically (oxygen is the final electron pair acceptor with carbon dioxide being the end product of our energy metabolism). Scientists could start genetically modifying mammalian mitochondria to operate in both environments (this already happens naturally in clams and other aquatic muscles). This could allow human heart muscle to survive and function in low oxygen tension environments; hence, no or fewer heart attacks. Pfizer http://www.pfizer.com/ [pfizer.com] is agressively pursuing cardiac and lipid metabolism research for the treatment of artereosclerosis. Combining Lipitor and a research compound, torceptrapib, will likely prevent plaques and cholesterol from ever clogging up arterial pathways, so my argument is almost impractical, but interesting.
Yes, I'm a chemistry geek! Did you see my Slashdot user ID?
Re:Doesn't sound all that practical... (Score:3, Interesting)
works for programmers too (Score:2)
All you laid-off engineers practice: (Score:2)
Solar robot, vegetarian robot (Score:2)
On a related note, here is an interesting bit about a solar powered robot [post-gazette.com]. Note the date and note the mentions of NASA projects. Sounds familiar?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
roguebots (Score:3, Funny)
Why can't we just have them eat old people's medicine instead?
human powered (Score:5, Interesting)
Dr. Evil (Score:5, Funny)
All I want is a friggin shit-covered death-bot...is that so much to ask?
But can it clean my kitchen? (Score:3, Funny)
Bad, bad idea! (Score:3, Funny)
God knows it's dangerous enough out there as it is, what with all the venomous snakes, spiders and insects and searing heat, lack of water, backpacker murderers and all.
The last thing you need is a bloody fly powered killer robot chasing you down when you're 500km from nowhere!
The illinest Flybot (Score:3, Funny)
Wait a minute here... (Score:5, Insightful)
If there is a major chemical weapons attack on a major population center there will be a lot of dead people. Where there are lots of dead people there are flies. Hence, the need for a robot that can sustain it's power needs with a fuel source available both day and night...Nothing to see here. Move along.
If they develop a web search engine to do this (Score:3, Funny)
PETI not PETA (Score:2)
Re:PETI not PETA (Score:2)
Re:Asimov, and Content... (Score:5, Interesting)
More interesting is how Asimov tests his three laws in this story. The George robots aren't concerned with physical appearances (hence robo-birds). Therefore they decide humans are really evaluated based on their minds and character. Since they worked out a way to save the US Robotics company and ensure a nice future partnership between humans and robots, they decide they are smarter than normal humans, and thus in fact actually are humans and superior ones at that. Oops.