Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

NASA Preps Mars Underground Mole 88

Roland Piquepaille writes "People at NASA never cease to surprise me. Searching for water or presence of past life of Mars obviously needs drilling beneath the surface. So NASA is developing the Mars Underground Mole (MUM), based on a previous device used for the European Beagle 2 mission. But here is the twist. MUM will include sensors which were previously used to collect spectral imagery of Earth from pilotless aircrafts, especially Hawaii, according to NASA. While the Mole will stay on the surface on Mars and drill up to 5 meters deep, it will transmit data via a fiber optic cable to a digital array scanning interferometer (DASI). And the spectral images produced by the DASI will enable researchers to identify possible water, ice, organics and minerals under the surface on Mars. And this MUM will be a small one, weighing less than a kilogram for a length of only 50 centimeters. For more details and pictures about MUM, please read this overview."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NASA Preps Mars Underground Mole

Comments Filter:
  • Reminds me of... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Ariane 6 ( 248505 ) on Friday July 16, 2004 @11:35PM (#9723444)
    The cryobot, which my advisor here at UH built for the Martian polar cap, as well as Europa. It was a tube that would be lowered nose-first from a lander onto the ice, and melt its way down using a heated tip in the nose, taking readings along the way. They actually tested it out in the Antarctic, but unfortunately, I wasn't here at the time, so didn't get to go along :(

    Come to think of it, some of the guys right down the hall have been working on the airborne hyperspectral imager mentioned in the article; maybe I'll go ask them about this.
  • by homeobocks ( 744469 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:10AM (#9723455)
    It seems as if space exploration has become a veritable black hole for funding. As my grandmother said, "They should fund heaven on earth before going to explore it." Though space exploration *may* have some good effects on research (like joysticks), I feel that we first need to invest in research to, say, cheapen AIDS drugs or provide cleaner water.
    • by ergean ( 582285 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @02:13AM (#9723834) Journal
      Space eploration is nothing compared to military expenses.
      So get out of your hole - there is no haven on earth .

      Any evolution in medicine would make us whis we invested more in space eploration. You'll cry for space in 30 years from now. Overcrowd -> lack of resources -> war. So cure more people to wipe them out with bombs.

      Any way you have it, we need space exploration more than an instant cure for all desises.

      So stop listening to what your grandmother says, and start thinking for youself.
      Think about weather forcast, internet, teflon, n's thousand of tv channels, asteroids, aliens and mostly about space.

      And what the hell would you do with 1.000 billions you save in 40 years?
      Trust me you don't want to know. You have no assurance that the money would be used in a better way.
    • by johannesg ( 664142 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @04:02AM (#9724046)
      Your grandmother evidently thinks space exploration is useless and should be stopped until _all_ problems here on Earth are solved. That is, until we have no more terrorists, peace in the middle east, cures for all diseases, no more corruption, hate, violence, or spam; no more drug problems, no more traffic accidents, plentiful resources for everyone, and little girls taking care of all the kittens. Presumably she also wants us all to live in a utopian world without government or money, where people are nice to each other from the goodness of their hearts?

      Presumably, once we have achieved all that we will finally be allowed to explore the heavens. Can your grandmother provide some sort of timescale? I'm asking, because I want to *see* that first man on Mars. Right now I think the chances of that are about fifty/fifty, but if she has her way I doubt there will ever be a generation that does.

      Finally, look up how much money your country spends on defence, how much it spends on healthcare, and finally how much it spends on space exploration. I'm sure there will be readers who can provide these numbers, but I can already tell you that space exploration will be less than a percent of any of the other two.

      • Presumably she also wants us all to live in a utopian world without government or money, where people are nice to each other from the goodness of their hearts?


        What she really says is, "What, they're spending $15 billion on that when $2,000 would clear up all my outstanding debt?!" And she's against it for that reason. So people are always going to be against spending any amount of money unless it addresses their own immediate needs.
    • by argStyopa ( 232550 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @10:16AM (#9725013) Journal
      I wouldn't call you cynical, only naive.

      Space exploration is a perfect example of the "give a man a fish..." paradigm.

      The problems of humanity are endless. And frankly, we've solved most of them. Now it's a question of distribution and dissemination.

      But does anyone doubt that in 1000 years we're going to be colonizing other planets and spreading the human race across the galaxy? We'll STILL have the same human problems of violence, greed, selfishness, etc. - I think they are endemic to the human animal.

      I can see your grandma saying 80 years ago "why are we funding these silly things called airplanes? They are unsafe and barely can stay up in the air - what use are they? Use that money for something important, like feeding the starving."

      And she'd be wrong.
    • Perhaps we should all head back to Africa and the Middle East, and not migrate any further until we've turned our species' homelands into heaven. I'm sure if we focus all our efforts on them, we'll accomplish that Real Soon Now too...
  • This site is getting a little slow, so here it is:

    NASA Preps Mars Underground Mole

    Posted by michael on Friday July 16, @08:45PM
    from the better-hope-they-don't-strike-oil dept.
    Roland Piquepaille writes "People at NASA never cease to surprise me. Searching for water or presence of past life of Mars obviously needs drilling beneath the surface. So NASA is developing the Mars Underground Mole (MUM), based on a previous device used for the European Beagle 2 mission. But here is the twist. MUM will include se
    • OMFG Insightful? (Score:4, Insightful)

      by PatientZero ( 25929 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:21AM (#9723477)
      He posted the text of the summary ... which is directly above his freakin' post! Funny, absolutely, but insightful?

      I think the moderators themselves need a systems upgrade.

      • I was reading awhile ago on some /.er's journal that funny mods grant no karma, but getting modded down from funny costs you karma. This person (whose name utterly eludes me, I'm sorry) advocated modding people up as insightful or something to get around the karma trap. It's possible that whoever modded this person was operating on that theory [said without comment on the value or lack thereof of the theory].
    • Of course it's redundant, that's the joke! Are you related to the guy who moderated this "informative?"
  • A small MUM (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    And this MUM will be a small one, weighing less than a kilogram for a length of only 50 centimeters.

    Indeed, that is even shorter than my MUM, and quite a bit lighter too!
  • Prediction (Score:5, Funny)

    by PatientZero ( 25929 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:18AM (#9723468)
    While drilling one of the many holes, the Mole will uncover a crystalline life form that lives in the underground Martian water table. The salt-based life will attempt to communicate with it with flashy lights, but of course the NASA "scientists" will be oblivious to the obviously higher form of intelligence -- besides, they've got a schedule to meet. In a desperate attempt to save their unique species from extinction, the life forms will seize control of the Mole and proceed to attack and destroy the other Mars Rovers using its drill.

    Finally, Beagle II will appear from out of nowhere, disable the Mole, negotiate a peace treaty with the new life, and usher in a new era of human-alien cooperation.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:24AM (#9723486)

    Today Martians sighed in relief as their underground civilization is 6 meters beneath Mars' surface.
  • by hondo77 ( 324058 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:29AM (#9723499) Homepage
    International Rescue had this figured out a long time ago with a much cooler mole [davidszondy.com].
    • But will this mole be delivered by Thunderbird 2? If it is will it be driven by an ex-austronaut puppet or a 15 year old kid with teenage angsts?
  • Underground Mole (Score:1, Redundant)

    by lewko ( 195646 )
    Moley, moley, moley, moley, moley... [the-reel-mccoy.com]
  • hmm (Score:4, Funny)

    by Turn-X Alphonse ( 789240 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:31AM (#9723502) Journal
    So we sent a dog... now a mole... whats next? A swallow?
    • Re:hmm (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward
      African or.... Oh I give up.

      Some things are just too easy.

      (In Soviet Russia, example.com points to slashdot.org)
  • by qaguru ( 777981 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:36AM (#9723522)
    Useless trivia: The original Beagle drilling technology is is based upon a Hong Kong dentist's idea. The name of the guy is Dr. Ng.
  • How Many Moles? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by MooseByte ( 751829 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:38AM (#9723525)

    I wonder how many of these little robo-critters they could deploy in a single landing? Sure seems like a swarm of the little buggers spreading out for not only redundancy but increased geographical coverage would be a big plus.

    Looks like that base station each is tethered to would put a kink in that idea though.

    And of course if the subterranean residents interpret the swarm as an invasion, Lucy's gonna have some 'splainin to do...
  • Servo's had one for years.
  • This is a job for The Mole
    http://www.martinbowersmodelworld.com/the%20mole.h tm [martinbowe...lworld.com]
    • This is a job for The Mole

      Don't you mean that this is a job for Molier, and his niece Moleen [lizardlounge.com]?

      .

      For those not on the in on this one, Molier and Moleen are two mole like creatures involved in the archaeological dig of an ancient underground city (they team up with Dr. TJ Taroo). Listen to the radio play at the link. You won't regret it!

  • A _real_ mission?? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by acceber ( 777067 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @01:07AM (#9723606)
    Now, let's wait until a real Mars mission comes to see if MUM really works.

    Is that implying that the Mars exploration mission of Spirit and Opportunity was NOT a REAL mission? Spirit and Opportunity has been one of the most successful missions that NASA has ever undertaken, those rovers have surpassed their use-by-date by more than 3 months!

    If that wasn't a real Mars mission, then what exactly is considered to be a real Mars mission?

  • by rritterson ( 588983 ) * on Saturday July 17, 2004 @01:12AM (#9723627)
    so, MUM's the word?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 17, 2004 @01:22AM (#9723656)

    "...please read this overview."

    TRANSLATION:

    ...please support and increase Roland Piquepaille spam and advertising [weblogs.com] clickthrough rates.

    If you really want more details and pictures about the Mars Underground Mole [nasa.gov] then you can

    It's much better than supporting craven self-interested people who are just after advertising like Roland Piquepaille, blog spammer [slashdot.org].

  • by One_6453 ( 740362 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @01:40AM (#9723725)
    ..my girlfriends mum.
  • by gerardrj ( 207690 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @02:00AM (#9723793) Journal
    Isn't this similar to that failed mission (the one with the english/metric issue or something like that) where two probes were to crash in to the planet, then drill down some distance to take samples?
    • The goal is similar, but the method is totally different. The first method was part of the cheap-better-faster mantra. <strained analogy>The first mission would be akin to drilling for oil by hurling the oil-dereks from the sky at several hundred miles per hour </strained analogy> The first mission involved no drilling, only the momentum of the crash to burrow some small distance underground. It was to rely on very hardened electronics to survive the crash, but no moving parts. There are ele
  • by Penguinshit ( 591885 ) on Saturday July 17, 2004 @02:28AM (#9723873) Homepage Journal

    NASA is planning on using drilling technology similar to Beagle 2.

    What technology is that -- running headlong into the planet at high speed? Seeing as how we never heard whimper one out of Beagle, I don't think that's such a good plan...
  • NASA sends an earth MUM to find their underground civilization, and then scold them all for having long hair while reminding them to wear a sweater outside, it's freezing!
  • Since it is so small and basically will only do a few experiments, they should send some other small inexpensive probes along with it to do some other experiments. It is a long expensive trip, might as well make the most of it.
  • No kidding. I'd hate to see our troops bomb the crap out of, then occupy Mars under suspicion of "weapons of mass destruction".

  • Wow, a underground mole? Thats some pretty neat stuff... I wonder what they are going to find, or what exactly they are looking for :P
  • But MUM could have other shapes, just like this cheese-shaped lander shows.
  • by zaren ( 204877 ) <fishrocket@gmail.com> on Saturday July 17, 2004 @09:47AM (#9724909) Journal
    They're sending devices that they'll basically be planting in the ground, and they're named MUM and DASI? Either they've got a sense of humor, or a green thumb. Maybe next they'll send the TULIP - Tunneling Underground Life Investigation Probe, or maybe the ROSE - Roving Observor / Sentience Explorer...
  • And this MUM will be a small one, weighing less than a kilogram for a length of only 50 centimeters.

    Just being picky... Is that its weight on Earth or on Mars?
  • by Archfeld ( 6757 ) * <treboreel@live.com> on Saturday July 17, 2004 @12:44PM (#9725698) Journal
    should not be sending anything but orbiters until we have the tech to survive longer..We should be building SG:Atlantis 'type' agrifarms and de-salinizations plants off the continental shelf now, and when we can survive down there long term, THEN WE START INTO SPACE with people for real, until then we should be building orbital factories for crytalline growth tech and other industries that could benefit hugely from either low/null grav, no pressure, or things that just are too scary to do at home..try the shadowline on Luna. Oh well sounds really straight foward and easy so it can't possibly be so, and will prolly never happen :( In the US, too many greedy companies hoarding info and tech, they'd rather go under and bankrupt with the assets than share any profit.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    NASA Preps Mars Underground Mole

    As opposed to what kind of moles exactly? Flying moles?

    PS. I didn't RTFA and I'm sorry if this has already been answered in the article.

news: gotcha

Working...