Canadarm Company Bidding on Hubble Repair 45
mhotchin writes "The Globe and Mail says that NASA has evaluated all the submissions for a robot repair mission to Hubble, and the only bid requested is from the Canadian company that developed the Canadarm. It appears they would copy the Special Purpose Dexterous Manipulator ('Dexter'), developed for ISS, as the main unit for the repairs."
helping is nice (Score:4, Funny)
These guys are brilliant (Score:5, Interesting)
On the other hand, I hear they know nothing about hockey, so they're not all good...
Re:These guys are brilliant (Score:1)
Re:These guys are brilliant (Score:3, Funny)
Re:These guys are brilliant (Score:1)
Conversation... (Score:5, Funny)
-Adam
Re:Conversation... (Score:5, Insightful)
"Sure, we can fix your satellite for ya, eh, but it'll cost ya two cases and season box seats for hockey."
Your comment is obviously not 'Canadian'. You didn't get the slang right. The correct quote would be:
Sure, we can fix your satellite for you. But, it'll cost you a couple'a twofours and some "blues", eh.
Re:Conversation... (Score:3, Funny)
( Old Cdn joke: Why drinking american beer like making love in a canoe? They're both fuck'n near water! )
Re:Conversation... (Score:2)
Silly americans.
two-fours = cases of beer.
blues = tickets in the blue seats.
Re:Conversation... (Score:1)
I hit your dog with my car eh.
It the noise it made was THIS LOUD eh.
You're not mad, eh?
Re:Conversation... (Score:2)
NASA outsourcing? (Score:1)
Re:NASA outsourcing? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:NASA outsourcing? (Score:3, Funny)
I.E. Re-use (Score:1)
Dexter's Laboratory is now a Vaccum (Score:3, Funny)
ISS helps USA? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:ISS helps USA? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:ISS helps USA? (Score:1)
Re:ISS helps USA? (Score:2)
Uh...isn't Hubble our only space telescope? At least, so far?
Re:ISS helps USA? (Score:4, Informative)
Try googling for Chandra, Spitzer, Compton, IRAS, SOHO, HEAO, or Hipparcos, combined with "space observatory". Or just "space observatory".
Re:ISS helps USA? (Score:3, Interesting)
Actually, the canadarm has been on shuttles since very early in the shuttle program. Using them to work on Hubble is nothing new, reference this photo [nasa.gov]. That's the shuttle variation of the arm holding Hubble in preparation for a past repair mission. The real difference in thi
And soon Canadians will make the launch vehicles (Score:4, Interesting)
The da Vinci Project [davinciproject.com] and Canadian Arrow [canadianarrow.com] are showing great potential!
Re:And soon Canadians will make the launch vehicle (Score:1)
Re:And soon Canadians will make the launch vehicle (Score:3, Informative)
I doubt this. We're in a horrible launch location (you want to be close to the equator), and the market is already pretty saturated (Arienne-5 and other solutions on the expensive side and Russian boosters on the less expensive side).
I'll be the first to cheer if we do get Canadian launch facilities (way too much red tape getting things launched by the US), but I'm not holding my breath
Re:And soon Canadians will make the launch vehicle (Score:2)
This is only true for equatorial orbits. While it's true you do get some 'free ride' from the earths rotation when launching from the equator, it's actually 'penalty' and delta V that has to be removed from the vehicle to achieve a stable polar orbit. USA launches eastbound from JSC because it's an over the water shot, and it's 'significantly' south. They launch westbound from Vandenberg because it's over the wate
Re:Hubble (Score:3, Funny)
Hubble isn't broke, 3 months or 3,000 miles since the last oil change is nearly up. They just need to get it into the nearest Jippy Lube for an oil change and it will be good as new for anouther 3 months/3,000 miles.
First time... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:First time... (Score:1)
Re:First time... (Score:1)
Re:First time... (Score:1)