Amateur Rocket Reaches Space 217
PatMouser writes "An amateur rocket carrying a ham radio avionics package reached the edge of space May 17. Launched from Nevada's Black Rock Desert, the 21-foot Civilian Space Xploration Team (CSXT) GoFast rocket quickly attained the 100 km altitude to make Amateur Radio and amateur rocketry history. Two earlier CSXT attempts to reach space--the last almost two years ago--were unsuccessful. A jubilant Avionics Team Leader Eric Knight, KB1EHE, called the successful launch 'a phenomenal experience.' The full ARRL article can be read here. There's nothing on CSXT's site yet..." (See this pre-launch story for more details.)
First step.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:First step.... (Score:2, Funny)
Muppetry (Score:5, Funny)
Re:First step.... (Score:2)
You must be talking about Darl, Chris, and Bill, right?
Define Space (Score:3, Interesting)
I was part of a Super-Loki rocket team in WI a few years back that went sub-orbital. (I was a camera systems specialist=ohhh, pretty pictures, look!!) It was an Amatur rocket, so does that count?
Re:Define Space (Score:4, Informative)
These guys had multiple GPS units broadcasting back the position of their payload.
Re:Define Space (Score:2)
And on a side note, how well does GPS work at that alt?
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Define Space (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Define Space (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Define Space (Score:2, Informative)
the 21-foot Civilian Space Xploration Team (CSXT) GoFast rocket quickly attained the 100 km altitude
(you also said that later on...)
Re:Define Space (Score:3, Informative)
To prevent people from cheaply building their own missile guidance systems, commercial GPS receivers are limited to a maximum altitude of 60,000 feet and a maximum speed of 1000mph. Link here [gpsinformation.net].
These are legal restrictions though, not technical ones. I have no idea what the "real" limits are.
Re:Define Space (Score:4, Funny)
*pop* "AAAIEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee" *splat*
Re:Define Space (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Define Space (Score:5, Informative)
"The suborbital vehicle will attain an altitude of 100 km or 62 statute miles--high enough to be considered 'space'--linger there for a couple of minutes then arc back to Earth some 26 miles down range."
So, they didn't actually launch an Amateur Satellite into orbit (darn!).
But it looks like these guys are trying just that [amsat.org].
Re:Define Space (Score:5, Interesting)
There a bunch of other amateur satellite projects - for a start check out:
http://cubesat.calpoly.edu/ [calpoly.edu]
http://ssdl.stanford.edu/ [stanford.edu]
http://www.arliss.org/ [arliss.org]
Re:Define Space (Score:4, Funny)
So, they didn't actually launch an Amateur Satellite into orbit (darn!).
To be precise, they did place their satellite into an orbit, just a highly eccentric one with a path that happens to intersect the Earth.
Still a fantastic achievement, in any event...
Re:Define Space (Score:3, Funny)
>To be precise, they did place their satellite into an orbit, just a highly eccentric one with a path that happens to intersect the Earth.
The orbital calculations probably just simplified the Earth's mass and gravity to a point source. It makes the math lots easier. Unfortunately, Planet Bloat (tm MS) spoiled an otherwise excellent orbital launch.Re:Define Space (Score:3, Insightful)
Go Minnesota! (Score:4, Informative)
When does your crazy project stop being amateur? (Score:5, Interesting)
I dont get it. I mean, I understand the concept of "Amateur Radio", and "Amateur Rocketry" right, but theres got to be a point when your mad scientest project gets out of the garage and into, say, space, and all of the sudden like pair of twin torpedos slaming into the death star your Amateur project gets a slashdotting and its pro.
Hell, I can go pro by buying an $8,000 digital SLR camera, why is it that shooting a home brew satelite into space is amateur? (j/k)
Its not like some homies duct taped an 8-track to an upside down trash can and stuck some dinomite under it, right? Please, for the love of god, come up with a better classification than this!#!
Hell, even in soviet russia amateur rockets launch you.
Come on, you know you were thinking it too
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:5, Informative)
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:2)
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:4, Informative)
Actually, according to The Professional Photographers Association of America [ppa.com] the rule is that you've made more than 50% of your annual gross income in one tax year from the activity in question.
I believe that is a pretty common definition, but it's been a long time since I worked for a member of PPA too. :)
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:2)
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:2, Informative)
profession. n. "An occupation or career."
(American Heritage Dictionary)
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:5, Funny)
I'm usually not one to reply to my own post but I've seen here way too many posts that basicly say "It is amateur because you are not being paid", while this rule does not explain this [google.com]anomaly.
If I were to spend 10 years learning and praticing ballroom dancing would I not become a professional ballroom dancer?
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:2)
-Restil
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:5, Insightful)
But let's say you're a good dancer who isn't paid. People might say you were "very professional" in your attitude or presentation but in that case they're using an analogy - saying you're as good as a professional, not saying you're actually a professional.
I think a lot of people are confused about this word. We use the term "amateurish" to talk about things which are crappy and I really think this helps to add to the confusion. For instance I write free software which by definition is an "amateur" activity since I don't get paid for it but I'd really like to think it's not "amateurish" and crappy!
There are some other distinctions used these days too. I play in a band which you'd definitely describe as "amateur". But maybe someday we'll get booked at a venue and become "semi-pro", meaning we get paid to play - but not enough to give up our day jobs. Not quite "professional" but not "amateur" either.
Hmm... (Score:2)
Sort of... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Sort of... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:3, Insightful)
> professional until you got paid. And even if you were terrible at it but got paid you'd still
> be a professional.
That is not entirely true. As a dancer you can simply declare yourself "pro" and start entering competitions for professionals.
On the other hand in many countries amateurs teach and do demonstrations and get paid for all of these, though usually there are some limits. The distinction between amateur and p
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:2)
If you're speaking of the Linux core developers, many (if not most) of them are indeed professional programmers. That is, they write programs for a living; the fact that they chose to forgo payment for a particular bit of code doesn't change their professional status.
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:4, Interesting)
1. Amateur radio may be sponcered but they guy/girl still has a day job.
2. Amateur ballroom dancing may get paid to dance but can't survive just painting.
3. Amateur painters can sell their work but if it doesn't bring in enough to live it's still just a hobbie.
As you can see Amateur doesn't mean you don't get paid it just means you don't get paid ENOUGH to just do X without having another job.
So answering the question when does it stop being amateur? When it pays enough money so they don't have to do anything else.
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:3, Informative)
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:3, Interesting)
Classifications other than amateur:
When you can do it reliably, it becomes "private space travel".
When you do it for money, it becomes "commercial space travel".
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:3, Funny)
The difference is simple, and you see examples of it everywhere: The basic variation of anything is "amateur".
Now if you take that, add a couple of small features targeted at business users, and then jack up the price by 70%, it becomes "professional".
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:3, Insightful)
People go pro with thirty year old pentax 35mm SLRs, so long as they can produce quality pictures and sell them to people. Crap pictures that no-one will buy from an expensive camera just make someone an amateur with a good camera. By definition, you are a professional at whatever your profession is - whatever you make the money at. Many amateur athletes are a lot better at what they do than the professionals - they just don't make any money out of
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:2)
Alright, try this one on for size. I'm currently involved in two separate and distinct business pursuits. Both make money, but neither alone pays the bills. In fact, both together don't pay the bills, but let's assume that sometime in the next month or so that status changes and both together pay the bills, but neither alone will pay the bills.
Oh yeah, one's in the food business and the other is my website (and a few related materials on the website). They're not at all related to one another. (I'm al
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:2)
Commercial != amateur.
yo.
Re:When does your crazy project stop being amateur (Score:3, Insightful)
Though it has been argued (unsuccessfully) that a sponsorship is not necessarily a waiver of amateur status (a bit of a stretch, stretched further by my application of it to this situation). So YMMV: Jeremy Bloom v. NCAA [state.co.us] (Warning: DOC file...).
And interestingly, as I preview, the banner ad is for Nike.
I take it the rocket (Score:5, Funny)
I'm sure it can make its costs back in sponsorship though.
Re:I take it the rocket (Score:2)
So ... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So ... (Score:5, Funny)
"Well now, that was off said. He'll be cryin himself to sleep tonight on his HUGE pillow"
Re:So ... (Score:2)
I know this is a joke, but about 80% of France's power comes from nucler power plants. Additionally their design on nuclear power plants rivals the American nuclear designs in terms of stability. (And anything beats the crappy Russian RBMK nuclear reactor design)
Soon now.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Recovery of the rocket (Score:5, Funny)
Re:MOD PARENT +5 FUNNY ROFLOLOLOL!!!!111 (Score:2)
K7R (Score:4, Funny)
Hmmm... the ham dialect of l33t Speak?
Re:K7R (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:K7R (Score:4, Insightful)
What?
I've been watching "1337" evolve and devolve for over a decade. It may *now* involve a lot of numeric keypad usage, but I can't believe it started as a way to be efficient.
Ten or twelve years ago there was hardly any number usage at all, just the dorky "i aM a HaXoR, aLL VoWeLZ R LoWeRCaSe" capitalization. I would see variations like using zeroes for o, fours for a, ones for l, threes for e, and sevens for t, but writing it "3Y3 4M 4 H4X0R, 4LL V0W3LZ R NuMB3RZ" actually takes more effort than spelling it normally.
I see it as being a deliberate obfuscation, like slang or the illegible writing style that taggers use.
Re:K7R (Score:2)
Any one told Homeland Security about this? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? (Score:2)
hmmm.....maybe they'll turn to animals on steriods!
Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? (Score:2)
Re:Any one told Homeland Security about this? (Score:3, Funny)
Article Text (Score:4, Informative)
NEWINGTON, CT, May 17, 2004--An amateur rocket carrying a ham radio avionics package reached the edge of space May 17. Launched from Nevada's Black Rock Desert, the 21-foot Civilian Space Xploration Team (CSXT) GoFast rocket quickly attained the 100 km altitude to make Amateur Radio and amateur rocketry history. Two earlier CSXT attempts to reach space--the last almost two years ago--were unsuccessful. A jubilant Avionics Team Leader Eric Knight, KB1EHE, called the successful launch "a phenomenal experience."
"It just roared off the pad and flew into space," said Knight, who lives in Unionville, Connecticut. "Everything went like clockwork this morning, and it was an awesome experience. We're all kind of on an adrenaline high right now."
The GoFast vehicle--named for one of the project's commercial sponsors--lifted off from the desert floor at approximately 11:20 AM PDT. The CSXT team, plus observers from the Federal Aviation Administration, were up and at the launch site several hours beforehand, however, and Knight said the rocket crew--which includes several radio amateurs--did a "dress rehearsal" prior to the actual countdown and launch.
Knight said several West Coast hams who learned about the rocket launch from ARRL news accounts showed up to assist in locating the vehicle, which was estimated to have returned to Earth some 26 to 30 miles downrange from the launch site. Knight said Monday evening that the rocket had not yet been recovered, but the ham radio telemetry package was continuing to transmit.
"We have a telemetry beacon telling us where it is--that it's alive and waiting to be found," Knight said. The rocket transmitted telemetry on the 33-cm amateur band and color Amateur TV pictures on 2.4 GHz. An HF special event station, K7R (for "rocket") didn't get much airtime, Knight said, "because we've been really focused on the mission."
"Everything came together very well," Knight said. His avionics crew includes eight Amateur Radio licensees, most of whom also were involved in the 2002 launch attempt. Former Hollywood stunt man--Ky Michaelson of Minnesota, directs the 18-person CSXT team.
Out of curiousity (Score:5, Insightful)
Am I free to build, launch and use my own space gadgets?
What does international law say about this?
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:3, Informative)
If you can get all the paperwork approved, then, yes, you (a private individual) could launch a rocket.
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:2)
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:4, Informative)
Ships registered to the U.S.A. are given protection of the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard, and an attack against an American flag ship is considered an act of war against the U.S.A., with all of the consequences that follow from that.
There are nations that do a "flag of convience" like Liberia, who only charge a modest licensing fee and do practically no inspections. (An inspection consisiting of "Yeah, the ship is there" is probabally a little bit too much for Liberia) Of course, the Liberian Navy isn't exactly going to go out of their way to help you out either.
The point here is that if you launch from a ship, even in international waters, you need to get permission from the government who you have the ship registered to. That is why I've suggested in the past that the Liberian Space Agency might end up with the largest fleet of space going craft, but even so you have to deal with at least some sort of government.
Who knows, maybe this can be a source of revenue for Nauru [cia.gov] to suppliment their income from domain sales.
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:4, Insightful)
AFAIK, there is no international treatys which restrics who that can fire lumps of metal into orbit - but there is a treaty [unvienna.org] describing what's not allowed. Only caveat there is that it's a "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States
in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", meaning it may or may not apply to you as a private person.
The main trouble I see is that you need to travel thru someones airspace to get there - and to fly thru controlled airspace you need permission from the relevant autorites in your country. As others have noted in reference to the article, in the US you need a waver from the FAA. In other nations you need to apply to the local aviation autority to launch somethign that passes thru the regulated airspace, providing you can get permission at all.
International law is not whats stopping you - it's the local laws that are the nail in your plan.
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:2)
Simon.
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:2, Informative)
The environmental impact analysis of the rocket engines and fuel and the explosives regulations are far more likely to be restrictions.
For example in the Netherlands rockets may only be fired by the military.
Amateur rocketeers have to report to the military where arrangements are made for the rocket to be launched from a shooting range (normally used for artillery practice).
The military will inspect the vehic
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:3, Informative)
You can claim anything, what you can defend or enforce is what is paid attention too.
Re:Out of curiousity (Score:3, Informative)
Essentially you have to prove you won't kill anyone on the ground, damage property, or act in a manner that is detrimental to national security or foreign policy interests to get a license.
Under international law, the United States government is ultimately responsib
UFO (Score:2, Funny)
did anybody "claimed", they definitely saw an UFO,
in that area?
Ooooooooh well... (Score:2, Flamebait)
And then the FAA stepped in and had all the involved parties arrested for questioning and further investigation.
Re:Ooooooooh well... (Score:2, Informative)
Oh, and the fact that there were FAA personal *on site* monitoring the launch (and giving final approval).
What ARRL Means (Score:5, Informative)
Maybe we can get an amateur probe to investigate.. (Score:2, Funny)
Is Opportunty watching Late Night when NASA isn't watching?
Job Growth (Score:2)
Are there niches here for smart, innovative, hardworking software guys to learn to fill, without having to start over in college?
It seems software is going the way of the dodo, until the U.S. decides to adapt itself to a global economy. Can the space race get the job market moving again in a way that biotech can't (meaning, not requiring another 6-8 years of college for entry-level positions.)
Just an out of work hopeful
And in other news... (Score:3, Funny)
Mainstream news coverage? (Score:2, Funny)
It seems that those presently in power (as a broad class of self-interested individuals, not some shadowy "conspiracy") have a vested interest in keeping the public convinced that only large corporate entities and governments can get any real work done. Perhaps that is why they don't want to broadcast the news that a group of amateur geeks launched a freaki
Re:Mainstream news coverage? (Score:3, Insightful)
What Really Happened (Score:5, Funny)
Amateur radio IN YOUR FACE :P (Score:2, Funny)
Where are the haters in this thread? Oh OHHH its because we launched a ROCKET INTO SPACE. Has your hobby done that? HMM!? What about dozens of satellites [amsat.org], space station experiments [arrl.org] and space shuttle experiments [spacetoday.org]? What about being a vital part of our nation's emergency communications network [ares.org]?
I didn't
Re:Apathy again! (Score:5, Informative)
It's kind of arbitrary [wikipedia.org]. 100km or 60mi is the cut-off, so if they made it past that -- which they apparently did -- they "reached space."
Re:Apathy again! (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Apathy again! (Score:2, Interesting)
Thats not even close to being correct. While in orbit, the craft is completely under the influence of our gravity. Its just that its centrifugal force is equal to gravity and hence keeping it in orbit.
Re:Apathy again! (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Apathy again! (Score:5, Interesting)
That's not even close to being correct. Gravitational force is a myth. Nothing is pulling the orbiting body invards. A body in orbit is essentially following the shortest path in space-time curvature.
Re:Apathy again! (Score:5, Funny)
That's not even close to being correct. The space-time curvature is a myth. A body in orbit is purely imaginary because the earth is flat, the heavens are anchored in one place and do *not* move. The earth spins like a fan blade, because it is attached to a huge fan, the center of which is the Sun.
Non-myth (Score:2, Informative)
Centrifugal force is highly real, as you will no doubt feel if you place yourself on a merry-go-round. It's just a matter of having an accelerated frame of reference. If you and your friend were orbiting the earth, and gravity were turned off for him, the centrifugal force would indeed make him depart radially from you, though the Coriolis force would eventually bend his path.
There's a good explanation at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/corf.h t ml
Re:Apathy again! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Apathy again! (Score:5, Informative)
And have a magical engine (and inertial dampening system) that can accelerate to orbital speed fast enough and without tearing the ship apart. Actually orbital craft angle backwards as they accelerate through the atmosphere instead of going straight up.
Re:Apathy again! (Score:2)
Re:Apathy again! (Score:4, Informative)
I'm going to plug a great simulator for you all, and that is Orbiter [m6.net]. You'll learn a ton about astrophysics just by starting the program up and trying to get into orbit your first time, and it won't quit from there.
Re:Apathy again! (Score:5, Interesting)
No it just means the craft has enough angular velocity tangental to the earth that it essentially outruns the earth's ballistic gravitational pull. Gravity still definiately has an effect though as it pulls the craft around the earth.
While achieving orbital velocity is an order of magnitude more difficult than reaching space and coming back down ballistically, reaching escape velocity to break orbit is even harder. Hence the massive 'moon rocket' Saturn V's that propelled the moon craft to over 24,000 mph (orbital velocity is closer to 17,000). The moon craft actually re-entered earth's atmosphere at over 30,000 mph!
Re:Apathy again! (Score:2)
Re:Laws governing space launches? (Score:5, Informative)
We do it 3-4 times a year have been for 15 years or so. We arrange ahead of time and then we call into ATC before we light up the waiver and again when we're done. We regularly get waivers to 100k ft ASL (20 miles up) well above the 30k ft commercial planes fly at. Though we seldom fly that high.
Getting a waiver above 100k ft is much much harder - the normal FAA ATC doesn't have juristiction above there - you have to apply to a different part of the govt. who worry about things like stuff landing on other countries etc etc
Want to come to a launch? - you're welcome - check out www.aeropac.org [aeropac.org]
Re:Laws governing space launches? (Score:5, Interesting)
Scaled Composites, which is a company founded to develop and design experimental aircraft obtained the world's first license for a sub-orbital manned rocket flight in early April, for their Ansari X Prize entry.
I don't know about laws relating to private rockets but I'm sure there are regulations in place and the team behind GoFast have been responsible in abiding by what rules exist, especially as its made amateur rocketry history and is a controversial area in law right now.
What with terrorism and 9/11 the enforcing of the law in this area would probably become more strict, even if they can potentially be used as weapons and have the ability to shoot down aircraft (despite the fact that this isn't very likely as guidance systems are exceedingly difficult to design).
Re:Laws governing space launches? (Score:4, Interesting)
So what would be your answers to these questions?
1) We already have regulations for dealing with terrorist attacks and other means of deliberately inflicting harm. Further, the history of using rockets for terrorist attacks is pretty ineffective. Military grade rockets are relatively easy to come by. The sole exception to this rule appears to be Hamas in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. They seem relatively insistent on building the Qassem [bbc.co.uk] rocket. Note that these terrorist activities are already illegal.
The US already requires lauchers to purchase insurance against third party harm seems to fix the other problems with what can be launched from Earth. If it's too dangerous, then the launcher won't be able to afford the insurance.
2) We don't need to regulate "how" things get into space. Physical law does a more than adequate job here.
3) I don't get why we need to regulate who gets into space.
Re:Just damn cool (Score:3, Funny)
I get the worm and fuzzies
My wife gets a worm and fuzzies when I do to her what NASA does--put a load into space.
Re:yow (Score:2, Funny)