X Prize Competition Gets New Sponsor, Amended Name 203
An anonymous reader writes "The X Prize Foundation today announced that entrepreneurs Anousheh Ansari and Amir Ansari have made a multi-million dollar contribution to the X Prize Foundation. As a result, the X Prize Competition is being renamed to the Ansari X Prize Competition." However, the X Prize rules stay the same: "The ANSARI X PRIZE will award $10 million to the first private organization to build and fly a ship that can carry three passengers 100 km (62 miles) into space, return safely to Earth and repeat the launch with the same ship within two weeks. Both flights must be completed by January 1st, 2005."
Re:Wow, interesting. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:What kind of passengers? (Score:2, Informative)
"The flight vehicle must be built with the capacity (weight and volume) to carry a minimum of 3 adults of height 188 cm (6 feet 2 inches) and weight 90 kg (198 pounds) each. Three people of this size or larger must be able to enter, occupy, and be fastened into the flight vehicle on Earth's surface prior to take-off, and equivalent ballast must be carried in-flight if the number of persons on-board during flight is less than 3 persons."
As much as I hate corporate sponsorship (Score:3, Informative)
And to risk venturing off-topic for a second,
I think Ansari X prize should consider expanding there efforts at not just the tech to get us there, but to provide a prize for the think tank that can invent a corporate (manufacturing?) incentive to go there. Basically, show practical applications in space and provide due dilligence.
Or maybe more on the mark... provide a multimilllion dollar reward for the company that can first create an operable facility in space.
Yeah... wishfull thinking, but the more efforts put towards extra-terrastial expansion the better I say.
Mods - get the whole joke? (Score:5, Informative)
Ads really are going on baseball bases. Spiderman 2 has bought the rights [cnn.com] to put some logos on baseball bases in the next few weeks.
Next thing you know, corporate sponsors will be buying insightful or funny slashdot posts.
THIS POST BROUGHT TO YOU BY MCDONALDS [mcdonalds.com]. WE'RE LOVIN' IT.
Re:Is the ship more important... (Score:5, Informative)
Rule number 5
I guess they don't put in on the press release since it points out that people might not come back in good health...but the full rules don't let dead people win.
Re:Loopholes (Score:5, Informative)
Nope. Rule 3 says "Each flight must carry at least one person..."
It does not specify if the passengers have to be alive or not. If you send up corpses, it is easier to keep them intact than it is to keep live passengers alive.
It's even stricter than that. Rule 5 says "The crew must return to the Earth's surface from both flights in good health as reasonably defined and judged by the X PRIZE Review Board."
Mice? Does not say you can't send them instead of humans.
Nope, but Rule 3 says "person" and I don't think mice count as people.
Try finding loopholes in the actual rules [xprize.com] instead of the Slashdot summary of them.
Re:propulsion methods (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Increase the prize money and extend the date (Score:5, Informative)
I mean, sure, once they start running a profitable business taking people up to space, Zero G for seconds to a few minutes, and then down real fast, then they can start working on the exponentially harder orbital flights, which will be even more profitable with business applications as well as pure fun.
Re:Following the money (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mods - get the whole joke? (Score:1, Informative)
I look forward to seeing the "Spiderman 2 Bat and Base Corporation" starting soon
Re:What I want to know... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Can this even be done?? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Can this even be done?? (Score:2, Informative)
Not true. Check out these tests [scaled.com] . They have a 40 second manned burn under their belts and could probably win the X-prize tomorrow if the paperwork were squared away.
Re:Wow (Score:4, Informative)
Re:X-Prize to the Moon... (Score:4, Informative)
(Disclaimer: Like any Usenet group, we have our share of trolls, but most of them are easily identified and kill filed. In general the s.s.* groups have an extremely low tolerance for fools, idiots, and those unwilling to learn. It's a tough place to get started in, but well worth it if you are truly interested in the topic.)
Re:Wow (Score:3, Informative)
The prize program itself was very much modelled on named prizes like the Orteig Prize, and "X" worked out both for unknown and for the X Program. Both the named prize and X program memes were floating around in space activist circles (Space Frontier Foundation, the old L5 component of NSS, High Frontier, etc -- not the NSS and Planetary Society fanboys) in the late 80s/early 90s.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Anousheh Ansari - Iranian Woman! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Wow (Score:2, Informative)
Karma whoring at it's best.
Re:Wow (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Can this even be done?? (Score:3, Informative)
Armadillo has done hover tests as well. The UK group (starchaser) has done some unmanned testing of their rocket infrastructure as well. I know the DaVinci team is also planning at least one launch attempt this summer/early fall as well.
Too bad about Armadillo Aerospace, unless the jet vanes really work well, it doesn't sound like they'll be launching this year. Still, their vehicle programme might go farther for the orbital race.
you might try checking the Scaled, Armadillo Aerospace, DaVinci team, Starchaser sites. The X-prize site is also useful.
XCor looks like they're going to get there, but they are the ready-steady course and are designing their way instead of for XPrize compliance.
No, not Rutan (Score:3, Informative)
You will find, however, many informative posts by the one and only Henry Spencer [lysator.liu.se], author of The Ten Commandments for C Programmers [lysator.liu.se] and possibly the most knowledgeable person in the world about the history of the U.S. space program.