


The World's Smallest Jigsaw Puzzle Piece 21
An anonymous reader writes "Scientists from the Laser Zentrum Hannover used a femtosecond laser to make what is probably the world's smallest jigsaw which will be shown at the Hannover Messe. Its size is 5mm x 5mm and it consists of 100 parts. It's supposed to demonstrate the precision with which femtosecond lasers can cut materials without burning or damaging them. (Closeup 1, Closeup 2)"
is it just me (Score:2, Insightful)
(also..fp! heh)
Re:is it just me (Score:3, Informative)
Re:is it just me (Score:2, Interesting)
the 100 pieces are said to be of dust grain size (now handle that - and don't you sneeze!).
its extremely short pulses (1 Femtosec. = 10e-15 sec.) make this a great tool for cutting materials without damaging or burning them.
Re:is it just me (Score:5, Informative)
With 10 pieces along each edge, (If you look at the picture they are pretty much square) then each piece has the width of 0.05cm or 0.0005m which for me is pretty tiny.
But the most impressive thing is that the laser is able to cut this substance while not destroying it.
Re:is it just me (Score:3, Informative)
Each piece is about 0.5mm x 0.5mm square, the same size as the diameter of the lead in my mechanical pencil.
That's Terrific... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:That's Terrific... (Score:1)
Oh yeah, this is Slashdot.
Anyone who can hand solder surface mount components should feel right at home. For example, SSOP ICs have 250 um wide pins centered 650 um apart.
waiting for version 2.0 (Score:5, Insightful)
why did they make all the pieces almost 100% alike? Jigsaw puzzles aren't supposed to have interchangeable pieces. Each piece should be somewhat unique.
Well, not all is lost... at least the pieces seem to have a little texture...
Re:waiting for version 2.0 (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:waiting for version 2.0 (Score:1)
Loss of mass? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Loss of mass? (Score:3, Informative)
So 10 piece gone and 100 remaining, which comes out to about 10% loss.
=Smidge=
Jeez (Score:1, Redundant)
Depth? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Depth? (Score:2, Informative)
The second is the amount of time you want to spend cutting. Deeper takes longer.
Given time you could cut the same 5mm square jigsaw out of a piece of paper 10 meters thick.
Re:Depth? (Score:2)
Re:Depth? (Score:1)
If it's in a sensitive context, you'd probably want to perform this in a low-pressure or inert-gas environment for other reasons. Clean air shouldn't significantly scatter the laser light at any distance until the dispersal becomes significant.
Punching a hole into the middle of something is, I think, a more di
cool (Score:1)
Pentium creates a missing piece? (Score:3, Funny)
I can imagine the scenario already:
"Why are you sifting through the A/C filter?"
"I sneezed while I was doing my mini-jigsaw.."
Damn.. (Score:2)
The most important applications... (Score:1)
Another big impact for these lasers