Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Science

Mars Express Confirms Water on Mars 503

jki writes "So, finally: Through the initial mapping of the South polar cap on 18 January, OMEGA, the combined camera and infrared spectrometer, has already revealed the presence of water ice and carbon dioxide ice. This information was confirmed by the PFS, a new high-resolution spectrometer of unprecedented accuracy. The first PFS data also show that the carbon oxide distribution is different in the northern and southern hemispheres of Mars. The MaRS instrument, a sophisticated radio transmitter and receiver, emitted a first signal successfully on 21 January that was received on Earth through a 70- metre antenna in Australia after it was reflected and scattered from the surface of Mars. This new measurement technique allows the detection of the chemical composition of the Mars atmosphere, ionosphere and surface." On another note, NASA has gotten some sort of signal from Spirit, but it's still not fully functional.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Mars Express Confirms Water on Mars

Comments Filter:
  • heh (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Let the terraforming begin!
    • Re:heh (Score:5, Insightful)

      by AKAImBatman ( 238306 ) <akaimbatman@gmaiBLUEl.com minus berry> on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:03AM (#8065652) Homepage Journal
      Terraforming?! Do you know what this means? It means that we now have rocket fuel, air, and drinkable water all for the taking! The primary equipment necessary is one nuclear power plant! That just leaves the problem of rockets that are still in one piece by the time they make it to Mars.

      Segway into GCNR rockets. They can be used for space travel, and landing and taking off. We could even build CO2 breathing "flyers" for easy transport from orbit to the surface and back. If NASA can, they should start work on the proper engines immediately! WhooHoo!!!

      • Re:heh (Score:5, Interesting)

        by forand ( 530402 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @11:57AM (#8066796) Homepage
        But why? In all seriousness what reason do we have to go to Mars? The moon is a much better astronomy platform since it has no atmosphere and lower gravity, plus it is much easier to get to.

        So what purpose does going to Mars serve? I am a physicist btw, working on GLAST [stanford.edu] for what is is worth.
        • Re:heh (Score:5, Informative)

          by AKAImBatman ( 238306 ) <akaimbatman@gmaiBLUEl.com minus berry> on Friday January 23, 2004 @12:41PM (#8067254) Homepage Journal
          In all seriousness what reason do we have to go to Mars?

          That is a difficult question, isn't it? The most common (and vague) answer would be Hillary's, "Because it's there." While that may not seem like a very good reason on the surface, it's really just an attempt to explain a strong pioneering spirit that is pervasive in many cultures.

          To actually look at the benefits of space travel however, you need to look at it from an economic standpoint instead of a scientific one. Opening up space to colonization would trigger a new economy. Those who take the step toward space will need various raw materials. Those raw materials are plentiful on asteroids, moons, and planetoids. Thus space based businesses could make a mint by mining and selling raw materials. Those raw materials could then be processed by space smelters and factories. Those factories could then produce a variety of products, including space craft such as cruise ships or colonization ships. Various institutions could then form colonization efforts where the cost is split among the settlers. (Similar to the settlers of the Americas; the Mayflower being a common example.)

          But what does this have to do with Mars? Well, space is a pretty vast place. If we assume for a moment that companies become interested in mining asteroids in the belt just past Mars, then we have to ask the question of how they're going to be supported. Sending ships from Earth would be problematic at best, very slow with catastrophic results in case of failure at worst. However, if Mars were used as a staging point for mining support and materials processing, trips back and forth could be substantially shortened.

          Of course, all of this requires the development of high thust AND high Isp engines. Of all the options available, only nuclear engines meet the necessary criteria. GCNR (Gas Core Nuclear Rocket) engines can throw the same mass as chemical engines, but have a much higher Isp (3000-5000). These would work well as a launch solution, space plane solution (since they could potentially "breath" atmospheric gases), and as a initial solution for interplanetary travel. However, even GCNR engines have a low Isp when you take into account how much space is out there. Thus the next step would be the development of pure space drives such as Orion or Nuclear Salt Rockets. Both of these would provide an excellent solution for non-landing craft with high thrust, high Isp, and excellent fuel and mass capacity. They'd have so much power, that they could easily carry GCNR space plane crafts as landing shuttles. (The largest Orion design calls for 8 million tons of ship mass.)

          More info on propulsion methods on Wikipedia [wikipedia.org].

          Does that help explain it?

          • Re:heh (Score:3, Insightful)

            by sgage ( 109086 )
            "Hillary's, "Because it's there."

            But Hillary did not ask for (at least) tens of billions of tax dollars to accomplish his explorations.

            - Steve
        • by hpulley ( 587866 ) <hpulley4NO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Friday January 23, 2004 @01:02PM (#8067498) Homepage

          Some say we should worry more about incoming asteroids wiping out all life on earth [go.com] which would mean we should establish human colonies on the Moon, Mars and elsewhere to hedge our bets against such an occurance (could return to repopulate the planet after a time). Others say earth is heading for environmental disaster [smh.com.au] and the solution might be to leave it for lifeless places and artificial environments where we can do no harm. Others yet want us to think about overpopulation [overpopulation.org] which could be solved by spreading out to other planets and while others say that sociopolitical causes are the main of hunger today, there is a limit to the number of people that can live here.

          Why did people come to the New World, not just in Columbus' time but earlier from Asia? Why did they send their canoes to Pacific islands? The time will come that our reasons will match theirs. Today the reasons are not yet there and the will is only shared by a few but the reasons will likely become more apparent and the population more willing with time.

        • Re:heh (Score:3, Interesting)

          by AKAImBatman ( 238306 )
          BTW, I was reading up on GLAST and came across this:

          GLAST is a next generation high-energy gamma-ray observatory designed for making observations of celestial gamma-ray sources in the energy band extending from 10 MeV to more than 100 GeV.

          Just out of curiosity, what would be able to hit the craft with 100 Giga-electron Volts of Gamma radiation? I could see getting hit with that much energy close to the Sun, but over interstellar distances?

          Or perhaps I'm just overestimating how much energy 100 GeV is?
          • Re:heh (Score:4, Informative)

            by NewbieProgrammerMan ( 558327 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @02:05PM (#8068250)
            I'm not an astrophysicist, but based on things I've read, I wouldn't expect 100GeV stuff coming from the sun. But there are other things in the universe (black holes, magnetars) that can make photons and other stuff with that kind of energy, and much higher (I've seen some articles about cosmic rays with energies of ~10^21 eV, although nobody knows for sure where they come from).

            As far as distance from the source goes, photons only get scattered if they interact with something . As long as there's not much between 'there' and 'here,' they can get through, even if it does take a while.
      • Re:heh (Score:3, Funny)

        by Arthur Dent ( 76567 )
        Segway? Have they started making rockets now? They must be the self stabilizing ones huh?
        :)

        <sotto-voice>I think you meant seque [m-w.com] </sotto-voice>

    • Let the terraforming begin!

      You may be joking but I think it's a good idea. I think the odds of finding life on mars is slim to nil. Right now they are fruitlessly running around hoping to find past traces of life.

      Terraforming will be a long long process. I say we jump start it by tossing out some extremophile [astrobiology.com] microbes and see what takes root. Scatter them around the water laden edges of the poles. Anything that produces organic compounds has got to be better than what Mars has now.

      At this point we
      • With not natural cycle for water and little amounts do we really want to waste it on microbes? I am with the poser above put some kind a big power supply there (nuclear, or microwave orbital) and start putting people there...

        Note: I am not a Bio major so maybe putting large colonies of microbes would not reduce the amount of water...

        • I am with the poser above

          Thanks a lump. :-/

          As for the microbes, I'm not sure that limited water is the issue. The real issue is if we really want to be deploying microbes when there's no one there to keep an eye on them? If we build a small dome city near a (relatively) closed area like a canyon, we will have the perfect staging point for deploying microbes. Inside the canyon, Oxygen levels would (hopefully) rise quickly forming a bubble of livable atmosphere.

          That's the theory anyway. Whether it's worka
      • Most astronomists nowadays believe most water on mars has evaporated off planet - there might not be enough to go around for terraforming. Maybe if spirit's got its little wheels spinning in some kind of icy mud there might be enough, but so far NASA hasn't stuck its detectors into the ground as they perhaps should have done right away.
  • by addie ( 470476 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:50AM (#8065523)
    It's just sitting there sulking.
  • Europe (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Tirel ( 692085 )
    Europe can be proud of this mission: Mars Express is an enormous success for the European Space Programme.
    • Re:Europe (Score:5, Funny)

      by woodhouse ( 625329 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @11:40AM (#8066630) Homepage
      It's probably not the most efficient way to obtain pretty wallpaper for my 2048x1024 desktop, but it's appreciated none the less.
  • Landers (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ilex ( 261136 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:53AM (#8065554)
    Any chance it can confirm the location of our missing landers?
    • Re:Landers (Score:3, Insightful)

      I don't think the parent question was intended to be funny. I think it's a serious question. I will rephrase:

      These new probe imagers have impressive resolution. Any chance that they can be used to identify lost landers and determine what happened to them? It might be useful to somebody to know if a lander ended up in one big piece or thousands of smaller pieces.
  • by SwissCheese ( 571510 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:53AM (#8065555)
    Sweet, so when do I get my free shrimp?!? [ljsilvers.com]
    • I wonder how much the insurance policy 'cost' them.. 5 million kilometers indeed...
    • Re:Free Shrimp!! (Score:3, Informative)

      by jea6 ( 117959 )
      You don't. The promo is only if the Mars Exploration Rover finds it. And it's pretty far away from the martian south pole.

      Long John Silver's announced today that it will give America free Giant Shrimp if NASA's Mars Exploration Rover project finds conclusive evidence of an ocean on Mars by February 29, 2004. The out-of-this-world offer from the world's most popular seafood chain celebrates NASA's efforts to find traces of ocean water - and possibly, evidence of life - on Mars.

      Besides, this is one of tho
    • by addie ( 470476 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:27AM (#8065864)
      For purposes of Long John Silver's offer, an ocean is defined as a single body of water, the surface area of which equals or exceeds five million square kilometers.

      Er... I'm pretty sure they're safe on this one.
  • Crap (Score:3, Funny)

    by l0wland ( 463243 ) <l0wland@y[ ]o.com ['aho' in gap]> on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:53AM (#8065561) Journal
    So Spirit tripped and drowned in a puddle of mud?
  • But of course... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bc90021 ( 43730 ) * <bc90021&bc90021,net> on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:53AM (#8065563) Homepage
    ...we're all still waiting for confirmation of bacteria and/or bacteria fossils. I certainly hope that NASA can establish good contact with Spirit again soon, and that Opportunity lands safely tomorrow!
  • by loconet ( 415875 )
    Correct me if im wrong but didnt we already know there was frozen Water in mars? Isn't what we're looking for liquid water or the indication that there was once liquid water? Is this frozen water in a melted state somewhere else in the planet ..that would be interesting?
  • Now I only need to ship out hop plants to set up my Martian Brewery!
  • by peter303 ( 12292 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:55AM (#8065578)
    When he saw the water channels on Mars, later confirmed by the orbiters.
  • 750 bytes (Score:5, Funny)

    by geschild ( 43455 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:56AM (#8065585) Homepage

    10 minutes at 10 bits/s, I wonder what was important enough to spent those bytes on...

    If Nasa-geeks are anything like other geeks, it must've been either martian porn or nethack I guess. The former being more likely. ;-)

    • by cperciva ( 102828 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:07AM (#8065696) Homepage
      Given that this response came after they uploaded new code to help them track down the problems, I'm guessing that the data received back included the string "HELLO WORLD".

      Which is unusually appropriate in this case, actually...
    • Don't know 10 bps (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Zorgoth ( 68241 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:15AM (#8065760)
      I work in the oilfield operating a 2 tons monstrosity called an MWD. These things are used to transmit data from up to a 10 km deep hole and on the basis of this data the decision of which way to drill a well are made (oil wells are usually not vertical affairs these days). Multi-million dollar decisions are regularly made on a data from a transfer rate of less than 10 bps, 6 bps is excellent and transmission rates are often in the range of 0.5-3 bits per second. You would be surprised at how much system information can be crammed into that bandwidth if the programmers are clever. Incidentally, my tools use a modulation/demodulation scheme similar to that used on the Voyager probes, we just have to transmit through viscous mud with pressure instead of light across the solar system.
      • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23, 2004 @11:02AM (#8066250)

        Multi-million dollar decisions are regularly made on a data from a transfer rate of less than 10 bps, 6 bps is excellent and transmission rates are often in the range of 0.5-3 bits per second.

        Sounds like a correct description of the thought-process normally executed by my boss...
      • You've got MWDs and oil????

        Don't tell Bush!

        (MWD must mean mass weapons of destruction... scary to think that not only has your company developed nuclear technology, but also developed antimatter)

        This only applies if you don't work for Halliburton.
    • Re:750 bytes (Score:3, Informative)

      by amabbi ( 570009 )
      according to the latest on NASA's marsrover webpage [nasa.gov], an additional communication session of ~20 minutes occurred with transmission at 120 bits/sec... hopefully this information will help determine what happened to the Spirit rover 2 days ago...
  • by ozric99 ( 162412 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:57AM (#8065593) Journal
    ... how are they going to get the bottling plant up there?
  • by MountainMan101 ( 714389 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @09:59AM (#8065614)
    As a scientist, although I find it very interesting that they have "discovered" water on Mars, I do no think it is the ground breaking discovery that it has been played up as.

    From the geological appearance water was always expected, Hydrogen and Oxygen are both abundant enough (in the early history of Mars - not in the atmosphere at the moment). H2O is the thermodynamic result.

    Although the absence of water would almost certainly have procluded the existance of "life" on Mars, the existance of water is not, in itself, that startling a discovery.

    It is important that scientific funding goes towards real science and not satisfying the public demand for fantastic revelations!

    Finally, well done ESA for building a spectrometer that accurate, and getting it there :-)
    • by tobe ( 62758 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:15AM (#8065761)
      I'd actually argue that as long as 5-10% of science funding goes towards feeding the public fantastic 'revelations' then the absolute size of the other 90% is far more likely to become and stay large.

      Giving the public something to capture their imaginations is a far lesser crime than allowing the majority of science resource in this day and age (admittedly not public money) to be frittered away on 'curing' dandruff, limp hair and stubborn stains.

      Centralised, organised world research council. NOW !!
  • by hookedup ( 630460 )
    Great! So we found water on mars. Now that this mystery is over, I think it's time for some real scientific work.

    Send the rover to the 'mars face' [msss.com].
  • Scientists confirm that what they've found is mostly water. They were quite surprised to see that the water was held in bags. Quite ugly bags.

    They continue to speculate what the discovery might mean, and whether life may be possible in this environment...

  • by TheOldCrow ( 260653 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:03AM (#8065647) Homepage
    Looks like some telemetry was just received from Spirit:

    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2004/30.cfm
    • That's more good news then. :-)

      Let's just hope the good news in it transmitting telemetry data doesn't mean bad news in what the telemetry data shows. :-/

      Regardless what, I'm starting to get ready for the Opportunity landing party to be held at #maestro on irc.freenode.net :-D
    • by Anonymous Coward
      JPL has an update [nasa.gov]

      Updated Mars Exploration Rover Mission Status January 23, 2004

      The flight team for NASA's Spirit received data from the rover in a communication session that began at 13:26 Universal Time (5:26 a.m. PST) and lasted 20 minutes at a data rate of 120 bits per second.

      "The spacecraft sent limted data in a proper response to a ground command, and we're planning for commanding further communication sessions later today," said Mars Exploration Rover Project Manager Pete Theisinger at NASA's

  • hmmm... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by rogabean ( 741411 )
    You know as of late it seems to me that NASA is just feeding us every little finding in morsel form. It feels like we are being baited with a carrot. This whole "we found water" thing is no exception. We go from hearing next to nothing to now hearing something "new" just about everyday. I understand they are grasping to get the American public "excited" once more about space exploration, but still. Water does not excite me.
  • by stuffduff ( 681819 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:05AM (#8065678) Journal
    I wonder if there is enough vapor to form condensation and potential short circuts where dust might accumulate in microscopically damp areas. Other concerns include areas of unusually high magnetic activity where magnetized iron bearing minerals might form accidential circuts. Or the possibility of static discharges, like mini lightening.

    Does anyone have a comprehensive list of what the rovers are designed to deal with?

    It may be time to return to a soft landing strategy.

  • I'm curious... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mark-t ( 151149 ) <markt AT nerdflat DOT com> on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:07AM (#8065689) Journal
    We've seen several photos now of the vicinity of the nasa lander, but I've been wondering... what does the area reallya look like at night? Do its moons reflect enough light for detail in nearby objects to be discernable, or is everything just cast in shadow?

    Moderation: -0.66 Mildly Off-Topic

    • Re:I'm curious... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by CaptainAlbert ( 162776 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:32AM (#8065910) Homepage

      Do its moons reflect enough light for detail in nearby objects to be discernable, or is everything just cast in shadow?

      Unlikely. Phobos and Deimos are tiny, and orbit very fast, very close to the surface of Mars. They can't even be seen from all points of the Martian surface. I'm guessing that in the Martian night-time, if they pass overhead they're entirely in Mars's shadow and thus cast no light. I think they're only visible at dawn and at dusk, under certain lucky conditions.

      What I'd love to see it some photos of the night sky. I've always wanted to see the same constellations from a planet other than Earth. Dunno why, just seems significant to me.

      • Re:I'm curious... (Score:3, Informative)

        by mark-t ( 151149 )
        The constellations would be essentially identical to what they are like on Earth. The only discernable difference would be in how the visible planets move past them over time.

        All those stars are *REALLY* far away, after all, and the short hop from Earth to Mars is insignigicant in comparison.

  • by TheNarrator ( 200498 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:12AM (#8065733)
    Wow.. That's a little more than one ascii character per second... I can see the bits coming down now: A...L...I...E...N...A...T...T...A...C...K
    NO CARRIER
  • better news (Score:3, Informative)

    by spurious cowherd ( 104353 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:13AM (#8065738)
    The latest update [nasa.gov] seems to indicate that they may be on track to getting back working
    They just need to stay away from the STOP+A keys

  • Contact w/ Spirit (Score:2, Informative)

    by Ateryx ( 682778 )
    Good News for NASA, Bad news for Brits. NASA had 20 minutes of connection at 120b/s with spirit [nasa.gov].
  • by SenseiLeNoir ( 699164 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:15AM (#8065756)
    Last communications between NASA and Spirit....

    NASA: MOVE FORWARD 10

    SPIRIT: 10? Ok 10 METERS [whir.. Trundle]

    NASA: NO NO. 10 FEET!

    SPIRIT: OOPS..

    NASA: WHAT HAPPENED?!?!?! REQUEST STATUS REPORT!

    SPIRIT: LOCATION - OLD RIVERBED
    GOOD NEWS - FOUND WATER
    BETTER NEWS - LOTS OF WATER
    BAD NEWS - NOT WATERPROO...#%$&#..... Bzzzzzzzzzzzt

    NASA: DAMN!!!!!!!
    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 23, 2004 @11:03AM (#8066255)
      NASA: Go North

      SPIRIT: THERE IS NO WAY THROUGH IN THAT DIRECTION

      NASA: Go West

      SPIRIT: I AM IN AN OLD RIVERBED. THERE IS A TROLL HERE. HE LOOKS UNFRIENDLY.

      NASA: Kill Troll

      SPIRIT: WITH WHAT SHOULD I ATTEMPT TO KILL TROLL?

      NASA: Kill Troll with Tinderbox

      SPIRIT: I AM IN AN OLD RIVERBED. THERE IS A DEAD TROLL HERE.
  • by fuzzybunny ( 112938 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:19AM (#8065791) Homepage Journal
    In breaking news today, NASA's Spirit probe transmitted data confirming the existence of rocks on the red planet. "We're very excited" said Aloisious Smythe Ponsonby-Jones, project manager of the Mars mission's rock-finding department. "Right on this picture, you can see a little redd-ish one, and here another. This one's shaped like an egg, and the second one, if you look carefully, has a little face shape on it."

    The mission's dust-detection sub-project, as well as its quest to determine whether Mars is, indeed, reddish-brown colored, are still awaiting further data.
  • Hoorraayyy (Score:2, Informative)

    by savagedome ( 742194 )
    Spirit Rover is back on track again [cnn.com].
  • Sinkhole!!! (Score:2, Informative)

    check out the Mars Express photo featured at the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3422841. stm

    looks like there's a sinkhole... and where there are sinkholes, there are....? CAVERNS!
    • by cxvx ( 525894 )
      check out the Mars Express photo featured at the BBC http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3422841. stm

      looks like there's a sinkhole... and where there are sinkholes, there are....? CAVERNS!

      Caverns? Maybe that's why Bush is so eager to go to Mars. You never know Osama may be hiding in one of them there. He sure can't find him on this planet :)

  • by Raleel ( 30913 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:24AM (#8065837)
    i mean...I know they got limited bandwidth and all, but what sort of protocol do they use?

    good lord, this is an incredibly geeky question, but I'm serious, i wanna know.

    • Probably some offshoot of Kermit. You can sent data over tin cans and a string without loss with that beast.

      In contrast, Beagle seems to have used YModem-G and "&Q0". Kiddies.

    • Spacecraft Commands (Score:3, Informative)

      by Detritus ( 11846 )
      This is a generic answer, as I am not familiar with the command and data handling systems on Spirit.

      Most spacecraft commands are sent as fixed or variable length frames of synchronous data. A frame usually begins with a sync pattern, some header information, the actual command, and a trailer containing a checksum or CRC. There is no protocol, in the sense that most people use. Think of the commands as UDP datagrams. The engineers in the control center monitor the telemetry downlink to verify that the comm

  • by gelfling ( 6534 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:25AM (#8065847) Homepage Journal
    It's kind of sad really all these nerds who pretty much owe their lives, livelihoods and amusement to advanced technology constantly pooh poohing this great science going on.

    Ah well - the confluence of indifference, stupidity and radical Libertarian 'prices of everything'.

    See If NASA promised that Mars science would guarantee the slashnerds could share illegal music for free forever I'm pretty sure those damn Trekkie buffoons could get behind it.

    Live long and eat Cheetos, fat goofy weird comicbook store guy.
  • by NeuroManson ( 214835 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @10:33AM (#8065926) Homepage
    Would the recent solar eruption have anything to do with Spirit's shutdown? No matter the data speed involved in the transmission, a solar flare and multiple sunspots would generate quite a bit of noise. Especially when you take into account that Mars doesn't have much of, if any magnetosphere to deflect ionizing particles.
  • More news (Score:5, Informative)

    by MouseR ( 3264 ) on Friday January 23, 2004 @11:08AM (#8066310) Homepage
    By increasing the digit at then of of this http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2004/30.cfm [nasa.gov], you can get more news.

    This one above is somewhat upbeat. The data rate from this last communication went from 10 minutes at 10 bits per second to 20 minutes at 120 bits per second.

    Not quite live streaming, but not yet slashdoted either.

No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.

Working...