American Solar Challenge 2003 Starts 176
Ryan Kingsbury writes "The world's longest solar car race kicked off to a sunny start today in Chicago! The American Solar Challenge, which is only held every two years, runs 11 gruelling days along historic Route 66. Race updates can be found at the official site. One big surprise was that last year's winner (University of Michigan) didn't make it through prerace qualifications. This will certainly give some lower budget teams a chance at gold. Details of qualifications can be found here."
wooha (Score:1)
First non-troll post
Re:wooha (Score:2, Funny)
> have 10 days of clouds?
They go to war with Iraq. Duh!
Re:wooha (Score:1, Funny)
Yabba dabba doo?
Re:wooha (Score:1)
Re:wooha (Score:3, Informative)
Happened in 99 (Score:2, Informative)
List of prior races [formulasun.org].
Re:wooha (Score:2, Informative)
Cloudy days will put a damper on things and will limit the speed at which the sol
No sun for you (Score:1)
Re:No sun for you (Score:1)
Re:No sun for you (Score:2)
Hm... (Score:2, Funny)
Woooo (Score:1)
Re:Woooo (Score:2, Funny)
Slight problem? (Score:1, Troll)
Re:Slight problem? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Slight problem? (Score:2, Interesting)
Prize should be bigger (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2, Interesting)
> even more money, contest winners will likely
> build SUPER sun vehicles that can over-take
> 4-wheel ram rods and pollutant S.U.V.s.
Umm, in a free-market, free-country, capitalist world, the prize is at least five orders of magnitude larger than that.
It's not an easy problem.
Oh, and one old clunker driven by a starving environment-loving artist gives off more pollutants than any 50 modern SUVs.
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2)
True, but the environmental cost has already been paid in the creation of that clunker. No matter how bad your car pollutes, it is still more environmentally friendly to drive it into the ground than to get a new vehicle.
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:1)
Then the prize should be 5 times 50 times bigger! So then NEITHER S.U.V.s nor stupid old cars from pre-1980s will ever drive again.
wrong and wrong. (Score:2)
However, in terms of carbon dioxide emission, which most scientists regard as the primary cause of global warming and most Americans stick their head in the sand over, the clunker will be way better.
And, finally, have you considered the possibility that the polluntants created in manufacturing a new c
Re:wrong and wrong. (Score:2)
My car, a "clunker" is a 1988 Nissan Stanza. It is well maintained mechanically, and it passes inspections easily.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/ 4 410.shtml
It puts out 7.70 tons a year of greenhouse gases with average driving, getting ~25MPG (I get around 27MPG myself, but I may drive more highway)
Lets take a modern SUV, like a 2003 Ford Explorer V6:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/noframes/18170
It puts out 11.30 tons of greenhouse gases, and gets 17M
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2)
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2)
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:1)
Solar power factory should be built by solar power construction company, using solar power android worker.
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2)
Sure. It is more environmentally friendly to drive a vehicle that in one year puts out more air pollution than a new car will do in a lifetime.
Yes, drive the old car into the ground. Let it leak and burn oil as the seals rot and the piston rings wear. Oh, and you can leak a little anti-f
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2)
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2)
Point made. And taken.
Were you towing that Rio on your website through MI today?
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:2)
Re:Prize should be bigger (Score:1)
Then sun power must use fuck of a lot less of fuel. Then you can bitch about fossil fuel suckers, while newly powered cars will give off shitloads less pollution!
what a waste (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:what a waste (Score:1)
most of the design goes into ultra low weight materials and maximum surface area.
Re:what a waste (Score:5, Insightful)
Quite frankly, you'll never see untested technology being used in these sorts of endevors. Its far more profitable to start a company to research, develop, promote, produce and sell these sorts of technologies. And really, you don't need to race a car in order to test out your newfangled gallium-arcenide solar cells.
That said, I believe that the well funded Michigan team brought in a researcher from germany for his new process that created mircopyramids or some such, increasing surface area over simple flat surfaces. Of course its incredibly expensive, but being sponsored by half the big motor companies in the area helps out.
Re:what a waste (Score:2, Interesting)
Quite frankly, you'll never see untested technology being used in these sorts of endevors. Its far more profitable to start a company to research, develop, promote, produce and sell these sorts of technologies.
I beg to differ. Lake Tuggeranong College [act.edu.au] used a prototype CSIRO [csiro.au] motor during two of their three World Solar Challenge [wsc.org.au] (a similar race heald in Australia). sUNSWift [sunswift.com] built their own cells (litterally; if you've ever seen solar cells being built this is a huge achievement) and developed their own
Re:what a waste (Score:5, Informative)
Looks like they're not even in it this year. Not really surprising, actually. The program was going downhill while I was a student there (didn't work on the project myself).
Wrong... (Score:5, Interesting)
In fact, the team makes a huge effort to reach out to non-engineering students, and we usually have excellent turnout.
Re:what a waste (Score:2)
bah, just my $0.02
Re:what a waste (Score:2)
most people barely seem to have an idea what "engineering" even means.
Yes, indeed.
It was explained to me a while back just why it is that doting mothers like to be able to say "my son the doctor" or "my son the lawyer" and not "my son the engineer" - the same reason for the lack of recognition and widespread esteem for the engineering profession.
The reason is that doctors and lawyers, professionally trained, offer their services retail direct to the public.
Engineers, professionally trained, rarely off
Re:what a waste (Score:5, Insightful)
It's sad that many engineering students end up doing things like PR, fundraisers, etc etc instead of
I disagree. Proposing an project, selling the idea to stakeholders, marketing, project management etc are all parts of real life engineering. No engineer sits at a desk all day and works purely on technical design work. They're also excellent things to put on a resume for jobs later on.
That and not everyone wants the same goals out of the project. They might be from other parts of the university like the business school or students who are looking to do something more people oriented instead of their normal engineering studies.
Now ... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Now ... (Score:1)
Some Results? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Some Results? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Some Results? (Score:2)
Here is a bunch of kids whose masters and doctoral theses might not be great big contributions to the quality of human life. Is that really so shocking? Aren't most theses pretty obscure and insignificant? Mine sure was.
Well it's great knowing about it NOW..... (Score:1)
this is not a sig.
Re:Well it's great knowing about it NOW..... (Score:1)
Get-out-of-your-basement!
Kind of Ironic (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Kind of Ironic (Score:3, Insightful)
Computers are used for CAD draw-ups, those computers were transported using some kind of fossil fuel. I don't really see how "student time spent" really falls in that catagory though. Without spending time, there is no research, without research, there is nothing new, and when there is nothing new, life just plain fucking sucks.
Re:Kind of Ironic (Score:2)
Re:Kind of Ironic (Score:2)
You think these things grow on trees?
Which kind of time is renewable?
Gasoline is a renewable resource. It just takes a long time for a specific carbon atom to be subducted under the crust and emerge again.
Re: Kind of Ironic (Score:2, Informative)
Able to scan the whole sky every six months, the Nasa satellite is producing maps of the CMB with unprecedented accuracy.
I'm no physicist, astronomer or the like, but how can they POSSIBLY know if they are even close to being accurate? Accuracy requires one to be as close to the current answer as possible within a reasonable amount of error, but how can they possibly know what that answer is? There's no way to gauge it. (Or is there and I'm just being
Re: Kind of Ironic (Score:1)
It comes from the common confusion of accuracy with precision. Obviously, the *MEANT* precision. They just didn't have the sense to know that's what th
Am I the only one to notice... (Score:3, Funny)
You editors are really slipping here...
Re:Am I the only one to notice... (Score:4, Funny)
You must be new here.
Re:Am I the only one to notice... (Score:2)
Rules? (Score:1)
I couldnt find any rules posted at the official website.
Re:Rules? Wind Power?! (Score:1)
Looks fun but (Score:1)
Re:Looks fun but (Score:2)
Also, I think it would be sweet to drive one of those without the shell at all. Like an extreme convertible. The dangers of that would be obvious to a 6 year old, but people would do it if they could.
Re:Looks fun but (Score:2)
i saw it on my way to NASCAR (Score:1)
The missing slashdot link (Score:1, Funny)
The missing link
1. Connect solar panel to battery terminals of flashlight
2. Point flashlight at solar panel
3. Turn on flashlight
4. Profit!
Why Michigan Is Out (Score:4, Informative)
The team is also exploring the possibility of racing SpectruM this October in the World Solar Challenge [wsc.org.au] in Australia, as well as participating in the inaugural 2004 Phaethon Hellas Solar Rally held in Greece before the 2004 Summer Olympic Games in Athens."
umich.edu/solarcar [umich.edu]
UM Solar Car Team statement (Score:4, Interesting)
Neat idea, but expensive (Score:4, Interesting)
I helped out with getting various information on different teams' cars, and some of the prices for the things are a bit ridiculous. My university's car is costing less than $150,000, which I thought was pricey until some teams told me that their cars cost 1.5 Million (Queens) or 875,000 (Waterloo).
I think most people think that the rayce is about showing people that we could have cars that run off of solar power, but that is entirely the wrong idea. The cars are made to show solar powers' abilities... if it can power a car, maybe it could do other things too (who woulda thought?)
I wish I could've gone on the rayce, but seeing all the cars was cool enough. I just hope our car makes it in time for Formula Sun next year! (Formula Sun Grand Prix is a track race every year)
http://www.formulasun.org [formulasun.org]
Re:Neat idea, but expensive (Score:3, Interesting)
The funny part is that I've met the guys who work on it, I've seen their
The problem's still the cell efficiencies (Score:2)
A better solar solution for many applications is solar thermal rather than photovoltaic. Higher collector efficiency (80%) on small scale vacuum tube panels typically used for domestic water and central heating and higher conversion efficiency to electricity for big
Re:Neat idea, but expensive (Score:2)
Yes, but remember Queens and Waterloo are Canadian universities. So those figures are in Canadian dollars.
...so it's tree-fitty ann two-bucks, four-coppers american, respectivitily.
How about FUEL-CELL races ??? (Score:2, Insightful)
This race is really hard..... (Score:2, Funny)
That's rough.
Seth
A sighting (Score:3, Informative)
Two Years? (Score:1, Funny)
Every two years, eh? Does that mean the previous challenge's entrants just keep going when they reach the finish line?
The problem I have for this race.... (Score:5, Interesting)
new technologies (Score:5, Insightful)
That's the nature of racing (Score:3, Insightful)
The amount of effort you put into something is irrelevant if you're making that effort in the wrong direction.
Re:new technologies (Score:2)
Heck, did you see how they're even outlawing technologies that people are commonly using today, like NiMH batteries? When you can buy the technology at Target (the best rechargable batteries are the NiMHs), I think they should allow it in the race.
Re:The problem I have for this race.... (Score:2)
UM Solar car speculation... (Score:5, Informative)
I got to see them in a test run a week or two ago, and it's very odd to see the car moving in one direction, but pointing 10-20 degrees off its path. The race page [umich.edu] indicates that steering failure caused the car not to finish the prequalifier - probably due in part to their more complex system.
As a note, the previous car did have four wheel steering, but the rear two wheels were locked during the races. I understand the reason is that the fairings (covers to keep wind drag down) became too large and the drag was greater than the benefit of having four wheel steering.
There is a ton of technology in the cars - both in and on the cells and within the shell - which you can't see because they like to keep an edge over other teams. Even though the cells appear to be flat on the back they are designed to take light in at a particular angle (or as close as one can get to that angle) and so I assume the four wheel steering is to enable them to point the cells more effectively into the sun.
-Adam
Energy Budget (Score:3, Insightful)
Why have mechanical linkages up front only to have servo-activated linkages in the rear? Seems like having servos would eat into your energy budget pretty quick.
People have to realize that electric cars should not have power anything. What is the point of trying to be environmentally concious when you are blasting your AC during the summer? You just can't do it.
If you want to make a statement about saving the planet, then just buy a gasoline powered car with rack-and-pinion steering
Re:Energy Budget (Score:2)
Re:Energy Budget (Score:2)
Unless, of course, you think through the problem and discover that it can and is.
But why find out, when you can go around indicating that it's not only impossible but stupid to even try.
If you want to make a statement about human intelligence and preconcieved notions - oh wait, you've already done that.
-Adam
Solar Rally! (Score:2)
This is right near where I work (Score:1)
American Solar Challenge? (Score:2)
Actually, don't the Canadians often win this event?
-psy
A sport I'd be interested in... (Score:3, Insightful)
Well (Score:3, Insightful)
As far as the engineering aspects go, I have a couple rhetorical questions:
How realistic is it that a bunch of students will be able to
1) develop new types of photovoltaic cells?
2) develop new, more efficient electric motors
Those are the kinds of things that have been through a lot of development already and will need tons of resources in terms of finances, facilities and manpower. It is wholly unrealistic to expect a group of undergrads (and possibly grads) to make any sort of strides in those areas.
What the students are doing well is taking existing technology and putting it together in well-developed and increasingly well-refined packages.
Making technical progress isn't always about developing an even fancier motor or PV array. Technical progress is often about finding new ways to put together existing technology.
People who complain about undergrads not researching new types of PV cells simply have no concept of what they're actually asking, and certainly have no appreciation of the ingenuity of many of the Solar Car designs and the technical developments they in many ways represent.
Obligatory Fanboy Rah Rah (Score:2)
I've got a solar-powered car (Score:2, Funny)
Bet it would do pretty good in this race, too.
I can't believe anybody hasn't mentioned this! (Score:2)
So, the race is
Solar Challenge Revs Up on Route 66 (Score:2)
Winner Of The Solar Race (Score:2)
Aerodynamics? (Score:3, Interesting)
The MIT teams evolution is similar if less extreme. The current car [mit.edu] is a moderately streamlined high-deck-and-bubble job with its wheels unshrouded. The 1999 car [mit.edu] has a similar body but shrouded wheels.
In fact, more or less streamlined high-deck-and-bubble designs seem to be the theme of this years race. These vehicles look hugely vulnerable to crosswinds.
Re:Aerodynamics? (Score:2, Interesting)
This is why when Porche made it's self-erecting spoiler, it only popped up at 140km/h - so people started speeding - so Porche did a firmware upgrade to make it come up at 100km/h.
Re:Aerodynamics? (Score:2, Insightful)
Our car was tested in a wind tunnel and had a CD of 0.05 or something crazy like that. For reference, most modern automobiles are in the
Go Waterloo! (Score:2)
The Team is currently sitting in first place with two meadia[sic] stops behind them. The car has peformed exceptionally well as the team moved from sixth to first during the first day.
Excellent work guys, and good luck to all the teams!
WWTGS? (Score:2)
damn you /. (Score:2)
Another solar car race starts tomorrow... (Score:2, Informative)
But, I thought you said... (Score:3, Funny)
One big surprise was that last year's winner...
Umm, I don't think that means what you think it means.
Go Team PrISUm! (Score:2)
Shameless plug for my alma mater: Go Team PrISUm [iastate.edu]!