Bigfoot A Hoax? 116
elzbal writes "The family of a Pacific Northwest prankster is coming clean. The Seattle Times is reporting that Bigfoot was just a creative figment of Ray L. Wallace's imagination. He orchestrated the prank that created Bigfoot in 1958. According to family members, he had asked a friend to carve a few pair of 16-inch-long feet. Then he and his brother Wilbur had slipped them on and created the footprints as a prank, family members said. He was also somehow involved in the famous walking Bigfoot film."
In other news.... (Score:5, Funny)
said one spokesperson: "the reward of $50.000 we offered for a captured bigfoot, will now be rewarded to those who bring us the heads of Mr Wallaces' family".
f64: making crack remarks since 1978 (the year crack was invented).
Re:In other news.... (Score:4, Insightful)
> Remembrances may be donated to Children's
> Hospital & Regional Medical Center in Seattle.
Seriously, it might be nice if any bigfoot reward money were instead donated to the medical center. It would be a nice legacy for the man, and a good ending to the story.
Probably never happen, though - I bet that Bigfoot hunting goes on for the next hundred years.
Anyone else care to bet that a lot of the same people who doubt the moon landing will continue to believe in Bigfoot?
Re:In other news.... (Score:1)
or to paraphrase mr burns: "i think i'll donate a million dollars to an orphage... when pigs can fly!"
f64 : making crack remarks while on crack!
Re:In other news.... (Score:2)
So someone needs to create www.badbiology.com, like www.badastronomy.com [badastronomy.com]
"somehow involved"? (Score:2, Interesting)
As an example of this kind of thing, remember crop circles. No one seriously believes that those guys pulled this hoax because the geometric shapes are too perfect, plus the wheat stems show no signs of cracking. There is clearly more here than meets the eye.
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:1)
This is beautiful! (Score:5, Interesting)
Actual proof is not required for the popular belief in the fantastical Bigfoot, but 'convincing and specific' proof with 'photo graphic evidence' and maybe 'a diary or something' is needed to refute the existence of a hypothetical fairy tale creature.
That is freakin awesome!
Re:This is beautiful! (Score:2)
This is exactly what I was thinking (and chuckling about) as I read the article.
Re: This is beautiful! (Score:1)
>
I'm curious as to what sort of photograph would show that fairy tale creatures don't exist. Maybe a picture of the whole universe, that you could go through and show that there weren't any FTCs in?
Re:This is beautiful! (Score:2)
If for some reason he doesn't require any sort of proof to believe that a hairy man ape is plotting against us while perfecting monster dunks so mass rad Darryl Dawkins' nuts will retract themselves and become ovaries, but does require physical proof that something isn't real, THAT'S why he's a genius!
We should just trust him. It's the internet, why would he lie?
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:5, Interesting)
They are going to have to be a lot more convincing and specific than that to turn the tide of belief in Bigfoot. We need actual photographic proof that this guy is Bigfoot or maybe a diary or something where he wrote "June 13. Dressed up as large ape-like creature. Was spotted by hunters."
I doubt anything is going to convince the Bigfoot believers that it was a hoax. People seem to have the desperate need to believe in fantastical things. I'm not sure exactly why (although I could come up with some ideas). It's nice that these guys came clean about their involvement with the Bigfoot legend but, realistically, I don't see anything coming of this.
As an example of this kind of thing, remember crop circles. No one seriously believes that those guys pulled this hoax because the geometric shapes are too perfect, plus the wheat stems show no signs of cracking. There is clearly more here than meets the eye.
Hmmm. Now you've lost me. Actually, most people DO believe that crop circles are hoaxes. I'm not sure where you get this "no one believes..." stuff. And you can certainly place me in the category of non-believers. I don't want to get into a crop-circle argument with you, PhysicsGenius, but I'll only ask one question. Which do you think is more likely: that some guys went out with wooden planks and played a trick or that aliens from a far away planet spent valuable resources to visit our world and, when they got there, all they did was make a few crazy patterns in the local vegetation and left? If you say that latter, then you and I are so far apart that it wouldn't make sense for us to discuss this, Bigfoot, healing crystals, psychic phenomenon, LockNess, Yeti, and all the other pseudo-scientific stories out there.
GMD
It's not a question of likelihood (Score:1, Insightful)
It doesn't have to be aliens, but it sure isn't some drunks on a lark.
Re:It's not a question of likelihood (Score:4, Insightful)
Simply because one can not adequately explain how the crop circles were made does not inevitably lead to the conclusion that 'aliens did it' or that it does not have a completely mundane and ordinary solution. I can not adequately explain many of the magical tricks performed by talented magicians, but I do not suppose that the *tricks* are truly magical in nature.
Now, you have every right to believe what you will, but do not mistake that *belief* with proof or evidence of the existence of aliens. After all, it is possible that aliens did make the crop circles (highly improbable IMHO
I am delighted that people require such strong 'proof or evidence' to disprove a fantastical notion, but require no proof and flimsy evidence to believe in a fantastical creature such as Bigfoot
Re:Who said it was aliens? (Score:3)
I am prepared and happy to admit that I do not _know_ who or what made those crop circles nor do I _know_ how they were made. Please read that last statement again.
Ask me if it is possible that aliens made those crop circles and I will say yes.
Ask me if it is possible that hoaxers made those crop circles and I will say yes.
If you press me I will admit that in my personal opinion it was a couple of hoaxers using an ingenious if unknown method, but I will not admit to having any *proof* for that and I will not state that my opinion is fact.
Your post as well as the parent stated as fact that _hoaxers could not be responsible_ as if you have proof or as if this were a fact. Once again, I submit you have no basis for saying hoaxers could not or did not create those crop circles. I submit you have no basis for stating anything as fact regarding the origin and method of creation of those crop circles. All is opinion and conjecture until we have proof. As far as the aliens, well I assume that is what the parent was alluding to...
Now, the reason I find all of this so funny? Because, the parent post calls for *proof* that a fantastical creature with no basis in reality *does not exist*! That is hilarious
Re:Who said it was aliens? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Not to be overly skeptical (Score:2)
Sorry if I sound incredulous, but that tends to happen to me in the face of rampant idiocy.
Re:Oh, I see (Score:2)
I do have to apologize, though, for one little detail; the show was aired on The Learning Channel, which is (as far as I know) a part of the "Discovery Network".
You post as AC nothing more substantive than a denial of the sun hitting your face and I'M the troll?Whatever helps you sleep at night, sparky.
Re:Uh huh, sure (Score:2)
LOL.. Ok, I know when I've been had. Good one. Touche. :)
Re:Who said it was aliens? (Score:1)
I saw that last night. They had some MIT kids try and fake the crop circle.
The two (apparantly stoned) grad students surveyed it via helocopter, and oddly enough suffered a power outage while over the darn thing. (the 'chopper auto-rotated and got a jump-start while doing so--and as the grad students were rather blase about the whole thing, hence the supposition of their stonage...)
Crop circles seem to be a genuine real phenomina, most likely caused by an as-yet undetermined natural event. Sure, there are folks who go out and create crop circles at random--but they don't account for all of the crop circles.
Then again, my source is Discovery Channel, so who the hell knows.
Re:Who said it was aliens? (Score:2)
It is more reasonable to believe that there are hundreds of groups of crop circle makers in the world out to get some attention and have a laugh at the public's expense than it is to believe that supernatural forces are involved.
Re:Who said it was aliens? (Score:1)
If it was just flattening crops, sure, but that isn't the only relevant phenomina.
Electomagnetic funnyness, odd light displays, melted iron bits in a regular pattern... there's SOMETHING going on beyond just a couple of hoaxers.
It's not necessarilly a "magical" unexplained phenomina, but it's something worth looking into seriously--oh, and look, there are people looking into it seriously!
Y'know, "christian" doesn't imply "moron." (Although "slashdotter" might... )
Re:Who said it was aliens? (Score:2)
Re:Who said it was aliens? (Score:1)
Who said anything about other-worldly? Assuming that we don't have a few dozen millionare-engineer-pranksters running around, the likeliest explination is an as-of-yet undetermined wholly-natural phenomina.
D000d, M@gl( l$ r341!!!! (Score:3, Funny)
And don't get me started on Jonathan Edwards! He so does not deserve Biggest Douche in the Universe, man! He's like in touch with God!
Re:D000d, M@gl( l$ r341!!!! (Score:1)
Re:It's not a question of likelihood (Score:3, Informative)
These issues and more are addressed in CSICOP's "Circular Reasoning: The 'Mystery' of Crop Circles and Their 'Orbs' of Light" [csicop.org]:
Hoaxers, most croppies insisted, could not be responsible because the plants were only bent and not broken, and there were no footprints or other traces of human activity. Skeptics replied that from mid-May to early August the English wheat was green and pliable, and could only be broken with difficulty.
Re:It's not a question of likelihood (Score:3, Informative)
Re:It's not a question of likelihood (Score:2)
No one ever claimed it was "some drunks on a lark." They're very intelligent people who plan their projects carefully and deliberately. They also by now have many years' experience under their belts, and this is the main reason the circles have become more elaborate as time has gone by. Those who make them have gotten lots of practise; it would be surprising if the circles didn't get more elaborate. It's why American circles tend to be cruder than British ones; the Americans aren't as practised.
YHBT by the self ascribed Physics whiz (Score:1)
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:2)
Well I don't. I honestly believe that there are people [circlemakers.org] who sneak out in the middle of the night and create geometric figures in fields of cereal crops. Those circles are real. Very real.
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:2)
What I'm waiting for is the theory that mirthful aliens sneak into fields and produce the circles using boards, ropes, and common surveying techniques.
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:2)
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:2)
But, you're arguing a bit unfairly. While one explanation is that guys with wooden planks played us for fools, there are possibilities other than graffiti-writing spaceships buzzing the UK.
You see, I actually believe most are hoaxes. Do I believe the few remaining are UFO related? I don't believe anything, except that they are strange phenomena that I would like explained. Uncommon though it is, sometimes the simplest explanation is wrong. Strange things do happen.
They are mutual copycats (Score:2)
See also SexyKellyOsbourne.
WATCH TLC!! (Score:1)
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:2)
*deep breath* Oh. Wait. You're not joking.
Thats even funnier! Ha ha ha ha ha ha....
As the great scientist Peter Venkman said, "you're right Ray, no human could stack books this way." Sure....
I'm not really going to respond... (Score:2)
-malakai
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:1)
Joe Schmoe:"Yeah, I made up Bigfoot back in the day."
Scientist: "I just cant believe that, Bigfoot must exist. You see, chaos dictates that soon, possibilities of events..."
There will be no satisfying a skeptic.
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:2)
Re:"somehow involved"? (Score:1)
again, @#%!ing discovery channel. AFAIK it's a bum report, but that's what I heard.
nice webpage, btw....
This is a SURPRISE? (Score:4, Informative)
There are so many real scientific puzzles and the press preoccupies itself instead with the mystery of Michael Jackson's deflating nose (which has be checking my nose all the time now to see if the cartilage is poking through like his....).
Bigfoot, we never knew ye. What will the Weekly World News do? Their circulation has been battered enough already.
Re:This is a SURPRISE? (Score:3, Insightful)
Hey, no worries there. They've had several front pages speculating on the location of Osama bin Laden!
Re:This is a SURPRISE? (Score:2)
Isn't Osama the love-child of Bigfoot and Bat-Boy? Or was that Elvis?
Re:This is a SURPRISE? (Score:2)
Re:This is a SURPRISE? (Score:2)
OK, he needs help for other reasons [usatoday.com], but I think he does have the common social maladjustment, too. To the extent his fame has denied him the help he needs, I feel bad for him. He seems to be a nice guy; nice, anyway, these days.
And yet -- what was the deal with the child dangling thing, anyway?
Re:This is a SURPRISE? (Score:2)
Re:This is a SURPRISE? (Score:2)
but mostly it is some relentless ass-kickin' of pseudoscience and the paranormal.
Re:This is a SURPRISE? (Score:1)
But John Edward is real. Honest. As real as Bigfoot.
I'm coming clean too (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I'm coming clean too (Score:2)
When Harry met... (Score:1, Funny)
g
Re:When Harry met... (Score:1)
Let this charade go on, let him live out the rest of his days in happiness with his faithful lovers Mary-Kate and Ashley Olson.
Sasquatch -- by Tenacious D (Score:1, Offtopic)
Try to figure out the Sasquatch riddle
Then they figured out it was a missing link
'In Search of Sasquatch'
That was a kick-ass 'In Search Of'
With Leonard Nimoy kicking out the jams
He captured the imagination
Of people all around the globe
His name was Sasquatch so I'm told...
Re:Sasquatch -- by Tenacious D (Score:1)
I just hope its not some cheesey rip-off that only has the show's name in common with the original version.
I used to love to watch those and National Geographic as a kid... Then again, I'm a weirdo 'cause I've been watching 'This Old House' since I was 11...
So... (Score:3, Funny)
Or maybe they're "coming clean" because that's what They want us to believe!
Re:So... (Score:2)
The Uncoverer... (Score:2)
Check out who the author is. (Score:2)
Re:Check out who the author is. (Score:1)
Ya know, I just left Seattle (seattletimes and all) after a 4 year stint...
Who the HELL is Bob Young and what difference does it make if he wrote the article? Never heard of the guy!
perhaps the jokes on *you*?
Re:Check out who the author is. (Score:2)
I believe (Score:2)
Now if only they could solve ... (Score:1)
This is excellent news!
Now, if only someone could solve the Mysterious Mystery of ChickenFoot [augiewan.com]
1st in a series (Score:2)
Hey that thief stole MY PRANK! I'M the Bigfoot prankster!
Meta hoax? (Score:1)
Re:Meta hoax? (Score:2)
Re:Meta hoax? (Score:2)
Wow, it must *really* suck to be him.
Re:Meta hoax? (Score:2)
Just now? (Score:3, Interesting)
I remember watching a 60 minutes on it years ago...
This man didn't invent Bigfoot! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:This man didn't invent Bigfoot! (Score:1)
Re:This man didn't invent Bigfoot! (Score:2)
Re:This man didn't invent Bigfoot! (Score:1)
Re:This man didn't invent Bigfoot! (Score:1)
Re:This man didn't invent Bigfoot! (Score:1)
Dang. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Dang. (Score:2)
That's why the CIA put the Wallace family up to this. Too many people were getting close to the truth.
Re:Dang. (Score:1)
Hey, about the Easter Bunny (Score:3, Funny)
Gee... (Score:1)
Bigfoot seems real enough... (Score:1)
I just wish all the spam was non-existant.
You mean he is not real? (Score:1)
What was that...
BIGFOOT IS A WHAT?!?! (Score:1)
*rolls eyes*
Astroturf mystery solved! (Score:2)
Lovable? This jackass and his family played a stupid practical joke, then swore up and down that they were telling the truth. Now they are having a very public laugh at the trusting people who believed them.
But this does clear up a mystery about those Microsoft/astroturf guys who hang out on Slashdot. "Shameless-Bullshit-Enabler Discovered in Washington Water Supply."
Harry? (Score:2)
Bigfoots (Score:2)
What more proof do you need?