Total Solar Eclipse at Ceduna, South Australia 144
moooooooo writes "The total Solar Eclipse on December 4 is fast approaching with Ceduna in South Australia being one of the better places to observe this rare event.
Accomodation was thought to have been booked out but a new site has been set up where you can find more information on the event. Information can be found here and accomodation info is at the bottom of the page. I heard on the radio that they will be setting up a "tent city" for those of us who want to camp out." There's a very impressive eclipse page describing the orbital conditions necessary for an eclipse and listing solar and lunar eclipses coming up.
"That's no moon . . ." (Score:1)
That's CowboyNeal, you insensitive clod!
Contray to popular belief.. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:5, Informative)
When you are viewing a total eclipse what you see for light is actually the Corona of the sun.
At Start and end of totality, light from solar surface passes through Crevices at the edge of the moon, producing Bailey's Beads(Points of light at the edge of the moon) or a diamond ring effect(One bright spot set upon the silvery corona)
It is actullay quite amazing though I have never viewed one in real life I seen one on a video in my Atronomy class in university
A total eclipse is rare because it takes about 54 years and 34 days for the total eclipse to return to (almost) the same area.
it takes 18 years, 11 and 1/3 days to occure again but it will happen 120 degreese further west due to the rotation of the earth durring that time.
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:5, Interesting)
actually if you saw anything it was probably a partial eclipse where the moon is not quite covering the sun. These are alot more commen and are actually called "Annular Eclipses" these are not good for your eyes at any time. and occure when the moon is at Apogee(farthest distance from the Earth in its orbit) Its umbra shawdow winn not reach earth.
So to what you said you saw it in 1999 that is not right because eclipses follow a designated path I have included a map of this path and as you can see it passes austria in december of 2002 and in 2013. http://www.uc.edu/geology/geologylist/worldeclips
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:1)
As your map shows, there was a total solar eclipse on Aug 11 1999 passing through Austria (Europe!).
See also here [nasa.gov], here for photos [sternwarte.at], and here for more reports [mreclipse.com].
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:1)
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:1)
It's called the Saros cycle (Score:1, Informative)
It's NOT the time between all possible eclipses. Many different (40+) Saros cycles are going on at any one time. There's no way you could see two eclipses from the same Saros in just a few years, but the fact that an eclipse is total is the cool thing for most of us, not the fact that it's part of the same Saros cycle as another eclipse.
Check out http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclipse/eclipse.htm
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:2)
I disagree; Bailey's Beads aren't that bright, and they appear gradually enough for you to look away. If you keep looking after that without putting on some protective gear, well, it's your own fault.
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:3, Funny)
It still seems stupid
to stare at the sun, whether
it's eclipsed or not.
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:1)
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:2)
Tukey got a total eclipse in 1999, and will again in 2006 - both total eclipses. (mag 1.029 and mag 1.052) 7 years, not 50. RTFA
Re:Contray to popular belief.. (Score:1)
"If you are fortunate enough to see a solar eclipse, keep in mind that the only time when it is safe to look at the Sun is during totality, when the solar disk is blocked by the Moon and only the solar corona is visible. Viewing this magnificent spectacle cannot harm you in any way. But you must never look directly at the Sun when even a portion of its intensely brilliant disk is exposed. If you look directly at the Sun at any time without a special filter approved for solar viewing, you will suffer permanent eye damage or blindness."
Also I remember watching a video of people going to watch an eclipse. They brought big powerful telescopes to use. When totality occurred I think they took off their filters and watched it though I might be wrong. Especially when you think that looking at a full Moon will have enough light reflected from the Sun to cause damage to your eyes, so I'm probably wrong about the unfiltered telescopes.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh boy! Oh boy! I can't wait!!! (Score:3, Funny)
Now all I need it the airfare to get there, and I'm all set! Oh...I almost forgot...better get permission from the wife...
Damn. She said no. :-(
Re:Oh boy! Oh boy! I can't wait!!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Oh boy! Oh boy! I can't wait!!! (Score:1)
I say ditch your wife and still come (Score:1)
I've had this trip planned for years since I first heard that the eclipse was happening.
I'll be going down in a big convoy of uni students (from Newcastle on the east coast, take us 3 days of driving).
The best place to see it will be in Lyndhurst, which is seriously in the middle of nowhere.
It's a town of 30 people surrounded by barren desert. The 'tent city' is actually going to be a giant music festival [outbackecl...stival.com] lasting 3 days that's in the middle of a meteor crater.
It's going to be mad, with wacked out hippies, astronomer nerds and gerneral freaks going wild in the desert sands.
Events even include the Worlds Biggest Twister Game [barrelfullofmonkeys.org] So 3 days of fun and great music and then to finish it all off the moon will block the sun. Man, you will seriously never find a better party on earth!
An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:4, Informative)
But I myself wasn't quite sure why Ceduna in southern Australia was a good place to view it. However, after some research, I found the following information:
To witness all that this total solar eclipse has to offer, viewing must be within the narrow path of the moon's umbral shadow, which passes directly over Ceduna.
Although the sun will be partly eclipsed throughout South Australia, and 88% eclipsed from Adelaide, the spectacular effects of this eclipse will not be visible outside the shadow's path due to the intensity of remaining light from the sun.
Even 99% eclipsed gives you much less than 99% of the 'total eclipse experience'!
The bottom line: if you are in your parents' basement at the time, you will miss the total eclipse.
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:2)
I mean seriously, isn't it common knowledge that the eclipse will only be visible from a small area? It's certainly part of pre-university physics here
(And BTW, "narrow path" = about 50-150 miles wide IIRC. At least it was in 1999(?) in Europe.)
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually no, the 1999 solar eclipse was visible from the Mir space station as a huge shadow on Earth [nasa.gov]. Spectacular.
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:1)
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:3, Informative)
In other words, if you're close to the path of totality, make sure to go see the total solar eclipse, even if it's just a little bit out of your way. It makes a big difference.
Additionally, this solar eclipse will be right at sunset in Australia. It should be a doubly spectacular sight.
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:2)
Having 'seen' many partial eclipses, and then having gone to Hungary for the 8/11/99 Total Eclipse [astro.cz] (we had just over two minutes totality) I have to whole heartedly agree. Though personally I would use the analogy of virginity rather than pregnancy.
While partial solar eclipses and total Lunar eclipses are entertaining, I can only describe the total eclipse in superlatives like mind-altering, orgasmic, cosmic, spiritual, etc.
I would disagree that all partials are interchangeable though. You have to get to something like 40%+ to really notice the lensing effect of the natural pin-hole cameras created by leafy trees (little crescent moon shadows are cast on the ground); and you have to get to somewhere like 90% for weather effects like the wind picking up or a noticeble change in temperature - or for the reaction this has on animals like the birds going quite.
I would eventually like to experience an anular eclipse - which is also a type of partial eclipse, which I imagine will be much like like a total eclipse though I doubt it will be quite the same. My guess is it will be somewhat analogous to sex with a condom vs. sex without a condom. For one thing, you can't view an anular eclipse without protection, like you can a total - so like sex with a one night stand vs sex with your spouse, perhaps?
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:1)
It's actually quite a pretty place to visit. So much of nothing, but heaps to see..
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:2, Funny)
Especially as a solar eclipse must happen during the day...
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:1)
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:1)
crap.
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:1)
The "Path of Total Eclipse" is the space between the two lines with the ellipses between them. You have to be standing somewhere between those two lines to see the 100% total eclipse.
The XX% lines tell how much of the sun (by diameter, not area, oddly) will be eclipsed if you are standing on that line.
West of the "Eclipse Ends at Sunset" line the entire eclipse will be visible. Between that line and the "Maximum Eclipse at Sunset" line you will see at least half of the eclipse, including the best part (totality). Between that line and the "Eclipse Begins at Sunset" line you will only see the beginning of the eclipse which wont include totality (which is why they dont even bother to extend the XX% lines that far).
So, to sum up... Queensland (in general) will have a crappy to moderate (with a tiny section of "great" in the southwest corner that I am ignoring for this summary) view of the eclipse. You will only see the very beginning of the eclipse because the sun will set during the first half of the eclipse. Depending on exactly where you are you could see from a few seconds up to a few minutes of partial eclipse, ranging from 60% to 100% coverage of the sun.
If you live anywhere in Australia it would be worthwhile to drive a few hours to Ceduna to see the total eclipse. If you cant do that, at least go outside near sundown and see what you can from where you are, even a partial eclipse is an interesting sight (do NOT stare at it!) that you dont get to see every decade.
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:2)
It's a few days from here to south australia, not a few hours - and I'm only in south-east queensland... North queensland, the top end, and the Kimberlies would be further still.
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:1)
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:2)
Total travel distance: 4041.51 km, Estimated travel time: 54 Hrs 55 Mins
thats over two days solid of driving!
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:2)
Re:An answer to the "But why Ceduna?" question (Score:2)
The thing is that Cenduna is in the middle of nowhere. There's nothing for hundreds of kilometers in either direction. Cenduna at least has some services for the hundreds who will show up.
To the owner.. (Score:3, Funny)
To the owner of a Blue Mitsubishi Eclipse licence plate ERQ-1343, you left your lights on.
haiku (Score:1)
to create a camp city
to watch an eclipse?
Tent City? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Tent City? (Score:1)
Well, during the eclipse, the corona will be visible. As it is much hotter than the surface of the Sun itself (millions of K vs. 6000K), it should keep you warm.
Re:Tent City? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Tent City? (Score:1)
False. It is not approaching fast. (Score:3, Funny)
December 4th is approaching at the same rate it always does. One day per day.
Actually, it IS comming faster... (Score:2)
How I Missed The Last Eclipse (Score:1)
Outback Eclipse Festival (Score:5, Informative)
"total" eclipse in Ithaca (Score:5, Interesting)
So not all solar eclipses are alike. It interests me that the Moon and Sun are so similar is apparent (angular) size. The Moon is unique in the solar system for its enormous one-quarter size relative to its planet.
The link [nasa.gov] has a 1992 photo and numerous tips and links re eclipses generally.
Re:"total" eclipse in Ithaca (Score:1)
With that and many other unique facts about your planet, solar system, galaxy, and universe people still think it was created by accident. They just can't seem to get it that someone created us and our environment and with the complexity of our universe you just don't get that out of happenstance (apologies to the million typing monkeys).
Duh. Well these amazing coincidences only had to happen once. It could have taken a billion eons and many cycles of the universe to happen. If it didn't happen, we wouldn't be here to question it. If it does happen, then everything would look like it was made perfectly for us to live in. We wouldn't be here to question it if it didn't form the right way. And with randomness and inifinite time, it had to eventually happen.
Mod parent up (Score:1)
Re:"total" eclipse in Ithaca (Score:3, Informative)
As for coincidences, like the size of the Moon and Sun, you can find any number of them looking around you. Humans happen to like coincidences. But what might seem unique could be the result of ignorance or lacking imagination: we just don't know of other examples. Also, things that are similar are only so for a brief time. The orbits of the Earth and Moon have changed over time. The Moon used to be much closer to its planet, and is gradually drifting away. The year used to be much longer: the Earth has accelerated as it has drawn closer to the Sun.
Stay tuned, we're learning faster and faster.
More information about Ceduna (Score:1, Informative)
Nice eclipse photos and info online... (Score:5, Informative)
One of my favorites shows the 1970 eclipse near total, with a diamond-ring effect". [mreclipse.com] I actually saw that one--it was amazing. When the sky gets dark, the birds figure it's night and go roost in the trees. Beautiful.
Mr. Eclipse also links to Ceduna info, including an animation of the shadow's path across earth.
Re: (Score:2)
If you intend to go (Score:5, Informative)
That area is largely arid - it can rightfilly be called desert.
AND
It's summer here.
Temperatures in that area can reach 45C to 50C and water is hard to find outside habitation. Even if you do nothing but lay in your tent you WILL need 4 litres of water per day. You have to drink enough so that you piss clear. (Guide: The darker your urine, the more dehydrated you are)
No, coffee, Coke and Pepsi aren't a substitute for water, even though they have water in them.
No, neither is beer, even if it is Cooper's Sparkling Ale.
Re:If you intend to go (Score:1)
Hmm. Bet I know where you got *that* from
(from an expat in SFO)
Re:If you intend to go (Score:1)
Re:If you intend to go (Score:2)
True, however my local pub waters there beer down so much, that is a substitute
Re:If you intend to go (Score:2, Funny)
Re:If you intend to go (Score:1)
If I can't survive purely on Cooper's, then life no longer has any meaning. So I won't be following your advice in that respect...
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:JUST MY THOUGHTS....... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
We're all gonna die! (Score:1)
Middle-of-nowhere (Score:1)
Total Solar Eclipse (Score:1)
(Pink Floyd, Dark Side of the Moon)
obligatory jack handy quote (Score:2, Funny)
"Wouldn't it be great, if in the future you had a time machine. Then you could go back in time and show up in front of a bunch of neanderthals right before a solar eclipse. Then you could tell them that you were going to put the sun out. When the eclipse occurs, they'd probably try to kill you or something. But then you'd explain about the rotation of the moon and earth and everyone would have a good laugh."
--Jack Handy
Just paraphrasing from what I remember.
Re:obligatory jack handy quote (Score:2)
Australia (Score:2)
Re:Australia (Score:1)
If you have to ask, you wouldn't understand... :-)
Seriously, though, it may be (partly) due to the fact that we haven't fscked up the atmosphere (yet, though some of us are working on it) to the extent that we can see beyond it. Also, we don't have to drive very far to escape the "light pollution" which makes (non-solar-related) observations hard...
Re:Australia (Score:1)
Re:Australia (Score:1)
I think "all" and "always" are overstating things a little. I suppose the air is generally less polluted (outside of cities), which would help in viewing these events.
David.
North America (Score:2)
Birthday (Score:2)
solar eclipse here! :) (Score:1)
watch on TV (Score:1)
Dance Party (Score:2)
From inthemix.com [inthemix.com.au], "Day will turn into night as the moon passes directly in front of the sun. This will be the best viewing point in the world to see this 100% solar eclipse."
"Over 50 international and local live acts and DJs, performing artists, crazy installations, mega shade, free drinking water, chillout village featuring geodesic domes." See you there.
Re:Dance Party (Score:2)
Yet Another Eclipse Site (Score:2)
They plan on having a live braodcast, but somehow I don't think that will work.
why I'm headed to Ceduna for 30 secs of totality (Score:3, Interesting)
Why go all that way to in the place where the "sun don't shine :-)" for a few seconds?
If you have ever seen / experienced a true
100% total eclipse you might understand.
I have NEVER seem a photograph
do justice to the experience.
Not only do photographs fail to present the
full dynamic range of the visual, they lack
the wind, the temperature drop, the effect
on plants, birds, insects, people ...
You really have to see and experience a total
solar eclipse directly.
Each eclipse is unique. The shape and size of the solar corona. The colors. Solar prominence positions, shapes, rates of change. Sky brightness. Duration of the diamond rings. Shadow edge sharpness. Shadow band size and change rate. etc. etc. No two eclipses look the same.
The eclipse near/at Ceduna will have some special features. The short duration is a result of the moon and sun being very near the same size. Long eclipses (such as up 7+ minutes) allow for observation of the inner corona (near the solar disk edge) only near the beginning and end of the Eclipse. Short eclipses offer excellent inner corona views throughout the eclipse. There is a trade-off between inner detail and duration.
The eclipse will be near sunset. The same optical illusion that makes a full moon near the horizon seem large makes the solar corona (sometimes 2x to 4x the apparent size of the sun/moon disk) seem huge.
The Sun will set after totality ends but while the moon is partially covering the solar disk. We will watch a crescent sun set. Instead of watching a single point wink out, we will watch two points wink out one after the other. Some are hoping to see a double green flash.
The Sun should be entering quieter phase of its sunspot cycle. But for the last few months we have seen an unusual degree of activity this late in cycle. A more active sun frequently results in a non-uniform shaped corona. A more active sun frequently results more and unusual numbers of solar prominences.
Too many people... (Score:1)
-the Concerned Residents Of Ceduna.
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:2, Insightful)
I understand that the moon may not block much, if any, but surely it can't amplify the radiation.
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:1, Funny)
In actuality, I believe he once watched the Weather Channel on a sunny day while staying in a motel near Cambridge.
Hence the qualifications.
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:2, Informative)
<g> (Moderators, in case your physics isn't too fresh, this is "funny", not "informative".)
Didn't you forget all those dangerous, sneaky neutrinos?
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:1)
Hot.
Re:What a load of shit.... (Score:1)
Didn't you know the Moon was a giant magnifying glass in the UV wavelength? That's why those Apollo photographs are distorted, which causes some lunatics to think they were faked...
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:3, Funny)
Obviously, this has nothing to go with looking at it. And it's even worse without the moon blocking some of the radiation. That's why I've been hiding in a lead-lined room in the basement for the last ten years...
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:1)
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:1)
This [williams.edu] article would seem to indicate that the sun does not emit more radiation as eluded to by other posts during the eclipse, but rather it is dangerous because you can look at it longer. If you stare at the normal sun your eyes start to hurt from the brightness, and you either close them or turn away after a short time. During the eclipse it isn't as bright so you can keep looking and the normal radiation emitted by the sun is exposed to your eyes for longer. This is from the black part that your eyes can fixate at. This is also the partial eclipse when part of the sun is still exposed.
Additionally the topic of eclipses was discussed not too long ago on slashdot here [slashdot.org] And there are comments on the same thing of the eclipse burning the retina and so fourth. Consensus seems to be that the sun is no more dangerous during the partial eclipse, but we just look at it more than usual because it is an eclipse.
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:2, Informative)
"I own a chain of stores here in London, and after several meetings with lower management, . . . "
"Seriously. I've noticed this too, lately, as I work for a small Verizon Wireless store . .
Oh how the mighty have fallen. If you're going to make up stories at least make sure your past stories agree. Or at least are not so accessible.
Looking at the sun (Score:1)
Re:Double-edged sword of nature (Score:1)
ROTFLMFAO
Re:Business Plan (Score:1)