Rat Mind Control 198
Patrick Key writes "Well, not exactly mind control but scientists have taken rat training to a new level. By inserting electrodes into the brain of a rat, they're able to effectively control a rat to move forward, left and right. They used the brain area that processes whisker info for left/right control and the pleasure center for moving forward. All sorts of interesting implications- no mention of when a human version would be available. The feat is mentioned in an IEEE's Spectrum article
here"
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)
Re:I wonder how long it will be... (Score:4, Funny)
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these -- lurking in the subway tunnels.
Re:I wonder how long it will be... (Score:1)
Hey how hard can it be? You'd just need to hack gpm to support rats instead of just mice.
Re:I wonder how long it will be... (Score:1)
Re:I wonder how long it will be... (Score:2)
repost (Score:4, Informative)
It's been posted here before [slashdot.org]. Took me 10 seconds to find it.
Re:repost (Score:2, Informative)
The medline database, for example, contains millions of abstracts from scientific articles that have been clustered using this [nih.gov] relatively simple method. It works very well. In this way editors would be able to find related posts. The 3 most similar posts could be interesting for us readers as well.
Re:repost (Score:3, Funny)
Subj: remote controller rats
Do they use 9.6 volt batteries? Those battery packs tend to run out so fast, I'd hate to have to recharge my rats after only a half hour of use. That simply wouldn't be acceptable.
Subj: First step rats, the next step Congressman!
The title says it all.
Makes for a great alibi, though. Combine it with a bone-conductive radio impland and it gives new credence to the old "voices told me to do it" excuse.
Subj: erm.. rat cyborg
does it star in the new terminator 3 movie coming out??
Subj: Okay I get it...
but did they really have to use rats? I mean, it's a great idea and all, but the last thing I want if I'm stranded somewhere is rats all over me. Am I alone in this?
Just my $.02
Subj: Re:First rats, then people
I don't know about you, but I think I would notice that portions of my skull were missing when my hairbrush perforated my brain.
Re:repost (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:repost (Score:2)
Re:repost (Score:1)
It's simple really... (Score:2, Flamebait)
damn skippy (Score:2, Insightful)
this story is instantly recognizable as a previous posting... would've taken me about 10 seconds to find as well!
Re:repost (Score:2, Funny)
while he was asleep.
Re:repost (Score:1)
Re:repost (Score:2)
Re:repost (Score:2)
Speaking of which [OT] (Score:2)
Now, would it not be awsome for that cursor to be hooked up with that mouse and let the monkey to control that cursor to control that mouse (hehe)
Ninja Turtles (Score:2, Funny)
Or imagine a real life donkey kong game?
rspc who?
aaaaaaahh...
Interesting... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Interesting... (Score:1)
Re:Interesting... (Score:1)
After reading that article (which sounds quite similar in nature to the opening of the book "The Terminal Man" by Michael Chrichton), I think it might be plausible to say that the same thing could be implemented in humans, but...
The problem with controlling a human the same way is that a human, with the power of reasoning, will eventually come to the conclusion that there is something going on here--something or someone with an agenda trying to control it. And a human would likely then end up resisting--unless there were a pain center with an electrode implanted in it as well, for correction.
Herein lies a Catch-22. Given a particularly strong-willed person with both pleasure and pain electrodes, after a while the person, beginning to resist, will quit being subjected to pleasurable stimulation and instead be frequently punished. This will tear away at the psyche of the subject in such a fashion as to eventually drive him/her to schizophrenia, insanity, or suicide.
Of course, all this is quite barbaric and all. But this is what the psychiatric community tends to teach...
Nevertheless, it would be great to have an electrode stuck into a pleasure center in my brain, with an easily-accessible pushbutton--surely I could handle it, right?
Pentagon insists real rats not being used (Score:5, Funny)
Only forwards, backwards, left and right? (Score:5, Funny)
does anyone else imagine (Score:4, Funny)
Set the Wayback machine for May 2002 (Score:1, Redundant)
Live rats are fitted with electrodes so they could be steered toward hidden bombs or disaster victims.
Was it:
January 2002
November 2001
May 2002
April 1999
August 2002
The correct answer is: May 2002, lets start checking dates and dupes!
Creepy (Score:2, Interesting)
~S
Re:Creepy (Score:2)
Re:Creepy (Score:2)
Re:Creepy (Score:1)
Re:Creepy (Score:1)
Re:Creepy (Score:1)
I hope it's soon. It would replace the current inefficient and error-prone cycle of:
work->money->shiny objects->attract woman->pleasure
with the more elegant and foolproof:
work->pleasure
This could be a huge timesaver.
MOD THIS UP!! (Score:1)
No worries... (Score:2)
For example, we are quite capable of making conscious choices that override basic and natural instincts -- This is because our brains are evolved enough to visualize not only the immediate consequences of an action. In fact, we can visualize not only definite consequences, but even the likely and improbable ones.
For example, we can choose to go on a diet, refusing the basic instinctive need to always completely satiate hunger whenever and wherever it is felt. We can choose to abstain from sexual activities, we can overcome chemical dependancies, we even take knowingly suicidal actions based on nothing more concrete than a single hope or belief -- all done by an act of conscious will.
We learn by more than experience, we can be verbally told something and take the idea within it, and hold to it faster than anything else - defying logic, defying instinctive, and definitely defying natural behaviour.
What does this all have to do with the subject, you may ask?
If someone tried to hook up a human being to one of these things, they might find that the person could get excessively violent in his attempts to resist being controlled. We, as people, have historically shown contempt for being manipulated or enslaved -- many would even rather die. I have no doubt that attempting to control a human being with something like this (and that's even _IF_ the declaration of human rights is revoked, which would prohibit this outright anyways) would prove most unsuccessful when measured against its effiacy with simpler life forms. It simply wouldn't be worth the effort to find compliant people.
Re:No worries... (Score:1)
Re:No worries... (Score:2)
Re:Creepy (Score:2)
Google "find other stories like this"? (Score:2)
Pulling the keywords "remote control rats whisker brain control" out of the story I found the previous submission (in May, also by timothy) as the top hit. Whilst I'm a huge fan of blaming the editors, I'm sure their job would be easier if the re-submissions were being weeded out in advance.
Would you like it ? (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:2)
What? The exterminator's number? Oh here. Yeah, rat infestations can be nasty, watch out for those mites...
Back to the lab rats, where was I?
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Ok, so I guess you consider wwf, aavs, greenpeace and such, trollers ?
Alright, now I start to understand what kind of people usually read
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Well, in this case, I'm happy to see there are so many stubborn bigots...
(On a side note, I don't particularly like Greenpeace methods, too. I consider them stupid morons. I just named them because a lot of ppl knows them, much more than the AAVS)
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:2)
You would rather have the testing done on humans? This is quite ridiculous, even if said humans are rapists or murderers. It is cruel and unusual for the human because he/she is self-aware and understands what is happening. He/she can appreciate the fact that they are being tortured. Rats cannot. Animal testing is a necessary stage before any science can be applied to humans and as long as humane policies are in place for the testing and disposal of the animals, I have no problems with it.
Whether you like it or not, animal testing has probably extended your life by about fifty or sixty years.
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Give me more evidence before you say rats are not self-aware! Sure they don't talk with us, but to conclude rats are not self-aware is illogical.
Remember all animals react to pain, and yes 'animals' includes humans.
Scientific American published an article (complete with pictures) about the sucessful creation of headless mice. Certainly you could justify their actions in terms of "the quest for knowledge" but at some point morality must weigh in. I suspect that the boundries placed on this kind of research cannot come from the desensitized scientists alone.
(i think the article appeared in SciAm Sept 95)
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:2)
"So torturing other life forms, even if they are beneath us in order to extend our own life is okay to you?"
Yes. O.k? Yes. I would torture a rat to extend my life a year. So would you. If someone came up to you and said "Kill this rat and your life will be extended", you would accept. Not only that, but these rats were -bred- for this purpose. They are creatures that would probably not survive in the wild (Their bright white coats would give them away to predators in an instant)
"No, I'd rather such "testing" (clever word to disguise the torture) not be done at all."
No, "Testing", is a clever word for learning things. It might be unpleasant for the rat, (In fact, it probably -is- unpleasant for the rat) but it isn't like scientists are sitting around killing rats for the hell of it. They are learning things that enhance our lives. (Most of the time)
"...Schools once taught the earth was flat..."
Ah, yes, the typical answer for a person without a valid argument. This has seen so much over-use that it is almost an argument against your point. Watch, I can use it too.
"Schools teach that man is mortal. However, they also once taught that the Earth is flat. Therefore, because they were wrong once, they must always be wrong. Therefore, I'm immortal." Cool eh?
"...but you cannot say that with 100% certainty..." (That rats cannot appreciate the fact that they are being tortured)
The amount of things that you can answer with a 100% surety are very limited. (I personally hold that rats -can- appreciate the fact that they are living crappy lives. I just don't care)
"That's a big "Probably". " (Animal testing having extended his life 50-60 years)
Animal testing has almost certainly not extended your life quite that long. However, 20-30 years is not an unreasonable figure. Tell me, would you give 30 years of your life for a few hundred white lab-rats that would've been exterminated as pests? How about condemning all of humanity to have 30 year shorter lives?
At the very end you mention stem cell research. That's where I draw the line. Using humans as fodder to advance humankind is beyond my tolerance.
Telling it like it is-
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Who want's a remote controlled rapist? Now... RATS on the other hand... a remote controlled rat would be really... useful? Aw forget it.
Seriously. It's just a rat. They're just animals. I'm all for protecting "animal rights" and what-have-you, but if it comes down to a choice of my life versus an animals... the animal is going to die. I'm not sure if a remote controlled rat is going to extend my life or make it better, but other innovations based on this research just might. So maybe it's justifiable after all.
On the flip side of the coin maybe not. What do I know. I'm only typing what the guy in the white coat holding the controller is making me type anyway.
Take Care
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:2)
If the electrodes stimulated my pleasure center 24/7, by definition, the answer would be yes.
(And if not before the surgery, then certainly after surgery. "Nope, no regrets at all, man, it's like they make me run these big mazes, but the walls themselves are made of cheese!")
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
(btw, why don't you post under your nick, instead of anonymous coward ? (unless this *is* your nick/name))
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Please post your name, address, and telephone number. Would you prefer to hold this discussion through post, phone, or face to face?
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Animals *do* have rights, should you be able to read, here's a link for you to check out :
Before speaking, you should check your knowledge on the matter
Re:Would you like it ? (Score:1)
Lets see if anyone notices... (Score:2, Insightful)
I can see it now. Farmers having livestock (cows, horses, etc.) implanted with these devices so all they have to do is throw a switch and they
are automatically commanded to come back to the barn for feeding / milking / slaughter / whatever. Add a GPS receiver, a livestock_id for each animal, and some software.
Or, use this to make sure that Man's Best Friend stays within the yard or comes back to you when out for a run at the park How about adding a small microphone and a clock so Spot is commanded to Not Bark At Night so you (and the neighbors!) can get some sleep?
I'm certain there are some people who would think these are Great Ideas ®
The immediate downside I see is there is no feedback loop. What if the AUC (Animal Under Control) breaks a leg, gets a deep cut, is threatened by a predator, or is otherwise incapacitated? The controller (human or automated) is unaware of this and keeps sending commands to "GO THIS WAY!!!" Shudder. I sure hope society works out the ethical considerations well before they overcome the technical limitations! Just because we can doesn't mean we should!
Sure, the expense is prohibitive, now. But there are some people for whom the expense is no object. The price of computers and other electronics have plummeted over the years. Power consumption requirements have dropped dramatically, too. I can well imagine that in 10 or so years, it would be possible to do this cheaply and easily.
So, if some day I wake up in a bathtub full of ice with a note beside me... instead of it saying my kidneys have been removed it'll say a remote control has been implanted in my brain. Let the urban legends begin! =)
'd
Re:Lets see if anyone notices... (Score:2)
Excercise the cat? (Score:2, Funny)
Now I can't wait to get one of these rats. Then I can just sit in my sofa with my brand new remotecontroller and play with my cat.
No more ping-pong balls for me and my cat
Finally (Score:1)
Rat Mind Control
forward, left, and right? (Score:1)
Makes me picture pinky and the brain. (Score:2)
Pinky: NARF how we gonna do that brain
Brain: Pinky what is that riduclous thing on your head?
Pinky: ZOGG! Oh this? The nice lady put this over my head so my mind control implants can't be set off by radio's
Brain: That's it! We'll reverse engineer your mind control implants and adapt them to humans. We'll control them via radio waves!
Pinky: Why would you wanna do a thing like that brain?
Brain: WHy, WHY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!
AAVS, WWF, Greenpeace ... (Score:1)
http://www.aavs.org/
http://www.wwf.org/
http://www.greenpeace.org/
similar project at umich (Score:1)
then again they didnt have much time to test it; it didnt live long
Re:similar project at umich (Score:1)
Looks like lemmings! (Score:1)
Suddenly I picture 100 rats marching single file down a tunnel. Now if they can teach them to build bridges, dig across, dig down, parachute, block and explode you could play lemmings for real!
related research (Score:2)
yahoo (Score:1)
whats new in it? (Score:2)
In case you are wondering what am i talking about, well its the TV, or the idiot box. No electrodes, no funny fires, just plain old mind control
LOGO (Score:1)
Wrong way round (Score:1)
..it would be better (Score:1)
Rats able to get beer and do mowing!
Didn't you realise... (Score:1)
hmm actually that url brings some other possibilities to mind....
I'd like to .... (Score:2, Funny)
And then punish it for failing :)
Thought I was smart (Score:1)
To get on topic, I think it's really interesting the steps we're making in brain research. Those paranoid among us freak out every time someone mentions brain control, but I see it as one step on the road to understanding our own brains. Who knows, someday we might even understand which defective lobe prompts people to bitch and moan about repeat posts by repeating each others' posts!
Controling a Rat's thought process 101. (Score:3, Funny)
After you chose your rat. You now need a very large organization that has in it's posession a large amount of money. Now do not be discouraged at this point, this easier done than you would be lead to belive. Simply take all ethics, integrity, honesty and honor that your soul posesses, roll all these traits into a little ball and then sell it on a street corner for crack.
If you can perform this deed you have the potential to suceed in boardroom shinanigans, backstaping, corporate hoaring, thought theft, frivilous lawsuits, accounting coverups and the ocassiaonal rimjob. Perform these tasks to the best of your ability and you will have a large corporate entity under your control in a matter of a few years.
Now you can't just pick any type of corporation and make it work with any rat. It just dosen't work out that way. Although there are exceptions there are general rules of thumb for picking the perfect corporation/rat marriage.
If you want to subvert the thought process of a democrat, you will want a large entertainment company. Such a company might make movies, television, music. Now generally for entertainment the more mind-numbing the product the better.
Remember that all you future Ted Turner's of the world. If your company produces quality mind-expanding entertainment that provokes thought in your target demographic then you are doomed to failure. A thinking population might actually think when they are in the voting booth. Such thinking causes random unforseen variables to occur like voting for the other guy.
Oil, is a good industry to use to subvert a republican. Also a company with very deep ties with the military would be an outstanding choice.
If you product destroys the enviroment and kills alot of people a republican is a sure thing.
Rat control is a very old and time honored tradition thar predates even the Romans. With tried and true techniques to subvert every kind of rat to your will.
There is nothing wrong with directly sticking a mind-controling apparatus into the subjects brain. You just need to take into consideration how obvious your influence when your rat is required to make a public speech with elctrodes, and wires sticking out of his/her head.
Boy that's all I have to do! (Score:2)
Control (Score:1)
redundant. (Score:2)
That device is called woman.
This is not news . . . (Score:1)
This is not particularly newsworthy. The main problem with turning humans into robots in this fashion, like in Piercy's book, is that you have to cut away quite a bit of brain tissue to implant all those electrodes. Then again, most people don't use their brains that much, anyway . . .
old news? (Score:1)
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/0
mind you, im currently a touch drunk,
and cant be bothred to read..
guilty as charged..
Rats! this has already been posted! (Score:1)
Tasty chicken dish @ your local Chinese restaurant (Score:2)
Well, not exactly mind control
Well, not exactly chicken (but don't ask what).
Human version. (Score:2, Funny)
It's called television.
Reprogramming humanity since 19xx...
--saint
How is this different then... (Score:2)
END COMMUNICATION
rats rule the world (Score:1)
you know that it's the rats that are in control.
Re:rats rule the world (Score:2)
old stuff (Score:1)
This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans (Score:1)
Re:This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans (Score:2)
I have this apparatus hooked up to your brain. Now I move the stick to the left and you move right. Oh wait didn't I tell you, I hooked it into the part of the brain that registars pain.
As soon as you regain consciousness again, we'll give it another whirl. Then you can start by mowing my fucking lawn, after getting me a beer.
Re:This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans (Score:1)
Re:This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans (Score:2)
Controlling Humans remotely (Score:1)
I'll make bill gates go right! (Score:1)
Oh, it's rat mind control. Not rat bastard mind control.
re (Score:1)
Wow that's primitive (Score:2)
Rat Remote Webcam (Score:1)
PHB dream (Score:2)
This hasn't been news since the early 60s!!! (Score:2)
-Adam
Sooo... (Score:2)
Re:Imagine.. (Score:2)
Re:Imagine.. (Score:1)
No, Beowulf was a human warrior. You're thinking of Grendel, who was slain by Beowulf by having his arm torn off. But he wasn't a giant rat either. So maybe you weren't thinking of him either. Come to think of it, there was a distinct shortage of giant rats in the Beowulf saga.
I think I need a lie down.
Why? (Score:2)
Why do intelligent people invent devices which help evil less intelligent people enslave them?
What good is a mind control device?