Disney Making Fake Crop Circles? 332
GuNgA-DiN writes: "It seems that Disney has been busy trying to promote their upcoming movie 'Signs' (by M. Night Shyamalan). There is an interesting article from some guys who REALLY follow and study crop signs: Paul Anderson of the Canadian Crop Circle Research Network has reason to believe that they will be creating some man-made formations to promote the forthcoming movie. Anderson cites a competition or sweepstakes currently being promoted on the official 'Signs' website." Remember, patronize only genuine alien-swirled crop circles!
fake crop circles? (Score:3, Funny)
I'm shocked, shocked!
Crop circle HOWTO (Score:5, Informative)
Well... as long as they're circles, and are made in crops, they're real crop circles...
Anyway, here's an interesting HOWTO [circlemakers.org] you can follow to create your own circles. Here's an excerpt: ;)
Re:Crop circle HOWTO (Score:2)
But to make some of the fancy crop designs? I dont think so unless you are a like a mathematician and you have really precise measurements.
The "real" crop circles arent circles anymore, they are complicated geometric shapes, perfect shapes at that, not something a group of amateurs could make, maybe something a group of bored scientists or mathematicians could make. I dont know why they'd be wasting their abilities running around making circles in crops though, maybe its part of some secret societies ritual, maybe some college fraturnity ? Who knows.
Re:Crop circle HOWTO (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Crop circle HOWTO (Score:2, Funny)
I love the human race, truly I do.
Re:Crop circle HOWTO (Score:2, Interesting)
You must have a strange [artbell.com] definition [artbell.com] of circle [artbell.com]...
the surprising cause of the real crop circles... (Score:3, Funny)
Those of you who were paying attention might remember that about a year ago, there was no such thing as crop circles. The only reason you think you've already heard of them now is because Disney has messed with the timeline.
Now you know why Disney really needed to extend the copyright term... When you're creating works in the past, you need that extra time!
Sue Disney (Score:3, Insightful)
Better yet, don't patronize any crop circles at all, since it's destruction of property (how would you like it if a bunch of jokers spray painted your house or car, or broke into your computer and muddled around with the files? It's all the same -- destruction of property). If Disney's really doing this, then I expect to see a rash of lawsuits against them as well.
Of course, if you believe that crop circles really are made by aliens, well ... I guess it's time to break out the ol' tin foil hat.
Re:Sue Disney (Score:2)
I was wondering this, but expect we'll see a rash of suddenly rich farmers if push comes to shove.
Dave
Re:Sue Disney (Score:2, Interesting)
Sad. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Sad. (Score:5, Informative)
He's right here [randi.org].
For those of you who don't know, James Randi is dedicated to exposing supernatural hoaxes of all kinds. He has an excellent method of exposing psychics. Anyone who claims to have powers can take simple psychic tests. If they pass they even get, IIRC, $1 million. He's never paid a dime.
He also does work with every other kind of proported supernatural occurence. His site can be a fun read (if only to see what some idiots try and get a way with
Okay, talk about supernatural (Score:2)
Triv
Re:Sad. (Score:2)
I think the Scooby Doo gang has patented that process already. Randi's now gonna hafta pay royalties to a dog with a speech impediment.
Theres hundreds of people involved maybe more (Score:2)
Theres no way anyone in their right mind can believe one guy, or a handful of guys make them all.
Maybe when they were just circles i could believe some of those dumb looking guys did it, but now they are getting more complicated in shape, some of them would be damn hard to draw on paper, you'd need precise measurements just to draw it on paper so whoever is doing them now is putting a great deal of effort into them.
Re:Theres hundreds of people involved maybe more (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Sad. (Score:2)
How are crop circles done? Here's some links. (Score:4, Informative)
Easy to Spot (Score:5, Funny)
Any Disney crop circles will have a little (C) mark somewhere nearby.
And maybe some mouse ears.
Re:Easy to Spot (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Easy to Spot (Score:2)
Are they really made by aliens? (Score:5, Funny)
On the other hand, if Disney goes to Canada to make crop circles, we can reasonably claim the crop circles were made by aliens. But if Disney hires Canadians to make the crop circles in Canada, are the circles still considered to be the work of aliens? This is actually a very important topic of discussion, because crop circles have historically been produced by illegal aliens who are not only underpaid and overworked, they're not paying income tax. I don't know about Canada, but the IRS has a whole division devoted to hunting these tax evaders.
The only thing certain is that these circles will probably appear in threes -- two smaller circles sitting atop a larger circle -- and a pop musician will be performing in the center of each one.
Re:Are they really made by aliens? (Score:3, Funny)
| _ _
| / \
| | C |
| \_ _/
|
Makes you wonder.... (Score:3, Funny)
Crop circle nonsense/fun shenanigans. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Crop circle nonsense/fun shenanigans. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Crop circle nonsense/fun shenanigans. (Score:3, Informative)
20% are smarter than him (Score:2)
False Alarm? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Crop Circles == Vandalism (Score:2)
True - it's very likely that stomping someone's fields is illegal in most parts of the world, but given compensation, I'd bet that most farmers would let someone (i.e. Disney) do it.
Re:Crop Circles == Vandalism (Score:2)
Or they'll just do what they normally do and buy themselves a law.
yes, fake (Score:2, Funny)
"Oh, I saw the sign.. and it opened up my mind; I saw the sign." *Whacks self several times*
Here's one that surely came from Disney (Score:2)
hmm.. (Score:2, Interesting)
perhaps you should check out some of the more recent ones on www.artbell.com
if you see the pics they are quite elaborate and definitely not natural, and for having been done in a single night Disney would have had to put down some serious money.. espeically considering the biggest one is right next to StoneHenge (correct me if i'm wrong but Disney still releases movies in teh US first)
i dunno what they look like to you but they look like hints at the solar flares from 2012 that the mayans predicted.. my $.02
disclaimer: this is neither a troll nor am i a lunatic (NATOL)
Re:hmm.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Art Bell is either an idiot or a charlatan, I'm not sure which though. He constantly airs completely unconfirmed anecdotal stories and tries to use that as evidence for all sorts of completely ridiculous things. I suggest you pick up an issue or two of Skeptical Inquirer. It is a very good magazine that has lots of good debunkings on such topics as dowsing, Kirlian photography, and even crop circles. I also suggest that next time you listen to Art Bell, you ask yourself how critical is he being of his "evidence", and whether or not there is a simpler, naturalistic explanation for the things that people claim to see.
if you see the pics they are quite elaborate and definitely not natural, and for having been done in a single night Disney would have had to put down some serious money.. espeically considering the biggest one is right next to StoneHenge (correct me if i'm wrong but Disney still releases movies in teh US first)
No one is saying that Disney is responsible for the crop cirlces that have already occured. If you had taken the time to read the story, you would see that they are concerned that Disney may in the near future sponsor some people making crop circles in order to promote their new movie.
I dunno what they look like to you but they look like hints at the solar flares from 2012 that the mayans predicted.. my $.02
First of all, the Mayans didn't predict any solar flares, they didn't even know what solar flares are. They predicted a huge (earthly) disaster because they believed that those occur during plantary convergences (like the one that will happen in 2012) and other unusual astronomic events.
The only way that a solar flare could bend as much as a single wheat stalk woud be if a satellite malfunctioned because of a flare storm and crashed into a wheat field. The material part of a solar flare is limited to the sun's corona. The ejecta of a flare is just a bunch of charged particles, some of which are attracted to the Earth due to it's strong magnetic field. It is the immense charge that causes the damage, not the particles themselves.
disclaimer: this is neither a troll nor am i a lunatic (NATOL)
That may be true, but if so you are a sorely misguided person who doesn't know much about physics and doesn't know how to critically think.
Re:The Maya and 2012 (Score:2)
Re:hmm.. (Score:2)
Presumably your skilled crop circle maker accompanied by several friends would be able to make pretty much any design using a plan, gps equipment, wooden boards rope, posts etc.
It's quite funny and sad that there are people who believe that alien visitors do them when logic, common sense and websites(!) demonstrate it is actually humans.
Re:hmm.. (Score:2)
Yes... (Score:2)
I remember how 'experts' kept saying that they were too perfect, could not be done in a single night, etcetera.
Of course, then the 'experts' had to scrutinize it and come up withe never-before-heard reasons why it is obviously fake. Of course, easy for them to say when they KNOW it's fake, instead of wanting to believe it's true. Perception is a powerful thing.
Crop circle originators -- Bower and Chorley (Score:5, Informative)
Some links:
An interview with Doug Bower [manchester.com]
An article by Carl Sagan on crop circles [2think.org]
Circlemakers, an art group creating crop circles [circlemakers.org]
flip
Re:Crop circle originators -- Bower and Chorley (Score:5, Funny)
Some people have no lives (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Some people have no lives (Score:2)
Being immature and stupid to make fun of other immature and stupid people, is not really very wise.
Also making fun of people who are open minded, by having hoaxes, only will make things worse if we ever find out aliens did make crop circles and some stupid as hell humans got in the way.
Re:Crop circle originators -- Bower and Chorley (Score:4, Informative)
THey were even infiltrated by a BBC reporter who filmed them making a few of them. However, this *STILL* doesnt explain the ones in Brazil, and other parts of the world that were turning up also. Im sure Bower and Chorley made a few or even a few dozen, but there have been hundreds upon hundreds of these things, all over the world, and they seem to co-appear, rather than being as random as CNBC would have you believe.
Im not a nutcase, and I dont believe there are spaceships landing to play bocce in wheat fields, but two pranksters from England claiming they did them all is kind of ridiculous as well.
Plus, there are other wierd phenomena involved in *some* circles that two guys with a 2x4 and large feet cannot make happen.
Plus, I'd like to know how they get into some of these places that are guarded now.. (some of the farmers have put their fields under video surveillance, found no evidence of people wandering around and had a crop circle the next morning..).
We may never know, but they are happening all over the place.
Next those two will claim they built the bizarre desert mounds that are only visible from aircraft!
Maeryk
Re:Crop circle originators -- Bower and Chorley (Score:2)
That's easy, copy cats. The tools neccesary to make crop circles are simple, and once it's reported on international news, any joker in any country with access to a field of wheat and an idea of how to do it can make them.
Plus, I'd like to know how they get into some of these places that are guarded now.. (some of the farmers have put their fields under video surveillance, found no evidence of people wandering around and had a crop circle the next morning..).
Compliance of the farmer? Have you seen these tapes? It would not be difficult to fake it. A little planning, maybe some cheap video editing equipment. Change dates and times on cameras.
Next those two will claim they built the bizarre desert mounds that are only visible from aircraft!
What are these? Hills?
Im not a nutcase, and I dont believe there are spaceships landing to play bocce in wheat fields, but two pranksters from England claiming they did them all is kind of ridiculous as well.
I don't believe they claimed they made all of them, just English ones, and probably not even all of those. See copycats above.
Re:Crop circle originators -- Bower and Chorley (Score:3, Interesting)
No.. the straight ones are pretty mundane. Its the animals and birds and things that get wierd.. because they are only truly visible from the air.
The are called "nasca" or "nazca" lines, and they are in Peru. (Which, if you believe the UFO-ians, is a real hotbed of interplanetary activity nightly. Most of the really good sightings tend to come from South America.)
anyway.. linkage: [crystalinks.com]
Check it out! neat stuff.. and very likely *NOT* hoaxed.
maeryk
Re:Crop circle originators -- Bower and Chorley (Score:2)
The crop circle evidence does imply that these were not as difficult to make as might previously been thought. Similarly with the likes of figures of horses cut into chalk downs.
Re:Crop circle originators -- Bower and Chorley (Score:2)
What about IP? (Score:5, Funny)
What's next? (Score:5, Funny)
The "Arecibo reply" crop "circle" (Score:5, Informative)
The differences are: silicon added to the list of atomic numbers, different DNA and nucleotides, different "stick figure" and stats, other planets highlighted in the solar/star system and a completely different transmitter.
Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:5, Insightful)
'Flying Saucers' were NEVER seen until one report back in the 60s got quite widespread. Then everyone reported seeing them everywhere.
Even worse, Alien abductions follow the same line. It NEVER happens to ANYONE in thousands of years... One day someone reports it happening. Then it suddenly happens to EVERYONE.
Crop circles are at least understood as fakes by most people because someone came out and admitted to doing them (despite expert opinions that people could not do such a thing
P.S. Next time you see Big Foot/Yeti and the Nesse/The Lockeness Monster, tell them Elvis said "Hi". I missed them at the last Christmas party.
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:2, Interesting)
Ezekiel 1-14:
And the living creatures ran and returned as the appearance of a flash of lightning.
1:15 Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces.
1:16 The appearance of the wheels and their work [was] like unto the colour of a beryl: and they four had one likeness: and their appearance and their work [was] as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel.
1:17 When they went, they went upon their four sides: [and] they turned not when they went.
1:18 As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings [were] full of eyes round about them four.
1:19 And when the living creatures went, the wheels went by them: and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:2)
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:3, Insightful)
The issue of whether the media stories come first or the sightings is controversial. Flying disks and other odd things *were* reported before "they hit big" in the summer of 1947.
For example, a meteorologist (weather person) quietly reported some flying disks about a month or two before the "big wave" hit.
There is also controversy about whether Kenneth Arnold's report (the first "big" story) triggered similar reports on the same day, or if they were independent. The timing is too close to accuratetly tell.
Simular things happened with abduction stories. There were a few reports before the "wave".
Whether the "wave" causes reports or simply makes people feel more comfortable in reporting them is something that is debated over and over in pro and anti UFO newsgroups.
As far as crop circles, I don't know of any history of them. I figured the field is too polluted by fakers to be worth anything. The "grays" of the abduction reports did not want publicity according to the material.
Thus, if there are true alien crop circles and abductions, it is probably not the same group of aliens.
Note that intentional faking is not even a common cause of (sky) UFO reports according to even the skeptics. They usually cite some sort of "media induced hallucination" as the most probable cause of the stickier cases, not fake ships.
I think ufology is an interesting topic of study. The problem is that clowns and greedballs keep ruining the reputation of *any* research into odd phenom.
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:2)
There is also controversy about whether Kenneth Arnold's report (the first "big" story) triggered similar reports on the same day, or if they were independent. The timing is too close to accuratetly tell.
Arnold never reported flying disks. He said they were sort of boomerang-shaped, kind of like the stealth bomber. What he said was that they seemed to skip through the air like a disk skipping across water, and everyone got confused.
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:2)
Confused over what they "envisioned", or confused over Arnold's description?
One theory is that disks were being widely reported about the same time, and a reporter took the word "saucer" from Arnold's description to apply to *other* sightings.
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:2)
While I agree with you on the fact that UFOs were seen and reported before they were popular, you still must admit that the number of UFOs being seen has increased exponentially. It appears that anything that looks even slightly strange must be a spaceship.
I can't count the number of times I've heard about reports of a spaceship landing, with red, blue, and white lights. Of course it turned out that they just saw lights through the trees, where there happened to be a street. So, even emergency vehicles must be aliens.
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:2)
Well, there was a sudden increase in the summer of '47, that is for sure. From the official Bluebook reports, the totals were high until about 1956 IIRC, when they dropped off a bit, then increased a bit in the mid 60's. Bluebook stopped tracking after 1969, so any stats after that are from private organizaions. But between 1947 and 1969 the reports were relatively constant, at least not "exponential".
(* Of course it turned out that they just saw lights through the trees, where there happened to be a street. *)
Well shimmering lights don't make very good evidence of much IMO. Lights are hard to interpret correctly. The best evidence (or should I say oddest cases) are daylight sightings where the outline of the "thing" can be clearly seen.
Even if the media-induced hallucination theories of the top skeptics are correct, the power of such hullicinations to fool cops and pilots is amazing in itself. Hallucinations by cops and pilots is not something to take lightly, for we depend too much on them.
What if they start hallucinating Osama missle attacks based on media reports? That would not be far off if we put stock in the leading skeptic theories.
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Crop Circles, Aliens, UFOs (Score:2)
I thought they all were man made? (Score:2)
Well even if they arent all man made, soon we will find out how convincing man made crop circles are compared to whatever else is making them
Dust Devils (Score:5, Interesting)
I've seen a very large dust devil (about 300 feet high, 100' wide at the top and 25' across at the base) follow the curves of a gravel road for over a mile (and it went *around* a car that happened to be in its way at a crossroads -- quite a sight!!) This road also acted as a thermal barrier when the airport behind it fogged up -- fog always ended at the road as cleanly as if it'd been cut with a giant knife.
BTW you can demonstrate dust devils' tendency to go around objects and continue on in their original line of travel -- just try "catching" a small one by getting in its way. It'll go around you every time (or even "run the other way"), doubtless because of how your being there changes the airflow.
I can easily imagine a pair of somewhat tipsy and mischievious fellows watching a dust devil moving in circles and smashing grain, and saying, "Hey, we can do that, only better!!"
I have somewhat more trouble imagining why aliens would give a shit about making crop circles (if it's communication they want, surely they can be more direct about it!) unless it's really a biohazard marking to warn their fellows.
Re:Dust Devils (Score:2)
We already know how to move faster than light in theory
Also it wouldnt be smart for any species to reveal themselves to us unless they want to fight us. Our history proves we cant even get along with each other.
Re:Dust Devils (Score:2)
The notion that aliens by definition would be super-advanced and benevolent is itself ludicrous, if you really think about it. It's far more likely to be quite the reverse.
Re:Dust Devils (Score:2)
How? simple, take a few hundred random people from hick towns who are dumb enough so no one will believe them, capture their DNA, take their DNA and make alien human hybrids, and slowly mix in with the human race over the course of hundreds of years.
This is how aliens could take over the world without us ever knowing it therefore we couldnt stop it. Its far more intelligent and aggressive than landing in front of the white house and making the annoucement "we are here"
Aliens are older than us and if they can get here its an automatic that they are more advanced than us. We know genetic technology, aliens most likely would have mastered this, if we can clone humans, dont you think aliens could take our DNA and come to earth in human form and take it over from within?
Why have a war when you can just change your genes to look like the people you are trying to take control of?
Of course aliens may have the ability to come here in saucers and have an all out war, but would we do it? honestly would we be stupid enough to go into afganastan with ground troops? hell no, we used stealth aircraft and flying unmanned spy planes, people in afganastan never saw what we were doing or they saw it and had no way to counter it, or they had no idea what the hell they saw in the case of an unmanned craft.
The easiest way to win a war, is to take over from within, the easiest way to take over a country, is to do so from within that countries government itself.
Now, of course, if that doesnt work, plan B would be to launch a more direct attack. But did we launch a direct attack on the russians? No, but we still destroyed them from within.
Re:Dust Devils (Score:2)
As to the sort of DNA-based assimilation you're talking about, that would only work if they were very nearly biologically identical, and even then chances are near 100% that any crossbred offspring would be Mules.
But assuming it works.. it's too late. According to Jack Williamson, it happened over 50 years ago.
Has anyone asked them why they bothered?? I mean, what have we got that they'd want?
Re:Dust Devils (Score:2)
The problem with that scenario is that sooner or later, they'd get caught. Imagine the row when the poor alien finally gets out of court (and maybe jail) and home to his wife:
Alien's Wife: Where the hell have you been? You're six months late!!
Alien: You know those crop circles I've been making for the kids' scrapbook? Er, well, this last one didn't go so good... I had to pay 50 credits and pick up the garbage!!
Re:Dust Devils (Score:2)
Difficult (Score:2)
I suppose some people need an outlet for their artwork and crop circles are the answer
of course it could be aliens, but i really doubt aliens would ever communicate with us, what would they have to gain by doing so?
What I don't understand... (Score:2)
Why would any alien intelligence capable of interstellar travel would choose to communicate using circles in corn but apparently not be able to figure out binary, or radio.
Re:What I don't understand... (Score:2)
"Crop circles, bwaahaha! Those humans, they're SOOO dumb -- they'll believe anything! Hey, maybe we can sell them that useless planet we got stuck with in that last auction."
Disney only Knows how to fake! (Score:2, Funny)
For example:
Fake Mouses
Fake Ethics
Fake concern about Fair Use Rgihts in Copyrights
Fake concern about consumers
Disney should just rename themselves Fakes'R'US
Re:Disney only Knows how to fake! (Score:5, Funny)
Heh ... they even have a Fake Senator.
amusement (Score:2)
Imagine if it were humans, landing on another planet, only to find the natives imitating our "footprints" everywhere. Do you think we'd take that as a sign of intelligence?
Even better than crop circles... (Score:2)
Strategy 1: Make fake crop circles in an attempt to raise publicity for movie.
Strategy 2: Make fake conspiracy about making fake crop circles in an attempt to get a good old-fashioned slashdotting.
whether you believe or not: (Score:4, Insightful)
I agree that most of them are man made, and probably the most intricate ones are man made as well.. but I also remember reading with a giggle as the SKeptic Observer reported definitively that they were being made by "mating hedgehogs".
I feel safe in saying we dont KNOW they are all man made, but we do know a lot of them are.
Check here: for more info. This guy seems to be a genuine researcher who accepts it when his hypothesis dont come out right. [cropcircleresearch.com]
Maeryk
Re:whether you believe or not: (Score:2)
Observing "molecular changes" after the fact isn't very useful. You'd need to observe the same stalk before and after.
As to spinning magnetic needles, all that's required is irrigation equipment in the neighbourhood (we're talking metal water lines that can be half a mile long). And measuring "changes in the magnetic field" isn't useful either, unless you could do so before and after (which would require an ability to predict where the "alien" crop circles are going to appear, and benchmark the site beforehand).
In short, this guy's "evidence" of alien manufacture is just as anecdotal as everyone else's, albeit involving more measurements.
And just because no one was *caught* making 20% of crop circles doesn't make them the work of aliens.
No one caught me making this post either. Maybe an alien typed it instead.
Sponsored Circles... (Score:2)
CSICOP's Investigative Files (Score:4, Informative)
If you're interested in more informed discussion, check out the CSICOP Mailing List [csicop.org], where this topic (Disney's Crop Circle promotion) is also current.
Stop! Patent Time! (Score:2)
Make the Source Forge ads stop, Mommy!
Is the movie a parody? (Score:2)
Of course, I'm the kind who confuses Close Encounters of the Third Kind with Closet Encounters of the Nerd Kind (a wonderful spoof of the other) while watching them to the point that it doesn't matter which one I'm watching - I'm waiting for the singing pastries :-)
Crop Circles are test patterns... (Score:2)
The accuracy with which these "images" are "drawn" seems to fall into two categories, foot-trodden, and laser-like. Many seem, to me, to be the latter.
Some of these images are very complex [crystalinks.com], and yet so accurately drawn, that the very notion they were trod out with plank and rope by a couple of old codgers (or a team of college students even) is pretty unthinkable. They would need sight lines and all sorts of technique for making sure each one of their stompings went right where it's supposed to -otherwise they'd not look so perfect as they do, no?
These highly accurate-looking images are, in my view, a combination test pattern and non-subtle message, imaged with microwave or other high-energy, non-visible laser, mounted on an orbital "Star Wars" missile defense test platform.
The message being, "notice the accuracy with which we draw on your front lawn? we can focus that beam on anybody who pisses us off!" (except Saddam or Osama, inexplicably) There was a hilarious scene along these lines at the begining of the Val Kilmer movie "Real Genius".
An article in New Scientist Magazine asked "How long before we see a manifestation of a Mandelbrot [set] in the fields?" One year to the day after the publication of that question, a mandelbrot set appeared [clara.net] in a field near Cambridge University -where Benoit Mandelbrot had taught.
Crop Circles: Quest for Truth (documentary) (Score:2)
http://www.cropcirclesthemovie.com/ [cropcirclesthemovie.com]
(Disclaimer: I'm not associated with the movie and havent seen it, but I've worked on the website.)
- j
I think all crop circles are man-made, but.... (Score:2)
http://home.clara.net/lucypringle/photos/2001/u
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2002/windmil
Re:step right up folks! read all about it! (Score:2)
Re:Fake Crop Circles? (Score:2)
Re:This could mean that...... (Score:2)
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:3, Interesting)
Only it has happened, many times. Many physicists have shown themselves to be quite credulous, which is why the best debunkers tend to be magicians.
People who get too successful in convincing the world of phenomenon outside the accepted realm of science are ridiculed, tormented, punished and murdered. Or nailed to crosses. Take your pick. There is, quite simply, NO way that a person with genuine abilities would be allowed to change the whole Western belief paradigm by way of James Randi's little challenge. --Think about it. Even in the corridors of accepted science, researchers are regularly assassinated for rocking the boat.
Right. Do you also believe in UFOs, astral projection, mental telepathy, ESP, clairvoyance, spirit photography, telekinetic movement, full trans-mediums, the Loch Ness monster and the theory of Atlantis?
Can you please point out any evidence of researchers being "regularly assassinated"? Beyond the biochemist thing, which is troubling but not necessarily evidence of a conspiracy?
James Randi has too much personal stake in his 'Quest for Truth'. Remember the last time you were caught out and shown to be 180 degrees of wrong in a subject you were not just spouting with authority for years, but upon which you based massive amounts of self-worth? Perhaps this has never happened to you. Perhaps you are very good at the denial game, (which allows you to continue living in a wishful thinking daydream and not feel like a damned fool). This is James Randi. I strongly suspect that he would do almost anything to prevent himself from being proven wrong in a massive public forum. This is the kind of bias James Randi comes installed with. He has NOTHING to do with truth, and everything to do with witch hunting and serving his ego-based agenda.
Only that James Randi's challenge includes an independent judging panel agreed upon by both he and the testee. Go read how the Randi challenge is set up; it's a fair, even-handed way to test supposed supernatural powers. And on another note, he HAS been proven wrong, just not on supernatural/alien issues; check his web page. He freely admits this.
As chance would have it, I happen to know several people who have 'supernatural' abilities but who, a) Have never heard of James Randi and his little propaganda machine, b) have been so sufficiently tormented and stunted for being different while growing up by ignorant and/or cruel people around them, that they instinctively cringe away from such mean-spirited (and most likely fixed) public challenges like Randi's; they would probably shrivel up and die if forced to stand on a stage facing a million eyes determined to see only what they want to see, and to pour out only scorn and disbelief regardless of what is demonstrated
Then tell them to take the test and make a million dollars. There are thousands of people who are convinced they have powers. In controlled experiment settings, they're always proved wrong. ALWAYS. The powers evaporate, leaving a string of excuses, evasions, and prevarications.
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:2)
And that's why James Randi has his own highly rated television show on Sci-Fi and John Edwards is a relative unknown except among a few geeks.
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:2)
And I bet James Randi doesn't approve of those people who send out the Nigeran letters asking help to embezzle millions, either. What a hypocrit. Wait a second, though; I assume since you think that he should encourage people to give money to his oppenents as well as him, you're a steady donater to him?
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:2)
In other words, "damn, I don't have any other examples, so I'll just pretend that I do but won't tell."
This does not mean that there isn't plenty of it out there; there is. Many of the greats, and many less famous scientists have been bullied, persuaded, mind-controled and, yes, in the harshest of circumstances, even killed. Go get over your mental blocks, and then go do some research.
Mind-controlled? How exactly does that work?
No. Only in the controlled experiment settings you choose to look at. --Which again cuts directly to my point that the Evidence skeptics cry for is, for all intents and purposes, unattainable. There have been a wide number of studies which have given positive results of various phenomena. But a good study doesn't mean good marketing.
No. In all experiments. None of the "promising" ones are ever successfully duplicated. This stuff isn't hard to test; if it exists it should show up easily, if it doesn't then it won't.
If someone claims they can bend spoons with their mind, let them try. If someone can read minds, then let's see them do it. There aren't millions of variables here, the majority of paranormal claims are easy to test. They never work. NEVER. It doesn't matter how many ad hominem attacks you launch against me, James Randi, or skeptics in general, it still won't make ESP exist.
but that people writing books I might want to read are penalized for the same thing?
Now you're REALLY making things up out of whole cloth. How are they penalized? This isn't a rhetorical question, please tell me how all the John Edwards, Erich von Danikens, and Uri Gellers are PENALIZED. Go ahead.
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:2)
Mo. In all the properly controlled experiments. Randi is a magician. He knows how to fool people. He sets up the test so that the subject cannot cheat. Don't you find it a little bit suspicious that no one can ever make their 'powers' work under those circumstances?
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:3, Insightful)
If you can bend a spoon, or whatever, under controlled conditions, then you have legimate enough evidence to win the million dollars. It's not like Randi is going to let someone edit in something.
Even video tape of a shuttle launch, shot with the most expensive 'movie quality' equipment could be argued as fake by somebody with such a bent.
Sure. But the claim that science makes, is that I can go down to Houston one evening and watch the shuttle launch. Science is open to people to people looking over their shoulder; even if I'm not looking over their shoulder at this time, I can trust someone else is.
People who get too successful in convincing the world of phenomenon outside the accepted realm of science are ridiculed, tormented, punished and murdered.
Just look at the bloody way John Edwards died, just when people were starting to hear of him.
Science works by proof, and so far has been very succesful at changing the world around us using that proof. All it demands of psychic powers is the same thing.
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:2)
Uh huh.
have been so sufficiently tormented and stunted for being different while growing up by ignorant and/or cruel people around them, that they instinctively cringe away from such mean-spirited (and most likely fixed) public challenges like Randi's; they would probably shrivel up and die if forced to stand on a stage facing a million eyes determined to see only what they want to see,
You don't have to stand on a stage. You don't have to face a million eyes. All they have to do is face Randi, one-on-one, in controlled circumstances, and bend one single spoon with their mind. Or divine the contents of the sealed envelope. Or predict the order of the cards. Or...
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:2)
If that's true -- and it certainly can't be proven otherwise -- then they're welcome to their supernatural powers. But if they refuse to let their powers be tested under controlled conditions, and allow scientists to do repeated experiments, with everything that goes with it, they shouldn't be surprised when most people don't believe them.
Re:JAMES RANDI = FOOL. -Don't use him as an exampl (Score:2)
That's because that's what thinking creatures do. There is no proof that writing this message wouldn't cause the destruction of the Earth. But by my judgement of what is real, this message will have minimal impact of the world. We go around assuming that floors and the ground won't collapse beneath us; it's not always a correct assumption, but someone who didn't believe that would quickly terrify themselves to death.
If scientists didn't prejudge what was real, they would constantly be doing to experiments to see if 2+2=7 or if things fly upwards when dropped. However, scientists like to do useful research, and people prefer to pay them for useful research. So they study stuff that they believe has a decent possibility of being true.
these bounds are subject to the creeds of materialism and naturalism.
By the nature of science, that's about all you can study using it. Supernatural things don't obey rules that allow them to be studied. They won't appear in a labortory, they frequently won't appear on film, and they can be very good at hiding or destroying evidence about themselves. How exactly are you supposed to study them?
There is no fundamental scientific problem with psionic powers. For some reason, however, while we can pull some guy who can bend a crowbar in half with his hands into a lab and study him, people who can bend a spoon in half with his mind tend to not be able to do that when watched too closely.
Re:look for the Union label (Score:2)
Re:look for the Union label (Score:2)
Re:look for CATS (Score:2)
Or the where-abouts of Jimmy Haffa's body in map form?
Or the source code to Windows XP?
Naw, that would starve the nation because it would kill too many crops.