Workstations 'Dirtier Than Toilets' 568
hettb writes "How often do you clean your keyboard and surrounding work area? A recent study (also discussed here) found that computer workstations harbour 400 times more health threatening bacteria than the average toilet seat. If you're anything like me, spending most of both professional and personal time in front of your computer, this is sobering news. "
I'll lick my space bar if you lick your toilet rim (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I'll lick my space bar if you lick your toilet (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'll lick my space bar if you lick your toilet (Score:3, Insightful)
BUT, there is a large difference between the microorganisms occupying your skin and computer and those that MIGHT be in your toilet (or on it).
i.e. Giardia, E. Coli, Clostridia, Salmonella, Shigella are all GI tract infectious and will make you really sick (as a bonus it only takes about five shigella to infect a person), but your skin houses things like Proprionobacterium acnes which won't make you sick but will make your acne worse.
Skin also houses some staphylococcus species but they usually won't cause trouble unless the get inside you in some way.
HTH,
Keith
P.S. I knew studying for medical boards would come in handy someday!
Clean everything (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Clean everything (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Clean everything (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Clean everything (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Clean everything (Score:4, Funny)
In related news (Score:2, Funny)
Workstations? (Score:3, Funny)
cooool (Score:3, Insightful)
viruses and the like. Keeps your body tough
and your immune system strong...
all that antibacterial soap shit gonna
kill you one day...
not really kidding in case you are wondering
Re:cooool (Score:2)
not really kidding in case you are wondering
If only I hadn't spent my mod points earlier today, I'd give you another +1. For the curious, check out The Coming Plague [amazon.com]. It's a good read and explains fairly well in layman's terms where we're going wrong, and what the consequences are.
Re:cooool (Score:2)
Of course, who knows how nasty the 'antibacterial' agent is to you, either. I don't.
-Billy (who DOES support the use of soap -- odd, perhaps I'm hypocritical or simply a luddite)
Re:cooool (Score:2)
Re:cooool (Score:2, Informative)
I have no clue if he was right, but I always figured he knew more about the topic than me...
Re:cooool (Score:5, Informative)
Bacteria can get resistant to antibiotics put there'll always be something antibacterial that'll kill it..
Consider a soap that's 70% ethanol. Just applying that ethanol over bacteria will kill it. Doctors don't use pure ethanol for disinfecting instruments for nothing.
Yes, boicott overuse of antibiotics but definetly do not hesitate to use other means of antibacterial products. Overprotecting your living enviroment is bad because it leads to poor immune system but being rational with this never hurts..
Oh, try taking a small dose of arsenic every day and watch your health detoriate over time.. Everything doesn't make you stronger. That's how they got Napoleon, anyway.
Re:cooool (Score:4, Informative)
Overuse of anti-bacterial products is strongly linked to increased over-sensitivity and allergy to dust, pollen and animals etc.
Live in an anti-bacterial environment for a few years and you'll find that you can't spend much time outside anymore, due to the pollen, car exhausts and parfume/aftershave.
Since people started to move into cities, got higher standards of living, and a much cleaner living area, the number of cases of over-sensitivity to all these things (animals etc.) has rocketed sky high.
I'm not sure it has anything to do with the immune system, as pollen or animal hair or aftershave are not viruses or bacteria.
Immune system (Score:4, Interesting)
If you have a weak immune system, you are very likely to get sick no matter what - quite possibly very sick - with or without using "anti-bacterial" products - unless you isolate yourself in a bubble, like people with Severe Combined ImmunoDeficiency (SCID, a.k.a. bubble boy syndrome) have to.
(*) Same applies to many viruses. Some people in experiments had live cold virus put up their nose! Some of the people did not get sick. Why? Because their immune system was strong.
Not letting your immune system even fight normal battles makes it both ineffective - leading to more infections, not less, and overreactive - leading to more allergies, asthma and even auto-immune diseases (such as Lupus and MS).
Well .. i suppose (Score:2)
I don't know about you . but 'watermelon blast' anti-bacterial hand satatizer(tm) smells good enough to eat
you just have to have a BIG glass of water handy.
[nothing like cleaning the pipes]
Re:Well .. i suppose (Score:5, Funny)
Whoah, I read "anti-bacterial hand satanizer(tm)" for a moment there. Scary stuff.
Re:cooool (Score:2, Funny)
Re:cooool (Score:2)
The funny thing is that people that I know who use paper towels to open restroom doors, or use ass gaskets on a perfectly dry toilet seat seem to me to be always sick. These are the ones who have that antibacterial evaporating hand rub crap in their desks and who constantly worry about bacteria, they are always sick. I've told them my theories about how killing all of the bacteria makes your immune system weaker, and how trying to sterilize your life just makes you more vunerable to colds and the flu, but they just blame me for being dirty and making them sick, so I just sneeze at them and walk away.
I recently when to Ghana in Africa, and because of some problems I went for a week without any malaria medication or without my yellow fever immunization. The only health problem I had was a little travellers diareah when I got back and nothing was going to stop that. IMHO the only thing that this huge antibacterial craze is helping is the companys that make the REALLY expensive products that clean you, and the bacteria itself, because it is getting stronger.
SMACK! (Score:2, Funny)
Getting things out of proportion (Score:4, Insightful)
Why get paranoid about bacteria that naturally crawls over pretty much everything in our environment. Have you got ill off your keyboard? No, I didn't think so.
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2)
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2, Insightful)
Now, that might point to an interesting distinction between "personal" computers and shared workstations, although I'll bet that personal computers are way dirtier, just by virtue of the fact that it's personal. On the other hand, those machines in university labs are probably pretty scungy.
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2)
no, but my keyboard got ill on me. I spilled my coffe cup on it one hour ago. The thing is utterly wasted (big cup, hot coffee).
Well, that's the way true keyboard must depart! So long buddy. You really had your way, especially when you add those little annoying useless letters at really bad times, but I kinda liked you.
I can't say I really like this new generation keyboard I reaplaced you with. Too much hype! wireless is good for changing channels with xawdecode, but is worth nothing in strafe jumping!
I really miss you...
on an unrelated note, this fufme site looks down...
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2)
And that's why it's a good idea to eat in nasty, unsanitary, hole-in-the-wall restaurants occasionally so you can keep your immune system in a good state of practice.
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2)
Unfortunatly, like everythink else, there are a million footnotes to the study such that it is useless for practical purposes.
Examples: My dad grew up on a farm, and remembers when they finially got indoor plumbing and didn't have to use the outhouse. (which was right next to the well) He cannot mow the lawn without wearing a resperator.
My cousins have asthma, blamed on the carpet in their basement.
The above aside, I generally agree with the results, that is if you don't get enough exposure to illness, your system gets weak. However there is a lot more than exposure to wellness.
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:5, Insightful)
The bacteria that do survive are resistant to the germicide and have an ample food supply (all their competitors were killed off). If any of these newly evolved resistant bacteria are harmful to humans, we now have a problem.
Hospitals are increasingly fighting infections by bacteria that are resistant to all known drugs. The major cause seems to be antibacterial supplements in chicken and cattle feed.
So next time you wipe down that counter with Clorox-guaranteed-to-kill-99.9%-of-all-germs, think about how happy the remaining 0.1% of those buggers are going to be, and remember, they do know how to multiply.
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:3, Funny)
I have to agree with (parts of) this post.
I have a strain of bacteria living along the outside edge of my bathroom sink that are resistant to everything I've thrown at them. I've gone so far as straight bleach and scrubbing with a toothbrush, and then rinsing the area thoroughly. "That'll get 'em this time," I always say. But sure enough, later that day, I see the thin familiar orange line of ogranic matter lining the edge of the sink.
I've just learned to live with them now. The tiny crevice they occupy hasn't gotten any larger in the last year that I've abstained from purposely attempting to obliterate them and so long as they don't mutate into a cockroach or Adam Sandler, they're fine with me.
Re:Getting things out of proportion (Score:3, Interesting)
The action of antibacterial soap kills all bacteria, leaving an equal playing field. Not so good.
gattaca (Score:3, Insightful)
Americans are obsessed with microbes (Score:5, Interesting)
Lets see some things that are probalw worse.
1) Any food/drink ordered from think geek
2) Coke
3) Paint fumes/dust and metal dust from people Modding their case.
4) Sitting in from of this damm irradating device for 12hrs/day
5)
6)
203331) some extra bactera on your desk
Re:Americans are obsessed with microbes (Score:4, Insightful)
What we do have is the world's most advanced Advertising System. Remember the definition of marketing: "Create demand". Most of what you see as microbe obsession is actually our advertising industry, trying its darndest to create an obsession with microbes.
By and large, they only succeed right where it probably does the most damage, with some parents of small children, which is of course a lot of people, but hardly the whole country. Most of the rest of us do not consider it a terribly big deal, up to and including the small children.
If all you watch is our advertising, you get a pretty skewed idea of our country, because what you really see is what Corporate America wants it to be. That does not always correspond to reality, and I dare say here's one place it has largely failed. We're not obsessive about microbes on a macro scale.
Note: I'd be surprised if there's a lot of bacteria in Coke. First, I'm sure the water's sterilized, probably distilled, same for the rest of the ingredients. This is a *good thing*, necessary for any product like Coke. (Consider pasteurization.) Second, that's one nasty environment for bacteria to grow in; I know some forms of mold can manage (don't ask), but it takes a lot of time... radiation hazards are usually seriously overstated (again for essentially marketing reasons; the people most worried about radiation are the ones least able to understand it, and so there are people capatalizing on this). Paint fumes and metal dust are probably underrated.
Solution: move to the toilet... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Solution: move to the toilet... (Score:3, Funny)
This is the complete integrated toilet office solution.
Scientific research has shown this working environment to be a whopping 400 TIMES healthier than most computer desks!
Similar products could cost you $500 or more. We are offering you this incredible invention at the measly cost of four payments of $19.95.
Order Now, don't delay!
So? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:So? (Score:5, Funny)
If you're sitting in something wet at your workstation, it's time to lay off the pr0n sites.
Sobering? (Score:3, Funny)
Not if you are growing brewers yeast in the keyboard like me! I call the subsequent beer, Windows 99 [macobserver.com].
Well DUH! (Score:2, Funny)
This doesn't surprise me... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:This doesn't surprise me... (Score:2)
My workstation (Score:4, Funny)
Coming soon... "QWERTY-WIPES" (Score:5, Insightful)
Hmmm. Imagine that. A company that makes cleaning/germicidal products finds that a common workplace/home device is direly in need of disinfecting. I wonder if we'll be seeing Clorox Key-Wipes any time in the very very very near future?
Re:Coming soon... "QWERTY-WIPES" (Score:5, Insightful)
Getting Personal! (Score:4, Informative)
At school I remember some old ADM keyboards that had slippery keys, with much blackness just aside from the contact points. Shudder!
Those were public terminals, though.
I've noticed that keyboard cleanliness really depends on the person. Not whether they dump coffee and cheetos on them, but whether their hands are particularly heavy sources of oil.
Re:Getting Personal! (Score:3, Funny)
Thank god! (Score:4, Funny)
Oh my god (Score:3, Funny)
I clean my cubicle every Friday (Score:2)
The absolute worst offender has to be phones though. If your phone gets used by anyone but you, you're well advised to disinfect the mouthpiece, especially during the cold/flu season.
Gee, A study funded by Clorox? (Score:3, Interesting)
Let's see- after using our new "Desk Wipes" product for just two days you too can rid your desk of 99.9% of those nasty microbes.
Hmmm.....
Not My Keyboard! (Score:2)
Who said that a toilet seat is diirty (Score:2, Informative)
Un-Hygienic Data on the London Underground
During Autumn of 2000, a team of scientists at the Department of Forensics at University College London removed a row of passenger seats from a Central Line tube carriage for analysis into cleanliness. Despite London Underground's claim that the interior of their trains are cleaned on a regular basis, the scientists made some alarming discoveries:
This is what was found on the surface of the seats:
* 4 types of hair sample (human, mouse, rat, dog)
* 7 types of insect (mostly fleas, mostly alive)
* vomit originating from at least 9 separate people
* human urine originating from at least 4 separate people
* human excrement
* rodent excrement
* human semen
When the seats were taken apart, they found:
* the remains of 6 mice
* the remains of 2 large rats
* 1 previously unheard of fungus
It is estimated that by holding one of the armrests, you are transferring to your body the natural oils and sweat from as many as 400 different people. It is estimated that it is generally healthier to smoke five cigarettes a day than to travel for one hour a day on the London Underground. It is far more hygienic to wipe your hand on the inside of a recently flushed toilet bowl before eating, than to wipe your hand on a London Underground seat before eating. It is estimated that within London, more work sick-days are taken because of bugs picked up whilst traveling on the London Underground than for any other reason (including alcohol).
Re:Who said that a toilet seat is diirty (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Who said that a toilet seat is diirty (Score:5, Informative)
Bathrooms vs. Kitchens in pathogen department (Score:3, Informative)
See http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arch/9_14_96/bob2.h
Sounds reasonable (Score:4, Funny)
Alcohol wipes (Score:2)
I've used some campus computing sites where there is a brown slimy coating on everything. Probably a result of human oils produced during the many all-nighters around exam time.
It's quite logical and comes as no surprise... (Score:3, Insightful)
Human beings are inherently dirty creatures. We can go through the whole day, doing almost no physical activity, and all the while, we're pumping out grease and perspiration. Meanwhile, we're going around touching door handles, money, and all sorts of other unsanitary surfaces. We then proceed to touch our keyboards and mice with these filthy hands. On top of that, many of us eat at our workstations, providing an ongoing food supply to whatever may be living on our input devices.
Now, think about the toilet. We spend very little time there. We never touch the seat. When we urinate, we're dispending a liquid that contains amonia and is actually steril. When we deficate, we're not very likely to get the contents on any surface except inside the bowl, where it is promply removed by about 5 liters per second of water.
Again, it comes as no surprise that computers are just outright dirty.
And this is surprising, why? (Score:2)
On the other hand, no matter how yummy the burrito was, I'll be damned if I'd leave a single drop of its corpse sitting on the seat of my toilet. I mean, really, how often do you leave *ahem* "dirt particles" where they land? Roughly never, particularly if 1) you ever have or intend to have a female over to visit or 2) ever expect to use that particular toilet again.
So, tell me again why I should be surpised?
Unfair comparison (Score:2)
One of the things that everyone seems to miss when people make this kind of comparison is that toilet seats are actually remarkably clean. They're engineered to be a very bad place for bacteria to grow, and people routinely clean them with strong antiseptic solutions. In fact, a typical toilet seat has fewer bacteria than a typical kitchen counter. Your toilet seat may very well be the cleanest place in your house.
To really amaze your users (Score:3, Funny)
There's a reliable study... (Score:3, Funny)
when I clean my stuff (Score:2)
I clean my "workstation" (I usually call it a "computer" but whatever) when either 1) keys don't come up again when pressed or 2) the trackball no longer rotates.
Other than that, I let the ol' immune system take care of it.
I believe every word of it. (Score:2)
I plucked it out, and thought it was pretty weird. I have shoulder length hair, and here i find a short and curley, rough textured looking hair about 1 or 2 inches long.
I need to get out more.
Imperfect understanding of science (Score:2, Insightful)
health-threatening? (Score:2)
The Slashdot version notwithstanding, I saw nothing in either article indicating that the study identified health-threatening bacteria. Just plain bacteria. The study is funded by Clorox. Think there's an agenda?
Bacteria -- the stuff that makes life possible (Score:2, Insightful)
Gotta love the media's constant portrayal of "bacteria" as something to be feared and destroyed at all costs. Bacteria are the basis from which all life (based on the cell theory definition) on Earth evolved. Not only that, but without them, we could not exist. Bacteria fix nitrogen to the roots of the plants we eat (or the plants which our cattle and pigs and chicken eat); bacteria (specifically, cyanobacteria, not "algae" and not "plants") created the oxygen-rich atmosphere billions of years ago and continue to contribute to it. Bacteria line our intestines and create vitamin K, which the body is unable to produce. Bacteria teem over every square inch of our bodies and can thrive in the most extreme of conditions. Any efforts to senselessly control or kill them will always be met with stronger resistance. Bacteria have been effectively "communicating" by swapping DNA plasmids for billions of years; collectively they form what could be seen as a neural network with far more evolutionary power than the entire human race. Making them out to be the enemy only creates a self-fulfilling prophesy.
Yes, there are quite a few nasty bacteria out there, but the world is for the most part an equilibrium where these few strains are kept in check by the sheer volume of other harmless or beneficial bacteria.
I say, the more, the merrier! Did you know that salmonella used to die at freezing temperatures, until scientists attempts to create a concoction of various strains of bacteria with which to innoculate chickens? The salmonella evolved and resisted so well that it thrives better than ever before. Let that be a lesson to the fools out there who want to kill every "bacteria" in their presence.
Heat kills germs (Score:2, Funny)
white powder=sugar or ... (Score:2)
Infected Elbows (Score:2)
Anyway, I've been cleaning regularly with bleach and have found that the problem goes away.
FYI
Your keyboard has some good company then... (Score:2)
Cold Hard Cash! Yup, it's a fact. That's why many places require food service staff to wear platic gloves if they also handle cash.
It's a lost cause to try to avoid bacteria completely and, as the other posts here point out, you don't really need nor should you want to.
P.S. - I know guy who are plumbers who will stick their bare hands into stuff you don't even want to know about. After a good gon of hand cleaner they'll go and grab a sandwich. A few of them are almost as old as dirt too.
don't forget the sponsor... (Score:3, Insightful)
needless to say, it's in their best interest to jack up bacteria paranoia levels whenever possible.
nowhere does it say that the bacteria levels on the desktop are unhealthy, just higher.
Re:don't forget the sponsor... (Score:2)
this just in, clorox is introducing their new plastic keyboard cleaner, with free keybrush!
Warts (Score:3, Interesting)
Obvious question (Score:2)
Take all the keycaps off and put them in soapy water?
If so, it's no wonder nobody does it.
oh well (Score:2)
Toilet seats are generally pretty clean (Score:2, Interesting)
Marketing scam for sanitizing wipes (Score:5, Informative)
The bacteria in someone's other excretions - especially saliva, feces and the delightful sexual juices - are potentially infectious. Blood is more likely to contain viruses (since blood borne bacteria generally kill you stone dead). Unless the other person has a staph infection on their fingertips, the bacteria on their keyboard are not. Even the infectious stuff in snot, which often ends up on people's fingertips, is also (usually) viral and, in any case, generally killed by being dried out.
The fact is - most of the organisms that remain infectious after being dried out live in your scat.
Whatever the bacteria count on a desk, I'd recommend eating off of one over eating off a toilet, which is likely to harbor some small number of bacteria (or other parasites) that favor the human digestive tract.
This is not to say that staph infections are not a real problem; especially in hospitals, which (generally) do use disinfectant soap. I am saying that alarm over the bacteria on your desk is premature.
Researchers also separated office workers into two groups: one group used disinfectant wipes to clean their desks, phones and computers; the other group did not.
Reee-lly! What an interesting project. I wonder who funded it? I have some other observations about people who clean their desks with sanitizing wipes, but I'll leave the psychoanalysis to the professionals.
Dr. Gerba has also done work on how anti-bacterial kitchen supplies reduce of risk for disease [state.ok.us] (html courtesy of google [216.239.37.100].) Search the document for "Gerba".
Hell, take a look at his press coverage overall. [google.com]
Let's be frank (Score:5, Funny)
Workstations vs Users (Score:3, Funny)
Ugh (Score:3, Funny)
clorox (Score:3, Insightful)
I wouldn't expect the average person to go around collecting samples from all of the surfaces in their house to grow in dishes and find problematic places.
The results don't surprise me at all. Anyone who's taken a high-school level biology course has probably done exactly that in class and found that commonly handled items have lots of bacteria. I believe door knobs and phones were the worst surfaces tested by my class. (which reminds me of a particular chapter of the hitchhikers guide...)
Everything (Score:3, Funny)
Your kitchen cutting board [www.rnw.nl] has 200 times more fecal matter than the average toilet seat. Thats why I've started preparing all my meals in the bathroom, using the toilet seat for a cutting board instead (hey, its 200 times cleaner, right?)
Well, this article has convinced me. I'm going to dip my telephone in the toilet once a week for a good cleaning. No more germs for me.
Funded by The Clorox Company? (Score:4, Insightful)
Unlike the Slashdot lead in, they did NOT say the bacteria were "health threatening." They did not say the "germs" were dangerous. They didn't say they had shown that they caused disease. They did not say they POTENTIALLY could cause disease. They did not say that the people using the antimicrobial wipes obtained any health benefits (fewer sicks days, etc).
All they said was, there were bacteria on your keyboard. Big deal. There are bacteria in cheese, in yogurt, in sauerkraut, in your own mouth right now, in your own gut right now, etc. There are not just bacteria but MITES in your eyelids.
Yes, it's true that colds in particular are spread more by hand contact than by droplets in the air. I'd bet that you are at far more risk when you shake hands then when you use someone else's keyboard.
Paranoid..... (Score:3, Insightful)
Think of the Children! (Score:4, Funny)
Dear God! Our poor little babies being babysat by the computers are catching bacterial infections from our filthy, filthy electronics!
Support the Child Online Cleanliness Act (COCA) to mandate child-safe bacterial filters on all library computers!
Stop the scourge of scurvy being brought home by your children using the same computer as some scuzzy homeless person!
Lord knows I always keep a box of handy-wipes by the computer for, um, cleanliness' sake.
Health threat? Says who? (Score:3, Insightful)
From the slashdot article: computer workstations harbour 400 times more health threatening bacteria
Note that the article makes no mention that the bacteria they found were a health threat. News flash! There are ten times as many bacterial cells in your intestines as human cells in your whole body. Not all bacteria are a health hazard, in fact many species are quite helpful in digestion and competing against disease causing bacteria for food and residence. Your entire skin is crawling with the little buggers. I've never heard of computers being a significant reservoir of any type of disease causing agent, but any microbiologists out there feel free to enlighten me.
Bacterial Slashdotters (Score:3, Funny)
I guess it won't be that long until these bacteria start making those utterly pointless "first post" posts to Slashdot. Hell, they're probably already more mentally developed that most of those lamers..
Re:makes sense (Score:5, Insightful)
But really, isn't this what we have immune systems for? If we spent all our time chasing every last germ, we'd end up like Howard Huges or Mr Burns.
This is obviously the basis for a marketing campaign by the Clorox company.
Re:it doesn't help... (Score:2)
Yeah, like quit her job!
Re:keyboard cleaning (Score:2)
The dishwasher also works well, so long as you don't use the heat drying cycle or too much soap. I've taken home a stack of dirty keyboards from work on more than one occasion, though I admit that I do get odd stares from my coworkers for it.
Re:Well, I think we know what's in most geek's KBs (Score:2)
Great revenge tactic on a bandwidth-hogging cow orker, though.
Take one jeweller's screwdriver. Drag it horizontally between two rows of keys. If it comes up loaded with pubes, it's game over.
Bonus points if the boss is within earshot when you exclaim "Fuuuuuck, look at all the fuckin' pubes! What the fuck were you doing the other night when you billed those 12 hours of overtime?"
(After you do this, I'll point out that you'll probably never want to eat Cheezy-Poofs or popcorn at work again.)
Ugh! (Score:2)
Virg
Re:UV-C Sterilizers (Score:5, Informative)
STOP.
While a UV-C (aka shortwave UV, 280-100nm, germicidal) lamp might be safe and effective for things that fit in an enclosed sterilizing chamber, the unit on the web site clearly isn't designed for that. In order to use it on a keyboard, you'd have to defeat the safety interlock and hold it over the keyboard. This does not sound like a good idea.
While your hands are designed to withstand some UV-C exposure before getting hellaciously sunburned, your eyeballs certainly aren't. Exposure to UV-C is a great way to get cataracts, corneal, or retinal burns.
If you were to use this unit as depicted (pointing an unshielded UV-C source at household items), the reflected UV-C (which you can't see, because it's outside the visible spectrum) from these items could eventually cause serious, permanent damage to your eyes.
Furthermore, the type of person to worry about "germs" on their combs, door handles, and phones to the extent of spending $180 for a UVC lamp for regular sterilizations thereof (I'm trying not to say "hypochondriac" :-) is precisely the kind of person likely to overuse such a device and overexpose their eyes to it.
Furthermore, most of the gunk-retaining surfaces in a keyboard are hidden from light. So if you're worried about germs from gunk in your keyboard, a UV light isn't gonna kill everything anyways. Disassemble the keyboard, wash it with good ol' soap and water, dry thoroughly, and reassemble.
And finally, if you still want to fuck with UVC, $130 for a hand-held 4W UVC source is pretty pricy compared to $40 for a comparably-sized EPROM eraser.
Awright, public service mode off. Now for the fun gadget on the page -- looks like a 4W battery-operated blacklight. (You can get a 15W 18" wall-mountable blacklight from Home Despot for the same price, though, which is way more fun, 'cuz it "lights up" the whole room.)
Another funny note about the site linked to by the parent post - the "personal inspection light" the tout is just a blacklight (UV-A) tube.
It works because many of the compounds in piss, puke, and shit, as well as some - but not all - molds, will fluoresce under UV-A. (You pr0n-hounds are safe, jizz doesn't glow under UVA)
If you shine a blacklight on someone's pants and notice big splotches of glowing stuff, it doesn't mean they've pissed themselves recently, it means they poured their laundry detergent onto the load of laundry before adding the water. Most laundry detergents make clothes "whiter" by adding a fluorescent dye. The clothes look drab under normal lighting, but if you go outside, the small amount of UVA in sunlight will make the clothes look "brighter".
Another fun trick to play with blacklights is to wave 'em around monitors and watch the phosphors glow. The old-school Sun 21" monochrome tubes really sing when hit with UVA.
Bottom line: UVA (blacklight) is fun to play with.
UVB and UVC, however, are not to be fscked with.