Comet Hunting For The Masses 118
khendron writes "In this article in Wired the most awesome past time is described. Comet Hunting. On you computer. No more cold nights outside with the telescope. Sit back with a cola, fire up the broadband, and start looking." From the article: "Amateurs looking at the SOHO images on the Web have found 76 percent of the 428 new comets that have turned up in SOHO images. Of the 31 people who have discovered comets, 21 of them are amateurs. They come from 10 different countries, including Australia, Great Britain, Germany and China. "
Distributed Computing (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Distributed Computing (Score:1)
Wooosh (Score:5, Funny)
Does NASA need help to identify Planet killers (Score:4, Interesting)
Sort of like: "Neighbourgh's watch for our own beloved planet"...
Don't take this seriously - or do...
Re:Does NASA need help to identify Planet killers (Score:2)
Geeks (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Geeks (Score:1)
Louis Franks's mini comets (Score:1)
This Frank fellow saw these black dots on UV weather satellite images and though they were clumps of water delivered by mini comets hitting the earth. This mini comets are supposed to be house-sized fluffy snowballs, and there are a lot of problems with this theory -- why is the Moon not getting hit with these things, producing a thin water vapor atmosphere?
As pointed out, the SOHO comets are not the big honker Hale-Bopp style comets. If the Sun is bombarded with SOHO comets, maybe the Earth is being hit with Louis Frank comets after all.
Re:From the description.... (Score:1)
That is the sadest sig I've seen in a long time.
You should go out more.
Comet hunting. I really want to do this. (Score:5, Funny)
1. Hunt comets
2. Flee nerd-hunters
Re:Comet hunting. I really want to do this. (Score:1)
Re:Comet hunting. I really want to do this. (Score:2, Funny)
No the Herders are the free software version.
Re:Comet Whoring. I really want to do this. (Score:3, Funny)
ELE? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:ELE? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:ELE? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:ELE? (Score:2)
Re:Even more importantly (Score:2)
Re:ELE? (Score:1)
Re:ELE? (Score:1)
Re:ELE? (Score:1)
ob.book
_Lucifer's_Hammer_ Niven
one of the best in the genre
a perfect beach novel, too.
Re:ELE? (Score:2)
Slashdot Effect (Score:1)
15 minutes of fame (Score:4, Insightful)
"Nearly all the comets they find are tiny shards of rock and ice, doomed to evaporate in the sun's atmosphere days after they are spotted. "
It's not like any of these people can point up in the sky in fifty years time and say "Look Jimmy, you see that fuzzy patch of light in the sky that is about to destroy civilisation? Well I discovered it! That's Anarchofascist-Limo-Taco-9...
Re:15 minutes of fame (Score:1, Informative)
I wrote the article. you're almost right about never being able to see the comets again. about 10 percent of the comets found in SOHO images do not appear to be on a collision course with the sun. So there is a chance they'll make it around again. Unfortunately, the short format at Wired forced me to leave out a lot of details like that. For example, most of what is being spotted are known as Kreutz comets, which are the shards of a huge comet (perhaps 100 miles across) that disintegrated sometime in the relatively recent past (less than 20,000 years). They are all coming in on the same trajectory.
regards,
jeff benner
Re:15 minutes of fame (Score:2)
Thanks for the informed reply! I guess I should have done my research a little better.
I do have a question however: Can we predict the orbits of the 10% of comets that SOHO finds but the sun doesn't eat?
I would guess that many of these close-encounter small objects would evaporate so much that they would soon become invisible, and the unknown amount of acceleration due to the solar wind at perihelion would make their orbits hard to predict.
If a dark comet heading out from the direction of the sun did collide with the Earth, I'm guessing the chances of a web-astronomer predicting the collision are still very low.
Be warned (Score:1)
Re:Be warned (Score:2)
Now much easier.. (Score:2, Funny)
Since our friendly neighborhood Heaven's Gate [wave.net] folk obviously got the wrong comet, it comes as a comfort the masses will have an easier time detecting these marvellous rocks.
Re:Now much easier.. (Score:2)
nah... (Score:4, Insightful)
People, part of the fun of "looking for comets, etc." is actually getting off your butt, going outside with your SO, friend, family, what-have-you, and doing it together. Now this is cool, if you would rather spend *EVEN MORE* time sitting on your ass behind your computer. No thanks, I'll grab my telescope and head outside to do this, like I have in the past.
Summary:
crank up your machine, get it running, and then go look outside for yourself.
*Disclaimer: I am at work, it's 4:45am, I'm cranky and there is no reason for me to be here, but I have to be.
-1 troll
Re:nah... (Score:2, Insightful)
An example of this is the British Supernova Hunt [britastro.org], where amateur astronomers (albeit with high-quality equipment) scan the skies for novae, image them and report back the findings, all of which lead to a better understanding of the universe. Professional telescope time is scarce and very expensive, so amateurs can do this time-consuming and laborious work, freeing up the professionals for more exacting science.
There are very few fields where amateurs can feel they contribute something to our understanding - Astronomy is one area where this is possible.
Re:nah... (Score:1)
Re:pimping (Score:1)
I think a girl would be rather impressed if a guy names a comet after her.
I had the same thought, but then I reconsidered. What will the girl do when she realizes that what you named after her is a chunk of ice thats going to melt in the sun? That relationship is probably going to be as short lived as the comet
But if you're lucky enough to find one of the few comets that's going to survive then? Well you'll name a piece of rock after her. A piece that you'll see for a while, and then never again in your lifetime as it flies further and further away from you. Can't say that I like that picture either
What about automating this ?? (Score:1, Insightful)
With image recognition, spectrum detection in an embedded system, which can tell that there is possible comet
SOHO Sales Pitch (Score:5, Funny)
You, like many of the other slashdotters who browse this site may be interested in Astronomy. But alas, Astronomy is one of those "evil" practices where often one must go outside, or even to a planetarium to witness the night sky.
No such need anymore! New and Improved SOHO gives you all the luxury of another nerdy hobby without ever having to leave the house! Just browse the pages, and you too can feel that you're at one with the night sky! Without even having to take your eyes off the computer screen!
Ever worry that you'll lose your lovely monitor tan if you go outside and do anything! Not to worry! SOHO's experience fits in a browser window, along with your threads of GIMPS, SETI@Home, and ProgressQuest to boot! Contribute to 3 1/4 worthy causes at the same time!
But wait, there's more! If you visit our Site, we will give you a nifty "I find comets while surfing slashdot" T-Shirt! This does well with the ladies when talking to them over the webcam.
Act now! Web site is limited as this site is bound to be slashdotted soon.
Visit today! Before that comet with your name on it becomes "Comet AnonCoward-23832"
Re:SOHO Sales Pitch (Score:2, Funny)
Say when? (Score:1)
Oh. You meant pastime! Now all is clear.
OnMyGod! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:OnMyGod! (Score:2)
Comet Hunter (Score:2, Interesting)
The feling that you are a tiny point in the universe is most significantly achieved if you are at night looking to the sky.
Re:Comet Hunter (Score:3, Funny)
Cool concept though - like 40 comets in a pack (or herd, or school maybe) orbiting together.
Re:Comet Hunter (Score:1)
Oh no, another one.......
Re:Comet Hunter (Score:1)
Boy, is that evil or what? (Score:4, Funny)
comet is out there searching for masses of people to kill. Gives a whole new meaning to "Armageddon", I guess I understand all the drama in that movie now.
Amateurs do a lot of the ground work anyway (Score:5, Insightful)
This is hardly unusual. When it comes down to it, amateurs do more than 76 percent of virtually everything practical in astronomy already. Professionals frequently work with amateurs to get and confirm results, and a lot of professional astronomers also do things as amateurs (for fun) when they're not working. Then amateurs keep up with the professional findings, and everyone gets something out of it.
Astronomy is probably one of the only sciences left where amateur hobbyists can and do still contribute so much useful effort towards it.
There's just not enough funding for astronomy and space science to do anywhere near everything that can be done. For example, to get time on any big telescope, a professional has to write up a massive report and convince a board that it's worth researching what they want to do. They often have to book it many months or years in advance for possibly one or two nights of viewing. If there are circumstances like bad weather, it's often just treated as bad luck.
That's about the state of professional astronomy. The resources are so limited that there's a massive reliance on data submitted by and work done by amateurs. Professionals can't watch all the sky all the time. Lots of supernovae, comets and asteroids in the past have been discovered by amateurs from their back yard, reported, and confirmed by professionals before (sometimes) being studied further.
I don't know why you'd want to sit in front of a computer studying photographs all the time when you can go out with a telescope. It's so much more fun and rewarding to be actually doing something, and you actually meet people when you get involved, which is more than most people get from sitting in front of a computer. But I probably feel that way because I'm an amateur astronomer.
Peel your face away from the computer! (Score:1)
The funnest part of astronomy is spending a cold night outside with the telescope. Sure, playing with computers is fun, but not nearly as fun as playing outdoors. I may spend 50 hours a week coding, but I spend as much of the other 118 hours as possible outside - hiking, canoeing, stargazing, etc. Try it, you might like it.
What's a 'past time' ? (Score:2)
Problem with real comet hunting? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Problem with real comet hunting? (Score:1)
SOHO is democratization of comet hunting (Score:4, Informative)
So SOHO is actually a playing field leveler in that sense and makes comet discovery more accessible than before. Sure the is less glory that doing it the old fashion way. It's free, always good weather, timely data. It's also the only legitimate [iau.org] way to get your name in the heavens instead of buying [starregistry.com] stars which is nothing more than a scam IMHO. So, sure, it's sure a much bigger kick to find one at the eyepiece but a SOHO one still counts in my book.
Equipment needed (Score:2)
Until he died earlier this year, Yuji Hyakutake found comets with his 25x150 binoculars [skyandtelescope.com]. Even then though, usually it's rewarding just tracking down and finding these things that the professionals find. Having a big telescope doesn't hurt, but it's not absolutely necessary. What really helps is keen eyesight, a certain amount of patience and experience, and an extremely good knowledge of what the sky and background stars should look like in whatever region you're looking.
Big telescopes aren't that much of a big thing, either. I know several people with 20"+ telescopes on homebuilt dobsonian mounts... and they are monster amateur telescopes, with the main significant expenses being the mirror and the time to build it. Apart from that it's just having somewhere to put it. I'm not suggesting that it's something for everyone, but it's hardly out of reach, either.
hunter-seeker comets?! (Score:1)
When I first read this i read it as Comet hunting for the masses--as in Comet is actively seeking out and attempting to run over (in a cosmic sort of way) 'the masses' whoever they might be.
I got a good chuckle out of it for about 10seconds.
Again this is pre-coffee, so that might explain it.
What about naming rights? (Score:2)
What about comet Slashdot?
or Microsoftsux
or....
or...
Re:What about naming rights? (Score:1)
Wait.. (Score:1)
Discover a Comet While on the Internet with SOHO (Score:2)
SOHO, launched over six years ago as a project of international cooperation between the European Space Agency (ESA) and NASA, has discovered more than 420 comets in just under six years. This makes the spacecraft the most prolific comet finder in the history of astronomy. Most of the comets were first spotted by amateurs around the world who downloaded SOHO's real-time images to their home computers. Anyone with Internet access can take part in the hunt for new comets and be a comet discoverer.
A new comet was discovered over the Internet by a Chinese amateur astronomer visiting the website for the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft. The comet "C/2002 G3 (SOHO)" was first reported on Friday, April 12, by XingMing Zhou of BoLe city, in the XinJiang province of China, who discovered the comet while watching SOHO real-time images of the Sun on the Internet. The comet is a new comet, not belonging to any known group.
"From September 2000 to now I have been trying to find SOHO comets, and I've discovered 13 comets, one of which, designated '2001U9' and initially cataloged by the SOHO project as 'SOHO-367,' was the brightest one in the last two years," said Zhou, who previously spent more than 1,600 hours since his 1985 graduation scanning the heavens with his 15cm F/5.3 reflector telescope to discover a single comet.
"What's exciting about these near-sun comets is that we are exploring a population of comets that has never been seen before because they are very small and faint," said Douglas Biesecker, a solar physicist with L3 Com Analytics Corporation, Vienna, Va. "By the time their orbits take them close to the Sun so they become bright, they are lost in the Sun's glare and require a space-based coronagraph like that on SOHO to be seen." Biesecker, who is affiliated with the SOHO program at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., confirms potential comet discoveries as they are posted to the SOHO website.
C/2002 G3 (SOHO) will be visible in SOHO's Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) C3 images until Saturday, April 20. The comet was first visible late in the day on Thursday, April 11. It entered the field of view at the bottom edge, almost directly under the Sun. It is moving upward to the left, and will eventually move back toward the right, exiting from the LASCO C3 field of view at the top edge, to the right of the Sun. First cataloged by the SOHO project as "SOHO-422," it has been officially designated C/2002 G3 (SOHO) by the International Astronomical Union.
The comet reached the point closest to the Sun in its orbit on April 17 at about 1:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time, at a distance of about 7.6 million miles (12.3 million kilometers). As the week goes on, the comet will move through the field of view more quickly.
In all these images, the shaded disk is a mask in the instrument that blots out direct sunlight, making faint comets and the dim outer atmosphere of the Sun, or the corona, visible. The white circle added within the disk shows the size and position of the visible Sun.
Solar radiation heats the comet, which in turn causes the outgassing of its water molecules and dust. The dust scatters sunlight at visible wavelengths, making the comet bright in LASCO images. The water molecules break down into oxygen and hydrogen atoms, and the hydrogen atoms interact with the coronal plasma (electrified gas that comprises the extended atmosphere of the Sun).
Story [nasa.gov] from NASA website. Modifications made.
Analog? Really? (Score:2, Insightful)
Right! (Score:1)
- Thomas
Re:Analog? Really? (Score:1)
The problem was that since the software was made by an undergrad a few people took it seriously, but got great results. The system was made in pascal
Right now it wouldn't take more than a week to build such a software, and even less time if you use something like scilab
Some thoughts. (Score:1)
Re:Best. Episode. Ever. (Score:2)
Skinner: Now, this morning we're going to be mapping a small square of sky that's thought to be empty. It's my hope that it's not.
Bart: So what am I supposed to do exactly?
Skinner: Just write down my findings as I give them to you. Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees twenty-two minutes declination: no sighting.
Bart: [bored] Mm hmm.
Skinner: Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees twenty-three minutes declination: no sighting.
Bart: Mm hmm.
[later]
Skinner: Six hours nineteen minutes right ascension, fourteen degrees fifty-eight minutes declination: no sighting. Did you get that one Bart?
Bart: Hell no.
Skinner: Good.