Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Science News

First Permanent Undersea Earthquake Monitor 5

No_Weak_Heart writes "UC Berkley reports on the successful deployment of the first permanent broadband earthquake monitor on the California seafloor. The instrument, similar to this one , is the first of a planned network that will help Berkeley seismologists and MBARI geologists measure earthquake activity from the ocean side of the San Gregorio fault zone. The seismograph was put in place by the Ventana, a remotely operated vehicle(ROV)."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

First Permanent Undersea Earthquake Monitor

Comments Filter:
  • by eXtro ( 258933 ) on Saturday April 13, 2002 @12:01AM (#3333489) Homepage
    Las Angeles was the first undersea earthquake monitor.
  • A few years back I remember Scott Adams writing (in "The Dilbert Future") that cable lines would be a great way to provide internet service, but he didn't think the cable companies would ever get their acts together about it.

    But now that people are used to the idea of transmitting something other than television over broadband cables, we're seeing the technology take on a whole new life. Who would have dreamed, when broadband first came around, that geophysicists would use it in the study of earthquakes?

    Hopefully this will bring us a little closer to more accurate earthquake prediction. It seems like every few months we hear another report of thousands dead in a major quake. The more we understand about the earth, the better off we are.

    • by No_Weak_Heart ( 444982 ) on Saturday April 13, 2002 @01:38AM (#3333726)
      Hmm... perhaps I should have mentioned this in the story item, I suspected there might be some confusion around this.

      The "broadband" in question is not for the transmission of data, but rather the range of the seismograph unit. Broadband seismometers can register sound waves with periods from one-tenth of a second to 100 seconds.

      Seismologists get better data if their instruments can "listen" to a broad range of frequencies. This has always been problematic, in that their is a lot of noise [ucsd.edu] in underwater settings, and that's why they go to the trouble of sticking the unit in a caisson imbedded in the seafloor.

      In Northern California the only one which is on the other side of the fault is an instrument located on the Farallon Islands.

Human resources are human first, and resources second. -- J. Garbers

Working...