Universe Beige, not Turquoise 250
ChazeFroy writes: "The universe is actually beige, not turquoise. Researchers at John Hopkins University initially reported it was turquoise, but the software they used contained a flaw that implemented a non-standard white index to arrive at the mint chocolate chip green color." The other color was much nicer than this beige.
Hey that explains it (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Hey that explains it (Score:3, Funny)
Steve Jobs is protesting the results.
Re:Hey that explains it (Score:3, Funny)
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_493478.htm
Re:Hey that explains it (Score:2, Insightful)
Wrong, wrong, wrong. Black is the natural color for computer cases, and it's damn near close to being the color of the universe too. What they don't tell you, is that they conveniently left the black emptiness of most of the universe out of their computations. If you correct for this, then the don't-call-it-beige color becomes such a dim gray, that it can pass for black.
So if you want your computer to cosmetically integrate with the universe and look like it belongs here, keep buying black. [directron.com] Beige computers will always look like unholy invaders from another dimension.
Re:Hey that explains it (Score:2, Funny)
Damn.... (Score:3, Funny)
I guess God got this idea from his wife.... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I guess God got this idea from his wife.... (Score:2)
yeah. (Score:1)
Hex Code (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Hex Code (Score:1)
Re:Hex Code (Score:1)
In decimal, that's 16710117... Let's sum it up... Damn! So close to 23! I guess the right color would be #FEF9E4
Re:Hex Code (Score:1)
It's just scrambled....
#fef95e -> Eff #95e
Maybe it's saying something about the EFF [eff.org] and Windows 95?
Who knows what the universe is trying to tell us!
Re:Hex Code (Score:2)
Re:Hex Code (Score:2)
That accusation says more about the accuser then the accused.
Re:Hex Code (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Hex Code (Score:2)
You have the WRONG color hex code (Score:2)
The color swatch at space.com is WRONG! The correct hex code taken from the academic page [jhu.edu] is #fff8e7 [jhu.edu] (which is gamma corrected [siggraph.org] assuming a display gamma of 2.2 which is only an average for various available monitors).
Who Cares? (Score:1)
Judging by the huge amount of feedback this one produced, not too many I'd guess. Heck, beige is about the most boring color in the universe. Now we know why.
Re:Who Cares? (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course now I've gone and offended astronomers (no intent to. I just find it odd how many of these "discoveries" are treated as if they change life as we know it: As if realizing something alters the past).
Re:Who Cares? (Score:2, Informative)
The astronomer said that expressing the color for popular viewing was not even part of the original scientific experiment. They did it "as a lark."
"We were doing this as an amusing footnote to our paper," said Glazebrook. "Then there was a huge media thing. We were completely overwhelmed. We didn't expect it to get so big."
Re:Who Cares? (Score:2, Insightful)
Secondly, there are very few things (especially in the academic fields) that are "useful" to the general public. The same argument could be made about art, music, or basically anything else other than food production, medicine, etc. . .
To quote Henri Poincare: "[The scientist does] not study science because it is useful to do so... [but rather] studies it because he takes pleasure in it; and he takes pleasure in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, and life would not be worth living..."
Re:Who Cares? (Score:2)
Secondly, there are very few things (especially in the academic fields) that are "useful" to the general public. The same argument could be made about art, music, or basically anything else other than food production, medicine, etc. . .
Well, medicine does have an impact upon our lives, so when I see a report that they've found a protein that makes rats live 60% longer, that is much closer to relevance to me than if they found that the universe is actually X years old, versus the previously believed Y (versus the previously believed Z...repeat perpetually: As others have said: Someone will use a better CCD and find that the universe is actually a light red, etc).
However, my point is that every new astronomy "breakthrough" is reported in all major media, while breakthroughs in other sciences are ignored : I mean, really, how many people are employed worldwide gawking at stars an unbelievable distance away, while at the same time we're not even close to getting a person on the nearest planet, barely even accomplishing keeping them in a tin can in near-orbit? And every couple of weeks there's the standard "Astronomers have found a twin-star X light years away that spins faster than they've ever found one spin before!". Now, when a giant asteroid is headed towards Earth, I care, but when they find that prior knowledge was ignorant (which is a constant theme for "Breakthroughs"), I don't.
The Answer to the universe (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The Answer to the universe (Score:2)
Pretty colors! (Score:1)
With all the news centering on fluff and rather useless stories these days, we have ffinally found the solution to get people to read stories with "boring" content.. just add color!
Researchers recently discovered that the color you turn when the DMCA takes away your speech is blue. No wait, other report it's a shade of purple.. oh the controversy!
I should have known... (Score:1)
Hmm...the universe and my underwear... (Score:1)
Funny how the article doesn't mention why this *is* science or what is proven by this? Seems like a grad student *who has run out of ideas.*
And everyone knows the color of the universe is 42.
Re:Hmm...the universe and my underwear... (Score:5, Informative)
From Glazebrook's page:
"We admit the color of the Universe was something of a gimmick, to try and make our story on spectra more accessible. Nevertheless it is an actual calculable thing so we believe it is important to get it right."
And:
"Of course, our real motive for calculating the cosmic spectrum was really a lot more than producing these pretty color pictures. The color is interesting but in fact the cosmic spectrum is rich in detail and tells us a lot more about the history of star formation in the Universe. You may have noticed above that the cosmic spectrum contains dark lines and bright bands, these correspond to the characteristic emission and absorption of different elements."
So this actually reveals something about the makeup and history of the universe. Viola, science!
Makes more sense than mint chocolate chip. (Score:3, Funny)
though I've always been more of a butter pecan fan, so the beige is fine with me.
From a colour perspective, it makes much more sense than a shade of green. Every kid who's ever played with play-doh knows that if you mix a bit of this with a pinch of that to create new colours (which is essentially what you get from stars.. blue, red, green, yellow, etc), you eventually end up with that nasty brown lump of play-doh that ends up getting left under the couch for the dog to play with.
Re:Makes more sense than mint chocolate chip. (Score:2)
At least your universe is. My universe is purple.
Three Questions (Score:5, Funny)
Q: Where are you from?
A: Johns Hopkins University.
Q: What is your professtion?
A: We are astronomers.
Q: What color is the Universe?
A:It's green... no, it's beige AAAAAAAaaaaaaaaiiiiiiieeeeeeeeee!
Re:Three Questions (Score:1, Informative)
In order for to cross the bridge, a troll asks you three questions, if you get one wrong you get tossed into the valley.
Re:Three Questions (Score:3, Funny)
He's NOT a troll! (Score:2)
It's not a troll that challenges them. "It's the old man from Scene 24!" [sacred-texts.com]
(Not the best reference site, but the best one is currently down.)
Re:Three Questions (Score:1)
Re:Three Questions (Score:1)
A: I don't know that. AAAAAAAaaaaaaaaiiiiiiieeeeeeeeee!
PC's (Score:1)
I mean, I knew there weren't as many macs, but wow
Bill
So steve Jobs is not God? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So steve Jobs is not God? (Score:2)
Beige vs. White (Score:1, Redundant)
Funny though, I think that the beige on black would have looked more white if the autor didn't comment in bright white text right next to the color.
and I suppose the color will change once more... (Score:2)
I think its much easier to declare black with small bright spots. At least the public can understand that.
I am still curious as to what significance this really has overall. It appears from the article that it was just for the fun of it, so how does it become news? Originality?
Re:and I suppose the color will change once more.. (Score:1)
Hmmm. (Score:1)
I thought the Cosmic Background was Three Kelvin (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I thought the Cosmic Background was Three Kelvi (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I thought the Cosmic Background was Three Kelvi (Score:2)
Re:I thought the Cosmic Background was Three Kelvi (Score:2)
Re:I thought the Cosmic Background was Three Kelvi (Score:2)
Re:I thought the Cosmic Background was Three Kelvi (Score:2)
^^^^Mod this poster up^^^^ (Score:2)
Bob
yet more proof (Score:1)
You're kidding right? (Score:1, Funny)
"Dude, look at the stars"
"Dude, if you like brought all the stars together, I'd bet you they'd be the color of hemp"
"No way man! That's far out!"
...I still can't believe that real equipment and time were used for this study, I'm sure it wasn't cheap, especially the man-hours. If I were a student there, I'd ask for my tuition back!
could it explain the neutral colors in housing? (Score:1)
bleh
The Onion? (Score:3, Funny)
It's nice to see a respected source as space.com using headlines that sound more like The Onion [theonion.com].
Re:The Onion? (Score:2)
This is true, although with the infestation of X10 ads on the net I've become somewhat oblivious to them.
Marketing Idea? (Score:1)
College (Score:2)
Beige (Score:1)
Beige (Score:2, Funny)
The Universe also has Track lighting and a great disco beat.
So that means... (Score:1)
Phew... (Score:3, Funny)
Wonderful (Score:1)
surely (Score:5, Funny)
Re:surely (Score:2)
What?
You mean the Microsoft Way isn't universal?
Re:surely (Score:2)
It's not beige (Score:3, Funny)
and then
Re:It's not beige (Score:2)
Suggestions for naming I11 E Gamma (Score:2)
You know, maybe it's because they complained about "beige" and then called it something horrid like "I11 E Gamma."
OK, how about
That's more like it (Score:4, Funny)
Non-standard (Score:1)
WTF??????? What the hell is non-standard white?
Am I the only one who thinks that maybe these astronomers were inspired by illegal substances at college [Dude, I can see the universe]? After all they got UK artist Damien Hirst (of shark-in-formaldehyde fame) to do their clour calibration on beagle 2. This guy is a complete fruitcake, and with him on their side I am suprised that the clour of the universe was not "magenta with cyan polkadots"......
UK artist Damien Hirst is reported to have provided paintings to travel on the spacecraft. These would be used as test cards for the cameras [bbc.co.uk]
Re:Non-standard (Score:2)
Great; just freakin' great.... (Score:1)
N
Does that mean they have to change the /. color? (Score:1)
Science, a continous error correction approach!! (Score:2, Insightful)
This is brillant (sorry beige...
Eat this, MacBigots (Score:1)
But this color isn't visible from Earth (Score:5, Informative)
However, this isn't what you see from earth at all. Originally I thought they had simulated what would happen if you could "funnel" all the starlight on a dark night visible from Earth (or even outside our atmosphere) and created one beam from it. They've sort of done this, but in their model they've stopped the expansion of the universe and "corrected" the light to make it appear as if the universe is static and all those galaxies are not actually moving away from us.
So, I'm not sure what to make of this color - it's not one you'd ever actually see: it's not "real" in the sense you could measure it somewhere.
Re:Actually this color is visible from earth (Score:2)
But that's just it - my understanding of what they said was that they removed the redshift from the spectra. In other words, had they just gone up in space and pointed a spectrometer all over the place in Earth orbit (forgive my simplistic account) they would have come up with a much redder hue for the universe, since most of the incoming spectra would be significantly red-shifted, and that would have produced a very red average.
It's even worse than that (Score:2)
It's even worse. While they did correct for the red-shift, they did not apparently correct for the "lateness" of the light. Since we are seeing galaxies a few billion LY away in the colors they had a few billion years ago, we are not really averging their current colors. Earlier stars form from the basic gasses of the big bang were hotter and bluer. Later stars have heavier atoms, and are not quite as hot, and so they shine at a lower temperature, hence more red. So if we could correct for the time it takes for light to travel, and see the current light right now it might be more red (certainly more if you do include red-shift in this), or less red (if red-shift made it redder than age).
Re:But this color isn't visible from Earth (Score:2)
What about distance/age effects? As someone else pointed out, the light hitting us here is an amalgam representing many eras of the universe's past. The light hitting us from 10 billion years ago will be much bluer (since it's younger) than light hitting us from 5 million years ago, for instance (discounting redshift, as they did).
So, the "average" color they created would differ if the aliens were located elsewhere in the universe, unless the universe is truly so uniform (and "wraparound", such that there is no "edge") that no matter where you are, you always have statistically the same mix of galaxies at x distance away at y luminosity, etc, even if they're different galaxies for different locations, thus always causing the same "average" to appear regardless of where you are. But do we know this would happen? I'd think there would be some localization, which makes this, again, kind of Earth specific (or at least Milky Way specific). So, again, I'm not sure what this "de-redshifted" color represents, since while they've removed the effects of expansion, they've not removed the effects of age. I'm just saying it's kind of an abstract thing they're representing with this color.
The magic color (Score:3, Funny)
Apparently (Score:2)
I'll stick with the false-color images of the universe EM background as a nice blend of purple and black
it's just a matter of time (Score:2)
Sigh. I miss Adams.
"Beige" (Score:2, Informative)
Any other suggestions?
Another joke nobody's posted yet (Score:2)
So now we find that the universe is simply off-color?
So this is what it takes (Score:4, Informative)
I am a regular slashdot reader for my sins. Finally an incentive to actually sign up.
I am amused to see the story got on the front pages this time, sorry that I had to be wrong to achieve this feat!
hope you all read the web page and about the science of starlight (and color!)
http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~kgb/cosspec/
and it's much more complicated than 'averaging 3 numbers'. The color is a volume-averaged - deredshifted (otherwise it would not be very meaningful) sum of all starlight. Those of you with www skills will be able to track down the origin of the erroneous software I will not deprecate it here.
Karl
p.s. the color suggestions are poring in, my favorite so far is 'cosmic latte'
As long as the answer is still 42... (Score:2)
Steve Jobs visits Johns Hopkins (Score:4, Funny)
Researcher 1: Hey, I think the universe is that greenish color.
Jobs: It's called Bondi, you twit!
Researcher 2: Nah, I think it's more bluish.
Jobs: (Jumping up and down furiously) AQUA! AQUA! AQUA!
Researcher 1: Let's just call it turquoise.
(after Jobs returns to Cupertino to plot his domination of the universe's color...)
Researcher 2: What the hell were we thinking? The universe is beige, not turquoise! Duh! We'd better change our report. What? 'It looks like you're trying to change the color of the universe?' Stupid paper clip.
Beige? (Score:2)
Color coordination is a bitch with beige. What should I wear to the next Big Bang?
Beige is such a bland color. How is our universe ever gonna attract another universe if it's such a bland color. Now, universe X14, that's a universe with a sense of color.
Did they account for the color shift caused by the atmosphere? Remember, these are the same type of guys who used metric instead of English measurements on Mars.
Why aren't there any other color universes? This is a beige conspiracy against universes of color.
I'll stop now.
Oh no! (Score:2)
Here a name for it... (Score:2)
How about "SunTan" ©? Har Har, get it - Sun (as in stars)...Tan (as in Beige)...
You should be able to just see it (Score:2)
Umm, on my color calibrated Apple Studio Display, its quite easy to see, and its clearly beige -- actually more in the Crayola "Flesh Tone(TM)" range.
Fantastic! (Score:2, Funny)
Thank goodness for this type of research.
And the point is? (Score:2)
Is there any scientific use for knowing the color of the universe? I can't imagine one. Who paid for this? (probably my grossly overtaxed self in some indirect way).
What about space? (Score:3, Funny)
Uhhh, we made another mistake. After having reviewed our software yet another time, and fixing the error, we have determined that the universe is indeed invisible. Sorry to all of you attempting to paint your houses the color of the universe...
Re:What about space? (Score:2)
What? I'm not just making that up because I'm lazy.
Re:What about space? (Score:2)
U ask if the human eye can really even see the universe? Well, everything we see is IN the universe and is PART OF the universe. Of course, we can't see ALL of it at once...
Average isn't always the right measure (Score:3, Insightful)
Damn.. (Score:2)
They were doing something useful (Score:2)
Then they were like..."HEY! Let's average these all together just for fun." Then it got all popular cause the media jumped on it.
Tim