Transparent Aluminium 368
Lynx writes "As the german magazine Spiegel reports, scientists at the Fraunhofer Institute for Ceramic Technologies have developed a transparent tile made from aluminium oxide pellets baked at 1200C. The material is very hard, and could be used as bulletproof windows." Use the fish.
Scotty finally came through! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Scotty finally came through! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Scotty finally came through! (Score:2)
aluminum tank.
I'm curious: did you realize this right away, or did it take you a few years after seeing the film fresh and new on the big screen? I know in my case, it was, like a whole decade later that I stopped and thought, "Heyyyy. Now hold on a moment!"
Perhaps I'm generalizing here, but I'll ask the question as though I weren't:
"Why is it that this sort of thing never seems so apparent at the time? Why are films so much more alive and real-seeming when they first come out? Do new films have a shelf-life or something? Is it more than just color which fades?"
-Fantastic Lad
Re:Scotty finally came through! (Score:3, Funny)
nerd alert.
he traded the formula for transparent alumium, for plexiglass.
they used plexiglass for the tank.
Combine some transparent aluminum... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... (Score:2, Funny)
Oh, but they still have to worry about being naked...
hehe, who cares... Clothes have not been invented to hide the body, but to keep warm.
The concept of hiding the body comes from the moral ineptness of some idiotic religious nuts during the dark ages
Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... (Score:3, Insightful)
Genesis 4:6-7
"And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves and made themselves aprons"
You don't have to accept this account as history to realize that at the very least, semitic societies had some sort of concept of hiding the body thousands of years back. Copies of Genesis predate the idiotic religious nuts of the dark ages by at least 2 millenia. There have probably been societies that felt it was good to hide the body from view for as long.
Not to mention covering the body for purposes other than warmth OR morality: protection from sun or sand or other dangerous substances, check against physical blows, adornment and status, disguise. Or for that matter, enticement -- if nakedness were the ultimate turn-on, Victoria's Secret wouldn't do such good business. I'm sure Victoria wasn't the first one to catch on.
Anyway, I'm overesponding, but the point is, there are lots of reasons for cloths, and most all of them are probably older than western society.
Thou Shalt Wear Pants (Score:2)
Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... (Score:2)
Re:Combine some transparent aluminum... (Score:2)
You know, I've actually been WAITING for someone to make a stupid comment like this.
MY comment was meant to refute two ideas contained in the parent post:
1) clothing was adopted solely because of "moral" concerns
2) this was done in the middle ages
I'd say my comment did both conclusively. #2 first and foremost -- unhealth attitudes about the human body may have been reperpetrated and reinforced then, but the use of clothing as a "moral shield" most certainly didn't first come about then.
#1 wasn't demonstrated conclusively -- how do I KNOW people came up with clothes for reasons like protection and ceremony and adornment and disguise? I don't. I just know people use it for that today, across nearly every society. It stands to reason that people adopted clothing for a variety of reasons a long time ago.
So my post did exactly what it claimed to do. Yours is a Red Herring.
Now if you WANT to address issues about whether all shame from nakedness is due to religious influences, and whether religious people are nuts, specifically, those who wrote Genesis, that'd be a whole 'nother post....
Wait.... (Score:5, Informative)
This isn't transparent aluminum; this is a transparent aluminum oxide. That is just not the same thing as aluminum anymore then water is Hydrogen gas, or table salt is the same thing as Sodium metal or Chlorine gas (both very harmful chemicals, sodium can explode when it comes in contact with water, and Chlorine can kill you in a few breaths, yet we eat salt all the time)
And secondly we have known about aluminum based compounds for a long time, in fact, longer then we have known about Aluminum or even about elements in general. Alum, the compound from which aluminum gets it's name (and which we extract aluminum from) has been known to man for ages and is, in fact, transparent.
Minor correction (Score:2)
Followup (Score:4, Informative)
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:5, Informative)
No, it says it is three times as _hard_ as hardened steel, which isn't the same thing (though they are related). Considering that corundum (i.e. ruby, sapphire) is made of aluminium oxide, that isn't that surprising.
Forming that hard material into tiles of unspecified but obviously reasonable toughness and strenth while keeping it transparent is the impressive bit.
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:2)
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:5, Funny)
(Aluminum/aluminium is just US/international spelling. Looking at the original German article it uses "Aluminiumoxid" where the fish translation has alumina.)
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:2, Flamebait)
So, that would make those of us in the US at least spelling it the original way =]
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:2, Offtopic)
In English "aluminium" isn't just an allowable second spelling, it is the standard spelling. It's also the internationally agreed IUPAC spelling. (And yes "aluminum" was used before "aluminium". Full history at http://www.webelements.com/webelements/scholar/el
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:2)
(L. alumen, alum) The ancient Greeks and Romans used alum as an astringent and as a mordant in dyeing. In 1761 de Morveau proposed the name alumine for the base in alum, and Lavoisier, in 1787, thought this to be the oxide of a still undiscovered metal.
Wohler is generally credited with having isolated the metal in 1827, although an impure form was prepared by Oersted two years earlier. In 1807, Davy proposed the name aluminum for the metal, undiscovered at that time, and later agreed to change it to aluminum. Shortly thereafter, the name aluminum was adopted to conform with the "ium" ending of most elements, and this spelling is now in use elsewhere in the world.
Aluminium was also the accepted spelling in the U.S. until 1925, at which time the American Chemical Society officially decided to use the name aluminum thereafter in their publications.
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:2)
Re: Hardness and strength not the same thing. (Score:2)
> I'm not sure exactly what property is the most significant in stopping bullets
Well, the article clearly uses the word "hardness", not "strength" (I do speak German), and given the context in which it is used (research into bullet-stopping materials), I'd say it's pretty clear that the bullet-stopping type of hardness is meant here. If it had the properties of jello WRT stopping bullets, I don't think they'd waste their time on it.
Re:Followup (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! (Score:2)
Expensive.
Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! (Score:2)
Heavy.
Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! (Score:3, Interesting)
You can actually buy sapphire windows at least up to 15cm square some places I found on the net.. supermarket scanners also sometimes have sapphire windows [saphikon.com] apparently.
The watchglass of my Rolex is a sapphire crystal. Looks cool, doesn't scratch. This page [europastar.com] has info about synthetic sapphire watchglasses. It says Seiko coats mineral glass with synthetic sapphire (sapphlex they call it) to make it hard.
Re:Windows out of Sapphire ? I WANT ONE! (Score:2)
Re: TAG Heuer Watches (Score:2)
My Esquire has one... so did my Luminox...
(Oh.. regarding those Luminox navy seal dive watches..... they are indestructuble, for sure.
Just don't wear one to bed.. I woke up and found one of the prongs that hold sthe strap pin in had sheared right off the main housing. GO figure.
Waterproof to 200 meters, used by navy seals, can take a hell of a beating.. but don't ware it to bed
and the engineers all over the world... (Score:5, Informative)
Alumina being transparent or strong is hardly new. Although the bullet proof glass thing is pretty funny. Alumina is not tough, it may be strong, and even greatly stronger than steel should we be talking about specific strength, but it is not tough at all. And I don't know about you, but the last thing I was between me and a bullet is a sheet of something that will shatter with countless sharp edges to cut me to ribbons.
I'm sure there are a great many chemical concerns that would be thrilled to tell you all about their alumina powders should you care to ask. But trust me, until we can do with alumina what clams can do with chalk the most interesting thing one is likely to do with alumina is make a crucible.
A little bit of nothing can stop a crack (Score:2)
If the material is close to 100% of solid density, then you can put a polymer between a couple of layers of it, just like safety glass. One reason this is big news is that alumina is cheap and available by the tonne. Then again, so is silica.
Tough Enuff (Score:2)
Now this MIGHT be news if they some how got their alumina powders on a nano scale where the alumina crystal grains are smaller than the wavelengths of light, then you'll actually get a relatively tough, and see through material. Not be cause something magical happens on that scale, but because the crack length will be huge, and actually require the formation of a large surface which would take a lot of energy despite the low toughness of the alumina. That would be news. BIG news. At least to me. But that's not what they said.
They said they made a 10cm alumina tile. Big whoop.
They might be able to enhance it by making it like corning wear, but that summery of a press release was clearly too light to provide that kind of detail. Which might have been interesting, although not news.
I would bet that it being transparent means they either used a spectacularly fine powder, or it is basically fully dense as there doesn't appear to be many internal surfaces to scatter light (ie it's not opaque).
Further more, I would bet that the flaw(s) introduced by the bullet would not be what caused it to fail, I would bet that pre-existing flaws near the bullets point of impact would be vastly expanded. Worse yet, the alumina tile might even bounce the bullet off instead of just stop it.
Maybe the news is the simplicity and low cost? Too bad that didn't make it into the news then.
Either way it sounds like it's nothing but a press release for a non-large company that's really happy that they might picked up as a contractor for the Department of Defence.
Yawn. Already, we've given it more consideration that it deserves.
True 'dat (Score:2)
I would also like to think that our military personel have something a little more substantial that alumina, perhaps silicon carbide, or better yet a ceremet of silicon carbide and nickle (but maybe that'd be too heavy). Either way in a kevlar vest, their opaque and not windows. I think Titanium Boride has been used for bullet proof vests too.
A'ight, yo.
Re:Wait.... (Score:5, Informative)
And artificial transparent rubies and sapphires have been made for around 100 years - so apart from maybe a new fabrication process there isn't really anything new in this story!
Jolyon
ps. Alum isn't used as an ore of aluminium - there isn't enough of it found naturally, the ore of aluminium is Bauxite [mindat.org], a mixture of aluminium oxides and hydroxides.
Re:Wait.... (Score:2)
Re:more corundum trivia (Score:2)
You are thinking of the Mohs hardness scale, not Vickers.
http://www.webelements.com/webelements/
And just because corundum is second on the list doesn't mean there are no substances in the range between 9 and 10. Things like titanium carbide, silicon carbide, boron carbide, and boron nitride are (or can be).
(However they aren't found naturally the way corundum and diamond are).
Re:more corundum trivia (Score:2)
(fx:googles) Oh. Ok, I take back what I said about it not being found naturally.
I actually don't know whether moissanite is natural or not.
I always assumed it was synthetic.
So I wasn't trying to make a point or anything with that post...I was just proud of myself for remembering the name for silicon carbide
Re:Wait.... (Score:3, Informative)
Halocarbon production in Nature (Score:3, Informative)
Not really true -- halocarbons are actually more common in nature than you think. A number of organisms such as certain fungi and marine algae produce halocarbons containing chlorine, bromine, and iodine. These compounds can range from simple Methyl-type compounds to polycyclic aromatics.
They can also be formed when wood decays in the presence of halogen salts. The lignin portion of wood is basically a polymer of aromatic alcohols, and under the right conditions halogen ions can react to form aromatic halocarbons.
Re:Wait.... (Score:2)
Re:Wait.... (Score:2, Funny)
--
Graceland tour guide: "Elvis has the left building".
Re:Wait.... (Score:2)
Note for the folks that don't get what dihydrogen monoxide (the silent killer!) is - in the words of the immoral Foghorn Leghorn "That's a joke, son."
Re:Wait.... (Score:2)
Dont confuse the common language, used to make a quick/basic argument, with the knowledge (in whole) of 'radical environmentalists'. Please, spare the propaganda for some other group. Framing advocates first as 'radical environmentalists', then maligning their effort with that kind of condescension is insulting. (at best)
Radical Pollution Apologists can sit and snigger about the environmentalists all they please, but in reality, these people are playing a Grade8 Debate game of insult/shift/confuse (FUD).
Most Radical Environmentalists (like myself) can see through your shit like transparent Al. A rebuttal of ignorance and hyperbole may work well with rednecks and McCarthy-ites
POPs explained [gristmagazine.com]
The fish, eh? (Score:2, Informative)
You would find the fish correctly at:
http://babelfish.altavista.com
Yes, but... (Score:5, Funny)
'A keyboard! How quaint.' (Score:2, Redundant)
Besides, everybody knows Transparent Aluminum was invented by a Dr. Nichols, plant manager at Plexicorp, sometime in the late 20th Century. Using a Mac Plus [lowendmac.com], no less!
Why use the fish ... (Score:2)
Re:Why use the fish ... (Score:2, Informative)
---
Sight /.ed -- here's the fishified version (Score:4, Informative)
Since both the Institute and Babelfish seem to be slashdotted, here the Babelfish output for those of you who can't get to it:
TRANSPARENT Tank page frame protects against projectiles
Dresdner researchers developed transparent and extremely hard page frames. By the material, from which visors can firing fixed be manufactured, also the pentagon is fascinated.
DPA transparent aluminum tile America weapon technician show interest in a tank page frame from Dresden. In the there institute for Fraunhofer for ceramic technologies succeeded in baking fine-grained alumina in such a way with 1200 degrees Celsius in the furnace that an extremely hard, transparent material develops. A 10 times 10 centimeters large disk (strength: only about 400 gram weigh, are however three times harder 1.0 cm as hardened steel. With firing tests under contract of the German Federal Armed Forces from the Bundeswehr in Koblenz " outstanding results " were obtained, report the researcher Andreas Krell. Also in the US state Idaho were examined the tiles: The pentagon is fascinated of the transparency of the material, with which firingfixed of visors or large windows of armored reconnaissance vehicles can be built.
Re:Ask a computer to translate a text... (Score:2)
Cryptnotic
Broken translator link (Score:2, Funny)
Been done a long time before (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Been done a long time before (Score:2)
Ruby (Score:2)
So, despite expecting some boring material science stuff, this news is indeed about computers! w00t!
The obvious use: (Score:2)
Life immitates StarTrek IV.
Re:The obvious use: (Score:2)
I'm going to san francisco and wait for giant "foot prints" to appear in the earth, then jump onto somebody moments before they are "beamed" aboard.
with my luck, they'll say beam me a board, and I'll be standing there with a 2x4
So how long until we see... (Score:2)
And how nice it would be if a rock kicked up by a semi would at most dent your windshield.
(Yeah, I realize it will probably be quite a while before this filters down to the consumer level, but it's fun to dream.)
Pictures just in. (Score:4, Funny)
Also available here! [about]
Finally! (Score:2, Funny)
Proper translation of article (Score:5, Informative)
as Babelfish & Co are not really up to it yet, here's my human-made translation of the German article. I'm a German native speaker, but I can't guarantee the English spelling, so take with a grain of salt ;-).
Things in [brackets] are my remarks.
- - - -
Der Spiegel [leading German magazine, a la Times or Newsweek]
February 19, 2002
TRANSPARENT
Armour-like tile protects from projectiles
Researchers in Dresden [German city] have developed transparent and extremely hard tiles. The Pentagon, among others, is fascinated by this material, which can be used to produce e.g. bullet-proof visors.
[PICTURE] picture caption: "transparent Aluminium tile"
America's weapon technicians show interest for an armour-like tile from Dresden. At the "Fraunhofer-Institut für Keramische Technologien" [Fraunhofer institute for ceramics technologies] there, fine-grained aluminium oxide was successfully baked in an oven at 1200 C to produce an extremely hard, transparent material.
A plate sized 10x10 cm (thickness: 1 cm) only weighs about 400 g, but is three times as hard as hardened [tempered?] steel. During shooting trials on behalf of the "Bundeswehrbeschaffungsamt" [federal procurement office] in Koblenz, "outstanding results" were achieved, according to the researcher Andreas Krell.
The tiles are also being examined in the US state of Idaho: The Pentagon is fascinated by the transparency of the material, which can be used to build bullet-proof visors or big windows for armoured personnel carriers [Panzerspähwagen?].
Re:Proper translation of article (Score:2)
(By the way - somebody with mod points please mod ths up.)
micrograin materials (Score:3, Informative)
Micrograin copper for instance conducts like gold, and is nearly as hard as steel (while being much lighter... this is wonderful stuff.)
Micrograin titania, another ceramic, is transparent, significantly harder than steel, as flexible as plastic, lighter than aluminum, and can smile at temperatures that would turn most metals into soup. Some folks who are working diligently on electrolytic extraction for titanium (the process that brought the price of aluminum down, from more precious than gold), believe that micrograin titania could one day make the perfect engine (since it can be cast and sintered directly into useable parts.)
Face it kidlings, the steady march of material science is giving us an incredible boon of new and amazing new stuff to play with... pretty much like the rest of technology knocking on our collective doors. I want to be the first on my block with a Moller Skycar with the transparent titania upgrades.
Moller Skycar; http://www.moller.com/skycar/
Genda B -- I detest Osama bin Laden, a man who is the bigoted, violent, religiously fanatical, spoiled son of a rich oil magnate, who believes he can control the world with the threat of war and destruction. Hey, wait that sounds like somebody else...
Re:micrograin materials (Score:2)
Excuse my igorance, but does it tarnish?
that is why we use Gold in electronics, and not silver, which is more conductive.
Re:micrograin materials (Score:2)
What has been done in the last decade (or more) is to have ceramic in the combustion chamber and a metal engine block to conduct away the heat. I think this has been used commercially for a few years. The other big problems with the all ceramic engine concept is that in some situations you want a bit of toughness, and that it is not yet known how to produce large pieces of high strength ceramic without a fairly high chance of significant flaws (which are going to be very small internal cracks or gaps). What this would mean in practice, is that you would make your engines, test them to beyond the conditions they are likely to experience and keep the ones that survive. A ceramic connecting rod could be made (and probably has), but something that isn't brittle would be nice in that situation, and you don't have to worry about heat, so steel is a good choice.
SiAlON is another material to watch. Turn rice husks into jet turbine blades!
Bulletproof Windows? (Score:3, Funny)
Right!
Oh, wait, this one isn't about computers.. hehe.
Re:Bulletproof Windows? (Score:2)
One form of alumimium oxide is commonly known as Ruby, which as we know is a language somewhat like Python...
The real application (Score:4, Funny)
As an aficionado of German beer, I'm sure that this will be the first real application. They just want to get the military to pay for some cool toys along the way.
Re:The real application (Score:2)
I can't really tell from the extremely bad translations, but it sounds like maybe this is a process analogous to tempering glass -- that is, heat treating it to create internal stresses that limit crack propagation. Probably very expensive. If it would make an unbreakable beer mug at a reasonable price, they'd already have tempered glass unbreakable mugs...
Re:The real application (Score:2)
Hey! (Score:2)
Great! (Score:2)
Hardness and Toughness Defined (Score:3, Informative)
Hardness [umd.edu] increases with toughness [tpub.com] not necessarily vis versa.
Think of it roughly in these terms:
A hardness contest between two materials consists of trying to scratch one with the other. The one scratched is harder.
A toughness contest between two materials consists of trying to break one material with the other. The one broken wins.
Errata: Hardness and Toughness Defined (Score:3, Informative)
"harder" should, of course, have been "less hard".
transparent METALS proper? (link to EE times) (Score:2, Informative)
http://eetimes.com/story/OEG19991108S0095
This is much more useful than transparent armor,
IMHO, if it can indeed be applied to photonic
band-gap filtering...
No bulletproof windows! (Score:2)
The new: iCar!
The exciting: iBoat!
The unbelieveable: iRoof!
The possibilities are endless, with our strong, clear steel!
Strong, tough and hard (Score:4, Informative)
Strength - A property of materials under elastic deformation, meaning the degree to which the material bends under load, and then springs back to its original shape. At sufficiently high loading, the material deforms plastically, meaning it stays bent. Strong materials deflect very little under load (low strain per unit stress), and can take high loads before plastic deformation occurs.
Toughness - A property of materials that contain microcracks or other fracture-inducing characteristics. Such flaws cause localized increases in stress levels and thereby cause fractures to expand until the material fails catastrophically. This is the mechanism underlying stress-corrosion cracking and fretting fatigue. Tough materials do not have high localizes stress at crack tips, and can tolerate microcracks without catastrophic propagation and failure.
Hardness - The strength of a material at its surface. Measured empircally by poking it with sharp objects. Hard materials resist scratches and dents. But whether they deform (elastically or plastically) has nothing to do with their hardness. It has to do we their bulk strength.
A little background for the curious (Score:2, Informative)
Porcelain and ceramic tiles get their strength from 2 processes: exposure to pressure from a vertical hydraulic press, and subsequent firing (baking) of the tile.
1200 degrees is not very far off the temperatures at which the firing curves for commercial mass produced porcelain lie.
I thus assume that the difference lies in the pressure at which the pellets are pressed. It's got to be a LOT higher than the pressures used in the commercial porcelain/ceramic manufacture environ.
And anything will become harder when you compact it. Look at how diamonds are formed.
So essentially, what we are saying here is " Hey, we took some transparent stuff, compacted it really tight then fired it, and whee, we got ourselves a slab of very hard transparent stuff"...
Where's the innovation?
Good article, but... (Score:2, Funny)
..build a million gallon tank on a starship to transport two humpback whales 200 years into the future in a desperate attempt to save mankind from a strange monolith emitting beached whale sounds.
Jesus....what ever happened to investigative journalism these days? Also, wasn't this guy supposed to speek english?
-Chris
bulletproof windows (Score:2)
But we already have bulletproof glass. What's so special?
Re:star trek (Score:3, Informative)
Re:star trek - isolinear chips (Score:2, Funny)
wow, i'm a dork
Re:star trek Kahn (Score:2, Insightful)
Why is it that the 3rd world is always thought of as "overpopulated"?
FYI the population density of San Mateo County or Manhattan is greater than that of Bangladesh.
How come we never hear of the overpopulation of those places? Is the problem really too many brown people?
The "overpopulation problem" is simply a way for "liberals" to indulge in guiltless racism.
Re:star trek Kahn (Score:2, Offtopic)
Then there's the birthrate. I believe the us birthrate is something like 2.0(I could be wrong about the exact figure, but I know the sense is right), which means 2 babies born for every 2 people in the country. Some quick thought will realize that this is not enough for population replacement. The replacement birthrate is something like 2.4 live births for every 2 people in the population, because you have people who die before they reproduce, childless couples, etc. In the past 100 years or so, the trend has been that the the more developed the country is, the lower the birth rate. So while a particular county may have a very high population density, the people there are not reproducting at a rate that can sustain that population. The population is sustained through immagration (hence Buchannan's book where he advocates all the white folks getting busy getting busy and pumping out more white kids.) Generally speaking, the more educated you are, the fewer kids you have.
Plus, San Mateo has enough resources available to feed its population. This is not always the case in what are called 3rd world countries.
So while San Mateo has more people per square mile, those people all have a higher standard of living and their population is stable. They aren't necessarily overpopulated for their geographic area. Meanwhile, in a 3rd world country the population is increasing while the standard of living and education is not.
Personally, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea if a random sampling of half the population of the planet never had kids and those that remained had only 1 or 2 kids. Random would remove all possibility of bias. There are too damn many people everywhere.
Re:star trek Kahn (Score:2)
No, it has the money to buy food and water from other sparsely populated areas in the US. Just disrupt civilization, motorized transportation, or the belief that pieces of green paper are actually worth something, and any American city would be in worse shape than Bangladesh... On the average, the US is fairly lightly populated, but that's averaging farmlands with one family per square mile, deserts and mountains with almost no permanent human residents, and densely populated urban areas together..
Re:star trek Kahn (Score:2)
According to the CIA Factbook:
Birth rate: 14.2 births/1,000 population (2001 est.)
Death rate: 8.7 deaths/1,000 population (2001 est.)
So for each death approximately 1.6 children are born. This would indicate population growth.
The fact that 2.8 children are born for "every two people" does not tell us anything about population growth. Depending on life expectencies, infant mortality rates and sex distribution of the population that could indicate growth or shrinking.
Re:star trek Kahn (Score:2, Offtopic)
Let's say there's an island with 1000 people on it.
If the island is suddenly discovered and a lot of people move in, say 1000 immagrants (50/50 split) are more likely to be younger (say under 50) and so they move in and have children. If the immagrants only have 1 child a piece after moving there, the death rate remains the same or goes up slightly (due to accidents), where the birth rate doubles. But the island's population will not grow that much over time because the new people do not replace themselves.
Fun with statistics!
Re:star trek Kahn (Score:2, Funny)
>
> Now comes some charismatic leader and, well, I hope I'm in the grave by that point.
What, you get pretty fireworks and solve the "too many males and not enough females" problem. Evolution in action ;-)
Re:star trek (Score:2, Funny)
Cars. (Score:2)
You do if you're driving.
Actually, if this truly were 'clear aluminum' it probably wouldn't be that great, I mean, aluminum is not really even that strong...
What? (Score:3, Informative)
I suppose you're one of those people who thinks that people shouldn't be allowed to have computers because they can use it to violate copyrights.
Anyway, it's not like there isn't a lot of bullet proof things out there already.
Re:What? (Score:2)
Re:Screw the Fish (Score:2)
Re:Screw the Fish (Score:2)
Re:Scotty (Score:2)
Re:Scotty! (Score:2)
I don't recall Scotty saying that he'd never *used* a keyboard, only that it was "quaint". Maybe Scotty has a passion for legacy computer kit or follows the ethos "Linux AI: because 23rd century computer kit is too good to waste". ;)
Re:Scotty! (Score:2)
of course vi vs. emacs war is still on going.
Re:Isn't this just glass... (Score:3, Informative)
This might be a good material to use on furnaces for example; or maybe a transparent car engine
Re:Isn't this just glass... (Score:2)
Never mind that, we want transparent factory made HD cases [slashdot.org].
Re:I don't speak German but... (Score:2)
stark (Stärke): strong (strength)
I do speak German, I've read the article, and they're saying exactly what you think they're saying: it's three times harder than hardened steel. Now they just need to make it a bit more transparent and less milky.
Re:I don't speak German but... (Score:2)
Except you can't buy it in the shape of your car's windshield.
Re:I don't speak German but... (Score:2)
Right, and that's the whole point of this research. How to essentially "bake" a sapphire of any size and shape (relatively cheaply, I would also assume).
Re:KITH (Score:2)
--Josh