Lost Moon-Landing Tape Recovered, Restored 90
esome writes: "Video clips of American astronauts bouncing around on the moon will never get old as far as I'm concerned. Now we've got one more to drool over thanks to Kipp Teague who has worked hard to archive Apollo stuff on his site. The BBC has an article on it here."
30 years on.. (Score:2)
Apart from the bullet-time 360 of Neil Armstrong jumping over Agent Smith.
Re:shut up! (Score:2)
Bollocks.
Develop a healthy sense of paranoia. People will try to rip you off. They will try to make you believe the unbelievable. And in your case, they'll succeed it seems. Assuming someone is telling the truth is a hideously niave and downright crazy attitude. Going by your own experience works. I haven't been to the moon. Whats easier to believe, that someone faked it in a movie studio, or that a huge team of people worked for years to propel a very heavy object all the way to our major satellitte, take a few photos, and then come back again.
My post was a joke. So, you humourless idiot, sod off.
Re:shut up! (Score:2)
Re:shut up! (Score:2)
A Real Live Conspiracy Page!! (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:How can anyone with half a brain believe this s (Score:1)
Re:30 years on.. (Score:1)
More MLP! (Score:1)
Audio, not Video (Score:3, Informative)
about video? This is an audio recording, *not*
video!
Video and Audio (Score:2, Informative)
The question on everyone's mind.... (Score:1)
Re:The question on everyone's mind.... (Score:1)
...who assume it is video because they didn't read the artice explaining it is *audio* of the controllers during the landing.
Movies don't (Score:2, Interesting)
The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:4, Funny)
Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors
Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!
Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.
Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:2, Funny)
I actually believe there are several "moon" satellites orbiting the earth, otherwise we wouldn't be able to see it in Europe, when it is hovering over the US. Damn liberals. Not only do they spy on their own people, but also on us europeans, who have done nothing against them.
I'll bet that the stars are surveillance satellites as well - I mean, they're always at the same place at night, night after night, year after year. Damn liberals!
Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:1)
Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:1)
Main points where the joke could be improved: remove, or at least improve, the denial of pre-1950 Moon mentionings (I can think of quite a few pre-1950 references to the Moon, which therefore strains the credulity of that bit), and address the issue of what happens when both Sun and Moon are both set (early pre-dawn, usually) or when the Moon is emitting no light (thus defeating its ostensible illumination purpose).
OT: definition of karma whoring (Score:1)
Since it was posted by an AC by definition it can't be karma whoring since that term implies the poster is getting remuneration in the form of karma. Since AC's receive no karma from their post there is no way for them to receive such remuneration.
Furthermore, karma whoring in general became essentially pointless on slashdot when the 50 point cap was put in place. Once you get enough points to earn an automatic +1 Bonus, there is really no point to posting purely for the sake of karma, or skewing your posts with the intention of getting additional karma, the hallmarks of a true karma whore.
Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:1)
Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:1)
these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up.
Nice troll, but I have one suggestion. Anyone that would speak of "decent, God-fearing Americans" would probably not use the metric system. They would use the English units like miles, as God intended.
Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:1)
Re:The moon -- a ridiculous liberal myth (Score:1)
1. The average height of the American male reaches 6 ft. 4 in. (~1.92 meters).
2. The meter is changed to be equivalent to 2 ft. 9 in. (~890 centimeters).
Otherwise, those of us who are a bit over average in height will lose the important component of our self-esteem brought by being able to claim 6 feet of distance between the soles of our feet and the tops of our heads. I'm not joking; "1.82 meter-er" just doesn't have much of a ring to it. Until this issue is resolved, expect the US of A to stick with the English system, at least for the measuring of human height.
Re:The moon -- Literature pre 1950 (Score:2)
Now if only the astronauts (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Now if only the astronauts (Score:1)
Re:Now if only the astronauts (Score:1)
If they had done that, the lunar landings would have been pay per view...
and damn right I would pay!
Great Recordings (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Great Recordings (Score:1)
Check out that recent movie called "The Dish", about the radio dish in Australia. I watched it last weekend, it restored some of my faith in humanity
The *real* tapes (Score:1)
Re:The *real* tapes - CHECK THIS OUT - FUNNY!! (Score:1)
The potential for fellow staff to question your sanity as you giggle to yourself or the possible damage to company computers when projectile blast your coffee/coke is too great.
Listen to a piece of history (the rescued tape). (Score:4, Informative)
Heres cool. (Score:1)
Available in Normal Formats? (Score:2)
I don't allow proprietary codecs on my machine. Is there a version of this audio clip in a standard format, like AIFF or MP3?
Schwab
Re:Available in Normal Formats? (Score:1, Funny)
That's UNpossible! Moon landing was way before MP3 or AIFF, dumbshit.
Re:Available in Normal Formats? (Score:1)
Schwab
Hey... my name is Schwab...
Good luck, Mr. Gorsky (Score:1)
video tape (Score:2)
It was was something like 6 hours long.
I wonder if it is available anyplace.
(There was also one a similar brodcast about pioneer going past neptune. That one I think I taped, and have it buried someplace)
Re:video tape (Score:1)
A document crying out for SMIL (Score:2, Informative)
This document could be all the more interesting and useful if it were marked up with SMIL [w3.org]. Using this, we could synchronize the display of a transcript, including the names of all the speakers. Last fall at the Virginia Center for Digital History [virginia.edu] I saw a demo of a similar treatment of some audio surrounding Kennedy's administration and the Cuban Missile Crisis.
You can just see it (Score:2)
Also, keep in mind that they didn't know whether the machinery would work, or whether the lander would sink into the moon dust, or what have you. They were literally descending into the unknown.
Quite an amazing piece of tape.
Re:You can just see it (Score:1)
This is the part of the story that really captures my interest, the "T1" decision. They really had no idea what to expect on the surface of the moon and had a leave/stay decision to make in the seconds following the landing.
Problem was, all the controllers were so overjoyed that the lem had made it down to the surface (after Armstrong had gotten down to _seconds_ of decent fuel), that Kranz had trouble getting them to sit back down at their consoles so they could decide if they were going to take off again right away or stay on the surface.
I haven't tried to download the audio while here at work, I'm going to do that as soon as I get home tonight. Should be interesting to listen to that moment for real (after having seen it portrayed in "Earth to the Moon" and whatnot).
FOX (Score:2)
Re:FOX (Score:1)
Learn to stop being be so damn gullible.
Re:FOX (Score:2)
--Comic Book Guy
The tape started to disintegrate? (Score:2)
Haven't these audio experts at Nasa heard about baking the tapes [audio-restoration.com]? That's standard procedure for any audio or video tapes of that vintage. You put it in a scientific oven (one that maintains a constant temperature, rahter than cycling on and off) at 130 degrees for 4 to 5 hours. That bakes out the liquid and emulsifies the binder. I've been restoring old 1/2" black & white videotapes. They were unplayable without baking and clogged the heads after 30 seconds. After, I was able to play fairly long sections.
Why didn't he just ask Paramount (Score:1)
Tapes in Texas? (Score:1)