Inchworming Probe for Planetary Exploration 44
An anonymous reader writes: "Honeybee Robotics, a firm in New York's Little Italy, has designed a probe that can inchworm deep into the Martian crust or Europan ice shell without a cable to the surface for power or data. Totally autonomous. It's based on a system the company designed to weld steampipes below Manhattan. It's also just really cool."
All About the Money (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Dumb fuckwit's car (Score:2, Funny)
Re: Dumb fuckwit's car (Score:1)
Re:All About the Money (Score:2, Funny)
Re:All About the Money (Score:2, Interesting)
mmm hot bit? (Score:4, Interesting)
As in the past the deep ice cores were contaminated with lubricant which lead to several fake ET lifeforms.
More info (Score:5, Informative)
Could be useful here (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Could be useful here (Score:3, Interesting)
I had a pretty silly thought since some folks were using cell phones, couldn't they triangulate ACKs from digital phones by sending them messages are calls or whatever and find the concentrations of where people are? You could also call some numbers and get the ringing for a audible cue when the diggers are close.
Don't know if actually possible, but it's worth a thought.
Re:Could be useful here (Score:3, Interesting)
For sure they should be able to. In fact there was a lot of moaning and bitching that the wireless providers hadn't yet implemented their system triangulation yet (of course the government is largely pushing for it for anti-crime reasons, but they pretend it's for 911), though of course that's absurd as a) GPS portions obviously would not work under the rubble. GPS barely works under heavy tree coverage. In fact I'm curious how GPS could play a part for that. b) If triangulation can be done at the cell phone towers then it can therefore be done onsite.
It is amazing how incredibly important cell phones (and the much more expensive plane phone versions) have been during this whole event. They were a crucial pipeline of information, and in the events over Pennsylvania they are how the victims learned that the terrorist had already plowed one or both planes into the WTC.
Re:Could be useful here (Score:2, Informative)
So even if GPS signals could penetrate the rubble, there would be no way to use that to locate people.
Re:Could be useful here (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Could be useful here (Score:2, Informative)
Agreed that GPS is of limited accuracy in this case, however the idea behind GPS in phones (which they are going to be doing in the near future as scary as that sounds) is that it relays your position over the cell control channels (i.e. if someone can make a phone call then it could be their position), so if someone was lost in the forest but could make a phone call they would know exactly where they were give or take 20 ft or so.
don't let goatse.cx know about this... (Score:1, Funny)
Cool! (Score:1)
unmanned drilling won't be easy (Score:4, Informative)
Re:The hype machine (Score:1)
As someone who has programmed robots, I can assure you that the level of effort required to get a robot to move consistently in a straight line, let alone navigate areound obstacles through sensory input is prohibitive.
There are few things I love more than the mentality "I can't do it, therefore it can't be done." Someone please mod this fella down now?
Re:The hype machine (Score:1)
There's nothing I hate worse than the mentality of inexperienced teenagers who think they know it all.
Re:The hype machine (Score:1)
YOU are talking out of your arse.
Re:The hype machine (Score:1)
A million imperfections in sensing and movement prevent easy programming of autonomous robots. If you want to guarantee straight line movement, you need either a strictly controlled environment, with lots of navigation aids for the robot, or you need to use stochastic mapping and kalman filters. None of that is easy.
Re:The hype machine (Score:1)
Various objections (Score:5, Insightful)
This I consider this to be rather foolhardy, to throw away the chance for access to another world because we are afraid that we might do something.
- - -
Radio Free Nation [radiofreenation.com]
an alternate news site using Slash Code
"If You have a Story, We have a Soap Box"
- - -
Re:Various objections (Score:1)
Re:Various objections (Score:1)
Re:Various objections (Score:1)
I believe there is a law describing this. Is it the Uncertainty Law?
We haven't a clue what is on this planet/moon, but until we visit, we won't know.
Once we do visit, we have the possibility of dragging along some [foo] and breaking the results. But we do have some results.
(Planck's Law? Where the more observations are made of a particle the better its motion can be describing, but the act of observing by bouncing a photon off it will influence the particle's motion.)
Re:Hypocrites (Score:1)
heh neato little wormie :) (Score:1)
it's feasible (Score:1)
But with the recent evidence of life on mars, such things will be really difficult to pull off. Imagine if we end up destroying life on mars, we'll end up destroying something which we've been searching for so long.
Inchworm, inchworm, measuring the planetoids (Score:1)
I believe this particular innovation has seen previous use in the field of the collection and collation of marigold metrics - now, after many years of research and development, we will finally get to see how far it and its arithmetic will probably go...