Electronic Implants Stimulate Brain 19
SquirrelLord sent in this note about pacemaker-like device to stimulate a part of the brain to treat depression. The device sends a minute electrical pulse to the brain every 3 seconds and has no side effects. Well, except for turning the user into a wirehead.
Side Effects? (Score:1)
Side effect one: A zipper in the side of your skull.
Side effect two: Your mood is being artificially altered! I know that this is a boom to some people with severe depression, but it's the electro-neural equivilent of a pain killer; it covers up the symptom while leaving the underlying problem unaddressed. People enter states of morbid depression for a reason.
On as aside, when I first read this blurb, I thought it said "...about a peacemaker-like device...", as in Colt Peacemaker.
.
Re:The usual paranoia (Score:2)
I suspect you are thinking of "depression" as it's commonly used, as a synonym for "sadness". Clinical depression is a whole 'nother animal, and rarely can be "overcome without assistance".
Confusing these two things is way too common, and understandably annoying to people suffering clinical depression. It's sorta like thinking script-kiddies and hackers are the same thing.
Less invasive, more sensible (Score:1)
Re:Similar experiment (Score:1)
"The page may have changed since that time." - but if it did, then how would we know?
Re:Technology or Nature? (Score:2)
Yep. And people choose technology over nature at just about every turn. The reason? Not because they're duped, not because they don't know any better. It's because the pure natural environment is by far the unhealthier.
If you get injured and your buddy can take you to the medics, would you rather your friend have to walk while carrying you, or would you rather your friend load you in your car and drive you there?
Would you prefer milk and meat straight from the farm, carried by hand until it spoils (to say nothing of any diseases it may have had to begin with), or would you prefer milk and meat that have been screened for germs and chilled during transport?
That's just for starters. It is a common misconception that technology is inherently bad for humanity - but it is a misconception. Those who call for the termination of all progress, delaying the introduction of new drugs and treatments that would otherwise prevent all manner of pain and death, have the blood of billions on their hands.
Re:The usual paranoia (Score:1)
And so suicide is just a person reaching their innate potential?
Your argument is deeply flawed.
One cannot make proclamations like "Depression is, in general, not a bad thing... to function properly in society, most people need to overcome depression without assistance" without understanding the etiology of depression. Our current macroscopic, integrative understanding of the brain is so lacking that it may be a while before we can conclude what causes depression, whether it is a pathology or not, and where the line betweeen fluctuations in personality and pathological brain function exists.
In other words, the issue is much too complicated and sensitive to talk out of your ass like that.
(I find it best to at least familiarize oneself with an issue before claiming someones suffering is somehow a Good Thing)
Star Treck Episode anyone? (Score:1)
On a side note, this would be cool as a remote, intoxicating device. Just hold this thing against the back of your neck and instand high. Simply incredible that someone created this device.
one gram and you don't give a damn -- aldous huxley
Vaginal nerve? (Score:1)
Re:Vaginal nerve? (Score:1)
Similar experiment (Score:1)
Re:Star Treck Episode anyone? (Score:1)
Isn't it "a gram is better than a damn"?
The usual paranoia (Score:3)
Why isn't the usual /. paranoia kicking in yet? Although the article says that the device "is not for everyone", imagine the potential for abuse! 'Sir, your kid is showing signs of depression: he's being bullied and wearing black. We'd like to put him on a NeuroGizmo 5000 before we end up with another Columbine'.
Depression is, in general, not a bad thing. It is a defense and/or coping mechanism, and to develop as an individual, and be able to function properly in society, most people need to overcome depression without assistance. Psychiatrists are often reluctant to prescribe drugs mostly because of potential side-effects, including dependancy. But when there are no side effects ...
For all the good they can do, little things like this need to be watched, or we may have it made law that everyone carry one to force us into utopian society...
Re:Similar experiment (Score:1)
The PAIN! (Score:1)
Endorphines stop pain and relieve depression? When can we get these in pill form? I don't want to wear a battery pack with wires in the back of my head like that lady.
I'm so sery vleepy
terminal man (Score:1)
Usefulness (Score:1)
If this new device were to have a high success rate, at least patients would have a safer 'last resort'.
It was explained to me that this basicly does what medications try to do, but by skipping a step. Anti-depressents are meant to create a chemical reaction that in turn cases these pulses. The problem is that no one realy knows which need stimulation. And sometimes they are overstimulated to create the same result: depression. So they create all kinds of drugs that stimulate each section differently- try one till it works.
I read about this a few months ago. Probably be awhile before this becomes a real option for patients though.
I have to say this (Score:2)
I didn't like having fifty karma anyway.
Re:Similar experiment (Score:1)
Technology or Nature? (Score:1)
When we are talking about depression, the same considerations that we see with other types of research, should apply. You can miss use it or not. The way we live today is not natural. To much workload and stress! The human body and mind is not set for this, and we do therefore apply technology to help us. I wear glasses, and they defiantly help me to see the screen in front of me. We use chemicals to ease headaches... why not devices. In the future we can be pretty sure to see the technology that helps us, being implemented into our daily lives, and the technology that don't help us will go away. Sometimes it takes time to get used to.
Just imagine if we used metal boxes on wheels, that made a lot of toxic pollution, and needed a black clay like material to drive on that would be paved all over the country sides... all just for us to get around. Scary right? We probably won't see that in our lifetime. - or?
The choice between unhealthy environment, where we will need technology to help us, and a pure natural environment is a choice the human race must do. You do it every day!
Saggi