
Water (ice) Found on Mars? 10
jeffthompson writes "Images from the Mars Global Surveyor show formations near the
equator that were possibly made by
ice inder the surface. And there's a chance the ice is still
there which would be a prime place to look for microbes."
White Mars (Score:2)
Bob
Follow Up (Score:1)
--
microsoft, it's what's for dinner
bq--3b7y4vyll6xi5x2rnrj7q.com
Well I'm thankful NASA wasn't looking for Milk (Score:1)
It makes me feel small yet great (Score:3)
At the same time however I feel great pride in the fact that inspite of this smallness we are scaling newer hieghts of knowledge and our quest for the whole picture is on.
Let us congratulate ourselves for what we have achieved and for what we shall henceforth.
Ski Olympus Mons (Score:1)
CLATHRATES AND CARBON DIOXIDE ON A DRY COLD MARS [confex.com]
I can't believe it's not water (spaceviews.com) [spaceviews.com]
1. rocket 2. camel 3. bring water [spacedaily.com]
Water on Mars (Score:5)
Except that in order for CO2 to become a liquid at all, you need an atmospheric pressure ABOVE that found here on earth (CO2 is 'dry ice' as it cannot exist in the liqid state unelss under pressure). If the beforementioned structures were to be verified as created by CO2-liquid, this would be a verry important and optimistic result, as the pressure on Mars vould have th have been much higher than today.
The structures found by the sattelites the past few years suggests that flowing water have existed on the surface of Mars in the past.
I hope it is still there (as some of the images returned have suggested, at least it was there some 10000 years ago), as this would make manned trips to Mars possible and practical.
Many landforms found on Mars have been made by flowing liquid (as they are so like those found on earth), and water is just the only plausible liquid avaliable on Mars.
Yours Yazeran
Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer.
More water on Mars? (Score:1)
Why don't we go there and see for ourselves? Pick some up and taste it? It's the year 2001, we're supposed to have hover-cars and space colonies for cryin' out loud!
If the Pentagon can "lose" a BILLION dollars why can't we afford to send men to Mars?
There is cause to suspect water in this case (Score:2)
Sure would make life easier for Martian explorers and colonists if they only had to drill down a few feet to find permafrost that they could tap for water. H2O + CO2 + yields rocket fuel, among other things. Zubrin's Mars Direct concept works even better if you don't have to ship any hydrogen along.
--
Let's not get our hopes up too much (Score:3)
eg, http://www.spacedaily.com/news/lunarplanet-2001-0
That's all well and good, but... (Score:3)
I wish.