Monkey Heads Transplanted At Last 28
elcosmico sends news that monkey brains are being transplanted. Well, sort of. We post some weird stuff in the science section, don't we?
"What if" is a trademark of Hewlett Packard, so stop using it in your sentences without permission, or risk being sued.
So what (Score:1)
I don't know which is worse... (Score:2)
What these guys have basically discovered is that glue sticks things together, really really well. Something most of the rest of us knew by the age of 5. (Though usually regretting it, afterwards. :)
Being able to stick two blood vessels together is so much a non-achievement that only Jeremy Beadle could compete.
Now, if these guys had managed to reconnect the entire nervous system (in the RIGHT order!), they would have achieved something that could credibly be called science.
IMHO, Universities should prohibit staff to play with paper and paste until they've got some serious work done.
Re:clearly i have completely lost my moral groundi (Score:1)
Re:Outside (Score:1)
Probably you refer to plastination [plastination.com], with a travelling exhibition [koerperwelten.de]. I have personally only seen it on TV yet. They don't just make it a medical exhibition but turn it into art.
horror film (Score:1)
Somehow I don't think we will ultimately be satisfied until we can slice, dice, improve, remove and recycle every piece of our bodies. Like the video game advertising article (basically) said: people just take for granted that things get worse as marketers and producers find new ways to make a buck. We just take it in stride.
For how much money will you sell your extra kidney? Left arm? Spleen?
Outside (Score:3)
The whole procedure actually reminds me a bit of the plot of David Bowie's Outside CD, where some crazy futuristic people perform bizarre medical operations as forms of artistic expression. Or that crazy German guy who embalms corpses in order to sculpt them (saw it on the Learning Channel).
Will fall for anything on the innurnet... (Score:1)
Re:Two notes. (Score:1)
Two notes. (Score:2)
2) As the article points out, what they've really got is a head connected to the main neck vessels. All nervous system connections are kaput. What this means is that the brainstem (which has all the centers that regulate your vital organs) does not have a connection to such vital things as the phrenic nerve (which moves the diaphragm up and down). I doubt that this poor beast was able to breathe on its own. Also disconnected would be the vagus nerves, which go to pretty much every vital organ in some way. There's a classic quote in my anatomy textbook: "bilateral destruction of the vagus nerves is sooner or later incompatible with life". Being completely unable to regulate your body means you're basically fucked the next time something goes wrong. Your body could have any number of fatal diseases and you wouldn't feel a damn thing until it started affecting the brain (at which point you're usually terminal anyway).
Could you use this to be immortal? Sure, if you could solve the whole rejection problem and you don't mind having all the joyful life experience of the classical head-in-a-jar. I feel sorry for the monkey. The experiment proves basically nothing, isn't a technique which any rational surgeon or patient would accept as therapeutic, and pretty much just managed to cost a lot of money and cause a poor animal plenty of pain. I'm agreeing with the second gent they quoted --- nerve regeneration looks a lot better.
Monkey Heads Transplanted at last (Score:1)
Stem cell (Score:1)
Isn't this where stemcells would come into play?
Re:Body or brains (Score:1)
Body or brains (Score:1)
I'm just not sure... (Score:3)
The Assayer [theassayer.org] - free-information book reviews
Re:Here's an idea for immortality (immorality?) (Score:1)
You'd be surprised how easy that is with some people.
Seriously, though, it'd be pretty damn hard to keep the spare body alive long enough to be useful. Ends up running into the same technological impossibilities as the plot of 6th Day (God-awful movie - I'm still kinda pissed at my roommate for suckering me into watching it. That time could have been much better spent playing CS.)
The Obligatory Beowulf Cluster Joke (Score:1)
eat (Score:1)
Impractical at best (Score:1)
Re:Irreverent. (Score:1)
It's wrong if he performs the experiment repeatedly (look, we did it again!) The only possible outcome of this experiment is the inevitable death of both animals. It's worth doing once or twice, but without the ability to reattach the spine, repeating it is pretty much just a form of torture.
I think it would be cool (Score:1)
-----
clearly i have completely lost my moral grounding (Score:2)
What about pain? (Score:1)
A while ago some nut (same guy?) offered to do this for Christopher Reave (sp?), but since he'd be just as paralized in the "new" body, Chris declined the offer.
Here's an idea for immortality (immorality?) (Score:1)
Grow your own clone, preferably without the brain, and replace your brain into it when the old body is all worn out. Repeat as nessesary.
Sure, you have some problems to overcome. The brain will still age, after all. And there is that nerve regeneration problem to be worked out... but hey, this could be the first day of the rest of your extremely extended life!
There is something this article is missing... (Score:2)
What I'd like to know is why there is no mention of this previous opperation, and everyone is acting like this is a first? Maybe it's been done better, more efficently, or lasted longer ect... but it's not original!
However, I remember when I first saw this, I was disappointed that the research ended at that time. I'm not for cruelty to animals, but I am all for scientific progression... and the goal of a brain transplant has too many potential benefits (it's the only major organ that won't be rejected in another body) for it NOT to be fully explored.
Sometimes we block ourselves off from potentially beneficial avenues of discovery in the name of "morality" and "ethics", such as Stem-cell research or cloning, but often times that same morality or ethics are misguided, or misinformed, and through the ignorance of the masses we have a situation where our best and brightest are told not to "go there", not because of any rational reason, but because it make the public feel "icky" (for lack of a better word).
Irreverent. (Score:1)
OTOH, I don't think this is the most credible source: "The arguments against head and brain transplants were outlined by Dr Stephen Rose, director of brain and behavioural research at the Open University." This sounds like a euphemism for head-shrink leader. I wouldn't expect a very open minded response regarding what is essentially an "evil" can of worms being opened from anyone other then the most liberal minded of scientists. Nor do I see this as "wrong", as it's just an experiment.
Re:There is something this article is missing... (Score:1)
This guy's right! I saw that too!
Furthermore the brain stayed alive for more then just a little while after the original operation and in point of fact Rush Limbaugh is still alive and well today.
Major major major (Score:1)
"And the brain, because of its uniqueness poses a major, major ethical issue as far as the public and even the profession is concerned."
Fortunately it was major, major fun, so we did it anyway. My whole research staff was major, major impressed. Lots of other people were ultra, ultra pissed off but they were totally major, major animal rights people. So we totally, totally didn't give a rat's ass.
--
Re:Two notes. (Score:1)