Iridium Saved By the US Dept of Defense 131
mccready was one of quite a bunch of people to send us the news trinket from CNNfn . It seems that the on-again, off-again Iridium system has at least another two years. The US Department of Defense has stepped in with $72 million, while another buyer is found. The reason? To avoid 'triggering possible "widespread anxiety" on re-entry.'
Rename to AlGoredium (Score:1)
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:1)
The first is that the satellites are not being bought by the government (as some people here have claimed).
The second is that Iridium/the bankruptcy court ended up selling their assets to a newly formed company called Iridium Satellite for the bargain price of around $25 million.
Iridium Satellite has determined that the only way that the satellite network will be feasible is to sell services to governments. Let's face it, the idea that even the above-average consumer would need a satellite phone is pretty crazy.
The US DOD already has a a couple thousand Iridium handsets in use. So they signed a deal to keep their service going (assuming that the service stays) for the next couple years. It's no biggie.
What honestly surprises me is that someone from the government would actually claim that it was to prevent re-intry when obviously it isn't.
Prevention of Anxiety? Thats the Cover Story. (Score:1)
If I were king (Score:2)
Re:So the guy who runs Pan-Am into the ground..... (Score:1)
Re:Is it going to be used at all? (Score:1)
At Microsoft, I often saw vans marked, "Teufel Landscaping Company" or something to that effect.
I'm sure it's simply the last name of the founder (a Google search for 'Teufel' turned up a number of home pages of Herr Teufels), but usually it translates from German as "Devil" IIRC.
I thought they said... (Score:1)
72 million = 2 years?
With the way the DoD misappropriates funds, this isn't that bad really. Although, I think we can safely assume that they aren't funding a glogal wireless telecommunications empire because the public (Most of which don't know where on a map is, much less that there are the satilites in the lower atmosphere. Imagine that? The DoD not telling us the whole story.
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:1)
Re:Bad precedent? - No. Money saving (Score:1)
The other blather is just added benefits included to pacify public imbecility.
Good idea (Score:1)
While the concers of the public are most liekly grounded in Hollywood science fiction they are no less improtant. Every day small pieces of space debris are able to survive re-entry. Most of this debris is too small to damage structures or living things, it also is concentrated in relatively uninhabited areas. Regardless, large pieces of Iriduim satellites reaching earth is a distinct possibility. Many municipaliteis have plans [www.naz.ch] for just such an event, plans that have scientific justification. While the possibility of this is remote, it is certainly in our best interests to consider the possibility.
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:1)
Abandonment is stupid and irresponsible. Who can "claim" them? Anyone who can successfully hack them? If you want the satellite, you also get the responsibility. All orbits degenerate, and no company can accept the liability of having a satellite of theirs crash in New York just because they didn't want to bother with de-orbiting their equipment properly. If they could have done it safely, but didn't, it all falls into their laps.
Re:Sounds like a smokescreen to me. (Score:2)
$72m is an absolute give away, they spend about half that on the maintenance of Air Force one for the president every year.
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:2)
Tax Writeoff
If Iridium ever comes down, Motorola can turn to the IRS and say "Even though we made around $44 billion USD this year (intial projection value for 2001, though this has been revised [cnn.com]), we just lost a $5 billion dollar system. Please have pity on us." And the IRS will cut them some slack.
The irony of this is that in a manner of thinking, the US governnment will have partially funded the cost of Iridium through lost tax revenue. So the DoD buying it seems strangely logical, given that a) the government would have footed the bill in one way or another and b) it's better to have a working orbital communications system than a rain of space garbage.
PS: I seem to recall an old animation on the Macintosh that showed a Star Destroyer-esque ship from the underside. A fleet of spacecraft flew out of the hold, there was a pause, and then a bunch of crap started coming out of the hold as the words "SPACE GARBAGE" flashed on the screen.
Man, that cracked me up at the time.
The new DOD? (Score:1)
Pan Handling (Score:1)
uncanny (Score:1)
it would appear that the very thing that the FBI was faraid of, that of people being able to communicate in an untracable medium, the DoD has gone and done for them so that they wont have to worry about it.
GlabalStar hasnt been selling like the investors had originally wanted, and could possibly be on its way out in the next couple years if things keep going down this path.
Take those two players out of the picture and there is no way to have a wireless communications system that cant be tracked by the government.
Good Idea by the DOD. (Score:2)
Completely useless, heavy objects with a bit of propulsion ability.
Uses: To set in the path of competeting countries spy sattelites.
Think about it. Russia worked for years and spent hundreds of millions of dollars to perfect the "Sattelite Killer"
The US DOD bought one for about a buck fifty.
krystal_blade
Re:Bad precedent? Air Force Purchase.. (Score:1)
$1 million a day in operating expenses (Score:1)
Bad precedent? (Score:2)
KTB:Lover, Poet, Artiste, Aesthete, Programmer.
Which will come first? (Score:1)
This is probably a good idea... (Score:4)
If you're not wasted, the day is.
Re:Iridium the Cat (Score:4)
I tracked a lot of the Iridium financial and PR stuff in the early days (several evil MBA projects ). Buried pretty deep in this info was the fact that the US Department of Defense was either a large potential customer, or a large actual customer but the details were secret. I have been wondering for a while if we would see something like this - it seems pretty clear now that DoD is making use of this system and doesn't want to give it up. Interesting.
sPh
Interesting (Score:1)
More corporate welfare! (Score:2)
Next time you hear those in big business praising the vigor of the free market, and being critical of the welfare state, just think of the Defense Department. The Defense Department is the welfare mother for our corporate failures.
The true reasons for the DoD's intervention (Score:2)
2. As part of the deal with Iridium, the DoD built an access site that connects the Iridium system into Defense phone and data networks.
3. Per this press release [af.mil], Iridium forms part of a critical link between AF leadership and foward deployed forces.
4. For other missions, such as Search and Rescue, Iridium phones have become backups for regular systems and in some instances the primary means for emergency communications.
These are all capabilities that the DoD won't want to easily give up. $72 Million over two years is a drop in the bucket compared to cost of developing and deploying a new constellation, as well as the back-end costs of converting over the missions listed above.
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:1)
Actually, I do know that. I don't have enough math to calcualte an orbit, but I am familiar with the basics.
My point, not very well stated, is that the satelites won't begin to fall for several years. Not even Motorola would build 'em with an orbit the enters serious decay after just two years. When the time to de-orbit them comes it will take maybe two or three minutes worth of radio, and a few hours of a mathematician's time to handle the job. Hardly a couple of million dollars.
So long as they are up there, they could be useful. Motorola is preventing them from being useful. Satelites have been abandoned and claimed in the past (I can only recall one instance, but it has happened). Instead they are seeking to destroy them out of what I can only assume is a sense of pure bastardry. Also, I suppose, for a tax write off.
On the subject of decaying orbits, I will add that I'm still pissed that they chose to put the ISS into a decaying orbit. Ten year lifetime, feh! We won't make any progress in space until we have a permanant station.
Yes, it would cost more to boost the components into a higher orbit, but what really is the point in spending billions building a space station that you intend to crash after just a few yars?
This surprises anybody? (Score:2)
Not only can you hide signal in it, but one of the up/down links is located in Quantico, Va., if memeory serves. Extremely convienient for three letter agencies.
It's half good half bad news. (Score:2)
- Iridium will not burn in vain
- The world will still have its own satellite telephone network
Bad:
- The astronomers will still curse Iridium for its "flare" effect
- Normal people will never use Iridium again...
That's their story... (Score:5)
Mercury News report [mercurycenter.com]
: FEAR OF PUBLIC OUTCRY CITED: Despite the relatively small risk, an interagency group led by the Justice Department was ``extremely unhappy at the prospect of a 14-month mass de-orbit,'' a background paper handed out at the Pentagon said. ``The group worried that this might create widespread anxiety and lead to a public outcry for ill-considered government action,'' the document said.
The Pentagon got a global phone system real cheap. They can encrypt all their transmissions, with add-ons or Iridium's existing feature set, and they have unlimited (well, up to the capacity anyway) use of the thing. Plus all the relationships with the local PTTs are toast, so they don't have to worry about China Telecom controlling them when the Green Berets are roaming around Tibet. Sounds like a great deal for the taxpayer!
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:1)
Iridium must have a plan for destruction because of physics and statistics, not a freaking tax writeoff. Just because you see everything in a slashdot induced corporate hate, doesn't mean that you are right. They are already taking tax write-offs on the business losses that they have I'm sure, but the destruction of Iridium is not about TAX WRITEOFF.
God, do you have a problem?
New uses for Iridium (Score:2)
Turning them into a television service that broadcasts "Ishtar" to puerto rico 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
Streaming porn service for RV'ers across the nation
Anonymous spam remailer
seti?
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:1)
Also, as long as these birds are kept in orbit and not sold off, they cannot be written off as a tax asset.
tax dollars (Score:1)
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:1)
The Iridium satelites are in what is called "low earth orbit". This means that they are actually flying through an extremely thin part of the Earth's athmosphere.
Um...the earth's atmosphere extends beyond the moon. An Earth satellite couldn't not be flying through an extremely thin part of the earth's athmosphere.
Also, "Earth" is capitalized; "the earth" is not capitalized. As in, "Mom" is capitalized; "the mom" is not capitalized.
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:1)
--
Do the Math - it's an excellent deal for the DOD (Score:2)
36.000.000,-/20.000=1800USDannually for each phone
which comes out to
=> $150 / month, unlimited minutes, works world-wide.
now, if you ask me, the DOD has made an excellent deal here. plus, they get encryption and independence of local networks thrown in for free.
hey, i would go for a cell phone like that any day!
Lame... (Score:2)
Why not take the $72 mil and buy everyone in the U.S. an ice cream cone instead?
Hmm... (Score:1)
I've seen this news before, and as a result, it might lower Globalstar's prices, IF the new administration of Iridium Satellite LLC are smart enough to fix their old marketing practices, and more importantly be able to operate the sixty-something satellite network, in terms of money and also in terms of remote management (technical), but Motorola's in the house for that.
They might get a good shot. But I won't use their services again UNLESS they prove to me that they can beat Globalstar's prices, service and coverage.
Doesn't it bother anyone that... (Score:1)
Re:For better and more info (Score:1)
They also track the ISS, Mir and a few hundred others. All with the intent of telling you when you can see the critters going by overhead.
Re:Heh (Score:1)
Re:Anxiety? (Score:1)
It's not the only service that has world-wide coverage, but the terminals, sucky as they are, are much smaller than inmarsat et al.
The "widespread panic" argument is fun, but reality is that $72MM isn't a lot for them to pay to keep the cabability around (given the huge sunk cost paid by the investors). In fact this is probably the best deal the pentagon has ever gotten with their COTS purchasing program!
We need _MORE_ not fewer, Manmade Meteor Showers! (Score:1)
I always wondered, what would happen if NASA took a refrigerator box full of steel lugnuts and launched them towards the earth? Would they have enough mass to make a shooting star on re-entry? If so, the US could put on a worldwide pyrotechnics show with a man-made meteor shower. I think that would have an interesting psychological morale boost for the space programs of the world: "Space isn't some obscure place millions of miles away- it's close and friendly enough that we can launch meteor showers in it." I personally would like to see NASA flaunt the rather godlike ability to announce and then create meteor showers the world over.
Also, if perfectly good lugnuts would be a waste just to melt on re-entry, we could always use trash with no other practical use, like: [INSERT HUMOROUS ITEM HERE] (Possible Examples- Furbies, Aibos, AOL CDs, Florida Ballot trucks, Playstation 2s, iMacs..)Heh heh heh. With dry, cool, and topical wit like that I could be a tech cartoonist! ; -)
Databass
Re:It's half good half bad news. (Score:1)
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:1)
Why can't anybody use these? (Score:2)
Granted, I don't understand the underlying costs for such an operation, but surely all the brilliant minds in the world can come up with something?
Better use for the 72M? (Score:2)
Re:Is it going to be used at all? (Score:1)
Maybe their problem was in their name choice. It's similar to naming a consulting company "The Devil"
The Devil says we need a new web server!
We're going to launch Iridium satellites into space!br>
At least they didn't name their company "Plutonium".
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:2)
Australia (Score:2)
Can't they just send all the satellites to Quasi?
On the serious side, I guess we should have all known that only the government could save this. After all, everybody else figured it was worthless, so naturally they have to spend our tax dollars on 'em.
That stuff about lots of reentries causing problems is bogus. Some people at DoD probably want them as yet-another-backup-channel in the event of a military communication problem. Why don't they just come out and say that?
$5,000,000,000 (Score:2)
Number one reason Iridium will not be de-oribited:$5,000,000,000 it cost to put it up.
'Everyone' obviously sees the value of the $5B array of sats 'we' have already put up - collectively the planet sees it as a usefull asset. The problem is* corporatists have corrupted our communities and our minds - we feel powerless - to the point where no one is willing to say "we can run them Non-Profit for the all people" or set up a quick and dirty 'world organization' and get quick commitments of government dollars to fund their usage... why is it that the next owners have to be a For-Profit corporation??? People of the planet obviously see the value - why cant 'civic will' step up and assume ownership???
With the alternative being de-orbiting $5,000,000,000 - what seems like a more plausable/reasonable/sane idea? How did 'profit making corporations' become the only method of force/action/will on the planet?? Why the HELL are we standing around hoping some corporatist is going to step up and save this resource 'for us'?
*Just what you need - another
Sensationalist reporting by CNN? (Score:1)
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:1)
Really? Then you should ask yourself why the U.S. is not a direct democracy (i.e., why do we elect representative instead of voting for issues directly?). There have been many times when the tryanny of the majority would have been much more severe than our government has ever been. The fact is that our founding fathers recognized that what we think is right too often is not what is right, and that the elected officials are supposed to be wiser.
You can also see this reasoning in the use of the electoral college and in the difficulty of passing or repealing a constitutional ammendment.
How about spys? (Score:1)
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:1)
Oh, wait, Godwin's law... I've already won this argument.
--
Bush's assertion: there ought to be limits to freedom
Remember, it's your money. (Score:1)
Remember, they're the same government that spends $10,000 on a hammer and $30,000 on a toilet seat.
Iridium in Embassies (Score:4)
I think it was a great idea: Unclassified but Sensitive information could be phoned back to the US without high level personel having to locate a STU [tscm.com] (secure telephone unit). Bypass landlines and possible wiretaps, and you can call from anywhere. I believe conversations from the handset to the satellite were encrypted, so it was a great investment. Of course, the Iridium shut down around 6 months later and the phones were useless...
Target practice (Score:2)
Re:Pan Handling (Score:2)
Re:Remember, it's your money. (Score:2)
It's not that standards are bad. It's that there are so many.
Re:Iridium the Cat - /. Icon (Score:1)
you've got to wonder if those satellites are ever coming down
Perhaps Slashdot should have used something other than the money icon. Maybe a lucky charm or the Energizer Bunny (with all due trademark symbols, or course).
Skeptical (Score:1)
gov't: yeah ...um ...people are terrified, senator. give us seventy-two mil.
senator: sure. [plop]
My .02,
Re:Iridium the Cat (Score:2)
Sure...we want to avoid a panic...sure... (Score:1)
Who needs SDI when you have a space-based cancer weapon? It works something like the sattelite laser from Real Genius only much, much slower.
Ridiculopathy.com: Our rejected plan to use it in a bid for world domination [ridiculopathy.com]
Re:Better use for the 72M? (Score:1)
They'd probally spend more than 72M on the missiles themselves. Do you have any idea what a good missile costs these days?
Neither do I.
Re:Why can't anybody use these? (Score:1)
Unless it was never commercially feasible to begin with.
Iridium is being used... Doh! (Score:2)
Nobody would give a crap if you sent down a satelite a day into the pacific. Nobody would even notice it anymore than they notice the hundreds of pounds of other cosmic crap that rains down on this planet every day.
$150/Month for UNLIMITED INTERNATIONAL CALLS!!! (Score:2)
It's not a total waste of tax money (Score:2)
There is a growing need for the encrypted services that will be made possible through a special "sleeve"" outfitted for secure handsets.
The Pentagon already owns about 1,600 Iridium satellite phones.
It will get unlimited air time for up to 20,000 government users for $3 million a month under the deal.
This will be ideal for easing the current crush of the U.S. military's ultra-high-frequency mesh for networking and point-to-point communications.
Currently, the department's communications satellites provide less than half such services required by U.S. forces, crowding lower-priority users off the airways.
Iridium? (Score:1)
Thimo
--
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:2)
Besides, what is right is what people want, or do you believe in some silly notion of moral absolutism? I'll laugh when some jack-booted thug asserts his moral justification to beat your face in, troll.
--
Bush's assertion: there ought to be limits to freedom
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:2)
It wasn't completely "worth more down than up", but it was getting close. This way, at least, the new Iridium company gets to survive while most of the investors, like Motorola, swallow the loss of their investment.
----
Re:Unpleasant dreams (Score:1)
--
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:1)
AFAIK, Ted Kennedy is still in office.
Re:Bad precedent? (Score:1)
If this were a democracy, we would all vote on it, which we are not doing. Hence they don't have to do what we "think" is right.
They do if they want to get reelected.
Why Iridium's marketing failed (Score:1)
Re:$5,000,000,000 (Score:2)
So, if the potential users are people who can pay for it, why don't they? The only reasonable answer is that the functionality doesn't justify the operating costs. If that's so, it shouldn't be run -- non-profit or otherwise.
Re:Bad precedent? Air Force Purchase.. (Score:1)
Stop your paranoia (Score:2)
It's just cheaper to pay to leave them there. And before you trot out your "Not my tax dollars !!!" warhorse just remember there are lots of things your tax dollars pay for that you should have no expectation or desire to take advantage of. Prisons are a good example of that.
For better and more info (Score:3)
Re:Sounds like a smokescreen to me. (Score:1)
Missile Command... (Score:1)
How's this for a twist? The DOD shoots $72 Million in tax money at the falling objects, and they still all explode when nobody buys them.
Of couse, $72 Mil means someone in the Pentagon'll have to go without an extra pencil sharpener...
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:1)
I have to make the point that I have no hate for (most) corporations. In fact, I see nothing wrong with tax deductions. Hell, my parents took tax deductions because of me (I was a dependent), yet I don't see them as greedy, just sensible.
Motorola has an obligation to it's stockholders. If it has a system that is sucking in cash with no chance of payout, then it is in the stockholders interests to get out of that venture while minimizing the losses. It would be totally foolish to do otherwise. And since they're taking tax write-off's why not take this one too?
Even if they couldn't get the writeoff, absorbing the costs of a useless system makes no sense from a bottom-line standpoint. And altruistic notions such as "open source satellite systems" are filtered out before they get there.
Re:It's half good half bad news. (Score:1)
Re:Anxiety? (Score:2)
Waste of money (Score:1)
Sounds like a smokescreen to me. (Score:3)
Re-Entry Day (Score:3)
Anxiety? (Score:4)
---
seumas.com
Re:Australia (Score:2)
Re:Anxiety? (Score:5)
For example the Galactic Radiation and Background satellite, launched in 1960, carried a second set of hardware to perform signals surveillance of the Soviet Union; this function was not made public until 1968. See http://www.physicstoday.org/pt/vol-53/iss-12/p51.
Well, damn. (Score:2)
But damnit, KTB, what are you doing now???
This sets a bad precedent. The DoD is acting to prevent totally unjustified anxiety on the part of millions of Americans. I thought the function of Government Departments was to do what is right, not what people think is right
I totally agree with this. What is going on? Did you get bored and decide to write something honest instead of baiting people? Did you realize that many of us were on to you weeks ago, and decide to throw in a monkey wrench by posting something reasonable? Is your karma dangerously close to the default score: -1 threshold?
I don't detect any hyperbole, feigned ignorance, or baiting here. And what scares me is the thought that maybe KTB hasn't changed, maybe I'm just in the select group of misinformed idiots being parodied by one of his posts, and don't realize it...
(Score -1: Confused)
Iridium and corporate BS (Score:2)
The company that put the satelites up went bankrupt, rather than a) selling them cheap, or b) abandoning them so others can claim them it is c) planning to destroy them if it doesn't get millions.
Once you put something into a stable orbit there isn't any reason to send it back down. Any mass in orbit is eventually going to be valuable simply in that it is already there. But, corporate idiocy strickes again "If we can't get our high fees, we'll just destroy our expensive investment." I simply don't understand this attitude: the money has already been spent, crashing the satelites results in an utter loss, any payment for the satelites is at least something.
Iridium the Cat (Score:5)
If I were a conspiracy theorist, I'd say that the Iridium project was actually an integral part of the new global monitoring system the US uses to track late model vehicles and toothpaste choices. At least then I would have a reason for the invulnerability of the Iridium system.
As it stands, I can only assume that it's the aliens that have kept Iridium flying so the astronomers can't see them. It wasn't a design fluke that the satellites wreak havoc on astronomers; the aliens got tired of hiding behind the moon, so they set up Iridium so they can take field trips around the earth.
You know, on the other hand, perhaps it's just an annoying thing that just won't die... kind of like Windows (or FORTRAN), I guess.
Heh (Score:3)
Re:Anxiety? (Score:2)
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:3)
The Iridium satelites are in what is called "low earth orbit". This means that they are actually flying through an extremely thin part of the Earth's athmosphere. Eventually the orbit decays (over a period of many years) due to the friction of the satelite hitting the molecules of air and the satelite will re-enter the athmosphere.
By doing a controlled re-entry they can control where the satelite will actually enter the athmosphere and hit the (hopefully) water.
real rationale (Score:3)
Re:Iridium and corporate BS (Score:2)
It takes money and effort to deorbit satellites. That is why there was plan to destroy the satellites. It actually was a very responsible and necessary corporate exit strategy. The issue for buyers is can they also have a serious and credible amount of resources need to operate and deorbit these satellites.