Nanotube Threads Get Stronger 69
pythorlh writes: "NewScientist has an article about carbon-nanotube thread. Could this be the begining of "monofilament" that sci-fi has been drooling over for years?" Well, from the sound of the article, not yet. But soon, perhaps: according to the article, "The new nanotube threads are about 10 times stronger than buckypaper, and can be tied into knots without breaking. But they are still much weaker than many other fibres, such as iron thread."
Potential? (Score:2)
Heh heh heh (Score:1)
Buckballs..... when? (Score:1)
This must be about the fifth year ina row I've heard great things about buckyballs, and Carbon 60. But where is it going? I mean, after all this time and we still don't have a decent end product.
I appreciate that development takes time, but when can we, the general public, expect nanotubular bike tyres or Lego blocks {grin}?
And what exactly does this new technology offer us? Maybe I'm being paranoid, but if this tech had many serious uses it would've been classified up the wazoo by now. Correct me if I'm wrong, please.
Ben^3Re:Heh heh heh (Score:1)
Umm.. good try at insinuating, but it really just makes you look... small.
Uses (Score:2)
It seems that these might actually have a use, unlike the buckyballs mentioned, which don't seem to be doing much of, well, anything (or, am I wrong? If anyone has info on actual uses of C60, please enlighten me).
My estimate is that nanoscience will become actually useful and commonplace within 13 years... I hope
-CoG
"And with HIS stripes we are healed"
Re:Buckballs..... when? (Score:1)
Re:Potential? (Score:3)
Sky chair (Score:1)
Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:2)
It shot out a spinning web of monofilament fibers that would turn its target into, as the book put in, something the approximate consistency of soup.
high fashion (Score:2)
i have a feeling new strong high tech fibers will be used for safety, practicality and bondage.. before they start making dresses using it..
Nanotube clothes? (Score:1)
Get yer thinggy out of the nanotube (Score:1)
One day, hopefuly not too long from now, this kinda think will have a mainstream use (bullet proof cloth, space teathers, any other thing used to hook two objects together and not break)
Busted link? (Score:1)
Re:Potential? (Score:1)
--
TSS-1r results aren't what you claim (Score:5)
--
Re:Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:1)
Wierd... (Score:1)
Exception in article: ns9999184 : org.xml.sax.SAXException: FWK005 parse may not be called while parsing.
I'm using Netscape 4.61 (OS/2). Maybe I'll reboot into Linux Mandrake 7.0 and try it using Netscape 4.73 (IIRC).
Re:Wierd... (Score:1)
it could be a server error...
or maybe.. the slashdot effect..
damn..
bastards killed em again
"The world is coming to an end. Please log orff."
Re:yeah (Score:1)
______
What's the alternative? (Score:2)
What was the point in researching electricity, 200 years ago? Nothing useful was built of it... for almost 200 years.
Yet if that research were not done, we would not have, in the intervening years, radio, speakers, solenoids, TVs, CPUs, etc.
So what will we have from C60 and buckyball research? No one knows... and that's all that can be said.
Do you want speculation? How about a different class of material? In one state superconducting, in another insulative, and in another, conducting? Different strength and material properties, maybe? How about a new class of allows using C60 instead of straight carbon? Or new optical devices using crystals doped with C60? It's sci fi, for now.
The nick is a joke! Really!
Re:Uses (Score:1)
Re:Wierd... (Score:1)
Re:Buckballs..... when? (Score:1)
To answer the other bit, technologies, in almost all cases, can only be classified by the US government if they were developed with government funding. There may very well be export restrictions on the stuff though.
from "Dune" (Score:1)
I don't want to know the taste of the recycled water....
monofilament in SF books (Score:1)
Re:Potential? - it may take a while (Score:1)
(why don't we just use nanobots! oh wait)
______
Re:Potential? (Score:1)
i think i also remember somebody pointing out that theyd make a really good heatsink, in theory it sounds good
then theres the nanorobots growing ever more possible
im sure millions of them out there
Re:What's the alternative? (Score:1)
We just need to be able to produce C60 and its spinoffs cheaply.
Re:Uses (Score:1)
______
Re:Nanotube clothes? (Score:1)
______
Re:Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:1)
Very Cheap Space Access! (Score:1)
This material in large quantities makes possible Arthur C Clarke's BeanStalk to Geosynchyronous orbit. Want to get to space? Ride an elevator!
If... (Score:1)
Space elevators are 38 THOUSAND kilometers long. The material would have to come from the moon or asteroids, getting even a few hundred of tonnes of material from either is maybe 10 years away; never mind the 10s of thousands of tonnes needed. Then there's the factory. Then there's the fuel needed to move stuff to GEO orbit. etc. etc.
In the shorter term though, we're talking stronger bridges, skyscrapers, stronger carbon fiber materials etc. etc. Even lighter (hence better) space vehicles. Cool tech. Want some.
Re:Potential? (Score:1)
These threads, because of their engineering structure will be quite stong once they are perfected. They could, in theroy, be as strong, if not stronger, than iron and steel.
Re:monofilament in SF books (Score:3)
Re:Potential? (Score:5)
One can estimate theoretically the ultimate strength of a nanotube be examining the microscopic failure modes, i.e. the ways in which atoms rearrange in response to an external stress (i.e. stretching).
In the case of perfect, defect-free nanotubes, there are two modes that seem to be important. First, the rotation of a single carbon-carbon bond by 90 degrees, which converts a patch of 4 hexagons (remember that carbon atoms are arranged in a chicken-wire or honeycomb pattern on the tube wall) into two pentagons and two heptagons (relevant references are Zhang & Crespi from Penn State in Physical Review Letters and work by Bernholc at NC State and Yacobson at Rice I think, but the exact journal escapes me at the moment). This mode is a plastic distortion of the tube; the tube with the bonds rearranged is a bit longer than it was before.
The second failure mode is for one of the hexagonal rings of carbon atoms to break open, i.e. for a carbon-carbon bond to break. This is a more catastrophic event, in that the tube then quickly breaks near the point of failure. Which way a tube fails may actually depend on how the honeycomb pattern is rolled into a tube shape.
Now that's just the microscopic theory on the ideal, defect-free system. In a real tube, one expects there to be pre-existing defects in the structure. The failure under tension will then be at the defective points
But, since nanotubes are so small, it's plausible that a single tube or bunch of tubes might grow entirely defect-free, in which case one can access the ultimate theoretical failure strength. Experiments on trying to stretch and break single bundles of nanotubes (Lieber's group at Harvard) show that one can extend a nanotube by about 6% of it's length before it breaks. This is in good agreement with the theoretical predictions mentioned above (and it's a legit prediction- the theory came first!). So it appears that in small enough systems, one can attain the theoretical mechanical strength.
Now if one wants to make a space elevator, one's material has to also be resistant to radiation damage, etc. I think a back of the envelope estimate shows carbon nanotubes or diamond nanowires as being in the right ballpark, so long as one allows the structure to taper, but once one factors in the necessary engineering margins and the need to be resistant to damage over long periods (don't want it to fall apart in a year or two :-) it's much
less clear if it's really possible. It's all
in the very very long run, of course.
I should admit- I have not yet read this specific article (New Scientist website is crashing on me) so I can't comment specifically on this current experimental result. My guess is they did a larger-scale version of Lieber's experiment and found that the resulting thread was alot weaker (not surpirising- their structure likely has lots more defects and possibly single tubes don't extend throughout the entire length- they overlap).
Re:Buckballs..... when? (Score:2)
Buckyballs don't have any important current application that I know of (there was some work in nonlinear optical materials, but I don't know if it panned out).
Carbon nanotubes have a pretty good chance of appearing as field emitters in flat-panel displays before too long. They have great conductivity, they're very pointy and extremely robust under the relevant electrical conditions. They are already at the simple prototype stage. Batteries might also pan out (they store lithium quite well) but tubes are still much too expensive for that.
The tubes will very likely find many more commercial applications than buckyballs.
Oh- and there's one application out there right now. Mass-produced (and very low-quality) multiwalled tubes are currently sold to mix into plastic parts to add conductivity to the plastic so that they can be charged up uniformly and electrostatically painted. Nice shiny plastic car bumpers. Not quite an elevator to geosynchronous, but it makes (a little) money.
Re:/. SysAdmins meet Mister Wizard (Score:2)
Hi,
I am a slashdotter myself occasionally. I am also currently performing research on nanotubes at a major research unversity, with publications in Science, Nature, and other places on nanoscience.
Perhaps the slashdot readership is a bit more diverse than you though. I find it an interesting place to visit, with some very intelligent conversation. (And thanks much to the moderators).
Re:Nanotube clothes? (Score:1)
Otherwise if these fibers are small enough and inflexible enough they can get into your lungs and tear up lung tissue making scar tissue and eventually causing lung cancer. Even if this was a concern don't smoke and you would still probably be in fine shape. In any case even if these tubes were carcinogenic you would only really would have to be working in a poorly ventilated manufacturing plant.
Re:Potential? (Score:2)
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/03948247
Called them skyhooks...
Later
Erik Z
Re:Buckballs..... when? (Score:1)
Re:Buckballs..... when? (Score:2)
--
Re:Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:1)
Re:TSS-1r results aren't what you claim (Score:2)
Re:If... (Score:1)
Re:Wierd... (Score:1)
that's the problem!
In 1999, marijuana [smokedot.org] killed 0 Americans...
Re:monofilament in SF books (Score:1)
Re:high fashion (Score:2)
This sounds like just the material I need to keep my Buckyballs safe and warm!
Re:Get yer thinggy out of the nanotube (Score:1)
Monofilament (Score:1)
It's fool-proof, but is it genius-proof? (Score:1)
Hmmm.... That would be bad juju for sure, but I wonder which would cause more deaths:
--
Re:Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:1)
-
Re:monofilament in SF books (Score:1)
But it's been a while...
---
You already do... (Score:1)
Re:Monofilament (Score:1)
Deo
Not Clarke (Score:1)
Re:Buckballs..... when? (Score:1)
link problem (Score:1)
"Exception in article: ns9999184 : org.xml.sax.SAXException: FWK005 parse may not be called while parsing." ?
Somebody is not processing exceptions the right way..
Any mirrors? (Score:1)
Re:Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:1)
I miss playing 40k
Re:Get yer thinggy out of the nanotube (Score:1)
Caution: Now approaching the (technological) singularity.
Nanotubes (Score:2)
Just a few problems with these nanotubes.
1) Assuming perfectly defect free nanotubes above the single fiber level is implausible. Nanotubes work fine as single fibers, however stringing them together requires either using them in some sort of fiber composite or somehow connecting the tubes together to form some sort of tube honeycomb. A honeycomb cannot be assume to be defect free so properties will be degraded and a composite will weight the fiber properties with the weaker but tougher matrix.
2) Nanotubes will likely be quite brittle no matter what form they take. This poses big problems. The usual method for overcoming this is by compositing them with a weaker but tougher matrix, but that will lower the end strength of the composite.
3) Construction of tall buildings and the like requires big compressive loads. Tube/fiber composites suck in compression because the fibers buckle before they ever even get close to their ultimate strength. This is a problem if you wish to build a space elevator since such a structure is bound to have huge compressive loads at its base.
Article in Scientific American (Score:1)
-MSD.dyndns.org [sjs.org]
"Sucks to your ass-mar"
Re:If... (Score:2)
The cable wouldn't wrap around the earth- it would burn up as it re-enters. You wouldn't want to be in the few hundred miles east of the cable, but other than that its not a problem that can't be dealt with.
So the idea is that the cable would be built on an east coast and other design features would ensure cable wouldn't reach the earths surface after a catastrophic failure.
Nanotubes/fibres - other uses (Score:1)
This has little to do with strength of such materials, but it does help to display their other uses. Don't write the stuff off.
Re:Nanotubes -space elevator (Score:1)
Re:Potential? (Score:1)
Re:Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:1)
Re:Monofilaments in Warhammer 40K (Score:1)