NASA releases first Chandra photos 37
Gedanken writes "Nasa has released the first images from the new Chandra Project X-Ray telescope and they are spectacular. It will be researching high energy events such as supernovas, quasars and black holes. "
Re:What the... (Score:2)
Non linear colour maps are all over the place. They're much more common than linear maps. Go buy some Fuji Velvia for your 35 mm camera. It takes awfully nice portraits doesn't it? It's because the colour map is tweaked to provide pleasing flesh tones.
This isn't any different than a mathemetician using a logarithmic scale to do a plot of a function with exponential growth.
Aren't X-Rays harmful to supernovas? (Score:1)
Nice res. (Score:2)
Wow.. works in Xray too.. reminds me of that video camera that could see thru clothing (kinda)..
"Now, the new NudieCam! Using fabulous X-ray technology developed by NASA, you can video tape women in their undies, from up to 12 miles away!"
hah!
---
Re:Aren't X-Rays harmful to supernovas? (Score:1)
NASA should be covering the atmosphere with lead to protect us, instead of the useless telescope stuff.
George
Ra-di-a-tion. Yes, indeed. You hear the most outrageous lies about it. Half-baked goggle-box do-gooders telling everybody it's bad for you. Pernicious nonsense! Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year.
Re:What the... (Score:1)
slashdot.gov (Score:2)
Think of the money NASA could save... (Score:1)
Re:Nice res. (Score:1)
Re:What the... (Score:3)
X-rays aren't visible to human eyes at all, so of course you have to process the image to display them in visible wavelengths. This is standard practice for all astronomy outside of visible light (which is most astronomy these days, actually.) The image of Cas A was mapped onto a red scale, where
white = highest intensityyellow = high intensity
red = low intensity
black = lowest or no intensity
The quasar image was done similarly, only using a blue scale rather than red. Right now, these colors are pretty much arbitrary, but later on, we'll probably start coming up with color maps that have a bit more science behind them, especially once we get into spectroscopic imaging.
Trust me, you don't want us to start displaying the images in "true-color" X-ray unless you have some passing desire to fry your eyes. Oops. ;-)
- Marshall
mperrin@cfa.harvard.edu
Desktop Backgrounds? (Score:1)
Re:Sure enough...server not responding (Score:1)
Remember, the site is mirrored at both chandra.nasa.gov and chandra.harvard.edu, although both are being slow right now...
*grin* So all of us here at the CfA packed into our main auditorium to watch the press conference via NASA TV (Chandra is being run from here in Cambridge, but the press conference was down at NASA HQ in DC.) As we were walking out of the auditorium around 2, after the conference ended with a display of the two URLs, I overheard one of the astronomers up ahead of me mutter under his breath "OK, now we're gonna get slashdotted." And indeed, by the time I got back to my office, the chandra server was already being reaaaal sloooooow. AFAIK, it's a pretty hefty Sun, but I guess not quite hefty enough.
Luckily, there are other servers which have all the actual data on them for people to do work with. Unluckily, those are all internal-only right now, so y'all are going to have to wait a bit.
sonic boom? (Score:1)
The outer wave may be related to an awesome sonic boom resulting from this collision.
Funny.. I never knew there was an atmosphere in space =P
Re:Desktop Backgrounds? (Score:1)
imabug
Re:Aren't X-Rays harmful to supernovas? (Score:1)
Re:Desktop Backgrounds? (Score:1)
What the... (Score:1)
Fuji Velvia is AWFUL for skin! (Score:1)
Fuji makes some nice portrait films, mainly NPH.
Re:Aren't X-Rays harmful to supernovas? (Score:2)
Re:x-ray images? (Score:1)
of the spectrum, but the colours in the image
that you see merely represent the luminosity
(or number of photons) recieved in each detector
pixel. The colours chosen are arbitrary. It is
customary to use shades of red for x-ray images,
as opposed to shades of grey for optical images.
It certainly makes them prettier too!
Ale
Sure enough...server not responding (Score:1)
Re:Think of the money NASA could save... (Score:1)
Re:Desktop Backgrounds? (Score:1)
Re:What the... (Score:1)
So, you have to map the higher frequencies down to the visible range. Conversely, night-vision goggles kick infrared light up into the visible range.
The point I was trying to make is that their mapping function is non-linear; they use a damped Boltzman (black-body) distribution, adjusted to look like fire. Pretty picture for the media, but utterly useless as a piece of evidence.
r
Chandra rulez! (Score:2)
/* Just kidding. */
Re:Sure enough...server not responding (Score:1)
-zeno
Slashdot Harvard instead. (Score:1)
Re:x-ray images? (Score:1)
One of the Chandra scientists (Norbert Schulz) has assembled a color image of Cas A where each color represents a different spetral region. It's a gorgeous image and the colors are actually significant, but it was unfortunately not ready in time for the press conference. I'm going to try to make a similar image next week if I have time.
-zeno
Re:Puddle Cruiser (Score:1)