

How Spaceport America Will Grow (space.com) 11
18 years ago Slashdot covered the creation of Spaceport America.
Today Space.com hails it as "the first purpose-built commercial spaceport in the world." But engineer/executive director Scott McLaughlin has plans to grow even more. Already home to an array of commercial space industry tenants, such as Virgin Galactic, SpinLaunch, Up Aerospace, and Prismatic, Spaceport America is a "rocket-friendly environment of 6,000 square miles of restricted airspace, low population density, a 12,000-foot by 200-foot runway, vertical launch complexes, and about 340 days of sunshine and low humidity," the organization boasts on its website...
Space.com: What changes do you see that make Spaceport America even more viable today?
McLaughlin: I think opening ourselves up to doing different kinds of work. We're more like a civilian test range now. We've got high-altitude UAVs [Unmanned Aerial Vehicles]. We're willing to do engine production. We believe we're about to sign a data center, one that's able to provide services to our customers who want low-latency, artificial intelligence, or high-powered computing. You'll be able to rent some virtual machines and do your own thing and have it be instantaneous at the spaceport. So I think being more broadminded about what we can do at the spaceport is helping generate customers and revenue...
Our goal is to see Virgin Galactic fly in a year or so, hopefully flying twice a week, and that will have a big impact on the spaceport... [W]e're trying to be open-minded as we're partnered with White Sands Missile Range to use that airspace. We're even looking at things like an electromagnetic pulse facility. It's a customer that I can't identify yet... We are working on a "reentry" license too. We recently discussed this with specialists and we think we have a site relatively close to the spaceport that's flat and free of mesquite bushes and such, so we can do capsule return and other types of return. And of course we have the runway. So I'd think we'd be the only spaceport that does vertical and horizontal launch and reentry....
We're never going to have the throughput that the Cape in Florida has. But we'll be a good alternative especially if you're going to do a small to medium-sized launch, and you need to do it quickly, and perhaps do it more securely than you would if you were to fly over water. That's why the Department of Defense is showing interest in the inland spaceport.
Today Space.com hails it as "the first purpose-built commercial spaceport in the world." But engineer/executive director Scott McLaughlin has plans to grow even more. Already home to an array of commercial space industry tenants, such as Virgin Galactic, SpinLaunch, Up Aerospace, and Prismatic, Spaceport America is a "rocket-friendly environment of 6,000 square miles of restricted airspace, low population density, a 12,000-foot by 200-foot runway, vertical launch complexes, and about 340 days of sunshine and low humidity," the organization boasts on its website...
Space.com: What changes do you see that make Spaceport America even more viable today?
McLaughlin: I think opening ourselves up to doing different kinds of work. We're more like a civilian test range now. We've got high-altitude UAVs [Unmanned Aerial Vehicles]. We're willing to do engine production. We believe we're about to sign a data center, one that's able to provide services to our customers who want low-latency, artificial intelligence, or high-powered computing. You'll be able to rent some virtual machines and do your own thing and have it be instantaneous at the spaceport. So I think being more broadminded about what we can do at the spaceport is helping generate customers and revenue...
Our goal is to see Virgin Galactic fly in a year or so, hopefully flying twice a week, and that will have a big impact on the spaceport... [W]e're trying to be open-minded as we're partnered with White Sands Missile Range to use that airspace. We're even looking at things like an electromagnetic pulse facility. It's a customer that I can't identify yet... We are working on a "reentry" license too. We recently discussed this with specialists and we think we have a site relatively close to the spaceport that's flat and free of mesquite bushes and such, so we can do capsule return and other types of return. And of course we have the runway. So I'd think we'd be the only spaceport that does vertical and horizontal launch and reentry....
We're never going to have the throughput that the Cape in Florida has. But we'll be a good alternative especially if you're going to do a small to medium-sized launch, and you need to do it quickly, and perhaps do it more securely than you would if you were to fly over water. That's why the Department of Defense is showing interest in the inland spaceport.
SPINLAUNCH, LMFAO (Score:3, Funny)
> ...SpinLaunch...
Oh you made me scharnfle milk out my nose. Imagine if Scott knew anything about whatever just came out of his talky-talky hole.
SpinLaunch.
Short watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
(no spin, no launch no product, no devs, it's about as close to bankrupcty as you get before... well... um... you've filed for bankruptcy protection.)
I'm not a lawyer, but then I'm not yoyo-stringing rocket launchers in my back yard to get them "...to space and beyond!"
Re: (Score:2)
Well, the actual concept only takes about ten seconds of thought to realize it is completely impractical. The obvious problem is easily demonstrated by what happens to objects in orbit when they aerobrake at the top of the atmosphere. You know, the whole superheated shell of air that requires high structural strength and ablative shielding to protect the contents of the capsule. In order to put an object into orbit, you have to reach the minimum velocity that an object entering the atmosphere to aerobrake w
Where's SpaceX? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Yea! Fuck the ocean!!
Re: (Score:2)
You generally want space ports near the ocean since it gives a large space to ditch the rocket if there is some mishap during launch.
And here I was thinking it was just in case the commercial space thing doesn't work out, you've always got the option to rebrand as a casino ship operator, with blackjack and hookers.
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly I'm way more invested in blackjack and hookers than I am in commercial space anything. There's value in those things.
All of the achievements of any rich billionaire anywhere in the world will pale in comparison to all the awful things they've done to accomplish them. Meanwhile, the US landing on the moon will still be the greatest achievement of mankind, precisely because it succeeded *in spite of* commercial interests.
Re: (Score:2)
That's why they said "if you're going to do a small to medium-sized launch". There's a lot of desolate land from there to the east where you could safely ditch a small rocket.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it is in New Mexico, so there's not much to hit anyway... :^D
What's this for? (Score:2)
Watch this excellent movie (Score:2)