

NASA Eliminates Chief Scientist and Other Jobs At Its Headquarters (nytimes.com) 204
NASA is eliminating approximately 20 positions, including its chief scientist and roles related to technology, policy, and diversity. The move, as part of a Trump administration effort to reduce staffing, "could be a harbinger of deeper cuts to NASA's science missions and a greater emphasis on human spaceflight, especially to Mars," reports the New York Times. From the report: The cuts affect about 20 employees at NASA, including Katherine Calvin, the chief scientist and a climate science expert. The last day of work for Dr. Calvin and the other staff members will be April 10. [...] The eliminated positions include the chief technologist and chief economist for the agency, which were part of the technology, policy and strategy office. Chief technologist positions at NASA centers like the Johnson Space Center in Houston and the Kennedy Space Center in Florida are not affected, the notice said. The agency is also cutting several positions related to diversity, equity and inclusion in its Office of Equal Opportunity. The notice said that NASA estimated severance costs would be about $1.2 million.
"To optimize our work force, and in compliance with an executive order, NASA is beginning its phased approach to a reduction in force, known as a RIF," Cheryl Wheeler, a NASA spokeswoman, said in an email. "A small number of individuals received notification Monday they are a part of NASA's RIF." Eligible employees could opt for early retirement, Ms. Wheeler said. The Democratic House staff members said they worried deeper cuts at NASA would follow.
"To optimize our work force, and in compliance with an executive order, NASA is beginning its phased approach to a reduction in force, known as a RIF," Cheryl Wheeler, a NASA spokeswoman, said in an email. "A small number of individuals received notification Monday they are a part of NASA's RIF." Eligible employees could opt for early retirement, Ms. Wheeler said. The Democratic House staff members said they worried deeper cuts at NASA would follow.
make NASA doge again. (Score:5, Insightful)
Prime Minister Musk has absolutely no conflict of interest here?
Re: make NASA doge again. (Score:2)
None whatsoever!
Re:make NASA doge again. (Score:4, Interesting)
Sir, as an American I find that offensive (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, we don't have presidents here. Or rather I should say they don't have presidents over there. President's work for the people and faithfully execute their office by obeying the laws. The YOB (Yuge Orange Buffoon) doesn't work and is absolutely immune. Period.
Elong [sic] also doesn't work there. It's all a game to him. So the YOB farts around and prances for the cameras and golfs (and wastes millions of taxpayer bucks on the security and graft) and the Musk farts around with other people's lives (with mor
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
What a stupid and meaningless generic drivel that isn't related to the subject at hand...
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Not click on a random youtube video?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: make NASA doge again. (Score:3)
Dunno about you, but I've known plenty of people at JPL and NASA.
all hard working, knowledgeable people.
The u.s. is shooting itself in the foot
Re: (Score:3)
NASA, like all bureaucracies was top heavy anyways.
What are you basing that on? Did you base this claim on anything real or did a talking head tell you this while providing zero evidence and you just nodded along?
Re: (Score:2)
What are you basing that on?
Rich people said so. If they weren't right about stuff, they wouldn't be rich, duh. Checkmate, libs!
Poe, I summon you.
Re: (Score:2)
Organizational Decline: NASA and the Life Cycle of Bureaus ~ https://www.jstor.org/stable/9 [jstor.org]... [jstor.org]
A paper from 1991? How about basing your claims on CURRENT "science"?
FBI sting uncovers the wrong stuff at NASA ~ https://www.newscientist.com/a [newscientist.com]... [newscientist.com]
NASA Corruption Case Ends in Finger Pointing ~ https://www.csmonitor.com/1995 [csmonitor.com]... [csmonitor.com]
A single instance of corruption (your two links are both reporting on one instance that was never proven in court), again from the 90's, is hardly evidence of a bloated bureaucracy.
Re: (Score:2)
A blunt knife can still get the job done. NASA, like all bureaucracies was top heavy anyways.
Can you cite any reason to think this? I would have said that NASA was one of the least top-heavy agencies
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.jstor.org/stable/9... [jstor.org]
https://link.springer.com/chap... [springer.com]
https://www.csmonitor.com/1995... [csmonitor.com]
https://www.newscientist.com/a... [newscientist.com]
https://www.independent.co.uk/... [independent.co.uk]
https://www.academia.edu/12678... [academia.edu]
https://medium.com/@rajeshvida... [medium.com]
https://www.justice.gov/usao-e... [justice.gov]
https://qz.com/1894591/federal... [qz.com]
https://www.reddit.com/r/books... [reddit.com]
Re: (Score:3)
And those first two links (to the same 37 year old article) were ambiguous about whether NASA bureaucracy actually was or was not bloated.
Re: (Score:2)
look at the trolls moderating down the truth again, talk about classism in action, truth hurts
top kek right you dumb fuck (Score:5, Insightful)
goodbye everything good in the world
Re: (Score:2)
Chief scientist (Score:4, Funny)
Why would NASA need to have a chief scientist?
After all its not rocket science.
Re: (Score:2)
20 whole people? (Score:5, Informative)
Meanwhile... The apportionment for DOGE grew from $6.75 million to $14.4 million between January 30 and February 8, and ProPublica notes that it's now up to $40 million as of February 20. Hopefully it won't keep doubling every 2 weeks ...
Elon Musk's DOGE office budget more than doubles from $6.5 to $14.4 million [businessinsider.com]
DOGE’s Millions: As Musk and Trump Gut Government, Their Ax-Cutting Agency Gets Cash Infusion [propublica.org]
Rick Sanchez: I can just feel the savings. [youtube.com]
Re:20 whole people? (Score:5, Insightful)
It gets even worse, corruption is now institutionalized.
Pay for access to the president, pay for access to elona, the GAAPB (government as a private business) model is now officially in place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Even the wildest lies about "Biden corruption" I've heard pale in comparison with the reality of the first few weeks of trump's "government, buddy.
No matter what dumb jokes you're trying to make here.
Re: (Score:2)
Your problem is debating Was and Is as binary measures. There's always a factor of this in every government of the world. The world shades of grey. Yeah Biden had corruption, but comparing him to Trump would be like an off-white shade on a graph to a shade painted in Vanta Black and then thrown into a fucking black hole for good measure.
If you think Biden's government had more corruption on the presidential level than Trump's then there's really no helping you anymore, other than letting others know not to
Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:5, Insightful)
Nobody is really asking this: .. where is all the money he's seizing? He keeps saying there are 20 million dead people in the social security database still getting checks .. that should be at least $40 billion a month he's been able to seize .. so where is that money? AT $500 billion saved this year, come next year every American should be getting a check for $1500 .. and that's just from eliminating the checks for those non-existent 20 million people. Add to that USAID closure, DOE shutdown, federal workers discarded and I better see a fact check of at least $10K. Anything less and that muhfuh is pocketing that shit and you know it.
-> Is it normal for a golden age to have job loss and decline in most people's stock market/retirement portifolio?
-> Is it wise to hand over rule to billionaires, whose goal in life is to make as much money as possible. People who couldn't stop accumulating wealth at $10 million, $100 million, or even $1 billion now expected to give up their lust for money?
- Musk claims to be saving trillions of dollars from being spent at by the government
Re:Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:5, Insightful)
Musk claims to be saving trillions of dollars from being spent at by the government .. where is all the money he's seizing? He keeps saying there are 20 million dead people in the social security database still getting checks .. that should be at least $40 billion a month he's been able to seize .. so where is that money? AT $500 billion saved this year, come next year every American should be getting a check for $1500 .. and that's just from eliminating the checks for those non-existent 20 million people. Add to that USAID closure, DOE shutdown, federal workers discarded and I better see a fact check of at least $10K. Anything less and that muhfuh is pocketing that shit and you know it.
Simple answer is (a) he's lying, (b) he's uninformed, (c) both. The dead people getting SSI money has been *thoroughly* debunked, even by the head of the SSA, but it's a good sound bite so he and Trump keep repeating it -- even though Elon is supposedly a coder and should understand. On a related note, as far as all the firings go, even firing *all* federal workers would only cut about 4.75% from the annual budget and an incalculably small amount from the total deficit. (see below) The DOGE stuff is all political theater to justify/support more tax cuts for rich people and corporations; there won't be any "refunds".
According to Google, there are about 3 million federal workers with an average salary of about $106,000 ($51.18/h). Even if you fired *all* of them, at that salary, it would only cut about $318 billion, which sounds like a lot, but it's only 4.57% of the annual U.S. Federal budget of $6.7 trillion and a *way* smaller percentage of the total federal debt of $36.33 trillion.
Re:Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:5, Insightful)
The DOGE stuff is all political theater to justify/support more tax cuts for rich people and corporations;
I forgot to add, reducing federal staff to (a) hamstring all the agencies regulating and/or investigating Musk's companies, namely SpaceX (FAA), Tesla (NTSB, SEC) and X (CFPB, SEC) and (b) reduce the ability of the IRS to audit wealthy tax cheats (usually with very complex returns).
Elon Musk's DOGE takes aim at agency (CFPB) that had plans of regulating X [wbur.org]
Re:Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:5, Insightful)
People are asking, but nobody in power is interested in answering any of these questions. This gang learned that you can blatantly lie and fool people and not have to answer to anybody. They claimed that immigrants were eating cats and dogs in Ohio. That was a massive lie before the election. Did anybody apologize for it?
For these people, there are no consequences for lying. Only benefits. So, they keep doing it. Did you hear that Ukraine started the war with Russia? We all had it wrong all along. And Putin is the good guy. And the west is the baddies. Also Canada is evil and must suffer the consequences.
We are in for 4 long years!
Re: (Score:2)
Cults blindly follow their leaders toward comets and cliffs.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
The "massive" lie that Biden was showing his age and Hunter Biden's laptop just make all of Trumps lies go away, huh?
My favorite is Trump spending the last 4 years undermining our Democracy with completely fabricated claims of election fraud and people like you cheered him on. He still insists to this day that the 2020 election was rigged but doesnt have a single piece of proper evidence to back up his claim. But yeah, that's okay because Hunter Biden's laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
How many years now into that fucking laptop story and it still hasn't gone anywhere. Through the first cheeto administration and now into the second and still nothing. All they managed was not paying taxes and lying on a federal firearms form. All of which republicans seem to brag about doing.
Re: (Score:2)
I was wondering when someone was going to bring up Hunter Biden's Laptop in a bothsides excuse-making of the gross incompetence we're seeing in front of us.
Just keep chugging that flavor-aid, my man. You don't look absolutely ridiculous at all. Be sure to bothsides the naked corruption by once-again bringing up Burisma too, while you're playing the debunked classics.
Please seek professional help.
Re: (Score:2)
Hunter Biden wasn't in government, unlike Trump's kids & son-in-law - who is very likely the reason Jamal Khashoggi was literally butchered inside an embassy
Re: (Score:3)
son's laptop wasn't his son's laptop
That isn't the problem with the laptop. The problem is that it didn't matter one bit. I mean it might for Hunter Biden himself if he did anything illegal while trading on his father's name. But his father wasn't involved.
And Biden never used his son in his role as President. This is unlike Trump's first term. That's the difference.
Whether Hunter Biden is good or bad doesn't matter at all politically if it isn't tied to or influencing the White House. It's a distraction.
You can argue whether it is or i
Re: (Score:2)
Bzzt! Wrong, try 10% for the big guy and work you way up. Don't forget James Biden as well. Who surprise surprise also received a blanket pardon back dated.
Whether Hunter Biden is good or bad doesn't matter at all politically if it isn't tied to or influencing the White House. It's a distraction.
Who do you think was helping Dr. Jill prop up Ol'Joe? Give you a hint it was Hunter Biden, who was
Re: Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:3)
If those things offend you, as they should, you must think the current administration is the most corrupt and vile in history, right?
Re: (Score:2)
We are in for 4 long years!
No kidding. We're still a week shy of just two months of this term.
Re: (Score:2)
come next year every American should be getting a check for $1500
That's neither how the tax system works is a normal country, nor is it how finance works in a country that has a $34trillion national debt.
But the reality is dumber than you realise. DOGE was originally posting receipts of their "savings". Turned out that most of them were wrong, not actual savings, and in one case transposed million to billion and thus off by a factor of 1000x. I do wonder if Elon thought he was buying Twitter for $44million and tried to back pedal when someone told him what the real numbe
Re: Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
The former Trump administration sent out THREE rounds of "economic stimulus" payments when Americans were already traveling and spending less and there were shortages of overseas shipments already. We're still seeing the inflationary effects of that. This wasn't even based on government "savings." This was on top of the PPP, which didn't even result in the jobs being retained that were supposed to be saved.
Re: (Score:2)
We're still seeing the inflationary effects of that.
Are you? Most of the rest of the world didn't get a stimulus check. Canada didn't get a stimulus check. Australia didn't get a stimulus check. And yet they were experiencing high levels of inflation as well. Heck where I live not only did we not get a stimulus check our inflation is far worse than what was experienced in America and Biden literally couldn't do anything that had an influence on us.
Whenever you attribute inflation to "a thing" just remember you are completely and utterly wrong. Inflation is a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is the stupidest argument I've seen in a thread filled with stupid arguments.
1. it's been 45 days, not a year. But do go on telling us how this is normal.
2. he wanted to fire many more than that, but several federal judges have told him to fuck off because it's illegal. For example, the 80,000+ "probationary" employees. But please do go on telling us how this is normal.
3. When people resign, they give notice and have a chance to move someone else into that role if it's still needed, rather than the
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody is really asking this: -> Is it normal for a golden age to have job loss and decline in most people's stock market/retirement portifolio?
Trump mixed up "Golden Age" and "Gilded Age." You know what the gilded ages actually are? A few uber-rich, and the rest of us are gilded like horses. Look up what that means if you don't know.
-> Is it wise to hand over rule to billionaires, whose goal in life is to make as much money as possible. People who couldn't stop accumulating wealth at $10 million, $100 million, or even $1 billion now expected to give up their lust for money?
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Fuck no. It's not only not wise, it's exactly the polar opposite of wise.
- Musk claims to be saving trillions of dollars from being spent at by the government .. where is all the money he's seizing? He keeps saying there are 20 million dead people in the social security database still getting checks .. that should be at least $40 billion a month he's been able to seize .. so where is that money? AT $500 billion saved this year, come next year every American should be getting a check for $1500 .. and that's just from eliminating the checks for those non-existent 20 million people. Add to that USAID closure, DOE shutdown, federal workers discarded and I better see a fact check of at least $10K. Anything less and that muhfuh is pocketing that shit and you know it.
Musk is being paid to do this job, and I can promise you any money saved is going straight to tax cuts for the wealthiest of folks, if it's not going right into a DOGE special fund that he can spend out of. We're sett
Re: (Score:3)
Gilded means covered in a thin layer of gold. You're confusing it with gelded.
Re: (Score:2)
Gilded means covered in a thin layer of gold. You're confusing it with gelded.
Well shit. There's my farm upbringing springing out. Pronunciation between the country folk makes those two words sound exactly the same.
Re: (Score:2)
where is all the money he's seizing?
They only announce the initial discrepancy and with a bold assumption that it is corruption and waste. They don't publicly retract it when they figure out that it's just a paperwork/systems issue and the money was still going where it was supposed to. The only "savings" is in delaying critical payments to states, agencies, and citizens on a whim or hunch.
So lots of people are asking that (Score:2)
1. I'm doing just fine so it's a golden age for me.
2. There is a natural hierarchy and some people are just better than you so yeah billionaires should exist. If we try to do away with them we disrupt the natural order and we will get earthquakes and hurricanes.
3. Elon Musk invented electric cars and rockets. Who are you to argue with him?
But honestly this is all just deck chairs on the Titanic. About 7 million people tried to vote for Kamala Harris last year and couldn
Re: Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:2)
Re: Needs to be asked on a serious level (Score:5, Insightful)
No, DGE is after something completely different.
a) The 450k in purchases of electric cars program SUDDENLY becomes a 400M purchase program of Swastikar program, directly benefitting the DGE edgelord
b) The ability to hire and fire staff across all government agencies gives an enormous lever of DGE's edgelord to save himself money from "unnecessary" safety and similar
c) The access to all kinds of government information, via the rather legally dubious DGE incursions by 20 year olds the edgelord has picked from his twatter thread, gives the DGE edgelord an enormous lever over the competition and US-registered and regulated businesses in general, which has already demonstrable jump of "advertisement purchases" of these on twatter.com, directly benefitting the DGE edgelord.
Glaring, in-your-face corruption that you're paying for and that your children and grandchildren will be paying for, on the background of DGE not actually saving anything.
A good deal from every angle. For the edgelord.
Re: (Score:2)
fire staff across all government agencies
rather legally dubious DGE incursions by 20 year olds
Imagine this - firing highly educated probationary employees who had just been promoted to high level positions. But instead of keeping them on payroll in a new role with DOGE, they preferentially use the people with the least knowledge and experience.
Re: (Score:2)
They are 100% loyal and it is loyalty and preparedness to do anything for the edgelord that has value to him.
The basic reason the Communist system failed, as summarized in the old Soviet joke "they appoint them for loyalty, but ask of them as if they are smart".
Dear Lord (Score:4, Funny)
Hi there, Lord, I have never asked for much but this time we really need a solid. Could you please find it auspicious to send Elmo to Mars? He really wants to go, and we really need him to go. We promise to give him a great send off....maybe even use one of his own rockets.
Re:Dear Lord (Score:5, Informative)
Hi there gtall,
I Only Help Those Who Help Themselves.
Signed,
The Lord.
Re: (Score:2)
Especially those who help themselves to our PII and our social security money, apparently
Re: Dear Lord (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I dont want to start any blasphemous rumors, but I think that God has a sick sense of humor.
I said it as a teen and I stand by it: If God exists, he's a sadist.
I'll add an addendum at this point: If God exists, he'd be sipping martinis with Musk & Co. and laughing at the plebes who dared to believe in any of them. They're all of the same base cloth.
Re: (Score:2)
Hi there, Lord, I have never asked for much but this time we really need a solid. Could you please find it auspicious to send Elmo to Mars? He really wants to go, and we really need him to go. We promise to give him a great send off....maybe even use one of his own rockets.
So who's going to babysit emperor Trump?
To be replaced with what? (Score:2)
NASA Eliminates Chief Scientist and Other Jobs At Its Headquarters
Space Karen strikes again!!!
Trump wants to eliminate NASA altogether (Score:2, Interesting)
Trump has already said he wants to eliminate NASA altogether and award the equivalent budget to SpaceX. Trump has been critical of NASA since he blamed "government incompetence" for the 1986 Challenger incident. He worships the toilet that Elon shits in so naturally shutting down NASA in favor of SpaceX is well aligned with his sleazy and corrupt modus operandi.
Re: (Score:2)
NASA returns $3 for every $1 spent. https://www.scrippsnews.com/po... [scrippsnews.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The really important thing you seem to be forgetting: SLS actually works. Starship is just a really expensive way to deposit a few thousand chunks of high-speed metal into the Atlantic from Texas.
Well, in 2020... (Score:2)
...as the world dealt with Covid19 and all of the shitstorm of problems that produced, multiple private space missions happened. Billionaires floated above the clouds, looking down upon the masses. "Champagne wishes and caviar dreams" up there, COVID19 down here.
The world's economy is funneled into the bank accounts of the elite. The result is that even governmental entities such as NASA are wilting. And NASA isn't the only one either, but let's not talk about that because that'll take the spotlight awa
Will make Roscosmos look better? (Score:3)
At this point I am not sure whether there will be a functional government in 3 months? Either way the NASA cuts will make Roscosmos look in better shape. Thank you Musk and Krasnov.
Re:Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:5, Insightful)
seems like you have no idea what a chief scientist actually does. why would they need to be a specialist in any of those things you mentioned?
With your complete lack of understanding about what people do in their jobs, you should apply for a role at DOGE.
Re:Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Climate science has been one of the core missions of NASA and other space agencies like ESA for decades.
But it shouldn't be. Obviously you need space assets to study the climate from beyond the atmosphere, but NASA shouldn't own those assets. The job of NASA should be 3 things and three things only: aeronautical research, management of government space operations, and space exploration. Period. Anything else is out of their lane. Climate research is NOAA's job. There are a number of agencies that should be doing environmental research as a core mission. NASA isn't one of them. They just get their satellites u
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:2)
NOAA has the boring spacecraft... proven technology that they make multiple copies of to monitor things... GOES, POES, even DSCVR or whatever stupid spelling it has was in part to replace NASA's ACE and maybe an instrument from SOHO.
NASA is an experimental agency... they're tasked with always pushing for new science, not simply repeating/replacing past missions. It might be similar, but with higher resolution, better sensitivity, better cadence, or maybe observing from a different location.
The sad thing is
Re: (Score:3)
NASA's Mission: Drive advances in science, technology, aeronautics, and space exploration to enhance knowledge, education, innovation, economic vitality, and stewardship of Earth.
NASA's Mission (Score:4, Informative)
NASA's Mission: Drive advances in science, technology, aeronautics, and space exploration to enhance knowledge, education, innovation, economic vitality, and stewardship of Earth.
Stewardship of Earth seems like it would require knowledge of climate and how it works.
Re:Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:5, Insightful)
chief scientist, Katherine Calvin. ... is a climate change specialist. ... climate change is important (and real), but it is only (loosely at best) related to NASA's mission, which is to explore space
Ya, it's not like NASA studies Earth's climate from space. Super good thing we don't *all* live here. And it's not like her experience studying complex systems could possibly translate to other NASA mission areas or studying climates on other planets... Areas of expertise don't have to be one-to-one to be useful across an organization, especially higher up where big picture and cross-department issues come into play.
Re:Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:5, Insightful)
That's outside the mission
No it's not https://www.nasa.gov/history/n... [nasa.gov] .
The good news though is that your willingness to make claims about things you dont understand makes you qualified for a job with Doge!
Re:Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:5, Informative)
Do you know what the first A in NASA stands for?
Re:Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:5, Funny)
Do you know what the first A in NASA stands for?
[raises hand] Ooo... Ooo... I know! "ASA" [pats self on back]
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you should read what EASA says about this:
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/... [europa.eu]
Re: (Score:2)
What ESA has to say would be more analogous. EASA is more like the regulatory side of the US's FAA than NASA.
Re: (Score:2)
ESA is purely a spacefaring agency, while NASA isn't and, as a matter of fact, has developed a lot of stuff that improved aviation safety, like, for example, crew resource management. I would even say they have done more for aviation safety than FAA (which is really not up to the task).
Re: (Score:2)
If you are so clever, why don't you know how much the weather patterns impact aviation?
Re: (Score:2)
"how much the weather patterns impact aviation"
and rockets. atmospheric conditions have forced the rescheduling of 100s of launches in including Rocket Man's
Re: (Score:2)
She needs to apply in la Presidenta's EPA? in what alternate reality do you think the current EPA gives a two-headed rat's fart about climate change?
Re: Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure we are, each one of us on those 1 million robotaxis that are on the road self-driving and will SUDDENLY sprout wings and what not that's necessary for the trip, including a small distillery, right?
Re: Well, not unreasonable actually (Score:2)
If we can terraform mars, why not terraform earth.
Re: (Score:2)
We can't terraform Mars.
What would give you the idea that we can?
Put the kool-aid down.
Re: (Score:2)
Easier for Musk to declare himself Imperator of Mars even though he'll never go there
Re: (Score:2)
If we can terraform mars, why not terraform earth.
If we wanted to terraform Earth, it would make sense to practice first on a different planet, one we're not living on.
Re: (Score:2)
So it looks like they got rid of a bunch of DEI positions
OMG was it one of those wooomans that you find so offensive? Is that your definition of DEI, anyone who isn't waving a cock in between their legs despite the fact that you know nothing at all about the person or their role?
Grow up kid.
Re:Right (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You don't trim fat by cutting off the pig's leg.The only thing for sure with the current firing squad is that they have absolutely no clue what they are doing.
Yeah but they're having a helluva great time!
Re:Maybe... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your example is something you made up? Or am I giving you too much credit and this is something someone else made up and you're just parroting it?
Re: (Score:2)
He was making a homophobic slur, and then laughing at his own homophobic slur like it's still 1988.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, I get it. My mistake for thinking I wasnt talking to garbage people.
Re: (Score:2)
Half the Trump admin are DEI hires. What type of medical degree does RFK Jr. have? Looks like you're rich and kiss the ring you get a job. Is DEI not about hiring unqualified people?
Re: (Score:2)
Trump, and Musk have hardly hidden their desire to focus NASA tightly on the goals of Lunar return, and putting American astronauts onto Mars
Not a surprise that Musk would want NASA focused on goals that would require numerous lucrative rocket contracts.
The 18,000 employees have roles based on current leadership. The way you eliminate those silently is by changing the leadership. Don't think they aren't going after more.