Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine

How Your Gut Influences Your Brain (stanford.edu) 52

A blog post from the Stanford University School of Medicine attempts to answer the question: What's the deal with the gut-brain connection? It affects your mood, your sleep, even your motivation to exercise. There's convincing evidence that it's the starting point for Parkinson's disease and could be responsible for long COVID's cognitive effects. And it sits about 2 feet below your brain. The gut plays an obvious role in our health by digesting what we eat and extracting nutrients. But there's a growing appreciation among scientists that our digestive systems affect our general well-being in a much broader fashion.

One fascinating aspect of the gut's widespread impact on health is its direct influence on and communication with the brain, a conduit known as the gut-brain axis. Through direct signals from the vagus nerve, [which] connects the brain and the gut, as well as through molecules secreted into the bloodstream from our gut microbes and immune cells that traffic from the gut to the rest of the body, our brains and our digestive tracts are in constant communication. And when that communication goes off the rails, diseases and disorders can result. The gut-brain connection is a key part of how the brain forms a picture of the rest of the body, a phenomenon known as interoception, explained Christoph Thaiss, PhD, an assistant professor of pathology at Stanford Medicine...

The gut also contains the largest number of neurons outside the brain of any structure in the body — more than 100 million neurons line the human digestive tract, from the esophagus to the anus. These cells make up what is known as the enteric nervous system, which some scientists refer to as a "second brain." The enteric nervous system is more brain-like than other peripheral nerves because it consists of lots of different types of neurons that communicate with each other, while other peripheral nerves primarily serve to communicate between the brain and the body, said Julia Kaltschmidt, PhD, the Firmenich Next Generation Faculty Scholar and an associate professor of neurosurgery. In fact, the gut's nervous system can act alone. Scientists have found that if they remove an animal's gut and bathe it in a special fluid designed to keep neurons alive, the gut continues to contract, pushing its contents from top to bottom.

How Your Gut Influences Your Brain

Comments Filter:
  • The /. experts will all tell you that weight management is merely a reflection of your worth as a person, that overwieght people are simply inferior. That can't be this "gut-brain connection" because that would contradict their appearance of superiority. Right, SuperKendalll?

    • by zawarski ( 1381571 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @12:37PM (#65221397)
      You don't have to be a /. expert to understand that carrying around an extra 50, let alone 100 pounds, is prematurely aging every bone, joint and muscle in your body.
      • by Coius ( 743781 )
        seconded, When I lost weight, my health improved. When I gained it back, my health went to shit. I'm now much older, with arthritis and infammatory response issues (since aged 16, still hits me and has already scarred my kidneys) and once I found I changed my diet and started losing weight. My health, and my thinking ability (without adderall) increased and I feel better, feel happier (even with depression), found motivation, and my bones and joints (with a healing broken foot) hurt less, my joints are do
    • One of best childhood friends was very overweight, his entire life, everyone in his family was overweight. He was a do the least IT admin whose hobbies were video games, movies, and MTG. He got really sick, and after two years of struggles he got into a fecal transplant study. It cured his problems. Then we started noticing changes. He asked to go on a backpacking trip on the AT with me. He started dropping weight, while claiming he hasn't really changed his diet much from pre-illness. He went from a do the
      • Many people that are obese have gut bacteria that can digest/break up fibres.
        Keep in mind: fibres are just ordinary carbon hydrates like sugar and starch, which we humans can not digest by our selves. Cows, horses and what ever - can (because of different bacteria in the guts)!
        So with the wrong gut bacteria, we digest 3x the carbon hydrates we want, because stuff we ordinarily would just shit out, suddenly ends up in our metabolism.

        And that gets worse and worse with artificial sweeteners and low fat and wha

        • Ever met someone who is always in a bad mood at work, that someone who skips breakfast, drinks only coffee and often skips lunch or eats a salad for lunch?

          Ever notice that they are in a bad mood nearly every day, in the morning, in the afternoon, in the evening....

          Starving oneself for some social media body shape....

          • Nope, never met one like that.

            But I met people who make a big habit of praying in a cantina before they start eating.

            So, I wait until they are finished, before I start eating.

            And some of them had the audacity to scold me that I did not join the prayer.

            So much thanx to me being humble.

            Regarding Salad: I often eat only a salad during lunch. Especially during summer.

            My main meal is dinner, after sports.

  • by AlanObject ( 3603453 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @11:00AM (#65221225)

    If you go back in time on the web sites that promote raw milk they have been writing about this for a decade or more. Also Mercola.

    Although I started drinking raw milk (reliable source) and seemed to get some benefit from it, I never bought into all the new-agey "here's the study that shows" type of hype that the fan base cultivates. It is sort of interesting to see this go mainstream.

    • by burtosis ( 1124179 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @11:10AM (#65221245)

      If you go back in time on the web sites that promote raw milk they have been writing about this for a decade or more. Also Mercola.

      Although I started drinking raw milk (reliable source) and seemed to get some benefit from it, I never bought into all the new-agey "here's the study that shows" type of hype that the fan base cultivates. It is sort of interesting to see this go mainstream.

      Drinking raw milk is like eating raw steak. If you have a taste for it then that’s great, but eventually statistics catches up and it comes time to pay the price. Despite being very careful I get food poisoning once every few years, it’s very easy to feel like a bus ran your intestines over. It can be days before you feel better or even be fatal. Because of that I’m in favor of restrictions and warnings so that people have to obviously brush them aside and take things into their own hands because it shouldn’t be possible to stumble into an Oregon trail ending to life.

      • by Viol8 ( 599362 )

        Quite. For some reason these dumbfscks seem to think that dairy companies just pay huge amounts of money to pasteurise milk just for the fun of it. I'm sure there's the name for a fallacy whereby someone doesn't believe something because it hasn't happened to them - yet. But it will, one day, when he drinks some raw milk with a boatload of ecoli 157 in it. I can guarantee he'll never drink it raw again after that.

        • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

          by AlanObject ( 3603453 )

          Dairy companies pay huge amounts to pasteurize milk because that fits their business model. They save more money than they spend on it. You can't handle raw milk intended for human consumption the way you do with industrially processed milke.

          Humans have been drinking milk from farm animals for 10,000 years or more. They weren't dying in droves over it or they would have stopped.

          It was only when factory farming practices became sufficiently widespread that things got bad enough that governments had t

          • Yes, humans have been drinking fresh milk for thousands of years, but for almost all of that time it was only safe if you had close access to a lactating cow. In the 1850's, Borden developed a process to make sweetened condensed milk, and sold it as Eagle Brand. Not only that, he set out a list of ten requirements [wikipedia.org] for keeping their dairies clean and wholesome if they wanted to sell to him. These were so good, and worked so well that they became the basis of the sanitation laws that keep our milk safe to
          • Dairy companies pay huge amounts to pasteurize milk because that fits their business model. They save more money than they spend on it.

            Nope. They do it because we force them to.
            They'd prefer to not pasteurize, and for people to just continue getting sick, and infants dying.

            You can't handle raw milk intended for human consumption the way you do with industrially processed milke.

            Sure can't. But they're going to either way.

            Humans have been drinking milk from farm animals for 10,000 years or more. They weren't dying in droves over it or they would have stopped.

            This is only partially true.
            The risk of them dying was indeed higher because of it.
            "Droves" depends on your definition. Given the things that would kill them at the time, I imagine they swallowed the increase risk due to the raw milk happily in return for its benefits.

            It was only when factory farming practices became sufficiently widespread that things got bad enough that governments had to step in and mandate pasteurization.

            That is absolutely true.
            Things went from "pretty bad", t

            • There is no law in Europe to force one to pasteurize the milk.

              The difference between raw milk and pasteurized is shelf life.
              That is all.

              There was a law that cheese can only be made from Pasteurized milk, that caused so many protests that the law got dropped.

              It is up to the customer and seller if they buy or sell pasteurized milk or raw milk.

              For big milk companies, it obviously makes no sense to not pasteurize the majourity of milk. It would not last the 10 days ordinary shelf life, or actual 20 days if it i

              • There is no law in Europe to force one to pasteurize the milk.

                There are lots of laws in Europe that ban the selling of unpasteurized milk. The EU itself allows individual member States to regulate it themselves.
                States that allow the selling of unpasteurized milk have similar requirements for doing so that we have in the US- that it must undergo extra hygiene testing.

                The difference between raw milk and pasteurized is shelf life.
                That is all.

                Flat out fucking wrong, lol.
                The difference between raw and pasteurized milk are the killing of bacteria, and deactivation of enzymes that may harm you.
                Doing this does, in fact, increase shelf life- howe

                • If you consider the 132kg of milk produce per person per year consumed, the few dozen deaths for the various raw milk products is in pale comparison to the risk of smoking, and about 30% of the population won't let that go, so your argument isn't that strong...
                  • lol-

                    If only your gut had influenced your brain a little better.

                    <1% of milk consumed in Europe is raw. And yet, it's responsible for almost all dairy related foodborne illness.
                    Scale up that few deaths by a factor of 100, and we're talking about an interesting problem, particularly since it mostly kills infants, young children, and the elderly, now aren't we?

                    But sure- set the benchmark to fucking lung cancer, you ignorant shit-for-brains.
                    • Now now now, there's no need to be rude. I was just explaining why people aren't going to heed your words, and if you didn't read that in my message, maybe you should read it again. Or maybe I didn't express myself clearly enough.
                    • Then I misread your intent as arguing in bad-faith, and I apologize.
                    • Apology accepted, pleasantly surprised. Thanks.
      • If you get a gut problem from raw milk, then there is:
        a) something seriously wrong on the distribution way. As the main reason is: some germs got into it after it was "packaged" or while it was packaged. Not because it is raw.
        b) there is seriously something wrong with your nose
        c) there is seriously something wrong with your taste buds

        Spoiled milk, even if it is only a very very tiny bit: smells awful, and tastes even more awful. It settles again when the milk is converting into Yoghurt or Cheese. But the in

    • Morons stumbling onto something with a scientific reality behind it does not somehow validate their dumbshit views.

      Drinking raw milk is stupid. Don't do it. It's going to kill you some day. The placebo effect you derive from it isn't worth your fucking life- find better ways to trigger it. Crystals are pretty benign, I imagine.
      • by Viol8 ( 599362 )

        He'd probably burble about how our ancestors drank it raw in their paloe diet. Conveniently forgetting 80% of kids died before adulthood and most adults didn't make it past 40.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The faecal transplant craze seems safer than drinking raw milk, if you are into that.

  • I want some of this neuron preserving fluid... Seems like something we should be working on ...
  • by Retired Chemist ( 5039029 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @11:10AM (#65221249)
    Nothing here really seems to be news. The critical question is what you can actually do to positively affect the situation. The gut microbiome is tremendously complex and very poorly understood.
    • Nothing here really seems to be news. The critical question is what you can actually do to positively affect the situation. The gut microbiome is tremendously complex and very poorly understood.

      The microbiome was not well understood even 20 years ago when I was in grad school for biochemistry. It's come a long way and as you said, it's complex and underappreciated until recently.

      With science, yeah, a few trailblazers pave a way and the wide industry eventually follows. It doesn't move as fast as the software industry in silicon valley, for example. However, that's obvious because some caffeinated and motivated engineers can come up with an idea and have it in beta within 6 months, whereas a

    • I agree that it is poorly understood from a western science point of view. I think other cultures have gotten a reasonably good handle on it in their own way for much longer though.

      I wish they would bring all these ideas together to better understand what is happening and how to help people, but thatâ(TM)s not something that a PhD, who has been embroiled they're entire lives in traditional academia in the west would necessarily even understand or see how to integrate, sadly.

      Here's to diversity though!

    • Contact Hawking's former carer and ask what hi-IQ snacks to have instead of steak pies and bacon subs. ðY(TM)

  • by Bumbul ( 7920730 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @11:44AM (#65221303)
    "which some scientists refer to as a "second brain." " So gut feelings are actually real thoughts?
    • this is a significant difference between eastern and western culture:
      we think this stuff is new in the west. We're SO egotistical culturally. We did not invent it at all. This has been the idea in traditional pre Mao Chinese culture, for instance, for thousands of years. Yogic/ayurvedic "science" also points to this as well as a little Buddhism.

      in the west, people have traditionally asked âoehow can this make me money?â
      in traditional Chinese culture they ask, âoecan I eat this?â

      while the

      • This has been the idea in traditional pre Mao Chinese culture, for instance, for thousands of years. Yogic/ayurvedic "science" also points to this as well as a little Buddhism.

        Traditional Chinese medicine and ayurveda point to a lot of things. How do you distinguish between the things that are bogus (rhino horn boner pills) from the ones that might have some scientific validity (the microbiome is important)?

    • Well, in a sense yes.
      Your guts have about 1/3rd of the processing power of your real brain.
      And are connected via the vagus nerve to the real brain.

      Some people get stomach aches when pondering a difficult situation.

      In Asian countries historically people thought the brain is in the belly ...

  • I used to be very reliably able to detect the cranks by their saying "gut" vs. "digestive system".
    • I used to be very reliably able to detect the cranks by their saying "gut" vs. "digestive system".

      The digestive system are the parts your body made. Your gut includes the bacteria inside them. So stomach/intestines?...digestive system...the flora of bacteria inside the intestines?....gut.

      • With no desire to trigger defensiveness in someone who at least claims to be a grad school attendee in biochemistry, I've always understood gut to be a synonym for "digestive system", and I'm not seeing any definition even in scientific literature that disagrees with that.

        If gut really did mean "digestive system + flora of bacteria", it seems to me that terms like "gut microbiota" would be inventions of the Department of Redundancy Department.

        I'm pretty sure it's just a synonym for your digestive tract.
        • by Kokuyo ( 549451 )

          Frankly, I call bullshit on the digestive system not including the... well, wouldn't it be fauna? Bacteria aren't plants, are they?

          I don't think our digestive system would digest much without the bacteria, would it?

          • well, wouldn't it be fauna? Bacteria aren't plants, are they?

            Their words, not mine. Agreed that it seems strange word choice.

            I don't think our digestive system would digest much without the bacteria, would it?

            A fair point. But it does work without the bacteria. Just not nearly as well as it does with. Probably to the point that long-term, you might not survive without a highly curated diet.

        • I think the same, I use "gut(s)" most of the time because I can not memorize "intestines" ... and windows spelling correction does not find the right spelling when I spell it wrong.

          Sorry, since a few months I mostly use windows ... but soon I am back on my Macs. And if my next job does not demand Windows: this laptop gets retired to Mint or Ubuntu.

  • ...is how to make my gut understand that it's being a pain in the arse, both literally and figuratively, and to please stop.

  • Yong (Score:4, Interesting)

    by 602 ( 652745 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @01:13PM (#65221475)
    1. I strongly recommend the book by Ed Yong "I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life" (2016).

    2. Unfortunately, there haven't been many studies that have shown a beneficial effect on diseases by interventions on the microbiome. Not for lack of trying (i.e., there are many negative studies).

    3. Nevertheless, eating plenty of vegetables and fruits is a good thing.

  • It makes sense (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Jeremi ( 14640 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @02:33PM (#65221569) Homepage

    Before brains evolved, organisms needed some mechanism for making decisions to enhance their chances of survival/reproduction, and they (generally) already had a digestive system that was directly involved in their day-to-day survival, so why not keep the necessary neurons there?

    The brain we keep at the top of our spinal column is just the modern-day, optional processing-accelerator; the GPU to our gut's old-school CPU.

  • If that's true, given my insane thoughts, there must quite a shit storm happening in my colon.

  • by theshowmecanuck ( 703852 ) on Sunday March 09, 2025 @10:36PM (#65222335) Journal
    The ketogenic diet has been used for at least 100 years to help treat and reduce epilepsy. It has been found in several small test studies to help treat and reduce schizophrenic episodes. To such an extent that larger studies are being proposed.
  • ...then you're built wrong

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

Working...