A California Boy Was Kidnapped from a Park in 1951. He's Just Been Found Alive (sfgate.com) 65
An anonymous reader shared this story from SFGate:
A boy who was kidnapped from an Oakland playground in 1951 has been found alive on the East Coast, a remarkable resolution to a mystery that has haunted his family for over half a century.
On February 21, 1951, 6-year-old Luis Armando Albino was playing with his older brother Roger at Jefferson Square Park. The boys had recently immigrated with their mother and four other siblings from Puerto Rico... That afternoon, Luis and 10-year-old Roger walked down the block from their home at 730 Brush Street to play in the park. They were approached by a woman in her 30s, wearing a green bandana over her hair, who began chatting with Luis in Spanish. She promised she would buy him candy if he came along with her, and little Luis agreed to join her. Wary, Roger trailed the pair for a while before returning home to alert an adult to the strange encounter. Oakland police were called by frantic family members and a search was immediately launched...
Antonia [the boy's mother] was convinced her son was alive. "She came once a week, then once a month, then at least once a year, to see the shake of the head, to have the answer 'no' translated for her although she could read it in the officers' faces," the Oakland Tribune wrote in 1966...
Decades passed.
In 2020, Luis' niece, Alida Alequin, took a DNA test on a whim, the Mercury News reported. The service returned several possible family members to the Oakland woman. One of them was a man who Alequin had never met. After some internet sleuthing, she began to suspect this man might be the missing uncle she'd heard so much about. She reached out to the man but didn't hear back.
Earlier this year, Alequin tried again. Armed with photos, she took her evidence to the Oakland Police Department's missing persons unit. In short order, the FBI and California Department of Justice were also investigating Alequin's lead. They discovered the man was living on the East Coast, had worked as a firefighter and served two tours in Vietnam with the Marine Corps. This week, the Mercury News first reported that a DNA test confirmed what Alequin suspected: This was Luis Albino.
In June, Luis flew to California to reunite with his family, among them his devoted brother Roger... For over 70 years, he lived on the East Coast believing he was the son of another couple....
When Luis met Alequin for the first time this summer, he held her in an embrace. "Thank you," he said, "for finding me."
On February 21, 1951, 6-year-old Luis Armando Albino was playing with his older brother Roger at Jefferson Square Park. The boys had recently immigrated with their mother and four other siblings from Puerto Rico... That afternoon, Luis and 10-year-old Roger walked down the block from their home at 730 Brush Street to play in the park. They were approached by a woman in her 30s, wearing a green bandana over her hair, who began chatting with Luis in Spanish. She promised she would buy him candy if he came along with her, and little Luis agreed to join her. Wary, Roger trailed the pair for a while before returning home to alert an adult to the strange encounter. Oakland police were called by frantic family members and a search was immediately launched...
Antonia [the boy's mother] was convinced her son was alive. "She came once a week, then once a month, then at least once a year, to see the shake of the head, to have the answer 'no' translated for her although she could read it in the officers' faces," the Oakland Tribune wrote in 1966...
Decades passed.
In 2020, Luis' niece, Alida Alequin, took a DNA test on a whim, the Mercury News reported. The service returned several possible family members to the Oakland woman. One of them was a man who Alequin had never met. After some internet sleuthing, she began to suspect this man might be the missing uncle she'd heard so much about. She reached out to the man but didn't hear back.
Earlier this year, Alequin tried again. Armed with photos, she took her evidence to the Oakland Police Department's missing persons unit. In short order, the FBI and California Department of Justice were also investigating Alequin's lead. They discovered the man was living on the East Coast, had worked as a firefighter and served two tours in Vietnam with the Marine Corps. This week, the Mercury News first reported that a DNA test confirmed what Alequin suspected: This was Luis Albino.
In June, Luis flew to California to reunite with his family, among them his devoted brother Roger... For over 70 years, he lived on the East Coast believing he was the son of another couple....
When Luis met Alequin for the first time this summer, he held her in an embrace. "Thank you," he said, "for finding me."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Propaganda for DNA? DNA exists!
DNA Aren't Real!
Re: (Score:2)
Is this subtle propaganda for DNA after negative publicity lately?
Fight Big DNA and its propaganda! Join the 80% of Americans who support mandatory labeling [washingtonpost.com] on foods containing DNA!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like the push to ban dihydrogen monoxide.
And also explains a lot of the pushback against GMO.
It isn't that GMO is dangerous, it's that people have convinced others, into a circular feeding frenzy, that it is, with basically zero evidence. It's mostly distrust of the corporations these days.
Me, I realize that just analyzing the food for dangerous substances would be easier, and they already just spray most of them on. GMO tends to reduce the need for those sprays.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this subtle propaganda for DNA after negative publicity lately [slashdot.org]?
Probably. Although I would not call it "subtle".
no means no (Score:2)
You don't 'immigrate' from Puerto Rico to CA (Score:5, Informative)
Life is Stranger Than... (Score:2)
... [Spoiler Alert!] True Detective Season 3 [wikipedia.org] fiction.
Thank you (Score:4, Insightful)
For sharing such a heart warming story in these miserable times. I don't care it is not about tech, we just dont get enough positive news these days.
Re: Thank you (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Positive news doesn't sell. Negative news gets far more attention, clicks, ad revenue, and potential to motivate action. Making people good and mad is a very powerful political tool, as well.
There's no "these days" about it. The emphasis on negative news has been around ever since there was news.
Incidentally, too much of it absolutely does skew your perception of reality. It's normal for people to believe that their neighborhoods and the world in general is much more dangerous than it is. Every strange
Re: (Score:2)
A 6 year old just shrugged and switched families? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Biographical memory is much more malleable than most people realize. Human memory is not like a hard drive where you put bits of data into it and then retrieve them later unchanged. Human biographical recall is more like reimagining of things that happened to you in the past. It's like your brain has a kind of schema for what happened, but your mind's eye fills in the details. That makes it very easy to add and delete details, and every time you recall a memory the schema changes a little bit. One neuros
Re: A 6 year old just shrugged and switched famili (Score:2)
Good answer, but that's not what gaslighting is. Extremely common mistake but it's making someone believe they're going crazy, not trying l tricking them or lying to them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or maybe he liked his new family better.
Re: A 6 year old just shrugged and switched famili (Score:2)
Kids dont forget that sort of thing. The details maybe, but not the main facts.
Re: A 6 year old just shrugged and switched famili (Score:4, Informative)
Kids kidnapped at age 8 or under stop trying to return home pretty quickly, coming to accept stories for their new living situation and losing details of their old one.
And memories are malleable. I have few memories before age 8, and the ones I do have e.g. older and more familiar versions of my parents copy-and-pasted in. I am often surprised looking at old photos.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Kids dont forget that sort of thing. The details maybe, but not the main facts.
Uhmmm..No. No disrespect intended, but you are completely incorrect. My Mother left my Father when I was 7. She took all the kids except for me and left me with my Father. It was literally the most earth shattering thing that ever happened in my life and has always affected me. I have no memory of when she and my siblings left and the days that followed. My first memory afterwards is being in my Father's truck at night, listening to the radio as he and a friend worked on the mobile home trailer.
Children's
Re: (Score:2)
In the 1950s kids didn't have cell phones or the internet. He might not have known mother's telephone number or postal address.
When I was 6 years old, there also were no cell phones or the Internet. But I can still recite the number of my parent's land-line from back then (despite it having been obsolete for > 40 years), and of course I knew the name of the city and the name of the street and the number of the house we lived in, even the license-plate number of the car my father drove back then.
Sure the child may have been hindered to contact his family by the abductors for some time, but he certainly had plenty of opportunity
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The boys had recently immigrated with their mother and four other siblings from Puerto Rico
So the numbers and address that he knew as a 6yo where most likely not the current one.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you missed the part where it said they RECENTLY MOVED from Puerto Rico. Do you think they kept the same phone number and address?
Re: (Score:2)
In the 1950s a lot of people didn't even have a phone. In the 1970s a lot of people shared a single line and were supposed to pick up the receiver based on a morse-like ring pattern.
Re: (Score:3)
It was 1951 and he was from Puerto Rico. Kids in 1951 were not as smart as the kids of today. It's thanks to technologies such as, radio, TV, telephone, computers, internet, mobile phone etc. that today's kids are much smarter than kids of the past. Luis probably never ever saw any of those devices before he was kidnapped.
Re: A 6 year old just shrugged and switched famili (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The progress was almost entirely in areas where poor nutrition and lack of education impacted scores in the 19th century. In fact, within the US there has been a decline since the 1990s so it's entirely possible that scores are similar or below what they were in the 1950s.
And on top of this, there have been changes over the years to "adjust" IQ scores according to meet other than strictly scientific goals. You can Google if you want to learn more about that, i'm not looking to start any food fights here.
Re: (Score:2)
In the 90's, I was living in a rural area. I saw little girl walking down the street and I thought that odd. So I went to talk to her, I stooped so we were eye level, hopefully not to scare her. I asked her where she lived, it was right next door. I asked her what her phone number was so I could at least call them first. She didn't know. I finally wound up walking her back home but before we left the road, her mother pulled up. The kid had been left off the school bus and finding no one home decided to go w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Or maybe even just telling him "Your parents were sadly killed in a car accident" right away.
I don't see that as a hole at all.
Re: (Score:2)
If he had been prepped with "we're going to have a new life after we move", and then the kidnappers are telling him "This is your home now, we're you're parents," and everyone new he meets is acting like that's the case (because they think it is), a
No explanation what the woman did with him? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: No explanation what the woman did with him? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
The guy was found after his mom died, but just before his brother died, so I guess that's good. But he's lived the majority of his life without his blood family and seemingly had a decent life and there's no way to get that back which is a mix of good and bad.
You know what pisses me off? Somebody took somebody else's 6 year old and we have absolutely no indication that the law is coming down on them in any way. Or that they're dead and the law can't. This is a huge, huge missing part of the story and t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well there's a massive reading fail for me; I had it in my head he was in his late 50s. The 'retired' part didn't click because his career as a firefighter often comes with an early retirement.
He didnâ(TM)t immigrate (Score:1)
Not tech, so it does not belong on Slashdot. (Score:3)
Turning Slashdot into a tabloid is contemptible. Yet another calculated step in wrecking the site the "editors" will never admit taking for that reason.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd argue that DNA analysis indeed qualifies as "tech."
"Immigrated" is definitely the wrong word (Score:2)
The boys had recently immigrated with their mother and four other siblings from Puerto Rico.
You don't say people "immigrate" to California from Arizona, or Virginia, or Alsaka, or Puerto Rico, or any other part of the US.
They just move there.
Re: (Score:2)
M-W: to enter and usually become established
AH: To enter and settle in a country or region to which one is not native.
So M-W uses it in the most vague of terms and AH uses region in addition to country. There's tons of usage of the term immigrate to discuss the Western migration of people from the East Coast of the US as well as the post Civil War migrations of people from the Southern US to the Northern US. It
to have the answer 'no' translated (Score:2)
How did he get a new Identity? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Back in those days, kids didn't get SSNs. Birth certificates were not carefully tracked either. So obtaining one from a kid that died young would not have been a major problem. "Recently immigrated from Puerto Rico" would have made tracking even more difficult.
Re: (Score:2)
> "Recently immigrated from Puerto Rico" would have made tracking even more difficult.
I mean... even today lots of Americans don't realize Puerto Ricans are Americans and can't actually 'immigrate'. Movement within the US is 'migrating' and to the average Joe, 'moving'.
So back in the day, I can't imagine it was better.
Re: (Score:2)
Right. But the issue is less the immigration or migration and more the state of record keeping in Puerto Rico. In 1945, there were backwater places in the continental USA that didn't keep good birth records.
Just Wait... (Score:2)
...for the California State Board of Equalization (their form of IRS) gets their hands on this guy and sends him a BIGLY bill for all the back taxes he owes the State.
After all, it is California, and they are having budgetary shortfall problem again, and they are never ones to overlook an opportunity to tax you coming & going.
Just wait for the entry & exit barriers to be erected at all California airports, complete with armed guards, and a sign saying:
Pay Your State Taxes Here ... Even If You Are '
So much fear about DNA tests (Score:2)
But this story illustrates an important *positive* use case for DNA testing. This was a consumer-grade test that led to solving a decades-old kidnapping. All indications are that DNA is far more often used for *good* purposes than bad.
Re: (Score:2)
>"But this story illustrates an important *positive* use case for DNA testing. This was a consumer-grade test that led to solving a decades-old kidnapping. All indications are that DNA is far more often used for *good* purposes than bad."
There is a huge incentive not to disclose or share what might be done that is bad. Plus, one of the most major bad things is that this data hangs around FOREVER once it is taken, and can be used for bad things way into the future.
Like most technological advancements, th