Coffee, Eggs and White Rice Linked To Higher Levels of PFAS in Human Body (theguardian.com) 68
New research aimed at identifying foods that contain higher levels of PFAS found people who eat more white rice, coffee, eggs and seafood typically showed more of the toxic chemicals in their plasma and breast milk. The Guardian adds: The study checked samples from 3,000 pregnant mothers, and is among the first research to suggest coffee and white rice may be contaminated at higher rates than other foods. It also identified an association between red meat consumption and levels of PFOS, one of the most common and dangerous PFAS compounds. The authors said the findings highlight the chemicals' ubiquity and the many ways they can end up in the food supply.
Re: (Score:1)
White rice bad, dark/black rice good!
Stating the obvious (Score:2)
Ever notice how these health articles and studies only focus on the same group of persons?
1. Article leads with high emotional sympathy getting subject - "3,000 pregnant mothers"
2. Research behind the article only studies that same group. Other groups are never a concern.
3. Research paper has a large list of contributors from the same group (first names - Caitlin, Jennifer, Rachel, Lisa, Carin, Lisa, Julianne, Antonia, Margaret, Megan) and a token for diversity from the other group (Brock) and two unknown
Re: (Score:3)
Spoken like someone who doesn't understand science.
>As others have said, questionnaire and blood samples from 3000 pregnant mothers with a generic, "What do you eat?" questionnaire is lazy science. What's needed is proper science of actually testing the food the persons eat.
You do realize that you can't just GUESS what small subset of foods you are going to test right? No grant is going be like "here, have a bunch of money to pick foods out of a list from in a hat to test for elevated levels of $X".
You d
Science (Score:2)
Small study with narrowly drawn questions to find some 'causality' between things which may or not be significantly linked. Net result lazy science publicized in the newspaper.
Agree, on the point that the premise of the study is quite flawed. Peer review could at least ask for additional data such as testing samples from another family member in the house.
Don't know the quality of research published in "Science of The Total Environment Volume 933, 10 July 2024, 173157"
Coffee: beans, ground, instant, other? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Keurig pods, perchance?
Re: (Score:2)
Rice in an instant heat package?
Re: (Score:2)
An interesting question, also was thinking if further there was a difference between that and a rice cooker which is far more common in asian countries but some of those even have a nonstick coating on the bowl as well.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never understood the point of a rice cooker but this may have to do with the fact that I've only ever cooked a couple cups of rice at a time. It's incredibly easy to just bring liquid to a boil in a sauce pan, pour in rice, cover, and reduce heat to simmer and set a timer for 20 minutes. 2:1 liquid to rice ratio and it comes out more or less perfect every time.
Re: (Score:2)
I somehow burn it every time like that. A rice cooker often has just a single button. Put water and rice in the bowl, you'll learn your favorite ratio with your machine, press the button, wait. Couldn't be easier. Super consistent.
Re: Coffee: beans, ground, instant, other? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bring to a boil, then low heat for 20 mins.
Re: (Score:2)
Throw pot in dishwasher to clean.
Re: (Score:2)
I somehow burn it every time like that. A rice cooker often has just a single button. Put water and rice in the bowl, you'll learn your favorite ratio with your machine, press the button, wait. Couldn't be easier. Super consistent.
I've had two different microwave rice cookers, and they give fast, perfect results every time. They're much lighter than electric rice cookers and take up less space. Sadly, they're also made of 100% plastic... :-{
Re: (Score:2)
I've never understood the point of a rice cooker but this may have to do with the fact that I've only ever cooked a couple cups of rice at a time. It's incredibly easy to just bring liquid to a boil in a sauce pan, pour in rice, cover, and reduce heat to simmer and set a timer for 20 minutes. 2:1 liquid to rice ratio and it comes out more or less perfect every time.
For white rice, I don't see the point either. I don't even use simmer as on an electric stove you can just turn the burner off and it cooks on the residual heat.
However, for quinoa, rice cookers are awesome. It makes the process totally brainless and messless. Cooking quinoa on the stove requires about 20 minutes of total attention and needs to be served exactly when done. It also sticks to the pot and splatters over the counter. A tall non-stick pot would help the mess part but I have never been able
Re: Coffee: beans, ground, instant, other? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is organic coffee any better?
Did they find elevated levels (Score:5, Interesting)
in the actual foods? Or just in the people who, on surveys, said they ate such foods?
It strikes me that these are very broad, overlapping categories. For example, lots of people both drink coffee and eat eggs. Did they observe a difference in levels between people who drank coffee but didn't eat eggs, or vice versa? I'll bet many of these people also ate bread, and candy, and sausage, and frozen pizzas, and who knows what else.
Nutrition science is hard, and lots of studies cut corners and draw conclusions that aren't necessarily supported by the controls, or lack of controls, in the study.
Re: (Score:2)
in the references section, they're mostly pointing at other studies that did blood tests. specifically this study, it's for breast milk and blood tests.
obv the researchers have not met someone with a ceramic or glass hario v60 doing paper filter coffee or a french press.
large roasters usually use all metal roasters in the process. the beans themselves might be delivered packaged in large plastic or burlap bags.
i think the main culprit is starbucks/peets/dunkin donuts consumers who drink coffee that's pregr
Re: (Score:2)
All your theories have potential merit. Proving it, or even concluding that any one of the sources of PFAs is "likely" is an entirely different matter. This study certainly didn't prove a link.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or it could be that almost all drip coffee mangers / k-cup type machines (including the cups themselves) are plastic and you are mixing high-heat with that during the brewing process.
Re: (Score:1)
in the actual foods? Or just in the people who, on surveys, said they ate such foods?
Yes. And by that I mean all of the above and more. Yes there are studies on self reporting of eggs. Yes there are actual studies that show eggs are an easy way of getting PFAS into the body. Yes there are studies on eggs showing they are contaminated with PFAS during farming. In fact there's also guidance in some parts of the world not to actually farm chickens yourself because your area leads to eggs being laid with PFAS levels determined not fit for consumption.
There's a lot of studies on PFAS right now f
Re: (Score:2)
Everything you said might indeed be true, but it doesn't help THIS study prove what it purports to prove. THIS study took surveys of pregnant women to see what they ate and drank, and also measured the levels of PFAs in their placentas and blood. There are too many overlapping potential sources in the various foods the women ate, to be able to control for any one of them. You might be very certain in your convictions, but that doesn't make THIS study a good source of information.
Giving blood and plasma reduces blood PFAS levels (Score:4, Interesting)
https://theconversation.com/ne... [theconversation.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Giving blood and plasma reduces blood PFAS lev (Score:2)
I must be almost PFAS free. I donate every whole blood every 8 weeks.
I am a 6 gallon donar to date. I even have a Red Cross tattoo on my right arm to track my gallons.
How many lives have you potentially saved? Everyone who is eligible should donate. :)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Giving blood and plasma reduces blood PFAS lev (Score:4, Interesting)
If that's true, aren't you giving your PFAS to the recipient then? I'm not sure where else they'd be going.
Re: Giving blood and plasma reduces blood PFAS le (Score:3)
Quite possibly. Not all donated whole blood is transfused that way. It is frequently separated into red cells, platelets, and plasma.
Also, if a person needs a blood transfusion, a few extra PFAS is likely the least of their worries. The donations of four people saved my life once. I was in no shape to complain.
Re: Giving blood and plasma reduces blood PFAS l (Score:3)
I suppose a person in need of blood has recently lost a lot of it (whether by accident or by a doctor), and would presumably lose PFAS with that lost blood. So it'd probably be a wash for them when they get new blood.
Eventually you can't eat anything. (Score:5, Funny)
Eventually you can't eat anything as everything harms you one way or another :P
Liquid diets anyone? Or Soylent green maybe? /It's a joke people!
Re: (Score:2)
Be sure not to breathe anything either. And if you must breathe oxygen, be sure to at least have some antioxidants.
Re: (Score:2)
Be sure not to breathe anything either. And if you must breathe oxygen, be sure to at least have some antioxidants.
But breathing causes death. Fact: 100% of all dead people were habitual breathers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Soylent green maybe? /It's a joke people!
In Soviet Russia, soylent joke is people!
I know right? (Score:4, Insightful)
Next thing you know they'll be taking asbestos out of baby formula and that's just crazy. I say we need more asbestos! More asbestos! More asbestos!
Re: (Score:2)
Soylent green maybe?
If people contain PFAS, so will soylent green.
If it ain't broke... (Score:2)
I know multiple Asian families who eat lots of white rice, and are mostly healthy and trim. Usually a family member is who chubby doesn't put enough vegetables with their (white) rice.
Brown rice is probably still better, but even with white rice, the Asian diet works better than a typical "American-style" meal.
Re: (Score:2)
Brown rice is probably still better
white rice is just what's left when you remove all nutrients from any rice except the carbohidrates in the grain and say merry godbye to all vitamins, minerals, essential fatty acids, antioxidants and fiber that were in the bran. genetics vary, but the difference is mostly in the processing, and since brown rice processing only removes the husk, it retains most of the bran so is indeed much, much better as a nutrient.
Asian diet works better than a typical "American-style" meal.
yeah, their rice is actually the nutritional equivalent of bread or pasta, merely plain ref
Re: (Score:2)
Eggs (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the eggs are related to the non-stick frying pans. I try not to use non-stick, but for eggs it's hard not to. ...
Try cooking your eggs with coconut oil. The added flavor is subtle, but good, and that's the slipperiest oil I know.
Re: (Score:1)
*vomit*
Re: Eggs (Score:2)
Re: Eggs (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the eggs are related to the non-stick frying pans.
Rice is a similar case. I've tried to find a rice cooker that doesn't have non-stick coating (read: PFAS) and as far as I can tell, there are none.
Re: (Score:2)
I found https://www.vermicular.us/prod... [vermicular.us] enamel-coated cast iron rice pot. The FAQ for one of their products read "Is the pan non-stick? -- The Vermicular Frying Pan is enamel-coated, and if preheated properly, food will not stick to the pan." The fact that they do not say "it is non-stick" and that the user needs to follow a specific pre-heating procedure that needs an explanation page 45 of the user manual hints that they are not using chemicals. Their shopping page has a Question section where they seem
Re: (Score:2)
Tatung and Aroma make rice cookers with stainless steel bowls.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The trick with eggs on stainless steel (with oil) is to have the pan hot enough that the egg white wriggles when put in it. That way it won't stick when you take it out.
Re: (Score:2)
Cook them in their own shell.
Re: (Score:2)
Using the right amount of heat and fat is more important than seasoning. Teflon is only useful for inexperienced people.
Re: (Score:1)
Study paid for by the People That Hate Humanity. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
By how much? (Score:2)
The full study results are behind a paywall. Does anyone know how much higher their PFAS levels were?
Re: Absolute nonsense (Score:1)
Probably non stick coatings (Score:2)
Pots, pans, kitchen utensils are all sources of these chemicals.
Why not just link the Science Direct article? (Score:2)