Researchers Identify a 'Switch' That Might Someday Kill Tumor Cells (ucdavis.edu) 29
Cells have a protein receptor that will cause that cell to die — in theory. Unfortunately, "Previous efforts to target this receptor have been unsuccessful," says Jogender Tushir-Singh, an associate professor in the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology at the University of California, Davis.
But he's now led a team of researchers at the university's Comprehensive Cancer Center that's identified a receptor-activating protein section. And more importantly, "now that we've identified this epitope, there could be a therapeutic path forward" for targeting that receptor... in tumors. The findings were published Oct. 14 in the Nature journal Cell Death & Differentiation... Death receptors do precisely what their name implies — when targeted, they trigger programmed cell death of tumor cells. They offer a potential workaround that could simultaneously kill tumor cells and pave the way for more effective immunotherapies and CAR T-cell therapy...
Tushir-Singh and his colleagues knew they might be able to target cancer cells selectively if they found the right epitope. Having identified this specific epitope, he and other researchers can now design a new class of antibodies to selectively bind to and activate Fas to potentially destroy tumor cells specifically.
Singh says their research "sets the stage" to develop antibodies that selectively kill tumor cells.
But he's now led a team of researchers at the university's Comprehensive Cancer Center that's identified a receptor-activating protein section. And more importantly, "now that we've identified this epitope, there could be a therapeutic path forward" for targeting that receptor... in tumors. The findings were published Oct. 14 in the Nature journal Cell Death & Differentiation... Death receptors do precisely what their name implies — when targeted, they trigger programmed cell death of tumor cells. They offer a potential workaround that could simultaneously kill tumor cells and pave the way for more effective immunotherapies and CAR T-cell therapy...
Tushir-Singh and his colleagues knew they might be able to target cancer cells selectively if they found the right epitope. Having identified this specific epitope, he and other researchers can now design a new class of antibodies to selectively bind to and activate Fas to potentially destroy tumor cells specifically.
Singh says their research "sets the stage" to develop antibodies that selectively kill tumor cells.
Sorry , no (well maybe sometimes) (Score:3, Interesting)
The problem here there is no such thing as "cancer" in a way that its physiology is predictable. It is a heterogeneous bunch of cells with mangled DNA, in basically unique and random forms, whit some basic similarities (activated telomerase etc). But basically these are native cells, so the immune system will not be able to distinguish and decide what to attack. WHen it does find a point of distinction, then within the tumor pool there is always a cell that lacks that particular feature. That cell then becomes the new cancer stem cell and you are back at square one...
So hopeful interesting, but not a gold bullit
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The Separate Challenge. (Score:2)
Targeting unaffordable price tags is a separate challenge. This discovery provides a very elegant and effective way to destroy an option to live, once Greed determines a "fair" enough profit margin for any new cancer treatment that proves effective.
If you to talk about the reality of this, then talk about the reality of this.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem here there is no such thing as "cancer" in a way that its physiology is predictable. It is a heterogeneous bunch of cells with mangled DNA, in basically unique and random forms, whit some basic similarities (activated telomerase etc). But basically these are native cells, so the immune system will not be able to distinguish and decide what to attack. WHen it does find a point of distinction, then within the tumor pool there is always a cell that lacks that particular feature. That cell then becomes the new cancer stem cell and you are back at square one...
So hopeful interesting, but not a gold bullit
They are already doing this targeting to a limited extent. This is already approved Worldwide:
https://www.aacr.org/patients-... [aacr.org]
And the 5 year outcomes are pretty encouraging:
https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/... [ascopubs.org]
My roommate started this 2 months ago. Is taking monthly doses (infusions) for the next 12 months. First CT w/contrast since starting this treatment (after completing 6 week radiochemotherapy regimen), just the other day showed no growth of the main lung mass, and no new sites nor metastases.
Fingers cros
Re: (Score:1)
Low low price (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Because patents are the name of the medical game. Just like those idiot Dutch scientists who gave up a cure for some cancers because they couldn't find a way to patent it. The main ingredient of their medicine was ordinary baking powder.
Whole damn planet wired for networking, and somehow we can't publish an unpatented solution? Does it work? Do I need a damn patent to ask for Grandma's old recipe for chicken soup? That worked wonders for a cold.
Who we calling stupid again? Those who can't afford baking powder? I mean seriously.
Re:In which country did they file the patents? (Score:4, Informative)
No. Baking powder is not a cancer cure. Never was.
https://apnews.com/article/fac... [apnews.com]
Re:No Profit in a cure (Score:4, Insightful)
Nobody is looking to cure anything, ever. They will only ever look for what makes a profit. Isn't for profit healthcare wonderful?
Exactly. It's why smallpox is running rampant across the planet. No one wants to cure it because then they wouldn't make money. Drug companies just want to keep things as they are so they can reap huge profits from the suffering.
Same with rinderpest. They just want to bleed famers dry rather than curing it.
If people are that upset that every single affliction isn't immediately cured or that it costs money to buy the medicine, they have two options. First, be like anti-vaxxers and drop like flies by not using the medicine. Let your body's "natural immunity" take care of cancer and diabetes and leukemia. Second, start your own company or takeover an existing company. Show the world how it's done by curing cancer and diabetes and leukemia so you lose out on billions in profits while driving those other companies out of busines.
It's really that simple.
Re: (Score:1)
Nobody is looking to cure anything, ever. They will only ever look for what makes a profit. Isn't for profit healthcare wonderful?
Exactly. It's why smallpox is running rampant across the planet. No one wants to cure it because then they wouldn't make money. Drug companies just want to keep things as they are so they can reap huge profits from the suffering.
Same with rinderpest. They just want to bleed famers dry rather than curing it.
If people are that upset that every single affliction isn't immediately cured or that it costs money to buy the medicine, they have two options. First, be like anti-vaxxers and drop like flies by not using the medicine. Let your body's "natural immunity" take care of cancer and diabetes and leukemia. Second, start your own company or takeover an existing company. Show the world how it's done by curing cancer and diabetes and leukemia so you lose out on billions in profits while driving those other companies out of busines.
It's really that simple.
Excuse me; I thought the WHO declared Smallpox Eradicated Worldwide four decades ago, in 1980.
https://www.who.int/health-top... [who.int]
And it has been eradicated in North America since 1953(!!!)
https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/h... [cdc.gov]
So, what were you saying, Mr. Paranoid?
Poe's law (Score:3)
The sarcasm was pretty blatant.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think he was saying "WOOOOOSH' because it's pretty clear to anyone with a sufficient degree of reading comprehension that they were singling out infectious diseases that actually have been cured / eradicated with his dripping sarcasm that you totally missed.
Re: (Score:2)
It's why smallpox is running rampant across the planet. No one wants to cure it because then they wouldn't make money. Drug companies just want to keep things as they are so they can reap huge profits from the suffering.
Same with rinderpest. They just want to bleed famers dry rather than curing it.
I mean... yes, I suspect a lot of drug companies would have liked to leave diseases -- even ones as horrible and destructive as smallpox and rinderpest -- as endemic things they can treat, rather than eradicating the diseases outright.
The people working on the drugs would like to eradicate the diseases, I would guess basically universally. The patients would like the diseases eliminated. Even the shareholders of the companies would, by and large, like to see the problem go away, because getting smallpox rea
Sounds like a scary weapon (Score:3)
We already had substances that kill all cells they come in contact with, but we have something that can be targeted at specific genetic traits.
Re: (Score:2)
*now
Re: (Score:2)
So we could make a very specific poison that only targeted, say, mosquitos. But is too expensive to use for that purpose.
This is research, and is interesting. Accurately predicting how it will be usable at this stage is basically impossible.
To All the Whinners (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Target fat cells for death (Score:2)
Now that would be really useful.
Re: (Score:2)
There is no escape!
Never happen (Score:1)