Cancer and Heart Disease Vaccines 'Ready By End of the Decade' 154
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Guardian: Millions of lives could be saved by a groundbreaking set of new vaccines for a range of conditions including cancer, experts have said. A leading pharmaceutical firm said it is confident that jabs for cancer, cardiovascular and autoimmune diseases, and other conditions will be ready by 2030. Studies into these vaccinations are also showing "tremendous promise", with some researchers saying 15 years' worth of progress has been "unspooled" in 12 to 18 months thanks to the success of the Covid jab.
Dr Paul Burton, the chief medical officer of pharmaceutical company Moderna, said he believes the firm will be able to offer such treatments for "all sorts of disease areas" in as little as five years. The firm, which created a leading coronavirus vaccine, is developing cancer vaccines that target different tumor types. Burton said: "We will have that vaccine and it will be highly effective, and it will save many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives. I think we will be able to offer personalized cancer vaccines against multiple different tumor types to people around the world."
He also said that multiple respiratory infections could be covered by a single injection -- allowing vulnerable people to be protected against Covid, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) -- while mRNA therapies could be available for rare diseases for which there are currently no drugs. Therapies based on mRNA work by teaching cells how to make a protein that triggers the body's immune response against disease. Burton said :"I think we will have mRNA-based therapies for rare diseases that were previously undruggable, and I think that 10 years from now, we will be approaching a world where you truly can identify the genetic cause of a disease and, with relative simplicity, go and edit that out and repair it using mRNA-based technology." But scientists warn that the accelerated progress, which has surged "by an order of magnitude" in the past three years, will be wasted if a high level of investment is not maintained.
Dr Paul Burton, the chief medical officer of pharmaceutical company Moderna, said he believes the firm will be able to offer such treatments for "all sorts of disease areas" in as little as five years. The firm, which created a leading coronavirus vaccine, is developing cancer vaccines that target different tumor types. Burton said: "We will have that vaccine and it will be highly effective, and it will save many hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives. I think we will be able to offer personalized cancer vaccines against multiple different tumor types to people around the world."
He also said that multiple respiratory infections could be covered by a single injection -- allowing vulnerable people to be protected against Covid, flu and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) -- while mRNA therapies could be available for rare diseases for which there are currently no drugs. Therapies based on mRNA work by teaching cells how to make a protein that triggers the body's immune response against disease. Burton said :"I think we will have mRNA-based therapies for rare diseases that were previously undruggable, and I think that 10 years from now, we will be approaching a world where you truly can identify the genetic cause of a disease and, with relative simplicity, go and edit that out and repair it using mRNA-based technology." But scientists warn that the accelerated progress, which has surged "by an order of magnitude" in the past three years, will be wasted if a high level of investment is not maintained.
Anything that sounds too good to be true... (Score:1, Insightful)
Remember when nanoscale manufacturing, home factories, the reduced work-week, Hyperloop transit were all variously five, ten or fifteen years away?
I'll believe it when I see it.
Re: (Score:3)
A lot of things that were promised did actually turn out to be true. Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] Even some things people thought would be ridiculous. Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] .. these were all predicted and people were skeptical. Heck in 1900, it was predicted that median life expectancy would have increased all the way up to 50 years! Actually they did get a lot of predictions right though. Reference: https://4.bp.blogspot.c [blogspot.com]
Terabyte hard drives, petaflop super computers
Re: (Score:2)
Remember when Pepperidge Farm remembered?
Re: Anything that sounds too good to be true... (Score:2)
You did see it already from moderna and Pfizer.
This is taking that technology, the ability to create nearly arbitrary proteins, to the next incremental level.
Re: (Score:1)
milliard
Let me guess... French?
Re: (Score:3)
Back in the 70s a British billion was 10^12
10^9 was a milliard
I think 10^15 was a billiard but I am not sure if there is any relation to the table game
Re:Straws for the camel's back (Score:4, Insightful)
Most developed countries are below replacement. You worry about the wrong things.
Re: (Score:2)
Most second and third gen immigrants to countries like the United States take on the same demographic trends as the "native" population. The United States is below replacement even with decades of illegal immigration swelling it's population numbers.
Re: (Score:2)
The United States is below replacement even with decades of illegal immigration swelling it's population numbers.
Not true. Because of immigration our population has never stopped growing https://usafacts.org/data/topi... [usafacts.org] and it's projected to grow by quite a bit due to immigration for the next 30 years at least https://www.pewresearch.org/hi... [pewresearch.org].
Re:Straws for the camel's back (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
2 Years, so - you'd have to store Approx 2184 meals worth of food just for one adult. Cereals, rice?, powdered milk?, canned and packeted food with long shelf life. Difficult to plan for without any wastage and you'd have to keep eating 2 year old food.
Our system is at full capacity and that's in part due to huge over-population. We're wrecking the ecosystems planet-wide and are genocidally wiping out huge numbers of species and some people seem to think this is OK.
Re: (Score:3)
Hi, Malthus! (Score:5, Insightful)
So suddenly nobody dies, and we get a good spike in people. Then we can't get enough food and/or water to all of them for this or that reason, and all hell breaks loose. With bad luck the riots break down the advanced infrastructure that kept us alive so far. And the great dying-off starts.
Hi, Malthus!
The last time I ran into your followers' putting that sort of thing forward seriously was in the '60s-'70s. "Club of Rome" and all that. We were all supposed to be dead of starvation or pollution by the turn of the millenium. But it didn't work out that way. Again. Just like it didn't work out that way right after you proposed it in 1798, only to have it knocked into a cocked hat by the events of 1815-1860, as infrastructure, mechanization of farming, and a few generations of invention bumped food production by more than two orders of magnitude, a trend that has continued since.
Your model, as you well know, predicts a catastrophe because it has population increasing geometrically (on an exponential), and food production linearly (first-power series), and an exponential will eventually overwhelm a linear progression or even any constant power series.
But guess what: Technology, including food production, ALSO follows an exponential, and with a faster growth rate. So food production wins. Even as it ramps back as the bulk of the population finds other stuff to do than grow food, we have more problem with overweight than starvation (whenever governments and their wars don't screw it up). Meanwhile, when a population is freed from subsistence labor they find other stuff to do than have kids, and the population growth rate drops - until their masters start to worry about there being too few of them to keep them getting richer, and starts importing more.
So I'm really not worried about a Malthusian Catastrophe ending the world. My current candidates are:
1: Nuclear War
2: Anti-global-warming measures damage economy and deplete resources enough that geoengineering to actually fix any real problems becomes impossible.
3: Globalism -> new Bronze Age Collapse -> Civilization down long enough for the Milankovitch cycles to take us into the next glaciation -> Tech doesn't develop to the point of geoengineering over the remaining interglacials before the next deep ice age -> we didn't free enough fossil carbon before the next deep ice age -> deep ice age trend of lowering carbon dioxide, lower each cycle, this time gets it below the level where (all forms of) chlorophyl works, rather than just missing like last time -> No more green plants, primates, or most vertibrates.
Re: (Score:3)
So suddenly nobody dies, and we get a good spike in people. Then we can't get enough food and/or water to all of them for this or that reason, and all hell breaks loose. With bad luck the riots break down the advanced infrastructure that kept us alive so far. And the great dying-off starts.
Hi, Malthus!
Hi person who seems to think that the earth has infinite carrying capacity!
The person you is making the silly reverse hot hand argument.
Malthus did not forsee the technological progress of industrialized agriculture or the various green revolutions.
But that does not mean his thesis at base was flawed. Population and availability of food are intertwined.
So all of the arguments that Malthus was wrong, so the whole concept of population growth/loss is wrong, and will be forever, world without end, amen
Re: (Score:2)
Hi person who seems to think that the earth has infinite carrying capacity!
Hi, person who seems to think I'm talking about just the resources of Earth, infinite time, and assuming nothing else is going on.
My point is that the Marthusian analysis has, and will continue to, put food-shortage collapse 'way too soon by fundamentally misidentifying the growth curve of food production technology as non-exponential, and that whatever events make it fall off that and behind population growth seem likely to be part
Where Malthus went wrong (Score:2)
Hi person who seems to think that the earth has infinite carrying capacity!
The person you is making the silly reverse hot hand argument.
Malthus did not forsee the technological progress of industrialized agriculture or the various green revolutions.
But that does not mean his thesis at base was flawed. Population and availability of food are intertwined.
Malthus predicted an exponential rise in population, but didn't consider counterposing forces. The counterposing forces lead to a bell curve distribution, and a bell curve is indistinguishable from an exponential at the tail ends.
All industrialized nations have seen a dramatic drop in the birth rate, there's good evidence that once the standard of living in poorer nations is brought up that they will experience a drop in birth rate as well.
The integral of a bell curve is an S-curve, which means world popula
Re: (Score:2)
Hi person who seems to think that the earth has infinite carrying capacity!
The person you is making the silly reverse hot hand argument.
Malthus did not forsee the technological progress of industrialized agriculture or the various green revolutions.
But that does not mean his thesis at base was flawed. Population and availability of food are intertwined.
Malthus predicted an exponential rise in population, but didn't consider counterposing forces. The counterposing forces lead to a bell curve distribution, and a bell curve is indistinguishable from an exponential at the tail ends.
Can you put forth a thesis that Malthus is always wrong, that no matter how many humans there are, that Technology will accommodate them.
We all know that rates of population growth are slowing in the Western world.
But In the end, take that all up with the guy who brought Malthus into this.
I make only one reply, and that is that various disasters can and will happen and technology - the crux of the Malthus was wrong and will always be wrong - that technology better be able to instantaneously fix the
Re: (Score:2)
Unnecessary, as "no matter how many" is code for "infinite". Anyone using infinite in their extrapolations isn't dealing with reality.
Re: (Score:2)
Unnecessary, as "no matter how many" is code for "infinite". Anyone using infinite in their extrapolations isn't dealing with reality.
So is "Malthus will always be wrong." I've heard that dozens of times in here. I'm used to discarding anything that ends up at infinity. Which is my exact point, and I'm glad to see that you 100 percent concur.
Re: (Score:3)
Well, if you lie about the actual Club of Rome predictions, you can certainly come up with claims like yours.
Are you seriously claiming that, among the '60s-'70s "Environmental / Ecology Movement" press-recognized spokesmen there WEREN'T some who tried to gin up panic about limits to humanity's growth both by echoing the arguments of Malthus and the Club of Rome?
As to The Club's actual predictions and the computer model that they claimed underpinned them, I don't have to deconstruct that. Others have long
Re: (Score:2)
Quite apart from the question of *can* Earth support an ever-increasing population, I'm more interesting in hearing from folks like you, *why* do you want ever increasing population?
I like going out in undisturbed wilderness! I like driving on non-gridlocked highways! I like less pollution! I like cheaper housing! I like smaller lines! I like less competition!
What do you think is the optimal population? 20 billion? 100 billion? I just don't get it.
End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
It's really not as much of a political party thing as people make it out to be. Trump himself even encouraged getting the COVID shot, meanwhile large swaths of democratic voters are also refusing to get vaccinated, particularly among minorities.
Re:End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
He was brief about his recommendations. He said on national TV that he hoped everyone would get the shot that he kept saying he had helped to create (which he didn't) and that it would be a beautiful thing, and then there was massive backlash and he immediately softened his position to always mentioning that it was your choice, but he still wanted people to take it... then about three days later, he stopped talking about it except to occasionally remind leftists that he helped! At least as much as a kid who
Re: (Score:3)
What's even more interesting about this is the left-wing commentators who have been shown (by Libs of TikTok back in the day) to be dead against the Trump vaccine, only to change their minds and demand everyone be forced to take the vaccines once Biden had replaced him.
Hilarious how the partisanship of politics is so extreme these days, and how the screeching harpies can't see their own idiocy, and how the establishment hates when anyone brings the recipts to highlight the hypocrisy.
The vaccine itself has n
Re: (Score:2)
"What's even more interesting about this is the left-wing commentators who have been shown (by Libs of TikTok back in the day) to be dead against the Trump vaccine, only to change their minds and demand everyone be forced to take the vaccines once Biden had replaced him."
Not a surprising comment coming from a viewer of "Libs of TikTok".
The vaccine was unavailable until after the election and accessible to essentially no one until after "Biden had replaced him".
"Hilarious how the partisanship of politics is
Re: (Score:2)
the libs of tiktok, for all your hatred, was pointing this out with the simplest of simple tweets of someone's hypocrisy. Without any comment either. It was the pure light of truth shone in their face.
And they didn't like it, just like you don't like it being a thing. Imagine powerful political and media creatures being accountable for their own words. Imagine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:2)
He was brief about his recommendations. He said on national TV that he hoped everyone would get the shot that he kept saying he had helped to create (which he didn't)
He might be referring to this:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik... [wikipedia.org]
In which his administration directly played a role. The TL;DR of that program was that multiple proposed vaccines were given aggressive funding and expedited testing in parallel, in the hopes that at least one of them would work. And as it turned out, two of them did.
That alone is probably why the US had not one but two working vaccines before the rest of the world did. I still remember right here on slashdot some Europeans were complaining that
Re:End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:5, Insightful)
Trump beat covid at the time because he was airlifted to a hospital and received still experimental treatments that normal people weren’t eligible for. https://www.latimes.com/story/... [latimes.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Trump beat covid at the time because he was airlifted to a hospital and received still experimental treatments that normal people weren’t eligible for. https://www.latimes.com/story/... [latimes.com]
Experimental treatments?? And his doctors weren't immediately fired and banned from social media for it??? Say it isn't so!
Re: (Score:2)
Trump beat covid at the time because he was airlifted to a hospital and received still experimental treatments that normal people werenâ(TM)t eligible for.
It isn't possible to know what would have happened. One can make reasoned guesses yet unqualified statements such as the above are not factual.
Personally given dubious timeline and publically disclosed list of treatments I doubt any of the special treatments (Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies) had any effect. Remdesivir is a nullity and as evidenced by steroid injections and low oxygen viral stage would have been mostly over at that point. As a result any monoclonal infusions would have arrived too la
Re:End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:5, Informative)
Looks he he received all the treatments, experimental antibodies, remdesivir, and steroids. https://www.science.org/conten... [science.org]
Re: (Score:2)
It's a good thing that /. has you to objectively question if the greatest health care in the world benefited the President of the US.
But, yeah, COVID is a nothing burger because it didn't affect you after 5 vaccines in 2023.
Re: End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:2)
No, that wasn't the point. GP made it sound as if Trump was only spared a bad case of it by monoclonal antibodies. I'm saying that's not necessarily the case.
Re:End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:5, Informative)
Trump told people to get vaccinated and was booed for it. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/a... [nbcnews.com]
As for “large swaths” we’re going to need some real numbers on that claim.
Re: (Score:2)
I think its a little more complicated than left or right people. Right wing politicians *absolutely* seemed to be stoking antivaxer nonsense, but I suspect amongst the voter base it was a bit more complex witih the "MAGA" extremes of the right wing getting into the horse paste and "vaccines cause 5G wifi autism", but also the stupid hippy new-age faction of the left fell for it, and then a bizare syncretic alliance formed that let a lot of those fall under the influence of those right wing politicians. In t
Re: (Score:2)
>"It's really not as much of a political party thing as people make it out to be"
For some people, EVERYTHING is a political party thing. That is very apparent on Slashdot. It also reveals very narrow and disingenuous prejudice thinking not only by those posting such stuff, but modding it up. And then we wonder about the increasing "polarization" of the country. Hmmm.
Re: End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:2)
Not exactly.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.c... [medicalnewstoday.com]
Re: (Score:2)
...once all the Democrats taking vaccines start outliving the, "Don't put yer poison in me!" MAGA crowd.
As the one vaccinated Republican, I was wondering that myself. Then every state will be a blue state and we'll all be shot by crazed catch-and-release carjackers.
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
Re: (Score:2)
One can hope the morons will do that, but they will probably just produce even more offspring.
Re: (Score:2)
...once all the Democrats taking vaccines start outliving the, "Don't put yer poison in me!" MAGA crowd.
That's why the MAGAts are trying to ban abortion and birth control, and legalize child brides [newsweek.com]. They need to breed more MAGAts, and they're willing to rape children to do it. And as always, they accused the left of doing what they were going to do before they did it [reuters.com], in order to poison the well. (I actually got a bunch of stuff about CA SB145 [ca.gov] and had to use -california in my terms, because of more fake news-related FUD coming up in my search around that.)
Re: (Score:2)
...once all the Democrats taking vaccines start outliving the, "Don't put yer poison in me!" MAGA crowd.
One of the advantages of being an old guy is that I've been watching your team say stuff like this, decade after decade ... and yet, your political opponents still refuse to die off, cussed buggers that they are.
It's almost as though there is some flaw in your thinking about this.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember a report that said because young people typically vote for leftwing parties and are generally more left wing in outlook, as the demographic ages the political landscape will become increasingly left wing to the point where right wing parties will cease to exist.
You'd think this was obviouse. Except the report was written in the 1960s.
Damn kids, keep growing up and seeing their first tax bill.
Re: (Score:2)
Kids growing up today aren't seeing big tax bills because they aren't accumulating wealth.
People don't get more conservative as they get older, they get more conservative as they get richer.
"Except the report was written in the 1960s."
And you've learned nothing since then.
Re: (Score:2)
you know nothing then. The report in the 60s showed that common perceptions are wrong.
Kids don't have to get richer, they just have to get a job and see their tax bill. And they will, because we cannot have 100% of the population on benefits. Its not about wealth, its that tax bill.
And maybe its not even that, it'll be that they see the closed shops and crime and will move to a red state, and there they'll be exposed to people outside their old groups and will recover from the "woke mind virus".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds scary... if it were true. Too bad it's all a fantasy in your world of conspiracy theories.
Re: (Score:2)
>> we came a hair's breath away from becoming a dictatorship
Can you please rank the things we're supposed to be shitting our pants about so I know which ones are most important:
- Trump dictatorship
- Climate change
- Covid-19
- White supremacy
Re: (Score:2)
The only thing that stopped us was Trump's incompetence and the fact that pence didn't like him. Ron DeSantis has no such baggage.
Yup, many people that know DeSantis don't like him: Just Wait Until You Get to Know Ron DeSantis [theatlantic.com]
“I’d rather have teeth pulled without anesthetic than be on a boat with Ron DeSantis,” says Mac Stipanovich, a Tallahassee lobbyist who set sail from the GOP over his revulsion for Trump and his knockoffs.
Re: (Score:3)
PS - If you immediately turn this video off 'because Fox News' instead of watching it, you are sticking your
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for the input, comrade. How many rubles were you paid for that comment?
Re:what trenchant insight (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, Trump is pro-vax because that's his one successful program, but the MAGA crowd has booed him at rallies for saying this. Meanwhile, remember that there is already a vaccine against the cervical cancer virus, and but evangelicals have warned their people not to take it on grounds that it "promotes promiscuity."
Re: (Score:2)
Second, there are peer-reviewed papers coming out pretty much every day about the vaccine and let's just say that the science is not on the side of more jabs=more better. The Moderna vaccine in particular, if you've had two jabs, increases your risk of myocarditis by 96 times, which is well above the risk from the disease itself. The Astra-Zeneca vaccine was just banned in Australia because of the number of blood clots caused. Really all you can say about the vaccine is, at the time it seemed like the best option for vulnerable populations because the prevalent strains at the time were fairly dangerous.
Sources of these papers? The Astra-Zeneca isn't banned either. It's been discontinued because the other vaccines work better. https://www.news.com.au/lifest... [news.com.au]
This isn't a fucking sports game dude, this is an area where it pays to learn and not just assume "hurr durr MAGA dumb." If you're not willing to spend a good half an hour a day keeping up on the science you should do yourself and everyone else a favor and shut the fuck up.
https://news.northeastern.edu/... [northeastern.edu]
Demand exceeds supply (Score:3)
this is an area where it pays to learn and not just assume "hurr durr MAGA dumb."
We don't think you're all purely stupid. We think some of you are proud racists. MAGA is a white nationalist slogan. It's not new, and Trump didn't make it up. His grandpappy probably brought it home from a Klan meeting.
None of which is even remotely true.
Half the country supported him in the last election, polls show that more than half the country support him now. The only ones who believe he's racist are the ones who think everything in the country is racist, our country was built on racism, and we eat racism for breakfast.
The demand for racism in this country far exceeds the supply.
Re: (Score:2)
The only ones who believe he's racist are the ones who think everything in the country is racist, our country was built on racism, and we eat racism for breakfast.
Our country wasn't just built on racism, it was built on genocide.
100% of this land is stolen, because the US has literally broken every treaty it ever made with the natives.
Re: (Score:2)
100% of this land is stolen
If you know the property you are on is stolen and doesn't belong to you why do you persist in inhabiting it? Do you condone theft or do you not actually give a shit? Which is it?
Re: (Score:2)
If you know the property you are on is stolen and doesn't belong to you why do you persist in inhabiting it? Do you condone theft or do you not actually give a shit? Which is it?
I actually just want the treaties to be honored. They're still finding new ways to break them.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:4, Interesting)
Too many young people are voting democrat? How about raising the voting age? https://newrepublic.com/post/1... [newrepublic.com]
They can’t win elections without gerrymandering or getting courts involved. The new hotness is getting elected on the democratic ticket and then switching parties.
Re: (Score:2)
>"Too many young people are voting democrat? How about raising the voting age?"
Well something is wrong. When you are considered an adult, all such privileges should follow. But we don't have that, primarily due to the "drinking age" and "handgun age". Either those should be lowered to 18, or everything else (contracts, marry, full-time work, owning property, etc) should be raised to 21 to match. Or perhaps a compromise of changing everything to 20 (I like that idea, since it is the first age that is
Re: (Score:2)
You really should take a civics class.
Re: End of the road for the Republican party... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Overturning Roe fucked that for them. Prior, they could choose to overpopulate while their enemy tribes choose the opposite. Now, no choice and no "demographics advantage".
But their illiteracy plan clearly works, as evidenced by your post.
Vaccine Against heart disease? (Score:3, Informative)
Ok, I get immunotherapy vaccine against cancer: sequence the tumor, pinpoint the genetic mutations with sequencing, put it in a custom vaccine to train immune system to attack tumor. But heart disease? How do we vaccinate against junk food, smoking and sedentary lifestyle?
Re: (Score:3)
Probably because those aren't the only things that cause cardiovascular disease. The one that puzzles me is how they'd protect against autoimmune diseases. But at the same time, "training" the immune system isn't entirely new either, some research groups had limited success doing that with transplant patients in order to eliminate the need for anti-rejection drugs, though not by using anything mRNA related, rather with some sort of partial bone marrow graft.
Re: (Score:2)
"And it shows staggeringly bad side effects."
It produced stupidity like this?
"don't go rushing in as we did with Pfizer and Moderna vaccines."
No, definitely go rushing in like this, it was an unprecedented success.
You're so close (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Neither Pizza no Milkshakes are particularly bad food.
You ofc can find examples unhealthy milkshakes I guess, same for pizza. But in genera there is nothing wrong with any of them.
Re: (Score:3)
It is called statistics.
Re:You're so close (Score:4, Insightful)
Are you trying to make a joke? I ask because there's nothing to think about here.
Of course it's possible to eat a shit diet and live a long time just like it's possible to live to 100 while smoking tobacco. That doesn't mean you aren't stacking the deck against yourself by doing either thing.
Meanwhile people leading healthy lifestyles can sometimes get a random ailment that kills them but that does not at all change the fact that eating a shit diet will very likely shorten your life.
Re:You're so close (Score:4, Insightful)
The overwhelming majority of people have next to no understanding of statistics and probability, and are very bad at making risk / reward assessments.
They're also stunningly unaware of this deficit and have complete confidence in their ability to make such assessments.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget to factor in the stress levels and sleep patters of those two lifestyles too.
Re: Vaccine Against heart disease? (Score:2)
As someone with congenitally hugh cholesterol but who has been some form of competitive athlete for half my life, I can tell you that those things arenâ(TM)t all that cause heart disease. Iâ(TM)m on a statin now, and it works where training as a cyclist and a swimmer didnâ(TM)t.
I donâ(TM)t know how it would work, but presumably those are the sorts of factors theyâ(TM)re looking at. A vaccine for high cholesterol, or atypically high blood pressure. Things that are already treatable b
Re:Vaccine Against heart disease? (Score:5, Interesting)
Heart disease is caused by atheriosclerosis, which in turn is the result of failures of the immune system. Let me explain: The mechanism is as follows, LDL cholesterol is carried around in the blood by a protein called ApoB, it sometimes sneaks into the artiery wall forming a lesion. The lesion gets worse because the immune system through a complex set of interactions that involve [the immune system] macrophages and CD4 T-cells (somewhat rightfully) thinking the ApoB LDL complex is an enemy. The issue is that the immune system responds with a type of molecule that actually causes the ApoB-LDL to get stuck there (turns the LDL into oxLDL etc.) and then if that's not enough .. through a serious of misteps causes other LDL molecules and other crap to accumulate there. This accumulation occurs over time, until one fine day .. the lesion just gets too big and ruptures. When it ruptures all hell breaks lose as the body tries to "repair" and patch up the injury .. resulting in a blockage. Anyway TL;DNR.. One way a heart disease vaccine can work is to make the immune system ignore the ApoB instead of attack it (a tolerizing vaccine). Another way is to reprogram macrophages to actually clean up the LDL buildup instead of fucking shit up. It's fairly complicated to explain in a slashdot comment but I dumbed it down and left out a few things. There are also other approaches not worth typing out.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you did an excellent job of explaining the situation clearly and concisely.
Re: (Score:3)
ONE form of heart disease is caused by the constriction of cardiac arteries from diet and lifestyle. There are many other ways to break a heart (pun intended). Some are congenital (ie. WPW), others are idiosyncratic. A vaccine will fix few of these.
Re: (Score:3)
Fun fact for those reading, but without the scientific detail and hopefully accurate from memory, I believe the artery walls have proton pumps that create acid to clear away these proteins. If you are taking a PPI like Prilosec, you are affecting these proton pumps the same way as the ones in your stomach that produce stomach acid.
It's best to get at the root cause of excess stomach acid rather than rely on a PPI long-term as it can worsen your chances for heart disease. In my case, it was sleep apnea. B
Re: (Score:2)
Taking care of sleap apnea is very important, but the leading cause of what you might think of as "stomach acid" .. actually the disease is GERD (gastroephageal reflux disease) .. is likely obesity. The biggest problem with PPIs is that they don't actually adress the cause of acid reflux disease. Acid reflux is typically caused by a problem with the lower esophageal sphincter (the valve between the esophagus and the stomach) .. the leaky valve results in stomach acid moving into the esophagus. Instead of ad
Re: (Score:2)
Treating the apnea made a 100% turnaround for me. Zero remaining symptoms.
Lowering pH in the stomach is not a big problem, but inhibiting proton pumps elsewhere in the body is a problem.
Re: (Score:3)
You could add a few words here about the role of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. That blockage could just not happen.
screw that (Score:5, Interesting)
Few ppl in society, and even fewer on
So many youths scream about pronouns, and shortly, they will be screaming that they have to pee all the time, or that their brain is being fried in 20 years.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
They really need to focus on vaccines for bacteria. We have not been doing the R&D on antibiotics and are now running out of these.
Errr. No. Firstly we have and continue to do R&D on antibiotics. Secondly we're not "running out", the standard antibiotics still address the overwhelming majority of ailments we have. Thirdly highly resistant bacteria that do survive what we throw at them kill orders of magnitude fewer people than heart disease or cancer, and is getting an appropriate amount of R&D support.
So many youths scream about pronouns
Why do you take away all credibility for yourself when discussing a serious topic?
Re: (Score:2)
They really need to focus on vaccines for bacteria.
I seem to recall about ten years ago that someone came up with a vaccine to prevent cavities in teeth. I don't think anything came of it. There are only a few bacteria that cause cavities, so this might be one thing to look at. Additionally, stomach ulcers seem to be exclusively associated with a specific bacteria (H. Pylorum). Although antibiotics are good at fixing this, bacteria can develop resistance over time. It's hard to develop a resistance to a vaccine.
Better than placebo this time (Score:3)
Comment removed (Score:3)
So... (Score:2)
...I can continue eating lard and read meat?
Re:So... and read meat? (Score:2)
...I can continue eating lard and read meat?
If it is novel perhaps...
Re: (Score:2)
".I can continue eating lard and read meat?
If it is novel perhaps..."
I knew that was coming after my typo, I couldn't have let it go either.
Not happening (Score:2)
There has been a cure for cancer "just around the corner" for the last 80 years. Every week in the media there is this groundbreaking research that promises cure for cancer. This is not happening ever. There will never be a cure for cancer in the foreseeable future.
Low quality clickbait as usual (Score:2)
Why is a Guardian post news for techies?
Right.... (Score:2)
Just like they promised for covid?
It didn't (clearly) work in 2008 (Score:2)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... [nih.gov]
It was a very small trial of a therapeutic anti-cancer vaccine.
In fairness it takes pretty spectacular results to achieve statistical significance when N=15.
(Show that paper to anyone telling you mRNA vaccines are too novel to be trusted).
Will it be different now? A lot has changed. We have machine learning to generate just the right sequence. We have field-proven lipid coats (Dr. McLachlan, you deserve statues).
No They Won't... (Score:2)
Since the later part of the 1900's, articles like these have been saying that we are within 5 years of curing Hair Loss, Cancer, Halitosis, Heart Disease, the USPS, Diabetes, the Common Cold, the Flu, Sleep Apnea, etc., etc.
NOTHING has happened!
Odds are that nothing will happen by the end of this decades. Or the next. Or the one following that.
Re: (Score:2)
What is your weekly dip budget?
Re: (Score:2)
Made up facts working out well for you? The latest studies show that actual COVID infections are 11x more likely to cause myocarditis than the vaccine and that risk is cut in half if you've had the vaccine. Out of a study of 43 million vaccinated people, only 0.007% were hospitalized or died with myocarditis. So while the risk still exists with the vaccine, it's extremely small. The only reason you hear about myocarditis at all is because of the sheer number of people infected and vaccinated globally.
ht [ahajournals.org]