Scientists Demonstrate Self-Awareness In Fish (phys.org) 85
Researchers from the Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, have provided evidence to suggest that fish have the capacity for MSR, a behavioral test to determine whether an animal possesses the ability of visual self-recognition. As Phys.Org explains, an animal's capacity for MSR is determined when they "touch or scrape a mark placed on their body in a location that can only be indirectly viewed in a mirror." From the report: Professor [Masanori Kohda] says, "Previously, using a brown marking on the throat area of [cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus], we had shown three out of four cleaner fish to scrape their throats several times after swimming in front of a mirror, a number on par with similar studies done on other animals like elephants, dolphins, and magpies." However, one of the criticisms laid against this result was sample size and the need for repeated studies showing positive results. Teaming up with researchers from the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior in Germany and the University of Neuchatel in Switzerland, this study increased the sample size to 18 cleaner fish, with a 94% positive result of 17 of them demonstrating the same behavior from the previous study.
[...]
Prof. Kohda says, "Our previous study demonstrated MSR in L. dimidiatus; however, studies with other animals have shown that simply moving a mirror reignites aggressive behavior, suggesting the animal has only learned a spatial contingency, not MSR." To address this, the team transferred mirror-trained cleaner fish to a tank with a mirror on one side of the tank and then three days later to a tank with a mirror on the other side, and saw the fish show no aggression toward their mirror image in both tanks. Also, to ensure the L. dimidiatus that passed the mark test truly are recognizing themselves, they placed mirror-trained fish in adjacent tanks that were separated by transparent glass. After two to three days, when fish largely reduced their aggressive behavior towards each other, they were marked the standard way the following night. None of the fish scraped their throat during the 120 mins of exposure to each other the following morning. This new experiment was recently published in PLOS Biology.
[...]
Prof. Kohda says, "Our previous study demonstrated MSR in L. dimidiatus; however, studies with other animals have shown that simply moving a mirror reignites aggressive behavior, suggesting the animal has only learned a spatial contingency, not MSR." To address this, the team transferred mirror-trained cleaner fish to a tank with a mirror on one side of the tank and then three days later to a tank with a mirror on the other side, and saw the fish show no aggression toward their mirror image in both tanks. Also, to ensure the L. dimidiatus that passed the mark test truly are recognizing themselves, they placed mirror-trained fish in adjacent tanks that were separated by transparent glass. After two to three days, when fish largely reduced their aggressive behavior towards each other, they were marked the standard way the following night. None of the fish scraped their throat during the 120 mins of exposure to each other the following morning. This new experiment was recently published in PLOS Biology.
Re: (Score:1)
Was that intended to sound non-PC? As in implying that LGBTQ+ are "animals"?
Re: freedom for LGBTQ+ fish! (Score:3)
Was that intended to sound non-PC? Welcome to Slashdot.
Re: (Score:1)
You mean Welcome to the Interwebs
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
one could argue that octopuses are "smarter" than cats.
anyway, how to you define "advanced"? we have no clue as to how consciousness happens, so it would be foolish to assume there is only exactly one configuration of brain that makes it possible. on the contrary, since the brains of e.g. mammals, birds and octopuses are so structurally different and all of them can achieve notable levels of intelligence, i'd wager there is more than one road to (self-)consciousness.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I'm assuming it's poorly-conceived satire on the slippery slope of giving a mouse a cookie (thinly veiled analogy is thin).
First, we can't eat 'em anymore.
Then, they'll want Netflix.
Next, they'll demand bio-suits so they can live on the surface.
Finally, they'll take over. Better welcome your aquatic overloads now, while you still have the chance.
Re: freedom for LGBTQ+ fish! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
As in implying that LGBTQ+ are "animals"?
we're all animals.
Re: (Score:1)
I'm a plant (and not Robert P.)
Don't feed the troll-fish (Score:2)
"That trick never works."
They already have equal rights (Score:3, Informative)
Re: They already have equal rights (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Primitive/proto-humans didn't care about sexual orientation either, until they did. What happened? Probably governance. Some group figured out that only men and women together could make babies, and they figured out that if they didn't make babies then some other group would outbreed and conquer them, so they developed a homosexuality taboo in order to boost birth rates. This may have been necessary in humans when it isn't in other species because humans can more easily override their procreative urges than
Re: (Score:1)
> Some group figured out that only men and women together could make babies, and they figured out that if they didn't make babies then some other group would outbreed and conquer them, so they developed a homosexuality taboo
Hogwash. Humans have no problem making babies. Thanks to infidelity, a woman with an "uninterested" husband will probably find a way to get knocked up.
Re: (Score:3)
Aquaman, is that you?
The control group (Score:3)
Was trump voters and teenage boys neither of which have achieved self awareness
Future AI will be controlled by (Score:1)
a Beowulf cluster of fish.
Sorry, I won't apologize for the food chain (Score:2, Insightful)
If you thought meat came from the grocery store, magically materialized straight into the packaging, you've been fooling yourself. Whether the source is from plants or animals, we kill to eat. We could discover tomorrow that cows have their own language, with a moderate vocabulary and regional dialects, and it won't stop me from eating them. Same goes for plants. They're all food, just like the fish. If this all makes you squeamish, feel free to subside yourself on veggies and pills - or save yourself the m
Re: (Score:2)
The capacity to care about the suffering of others is very clearly a sliding scale. Some people have such a strong expression of it that they guilt over micro-animals that they might kill when taking a shower. And others have so little of it that they merrily perpetuate genocide whenever they benefit from doing so.
It sounds like you might be on the "low" end of the empathy scale. Whether that makes you a monster, or selfishly-enlightened, is a matter of opinion. But one thing that is not a matter of opi
Re: (Score:3)
Rejecting one's humanity doesn't seem justified by this.
this is not about rejecting "humanity", it is about us humans not being anything special unless we can actually behave like we are, e.g.:
Accepting practical realities as morally acceptable seems much more justified.
i can accept no problem the practical reality of my immune system killing bacteria, i could even accept killing an animal to feed myself if in need, but rather not the senseless daily torture and onslaught of millions of conscious animals at industrial scale and in miserable conditions, just so a bunch of oblivions humans can munch on their crispy bacon every day (and prob
An eternal Treblinka. (Score:5, Insightful)
As for industrial fishing, it could be about 2 trillion fish [forbes.com] that they tortured [sciencefocus.com] to death every year.
Factory farming and industrial fishing causes more pain and suffering than all other atrocities ever committed, combined.
Re: (Score:2)
And the hecatomb is repeated year-on-year, while most human-on-human atrocities are not repeated, often.
Re: (Score:2)
What's more special than being at the top of the food chain?
What's special about deciding to cut yourself off from the highest value food available?
Re: (Score:2)
The "special" bit is that humans can exercise restraint in their eating habits out of moral or compassionate reasons, whereas other animals don't do this. Our special capacity for morality extends to other domains of life as well, of course, but eating is the focus on this thread.
Re:Sorry, I won't apologize for the food chain (Score:5, Insightful)
People do not care about the suffering of others; they care about the suffering of things that look sufficiently similar to them, and cute.
All science indicates that octopodes are quite intelligent and self-aware compared to seals, but they look quite otherwordly to a man, who sees in the seal the cute expression of a mancub, and consequently cares more for the seal than for the octopus.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The film "Sausage Party" comes to mind. Conscious food. :-)
Re that last sentence in the first paragraph, I think you forgot to add "(...) but it's your own moral choice so don't try to force it onto others. Let everyone eat what they want."
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They're all food, just like the fish. If this all makes you squeamish, feel free to subside yourself on veggies and pills
Before I tried Impossible Burger, I was fully expecting to write an expletive-laden rant about what a disastrous direction human civilization has taken if we're actually expected to willingly consume the results of someone's glorified science experiment. It was available at Epcot and I figured it was worth trying just from a "know the enemy" perspective.
I went back for seconds. It was actually pretty tasty, imagine that. So, if it ever turns out that "moo" actually means something besides "I am a cow, ea
Re: Sorry, I won't apologize for the food chain (Score:2)
Having also tried the impossible burger - or burger king/hungry jacks version of - I can say that you sound like a paid shill. Not saying you are, just what it sounds like.
It tasted like excessively salted smoked dirt. And that's the kind description. Three of us tried it and none took a second bite. All reports were the same.
In my opinion, the only people who think the impossible burger tastes like meat are people who have not eaten meat in a very long time and have some vague memory or once heard a descri
Re: Sorry, I won't apologize for the food chain (Score:2)
Re: Sorry, I won't apologize for the food chain (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
burger king/hungry jacks version of
Found the problem. Burger King chars both the real and fake stuff until it tastes like a piece of burnt tire. I've tried the Impossible Whopper too and I don't much care for it either, it is far too overcooked.
Epcot's preparation method was cooking the patties on a griddle, then they were served on a slider bun with "Asian slaw" (fancy lettuce, basically) and wasabi mayo.
Re: (Score:2)
I finally had an impossible burger not too long ago. It tasted just like a burger... a really low-grade one. Like, something that Burger King cooked all the life out of and delivered in beyond-well-done condition. Those of us who actually like the flavor of meat have nothing of substance to enjoy there. You are apparently not one of those people, so by all means, enjoy your saltburger. Far be it from me to tell you not to eat that little plant puck that is actually less healthy for you than an actual burger
/. used to be cool (Score:5, Insightful)
When did we get so lame?
Re: /. used to be cool (Score:3)
lame
To eat you need to kill. Fruit and vegetables are alive for some definition of.
Everything needs to kill to eat. It's just the nature of life. What separates humans from everything else is we at least kill quickly and don't butcher the animal while it's still alive, so it's suffering is at least less.
Re: /. used to be cool (Score:2)
Yeah, see this is exactly what I'm talking about (Score:2)
I mean for God's sakes just Star Trek replicators making food from Atoms would be enough to have a civilization that can eat without killing. Or how about pure energy people if you want to go all the way out. For the whole new humans or new types.
It's all just so lame. A whole bunch of old men sitting around annoyed that thing
Re: (Score:2)
When did we get so lame?
We got old, and as people get old, they tend to get more conservative and so reactionary.
Re: (Score:2)
When did we get so lame?
You got lame when you wrote a comment suggesting that being a meat-eater is that without any reasoning behind it. Why should I want to stop eating other creatures? Some appeal to morality? Pass.
I'd rather be a beast than a prey animal. You be whatever you want, though.
Damn you got zero imagination (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure I've read all of them. You think because some fictional alien morality looks down on eating animals that it's wrong? That's ludicrous.
Re: (Score:2)
why shouldn't we hunt, torture, and slaughter you if you're too under evolved to classify yourself as being distinctly human?
Why not indeed? No reason, except that if you move the bar too far towards yourself you might find yourself getting eaten when someone else moves it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You miss when you were cool, when you could imagine that someone else could have a different view from yours, and still be right. And I miss that time, too.
You made an appeal to sci-fi as if that was supposed to be meaningful in any way, and while ignoring that the counterargument to your opinion is also present in sci-fi. I'd rather be a Kzin than Soylent Man.
Even in a world of replicators there's still people who want to eat real food. They still have people gardening in Star Trek (which involves causing
Re: (Score:2)
When it started shilling cryptocurrency and didn't give two shits about dupes. Oh you meant society and not /. in general. /s
I don't think there is an exact date for the when men turned into wussies but I'd say around 2010 give or take a few years. i.e. People see something "offensive" on TV, movies, social media, etc. and instead of changing the channel they whine about a non-issue that no one gives a fuck about.
Technically Stupid Juvenile Whinners have been around for 150 years [amazon.com] however "The Message" is
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think self awareness has much to do with how humans feel towards other animals. Cats don't recognize themselves in the mirror but most people would feel quite bad about hurting a cat.
Whatever the criteria is (to be honest I'm not entirely sure), self awareness can only be a small part of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Humans can end up with mirror agnosia as the result of a brain injury. It often comes with substantial other side effects on cognition due to, well, being a brain injury, but there are certainly cases where the afflicted person still exhibits human level of intelligence. Based on that I've always found it odd that self-recognition in a mirror is considered a very important sign of intelligence.
Re: (Score:2)
Head injury can decrease intelligence, film at eleven... right after the big boxing match
Re: (Score:2)
Head injury can decrease intelligence, film at eleven...
Yeah but like I already said while there's generally some other cognitive impairment people still have human level intelligence. They can still talk, read, write, etc. In other words it seems possible to knock out the bit of the brain that's ultimately responsible for self-recognition in a mirror.
Having a very cursory look at the case studies it looks like it often came with cognitive visual impairment, so self recognition might be connected to advance
Re: (Score:2)
I get what you're saying, I think that the best answer I have on tap is that while there are different kinds of intelligence, they tend to be exhibited together. This suggests that by and large they require the same hardware. When we characterize a species we have to look at multiple examples thereof or else we risk creating an incomplete or otherwise inaccurate definition.
There are definitely some animals where some examples will recognize themselves in a mirror and some won't. If you wanted to characteriz
Re: (Score:3)
Depends on the cat.
And "self aware", has many levels. Just because a cat does not recognize himself in a mirrors imho does not mean she is not self aware.
We have many cats on my farm in Thailand, one died. The others started searching for her a day later, when they figured something had happened, they did not eat for three days. Not the same as "self aware", but certainly not a dumb robot.
Yes, and all know their name, and come if you call them - most of the time.
Re: (Score:2)
You seem pretty defensive about this finding. Why? Or are you just shilling for soylent somehow.
Re: (Score:2)
I could turn around and ask you the inverse of your own question - "Why do you immediately think something is wrong with me, just because I post a discussion thread topic that you personally disagree with? Did some meat-eating thug abuse you when you were little?"
Actually, perhaps to your dismay, it's actually none of what you suggest. I posted my comment in order to spur some discussion that was tangentially related to the story, because I wanted to get a pulse response from the community. If you look arou
Re: (Score:2)
Well, anyways. This is pretty much how it goes in nature: Most animals get eaten and predators not so rarely get killed by their prey. Predators also generally do not have a choice. Eventually we may have the ability to feed ourselves reasonably without killing animals, but that is way off.
But there is another aspect: If we stop farming for meat, there will be a lot less of those animals. Now, does that mean they simply will never exist? Or does it mean they will have to wait longer for a reincarnation? In
Ububble (Score:1)
Fish can learn how to drive [slashdot.org] and are self-aware. You're next Uber driver may have gills, and not in the Kevin Costner Water World sense.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah. [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Now we can start worrying about Seanet.
typo correction (Score:2)
Correction: "Your next..."
Re: (Score:2)
You mean we can learn to make a car that even a fish can drive, right? Which itself is pretty great news, because most people out on the roads are even worse at it than a fish would be... in their current car.
mirror vs video (Score:2)
What if they played a video of itself would it recognize that it wasn't a mirror and ignore it?
We'll all starve now! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now fish will become a protected species and we won't be able to eat them.
That's where the Japanese come in with their 'scientific research'.
Feeling the marker? (Score:3)
Could it be that fish are feeling the marker on their skin?
How many of marked fish scrape their marked areas when not exposed to a mirror?
Re: (Score:3)
Could it be that fish are feeling the marker on their skin? How many of marked fish scrape their marked areas when not exposed to a mirror?
Well the summary already shows they don't to any meaningful extent.
Unlike 'AI', real intelligence (Score:1, Offtopic)
Real intelligence that adapts to a novel situation. These creatures, like all others including humans, are pre-programmed for certain functions. When birds migrate or bears hibernate, it's not because they are very clever or intelligent. But many creatures innovate individually. These fish are very surprising in their understanding of the mirror. Does your pet understand the mirror or recognize the image on the TV?
What is continually touted as 'AI' is a shameful parody of intelligence. I hope to see compute
MSR (Score:5, Informative)
MSR == Mirror Self-Recognition
Fish Heads, Fish Heads (Score:2)
I took my fish head
Out to see a mirror
Fish Heads Fish Heads
Eat them up, yum!
News flash: only biologists surprised by this (Score:2)
As is typical with the non-science that is biology, a new observation that another species might have something like human sentience that is a surprise to no average person but contentious and new to biologists.
CONSIDER: What if you lived in a world without mirrors? Somewhere where reflection was a not a thing? And then such a mirror, an alien inconceivable thing, was put in an artificial environment you were being kept in. Would you expect your intelligence to be measured by how you dealt with your r
I doubt it. (Score:2)
What if the fish thought the mirror was another fish and figured they better buff up if they want to win the girl? This sounds extremely bogus. Even cats can't figure out it's them in the mirror.
Interchanging names of your servers or aws / azure (Score:2)
Think of the confusion it must be causing to the fish !
What if some super intelligent beings were to keep randomly renaming your servers / AWS/Azure instances & duplicating problems of one server into another while you go crazy ssh'ing into them trying to be "aware" which is which ?? :)
Oh the horror !