Fourth Pfizer Dose Is Insufficient to Ward Off Omicron, Israeli Trial Suggests (bloomberg.com) 173
A fourth dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was insufficient to prevent infection with the omicron variant of Covid-19, according to preliminary data from a trial in Israel released Monday. Bloomberg reports: Two weeks after the start of the trial of 154 medical personnel at the Sheba Medical Center in Tel Aviv, researchers found the vaccine successfully raised antibody levels. But that only offered a partial defense against omicron, according to Gili Regev-Yochay, the trial's lead researcher. Vaccines which were more effective against previous variants offer less protection with omicron, she said. Still, those infected in the trial had only slight symptoms or none at all.
Israel started rolling out the fourth dose of the vaccine to the over-60s and immunocompromised in late December amid a surge in cases. Since then, more than half a million Israelis have received the extra dose, according to the Health Ministry. The decision to give the fourth vaccine to the most vulnerable was the correct one, Regev-Yochay said at a virtual press conference, since it may have given additional benefit against omicron. But she added the results didn't support a wider rollout to the whole population.
Israel started rolling out the fourth dose of the vaccine to the over-60s and immunocompromised in late December amid a surge in cases. Since then, more than half a million Israelis have received the extra dose, according to the Health Ministry. The decision to give the fourth vaccine to the most vulnerable was the correct one, Regev-Yochay said at a virtual press conference, since it may have given additional benefit against omicron. But she added the results didn't support a wider rollout to the whole population.
The fifth dose (Score:2, Insightful)
Current vaccines are a stop-gap (Score:2)
Short term vaccine boosters are makeshift in nature. The proper vaccine should be a single dose fix.
Covid19 was a tricky one from the start - https://science.slashdot.org/s... [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Current vaccines are a stop-gap (Score:4, Insightful)
Absolutely all of this is wrong. We are not "up to four already", we do not know what is required nor is the virus staying the same. We do not "require a dose every four months" nor has that ever been recommended. Most vaccines are NOT one dose.
BS and too stupid? Got that right.
Re: (Score:2)
Like what?
MMR? Nope
Flu? definitely not
Polio? Still no
HPV? Guess what the answer is
Re: Current vaccines are a stop-gap (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When a vaccine DOES NOT work it DOES NOT work. And Pfizer DOES NOT work for anything after the first few strains. One look at the curves could have told you that a month ago. In fact, I posted it a month ago here and dumfuck cretins sh*theads which cannot do elementary maths did not
Re: (Score:2)
More doesn't equate to better.
If your body is already primed to look out for particular protein strains. Telling your immune system to look out for these again isn't going to do too much.
Omicron is a mutation, so it has different characteristics that will make your bodies immune response to take some extra effort into recognizing and fighting it off. That said, it still has a fair amount of similarities so the Vaccines are effective, and normally your body can fight it off much faster than those who don't
Re: (Score:2)
should do it.
Ongoing support will require a Pfizer 365 subscription (formerly known as Vaccine Assurance).
What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:4, Interesting)
If we are going to use agile to change fast, might as well use waterfall. If we are not going to do tailored vaccines than might as well use whole virus vaccines which have been used for decades
Re: (Score:2)
Re: What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>"The whole reason we went with mrna vaccines which were a new type of vaccine was that they are fast to make and you can tailor them for variants. I was dissapointed when a delta specific vaccine booster wasn't issued but with Omicron being so infectious why are we not rolling out a tailored vaccine."
Probably because even as fast a MRNA is, Omnicron was even faster- precisely because it is 700 times (or however many hundreds of times) more infectious. It has already peaked in several countries, and loo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The "original" estimate when Omicron was named a "Variant of Concern" was "we'll start research for a new vaccine right away, we'll see if we need to actually make it" - with availability somewhere in March. Not sure if it was Moderna or Pfizer, but they should reach production about the same.
Re: (Score:3)
Very informative discussion about C19; the basis of my reply. [youtu.be]
Were v2 vaccines suppressed? (Score:2)
Moderna had five second generation vaccine candidates in testing in February. It was oriented to Beta and would have finished testing by August at the latest.
All the vaccine makers have been making new vaccines but I'm not sure any other went into Phase II.
It's not quite the same as software but when they made the v1 vaccines they had little idea which parts of the spike would mutate. Only 1 in 40 antibodies affects Omicron.
No-one has explained why none of the second generation vaccines are ready.
As far a
Re: (Score:3)
A common problem with vaccine trials is finding the right volunteers. Guessing, if they need unvaccinated volunteers, they'll be hard to find.
Re: (Score:2)
"If we are [not] going to use agile to change fast, might as well use waterfall."
Ignoring the terrible analogy, your problem is your lack of understanding of what is fast and what is not.
"If we are not going to do tailored vaccines than might as well use whole virus vaccines which have been used for decades"
You sound like quite the vaccine expert. Who ever said that the used techniques were chosen so that we could "do tailored vaccines"? Perhaps you could develop your own "whole virus vaccine" instead. S
Re: What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:2)
"Perhaps you could develop your own 'whole virus vaccine' instead."
Why? J&J vaccine already exists. And it's the go to vaccine for Africa, which has much better COVID numbers than the rest of the world.
I trust African science.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My understanding is that the Delta variant vaccine is still in testing. Here's the announcement from August, https://newsrescue.com/pfizer-... [newsrescue.com]
Perhaps they have had a harder time finding the right volunteers, often a problem with vaccine trials.
Re: (Score:2)
Variant-specific mRNA vaccines are in trials and that tends to take a while. While it's indeed possible to use the technology to create a new vaccine really quickly, it's currently impossible to get it approved for human use without clinical trials. For example, the Pfizer vaccine many of us have had was developed in a matter of hours but it took a year before it became available. There isn't some blanket approval for "mRNA vaccine" where the contents of the vaccine could then be rapidly changed without aff
Re: (Score:2)
They go on an "accelerated" testing - that means there is partial overlap (in time) over the three testing phases (with tens/hundreds, thousands, and tens of thousands of subjects). ...).
Even with this overlap, it takes some three months for the entire testing phase, generating the results and documentation and the actual approval process by the health agencies (federal, national, European,
Production ramp up can start early, with the vaccine companies "eating" the risk of regulatory disapproval - but even s
Re: (Score:2)
I was dissapointed when a delta specific vaccine booster wasnt issued but with Omicron being so infectious why are we not rolling out a tailored vaccine.
Pfizer says they will have one in March. Given the characteristics of Omicron by then there will be few left who have not already been infected with Omicron.
If we are going to use agile to change fast, might as well use waterfall. If we are not going to do tailored vaccines than might as well use whole virus vaccines which have been used for decades
There is Novavax and Sinovac.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:5, Informative)
The whole reason we went with mrna vaccines which were a new type of vaccine was that they are fast to make and you can tailor them for variants. I was dissapointed when a delta specific vaccine booster wasnt issued but with Omicron being so infectious why are we not rolling out a tailored vaccine.
If we are going to use agile to change fast, might as well use waterfall. If we are not going to do tailored vaccines than might as well use whole virus vaccines which have been used for decades
It takes about 3 months to produce one batch of the mRNA vaccines. Omicron was discovered about a month and a half ago. Pfizer is talking about having an Omicron variant available in March. It's a huge improvement over prior vaccines - the annual flu vaccines take over 6 months to make.
A Delta variant was researched, but it just wasn't necessary. The original vaccine worked fine against it. The Delta mutations didn't affect the area the vaccine targeted. The need for the booster was just typical vaccine behavior. Most vaccines we take require 3-4 doses. In the long run, we may end up needing more doses due to scheduling. For the best long term immunity, you want the doses spaced further apart. The short spacing we're doing now generates a high level of immunity faster, but it doesn't generate as good a long term response. Once we move from the pandemic phase to endemic, we'll probably adjust the schedules to give less doses but give them further apart.
Re: (Score:2)
The whole reason we went with mrna vaccines which were a new type of vaccine was that they are fast to make and you can tailor them for variants. I was dissapointed when a delta specific vaccine booster wasnt issued but with Omicron being so infectious why are we not rolling out a tailored vaccine.
The speed of creating a vaccine doesn't determine how quickly you can get it to market. There's a reason the mRNA vaccine hit the market at the same time as the traditional vaccines, despite effectively being made in a weekend. The *real* reason we went with mRNA was not speed but rather targeting of specific proteins, which is also why mRNA vaccines ended up being more effective at stopping variants compared to say the modified adenovirus (AZ).
You can be as agile as you want during development. Your agilit
Re: What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It wasn't out of context, it was just using the available information at the time (which turned out to be mostly correct).
People vaccinated have a lower infection rate, faster recovery rate if they do get infected, and much lower hospitalization/death rate compared to unvaccinated.
That's not to say there couldn't be a better vaccine or one tailored for the delta variant
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
> It wasn't out of context, it was just using the available information at the time
The science "at the time" is always wildly different than what happens in real life. About efficacy, about masks, about variants, about doses... everything is always being corrected. Which is fine... but at what point do you stop believing the bullshit.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/2... [cnbc.com]
Israel says Pfizer Covid vaccine is just 39% effective as delta spreads, but still prevents severe illness
Re:What happened to the promise of mrna (Score:5, Informative)
> It wasn't out of context, it was just using the available information at the time
The science "at the time" is always wildly different than what happens in real life. About efficacy, about masks, about variants, about doses... everything is always being corrected. Which is fine... but at what point do you stop believing the bullshit.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/2... [cnbc.com]
Israel says Pfizer Covid vaccine is just 39% effective as delta spreads, but still prevents severe illness
And this study [bmj.com] claims 80% (several months after vaccination).
And both the Israel study and BMJ study claim well over 80% protection against hospitalization & severe illness.
They didn't issues a delta specific variant because the evidence didn't support it at the time, and in retrospect, they were right.
Re: (Score:2)
"They didn't issues a delta specific variant because the evidence didn't support it at the time, and in retrospect, they were right."
Correct, the decision has shown to be the correct one. An inconvenient truth for the Trumpers.
Re: (Score:3)
Why are all your links from half a year ago? Surely you've heard more up to date medical advice and seen more up to date studies on vaccines since then
Re: (Score:2)
But plenty of research came out with analysis after the window that you seem to be ignoring. Here's the first result when googling "vaccine effectiveness against delta": https://www.bmj.com/content/37... [bmj.com].
It's a study from last month, here's the conclusion
Two doses of mRNA-1273 were highly effective against all SARS-CoV-2 variants, especially against hospital admission with covid-19. However, vaccine effectiveness against infection with the delta variant moderately declined with increasing time since vaccination.
Now it wasn't hard to find this research, which is why I suggested that you haven't bothered to look since your saw something 6 months ago
Re: (Score:3)
You sure shows me with all those supporting links.
Re: (Score:3)
https://www.economica.net/majo... [economica.net]
274 out of 349 sequencing tests are "probable Omicron", with the rest being Delta.
Romania exited the fourth wave (Delta) a couple of months ago.
Re: (Score:3)
"The science "at the time" is always wildly different than what happens in real life. About efficacy, about masks, about variants, about doses... everything is always being corrected. Which is fine... but at what point do you stop believing the bullshit."
Yes, you described literally how science works...and then called it bullshit. The best understanding is the best understanding, it is not "bullshit" even if it turns out to be wrong. You know that, of course, you're just an asshole.
"Israel says Pfizer Cov
Re: (Score:2)
> Yes, you described literally how science works...and then called it bullshit. The best understanding is the best understanding, it is not "bullshit" even if it turns out to be wrong. You know that, of course, you're just an asshole.
If I gave you a True / False test and you scored 0 out of 10... I would be impressed, but not for the reasons you're thinking.
Re: (Score:2)
It was only a matter of time before a more evasive strain came along. Beta was more evasive than Delta.
Fauci said the v1 vaccines were effective against Delta. They were, particular Moderna's.
He didn't say second generation vaccines wouldn't ever be needed.
Re: The fifth dose (Score:2)
We need a Jab Store(tm) and regular updates or whenever the fuck jab devs feel like it, daily sometimes...it all depends on how jab stock performs really
I'll settle for staying out of the hospital (Score:4, Insightful)
1, 2, 3, or even 4 shots can keep me from taking up a hospital bed that someone else needs on a day when the local hospitals are full or nearly full, it's worth it.
Re: (Score:2)
Some people say the firefighters that died on 9/11 were heroes. I say fuck that. The real hero is people like davidwr.
Ladies - if you're taking notes, this is where you want to throw your panties, that is if you can still get them off when they're soaking wet.
Re:I'll settle for staying out of the hospital (Score:4, Insightful)
1, 2, 3, or even 4 shots can keep me from taking up a hospital bed that someone else needs on a day when the local hospitals are full or nearly full, it's worth it.
And fortunately the vast majority of people feel that way. If this pandemic has shown us anything, it has cast a bright light on that ~15% of people who don't care about anyone but themselves.
And we will remember who they are.
Re: (Score:2)
and also that they play by different rules. While the vast majority of people have a basic respect for truth, facts and honest dialog, that ~15% of people will lie about anything. That is why our problems are so intractable, social media has enabled liars to broaden their reach.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm conflicted on this. People who get indoctrinated into cults are usually seen as victims, people we should help. Is anti-vaxx a new kind of cult, based around Facebook? A kind of stochastic cult where you can't point to specific leaders or organizations, but it's effective none-the-less.
On the other hand, I don't want to get COVID so I have very little tolerance for such people being around me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What makes you think those people care about themselves?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
not even a middle school quality troll. Try harder to earn your rubles, comrade.
Re: (Score:2)
Curiously, both are being done and for all this "hoarding" that's denying the world of these ineffective vaccines, the country is literally throwing away vaccines because people won't take them despite the availability. "100% correct" except for all the lies, you mean.
Re: (Score:2)
You do know that the vaccines don't prevent transmission OR infection, right?
They still do a good job keeping people out of the hospital, (and particularly 20x less likely to end up in the ICU), hence this thread title.
I'd feel like a real douchebag seeing cancer surgeries postponed because I could not be bothered to get a simple shot, but hey, you do you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When Omicron came around, the wave piffled out before any hospitals were overwhelmed (https://covid19.who.int/region/afro/country/za). The lockdown measures were even relaxed end of December.
Lucky for you. Our hospitals are setting new records every day and surgeries and other procedures are again being cancelled because every health care asset is needed for COVID patients, most of whom are unvaccinated. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada... [www.cbc.ca]
And pretty much everyone I know is vaccinated, and there have been no mysterious side effects. None.
I don't expect to eradicate it. I'd like the hospitals to stop being full of COVID patients so they can start to catch up on the 150,000 procedures that
Re: (Score:2)
I used to think the people called "anti-vaxxers" were the most stupid and selfish people you could possibly meet. That is, until I met the new breed of "pro-vaxxers" who emerged from this pandemic. These people truly don't give a shit about any other human being other than themselves, but even worse, is they claim to have everyone's best interest in mind, and feel smugly righteous in their own seething hatred.
The only thing I "truly" care about is that 15% of anti-vaxxers are the 70% of the people using ICU beds, and that people with cancer and heart disease are having their procedures cancelled because of that. If those 15% were vaccinated, ICU goes to less than half, no longer a problem. Pandemic is over and we can begin to try and catch up on the huge number of needed procedures on hold. Our health care system is truly fucked because of a small number of douchebags - there is no more polite way to put it.
Re:I'll settle for staying out of the hospital (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Polio takes a course of 4 shots to be optimal, why should covid be any different?
Twinrix (Hep A and B) is a two dose course with boosters at 20 years.
Tetanus is every 10 years.
In fact it's rare to have a vaccination that lasts your entire life from a single shot. I think that MMR and Yellow Fever are the only two I've had an Yellow Fever is optional (recommended if you travel to South America or Asia though). Here is the vaccine schedule for an Australian [health.gov.au].
The main reason we don't need boosters for many of those is the fact we have almost eliminated many of those diseases in t
Re: (Score:2)
So, if I understand you correctly, 50 years ago medical science had advanced to the point where we could produce a vaccine that conferred immunity for 10 years, and today our vaccines confer partial (not complete) immunity for six months or less.
And to top it all off, now they're saying the vaccines won't prevent someone from getting the disease, or spreading it, but only reduces the risk of dying from a disease which already has less than a 2% mortality rate?
How exactly is this progress? And why would
Re: (Score:2)
years ago medical science had advanced to the point where we could produce a vaccine that conferred immunity for 10 years, and today our vaccines confer partial (not complete) immunity for six months or less.
Those vaccines still work fine and we still use them. They have not gotten weaker.
How exactly is this progress?
Well for starters, 50 years ago we had no idea how to make a vaccine for a Coronavirus at all. It took 20 years to develop the first Polio vaccine, and it wasn't very good. Whereas today, not only can we develop a vaccine for a coronavirus, we developed 6 different Covid vaccines in less than a year (J&J, Moderna, Pfizer, Astrazeneca, Sputnik, Sinovac) and distributed them throughout the world. Another form of progress
Re: (Score:2)
I got an MMR booster a couple years ago. It might be because of age and when you got it can't remember. EIther way I still would have got it.
Re:I'll settle for staying out of the hospital (Score:5, Insightful)
1, 2, 3, or even 4 shots can keep me from taking up a hospital bed that someone else needs on a day when the local hospitals are full or nearly full, it's worth it.
Uh huh. That's what you say now, but when you get your clot shot induced heart attack, I'm betting you'll take up a hospital bed anyway.
Okay troll, let's play.
First, Pfizer and Moderna's vaccines haven't been associated with blood clotting at all. Second, the J&J formula resulted in 54 cases out of 17,000,000 doses administered (in the US). Third, the AZ product is associated with about one case in thirty thousand doses at worst, and... isn't approved in the US.
But wait... there's more. Nearly 20% of COVID cases admitted to ICU develop blood clots. And all the vaccines prevent roughly 90% of cases, and dramatically reduce odds of being one of those ICU cases. Translation: not being vaccinated causes blood clots.
So. How much are we betting? Put your money where you anonymous mouth is.
Re: (Score:3)
One in a hundred thousands.
That's the risk of bad reactions to vaccines, and (interestingly) is on the same order of magnitude for the three big ones early in the pandemic (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna).
As for COVID that actually got into hospital care (some were not symptomatic, some were easy cases, some didn't fit into hospitals), the survival rate is 97% or less. One in thirty.
I agree that the COVID vaccines can lead to bad outcomes. But I do feel lucky enough to avoid the 10 in a million cases.
Re: (Score:2)
My shots have been heart-protective and reduced my risk of clots. Prove me wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
You're the kind of guy that thinks driving out of Tokyo before Godzilla attacks, is fundamentally unsafe due to the risk of your car killing you with carbon monoxide.
Headline is clickbait BS (Score:5, Insightful)
The 24/7 news cycle has well and truly borked our entire national discourse. It means that whoever gets their headlines out first and flashiest is the one who reaps the rewards. As a result I have read a 50/50 mix that omicron is nothing to worry about and that we're all going to die sometime later this week. And as long as the clicks keep coming it's all good.
Keep calm. Wear your mask. Wear the best mask you can get. Remember that the best mask is the one that you will wear. And get your three shots. Don't go looking door knobs and don't go to clubs and parties. If you're going to hang out with people hang out with people who are also vaccinated.
Remember that if nothing else the first two variants and the flu are still out there and people can still get sick from them especially people who refuse to get vaccinated and if you can avoid giving those fools the virus maybe you can keep a few more people out of the hospital while we wait for this surge to abate. I just read a story about a doctor having to take a critical cancer patient who is probably going to die out of the ICU to make room for an unvaccinated covid patient. Yeah the cancer patient was going to die but they could have had a slim chance at life and maybe a more comfortable death. I can't get those people vaccinated for bumping people out of ICU beds but I can't at least prevent a few people from getting covid should I happen upon it myself in my thrice backed state of being.
Re: (Score:3)
The Omicron wave does pass after a couple weeks, which means most people aren't immediately getting re-infected with it, or failing to clear it from their system in the first place.
Re:Headline is clickbait BS (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Headline is clickbait BS (Score:3)
Regev-Yochay noted that only slightly fewer people who received the fourth dose caught coronavirus than those in a control group, who were fully vaccinated with two shots in the last two months or three shots.
No numbers were shared during the briefing because the infections were so close to receiving the fourth dose; "they do not shed light but are only confu
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds great except you have no evidence for any of that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>"Of course, it isn't JUST Omicron going around right now (well, it is in some countries, but in the USA, as of last week, it was 88%)."
Reply to self. I meant to address your: "Remember that if nothing else the first two variants [...] are still out there and people can still get sick from them"
In the USA, not really. 11.49% of infections a week ago are Delta and 88.4% are Omicron. That is 99.89% of infections, so Alpha is essentially gone. Similar lack of Alpha in most countries I checked. Could i
Re: (Score:2)
>"The N95 IS a mask."
Actually, it is a respirator
https://news.3m.com/The-differ... [3m.com]
https://www.cdc.gov/coronaviru... [cdc.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
>"It can be a respirator and also a mask [amazon.com]:"
Only in the same way a vaccine can be both a vaccine and "a shot". And an injection is "a shot". And a syringe or hypodermic needle is "a shot".
Cya on the dark side (Score:2)
We laughed when SNL mocked multi-bladed razors (Score:2)
But now they're here. ...
We laughed (and cursed) when that guy got dozens of COVID-19 vaccine shots, and now
Nah, he's still a jerk, and I guess we need to look to updated vaccines, results of testing on what benefits, if any, supplements like Vitamins C&D, the mineral Zinc, and Vitamin K2, have had, and the testing on the effectiveness of supplementary drugs, both old and the bleeding edge ones just getting released.
Nobody of note is likely, imo, to suggest what some of us may have been thinking, that t
Re: (Score:2)
What's good for M & M Enterprises will be good (Score:2)
What's good for M & M Enterprises will be good for the country.
Now eat that cotton!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
When did vaccine efficacy get redefined? (Score:2)
Last I checked, vaccine efficacy was defined in terms of the rate of infections prevented not in terms of hospitalization prevented. So first of all, we are lowering the bar a lot.
Secondly, if vaccines do little to prevent the spread of the disease then getting vaccinated is mostly a personal decision. Forcing other people to get vaccinated will not lower your probability of ending up infected or in hospital.
Thirdly, even if the vaccine reduces your chances of landing in hospital you have to remember that a
Re: (Score:2)
What kind of science is this? (Score:2)
But there is something clearly missing here.
A dumbed down article sharing common knowledge about omicron : https://www.medicalnewsto
Bad news sells (Score:2)
Duh! (Score:2)
All our currently approved vaccines are based on the original strains - specifically the spike proteins. Every mutation decreases the likelihood the vaccine will provide adequate immunity. Omicron has 36 mutations on the spike. Unfortunately this virus is mutating too fast for us to create new vaccines at a time when they are needed. Let's look at it this way. Someone trains facial recognition to you. You grow facial hair, change your haircut, put on a mask, etc. How likely will that facial recognition matc
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe if the first world was actually interested in eradicating this virus they would concentrate on providing vaccines to less fortunate countries that are the source of virus variants due to their low vaccination rates rather than hoarding vaccines and just continually jabbing the population. The vaccine-resistant variants will come fast if this isn't addressed as a global effort.
That's what should be done but I'm not sure that would work in practice. Poorer countries have their own share of anti-vaxxer morons and they are going around convincing people that they can be cured through the 'power of faith' and other such hokum just like in the wealthier countries.
Re: (Score:2)
>"That's what should be done but I'm not sure that would work in practice."
Unfortunately, it won't.
From grandparent post (not yours):
>>"Maybe if the first world was actually interested in eradicating this virus"
You can't "eradicate" COVID-19 with any technology we currently have. It isn't like polio. Viruses that can mutate regularly will do just that. It is why the vaccines developed for Alpha were far less effective for Delta and even far far less effective for Omicron. No matter how quickly
Re: (Score:2)
> Maybe if the first world was actually interested in eradicating this virus
How do you eradicate a virus that came from animals and uses animals as a virus reservoir?
You would need to have an actual vaccine. Then you would need to apply it to all humans and animals capable of carrying it.
Humans have NEVER eradicated a virus that has an animal reservoir.
Re: (Score:3)
https://polioeradication.org/n... [polioeradication.org]
Point #4
https://www.economist.com/scie... [economist.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe if the first world was actually interested in eradicating this virus they would concentrate on providing vaccines to less fortunate countries that are the source of virus variants due to their low vaccination rates rather than hoarding vaccines and just continually jabbing the population.
The reason to distribute vaccines to less fortunate countries is to prevent people in those countries from getting sicker or deader than they would otherwise. The whole variation and eradication themes are effectively no-ops at this point.
Nobody believes eradication is feasible.
Omicron most certainly did not arise in humans and human driven variation is driven by the relatively few severely immunocompromised where vaccines are of limited utility.
The vaccine-resistant variants will come fast if this isn't addressed as a global effort.
Omicron infection spreads readily amongst populations regardl
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure they're working on it as we speak. A reformulated vaccine targeting the new variants has been six weeks away for the past year and a half or so.