The European Union Pulls Ahead of the United States In Vaccinations (nytimes.com) 192
gollum123 shares a report from The New York Times: The 27 member states of the European Union altogether have now administered more coronavirus vaccine doses per 100 people than the United States, in another sign that inoculations across the bloc have maintained some speed throughout the summer, while they have stagnated for weeks in the United States. E.U. countries had administered 102.66 doses per 100 people as of Tuesday, while the United States had administered 102.44, according to the latest vaccination figures compiled by Our World in Data. This month, the European Union also overtook the United States in first injections; currently, 58 percent of people across the bloc have received a dose, compared with 56.5 percent in the United States. The latest figures provide a stark contrast with the early stages of the vaccination campaigns this year, when E.U. countries, facing a shortage of doses and delayed deliveries, looked in envy at the initially more successful efforts in the United States, Britain and Israel. But the European Union is now vaccinating its populations at a faster pace than most developed countries. More than 70 percent of adults in the bloc have now received at least one dose of a coronavirus vaccine.
Yay (Score:5, Insightful)
Good job.
Re:Yay (Score:5, Insightful)
This. It's a good thing. No sarcasm. It doesn't matter which country leads the way, so long as we get enough people vaccinated that we can push this disease into obscurity.
Re:Yay (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Yay (Score:5, Insightful)
Hey dumb ass, time to upgrade your reading comprehension. Here is your lesson for today: the construction "it doesn't matter which country" does not preclude sets of countries from being referenced.
The More You Know!(TM)
Re: (Score:3)
I never said it was. I said it doesn't matter which country is in the lead, which is true. I could have expanded it to say "country or bloc", but that would have been awkward and unnecessary for the point I was trying to convey.
My intent with that statement was to cut off any attempt—presumably by my fellow Americans—at marginalizing the EU's success in this area, so my wording was deliberately targeted at addressing the loss that Americans might perceive. I agree that my phrasing could be ungen
Re: Yay (Score:2)
In Switzerland it's regular approval. In the EU its similar to the EUA in the USA.
Re:Yay (Score:4, Funny)
Good jab!
Re: (Score:2)
This "victory" is probably not long-lived though. The rate of 1st dose vaccination is flattening out, and people under 40 have 50% vaccination rate here. And this is just before the summer vacations, when everyone should have the most incentives to get vaccinated to be allowed to travel to the sea resorts.
Re: (Score:3)
So much stupid, healthcare workers rallying against vaccines, this must be end times. Full on idiocracy.
Olympics and national sports (Score:3)
Well, it's currently the Olympics.
Multiple countries compete with each other in multiple disciplines.
Apparently Greece is running up to dethrone France at their own national sport: public demonstration and strikes.
But they might lose style point over their lack of tear gas and burning cars.
Not really a surprise (Score:5, Insightful)
And before anyone brings it up yes I know blacks and Latinos have low vaccine rates. This can be traced back to the primary reason people who are hesitant to take vaccines get vaccinated: their doctors. In this case a lack thereof. Studies have shown to the vaccine hesitant primarily become willing to take the vaccine after talking to a doctor, blacks and Latinos both have very low rates of access to medical Care. In other words they can't afford to go see doctors and so they don't have anyone they trust telling them to take the vaccine. Instead they have a bewildering array of anti-vax propaganda put together by skilled professionals and focus group tested to millions every night during prime Time on Fox News.
Blunt but true (Score:5, Insightful)
Fox Kills
Re: (Score:2)
Except they aren't news - fake or otherwise.
They admitted as much in court. They are 'entertainment'. That was the filing that Fox's own lawyers made to get them out of the shit.
Re: (Score:2)
All of these 24 hour “news” channels are basically commentary with some amount of straight news. Fox at least differentiates between the two. No one is going to mistake Sean Hannity for Bret Baier.
Re: (Score:2)
No one is going to mistake Sean Hannity for Bret Baier.
Not a unique problem to Fox, by any means, but that's simply not true.
I have friends and family who absolutely think Hannity and Carlson are truth speaking news delivering superheroes.
I'm sure there are people who are just as fucking in love with the dumbfuck opinions of Rachel Maddow, I just don't really know any of those people.
Re: (Score:2)
That was specifically about Tucker Carlson's show. They used the Rachel Maddow defense -- she argued the exact same thing in a similar case earlier, and was also successful.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
>I watch a couple hours a day of Fox News
You must be tired after all that brainwashing.
Re: (Score:3)
I watch it too and they are very pro vaccine.
Those are all anti-vaxxer, dog-whistle, arguments. (Score:5, Insightful)
What I do hear on Fox is the argument that it is a choice, no different than the flu shot.
It is not a choice.
It is no more a choice than cruising for bareback sex in front of AIDS clinics and then doing the same with everyone willing to have sex without telling them about the AIDS bit.
Unless you consider suicide or a death of someone you know as valid an option as "just because".
There is no such thing as a "freedom to chose" whether to be a plague rat.
Neither is it anything like a flu shot.
While flu CAN kill and cause tissue damage that takes time to repair - it is nowhere close to COVID-19.
We have SOME acquired immunity against flu viruses - there is no such thing for COVID-19.
Again, suicide or death of someone you know - just because.
And if one is a kind of person who is willing to let someone else die to prove a point... I'd rather they pick option one and step out into the traffic with their eyes closed.
It's quicker and less painful for everyone. Cleaner too.
Fox commentators argue against government overreach when it comes to mask mandates, especially for children in schools, against shutting down schools and businesses, and against any type of policy that would make either vaccinations or proof of vaccinations mandatory.
Again, when it is either of those things vs. suicide or people dying... I'd rather they all collectively commit suicide.
Particularly since any such argument from people who are ALL fully vaccinated is utterly hypocritical bullshit - and arguing that it is a "choice" makes them as guilty as if they've personally killed every single person since the vaccine became available.
I can't see how anyone would have an issue with any of those positions.
It's called willful ignorance. It doesn't hold up in the court of law, [wikipedia.org] or anywhere else.
Particularly as people keep dying just because someone could have the "freedom to chose" whether to be a plague rat.
There is no such freedom. There is only death.
All combat deaths in ALL US WARS EVER, since 1775 on, come out to ~666441 dead. [wikipedia.org]
Currently the US has ~617171 dead [wikipedia.org] of willful negligence [reuters.com] and pure vile. [youtube.com]
Japan got nuked for far less.
Just something to keep in mind when talking about standards and scale of what constitutes "government overreach".
Re: (Score:2)
It's because the threat of punishment does nothing to deter the behavior. Once you've established that fact, keeping the law in place seems as stupid and arbitrary as jailing jaywalkers (except that in jaywalking there's a public harm, instead of a private harm).
You've also got the aim wrong. It isn't like I've got uncontrolled HIV and I injected you with my blood and "KNOWINGLY" infected you, I just had unprotected sex with you and didn't tell you beforehand. Big difference there.
Let me make a suggest..
Don't pull on the tail of the sleeping monster (Score:2)
There are no good drugs available yet to treat Covid.
Carefuly with those words~
You risk attracting the attention of the "HCQ, Ivermectine, Vitamin D and Zinc!" crazy crowd~
They are almost as rabid as the hosts file guy... Oh, shoot! I said it! I've said hosts file, now the discussion is going to be completely taken over!~
Re:FOX news is FAKE news (Score:5, Insightful)
"I can't see how anyone would have an issue with any of those positions."
Fox turned health decisions into political decisions, that's the problem.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I watch a couple hours a day of Fox News and I donâ(TM)t hear anyone there arguing against vaccinations. In fact the talk about vaccinations on Fox usually focuses on that they are effective and people shouldnâ(TM)t be concerned with getting them.
Sorry to hear about your habit. I'm sure with support from your friends and family, you could quit it entirely.
That said Fox changed the tune pretty dramatically just recently. Maybe they suddenly realized covid would kill off all their/GOP primary demographics.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just them - all of a sudden conservative politicians are jumping on board with vaccines. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the Delta variant predominantly putting their constituents in the hospital or morgue due to their own negligent posturing and bullshit.
Re:FOX news is FAKE news (Score:4, Insightful)
Fox has done a great job of having it both ways. A sometimes "serious" straight news side which mostly avoids looking absurdly biased, especially when it comes to the big lies -- Trump's election lies and most Covid conspiracies.
They "balance" it out, though, by giving a ton of air time to extreme partisans who DO push misinformation as a form of "opinion". Whether it's stop-the-steal Republicans pushing Trump's election lies, Covid denial/anti-vax, or other wildly partisan perspectives.
The thing with most of these issues is that you don't need to pursue outright lies and conspiracy theories. You can undermine vaccination drives just by "asking questions" and sowing doubt and giving people the false sense of a "choice".
I mean what kind of "choice" can the average, even better educated, person make about a vaccine that's gone through a massive amount of review by actual experts? It's not a reasonable "choice", it is just a naive decision driven by fear and partisan alignment.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? You haven't heard anti-vax crap? Then I guess you don't watch their most popular shows, Bowtie Boy, sorry, Fucker Carlson, and Laura Ingraham.
Re: (Score:2)
As you can tell by my ID, I’ve been around here for a LONG time. We are a surprisingly moderate group, not too much extremism in either direction. I always expected that had to do with people here probably being a bit older than the average internet commenter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: FOX news is FAKE news (Score:2)
Nice. Respect!
Re: (Score:2)
Boomer
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
. . . blacks and Latinos both have very low rates of access to medical Care. In other words they can't afford to go see doctors and so they don't have anyone they trust telling them to take the vaccine.
But even when they do have a doctor they trust, that doctor might not believe in the vaccine.
Dr. Eugenia South I'm a Black doctor who didn't trust the Covid vaccine. Here's what changed my mind [nbcnews.com]
So it's not always about access to healthcare and trustworthy medical professionals.
Part of the problem comes from the way the U.S. govt treated blacks in the past such as during the Tuskegee Syphilis Study [wikipedia.org]
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice,... Nope. There won't be a second time.
Re: Not really a surprise (Score:2)
Studies have shown to the vaccine hesitant primarily become willing to take the vaccine after talking to a doctor, blacks and Latinos both have very low rates of access to medical Care. In other words they can't afford to go see doctors and so they don't have anyone they trust telling them to take the vaccine.
Gee, we ought to implement a healthcare program focused on providing healthcare to those without coverage. Why, we could even subsidise it so that many pay just a few dollars a month, and many would pay nothing. It would be wonderful.
Then, to really drive home the idea that everyone should get vaccinated the government should offer the injections for free, allowing anyone that WANTS the vaccine to get it.
And we'll run countless TV ads, encourage vaccinations on every news or "news entertainment" show as wel
Re: (Score:2)
You keep bringing up this Tuskegee experiment thing, and I have no idea what that reprehensible chapter in venereal disease research 80 years ago has to do with what's happening today. Are you suggesting that the vaccine is a placebo so that researchers can track the full progression of COVID? I think we've got more than enough people in hospital beds to get that research done without any amoral activity.
Are you also going to bring up the forced sterilization of native americans in the 1970s, or the injec
Re: (Score:2)
they can't afford to go see doctors
This is the part that most Europeans won't understand without explanation. How is "can't afford" and "doctors" related? Don't you have health insurance? Can't you go and see a doctor for free whenever you feel ill or think you need a check-up?
I have never, ever, not once, paid a single Euro to be seen by a doctor.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, the real irony here is that you don't need to see a doctor to get this vaccination either. You need a smartphone. You go to a web site to make an appointment at a pharmacy, and then you get a free ride from Uber or Lyft to your vaccination appointment at the pharmacy, a pharmacist administers the shot for free, and you go home without spending a single cent. Then you do it again in a couple weeks unless they gave your the J&J vaccine.
Re: (Score:2)
RTFS (read the f*cking summary) - you don't even need to read the article to understand that it's not about visiting the doctor to get the shot. It's about visiting the doctor to get good medical information that increases the percentage of people who WANT to get vaccinated.
Or in other words: People who go to school less often are worse at math and sign contracts that are financially not beneficial to themselves. News at 11.
Blame the Public school system (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Insightful comment, perhaps people can argue whether it's true or not that a major political party and their multi-billion dollar propaganda apparatus pushing anti-vax nonsense. My opinion not exactly pushing anti-vax nonsense but not containing nonsense or occasionally push "muh freedums, etc" which cancels any pro-vaccine comments they said earlier.
You do bring up an important topic of blacks and latinos usually these demographics are in poorer economic tiers both have very low rates of access to medica
Re: Not really a surprise (Score:4, Interesting)
So maybe the problem is not Fox News???
No, the Fox tabloid is the problem [imgur.com]. The study [sagepub.com].
Also, watching only the Fox tabloid makes you less informed [businessinsider.com] than watching no news at all. They knew this twelve years ago and it hasn't changed since.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that Fox are no worse than any of the other major media outlets.
No, Fox is way, way worse than anything else. It's just downright the propaganda arm of the GQP.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? The rest aren't the propaganda arm of the Democrats then?
Give us a break, they're all biased and skewed.
Yes, really.
I'm not saying they don't suck, but Biden doesn't call into CNN every night to bitch about how mean everyone is to him, or take his policy positions from shit he's seen on Maddow.
Re: (Score:2)
rural poor have very low rates of access to medical Care. So maybe the problem is not Fox News??? Just a thought there. But continue your hate speech rsilvergun. We love it!
Funny you should mention rural. Back in March I drove an hour into Trump country to get my vaccine. The state was rolling out the vaccine in stages and the over 65 crowd or immune compromised were first. Trump country had tons of open slots and they were giving out the vaccine to anyone that showed up.
GP is trolling but they're not entirely wrong (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Citation needed?
My understanding was that Trump bought 100M, optioned 400M, then boneheadedly didn't take a zero cost option on an additional 100M
https://www.nbcnews.com/scienc... [nbcnews.com]
So, yeah, the administration bought 600M, but like someone with poor business acumen, refused to take a zero-cost-only-benefit option on the additional 100M doses.
As for the, um, dog whistle BS fanciful hallucination your talking about... care to elaborate?
Re: (Score:3)
Why would they need to try to uncover secret discouragement of vaccination from Republicans when it's out loud in the open until a week ago?
Why didn't Trump join with every other living former President to publicly campaign for vaccination? Why won't he publicly campaign for it now, when it's predominantly his supporters not getting the shots? He did the work to get the thing tested and approved for emergency use, and then disappeared on the issue completely? Why won't he publicly admit that he was vacci
Re: (Score:2)
They were literally giving them out to whoever wanted one. I went into the pharmacy with nobody waiting in the "recovery area" whatsoever. It was surreal.
This was while my girlfriend (who had managed to get scheduled in town) was literally sitting in a gym full of dozens of people waiting to get hers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You are a white male in America.
Look, call him a cunt all you like but stop being a sexist racist piece of shit.
Re: (Score:2)
There is zero excuses for white males in America. ZERO.
Of course there are excuses. Immigrants, dems not building a wall, dreamers, the green new deal has ruined the country, California is a dictator to the nation trying to take away everyone's quality of life through regulation, something something ${insert easily disproven bullshit often parrotet by rsilvergun here}.
Help help I'm being oppressed is the battle cry of the white male middleclass standing on a tower of the truly disenfranchised.
Re: Not really a surprise (Score:4, Insightful)
BS, it is Fox News that has apoplectic fits over making health care gov. supported. Fox News rather enjoys the fact that one medical emergency can bankrupt you if you have no medical insurance. They figure if you don't have medical insurance, then you aren't one of the Chosen who is succeeding financially and hence deserve to be screwed.
Re: (Score:2)
And why do the rural poor have very low rates of access to medical care? Would that happen to be due to the 10+ years of resistance to the expansion of Medicare under the Affordable Care Act in the very states being hammered by the Delta variant right now? And who's been beating that drum the whole time?
Fox News and the GOP. And now those seeds are sprouting in the lungs of their constituents.
This is why health care should be apolitical - viruses don't have the capacity to give a fuck about liberal or co
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is what happens when you pick your news - eventually you've turned off actual sources of news, and just have the echo chamber filled with performative outrage. Critical thinking isn't a value that the Republican Party holds at this particular time, so challenging the spoon-fed bullshit isn't something anybody watching Fox "News", "News"max, or OAN is interested in.
Re: (Score:2)
"Republicans which are hovering around the 2% mark"
Please cite your source
https://www.upi.com/Health_New... [upi.com]
In terms of education levels, people with a high school education or less had the largest decrease in vaccine hesitancy during the study period, while hesitancy held constant among those with a PhD, which was the most hesitant group by May.
Vaccine hesitancy fell across nearly all racial groups, with the largest decreases among Black people and Pacific Islanders. By May, they had joined Hispanics and As
Re: Not really a surprise (Score:5, Informative)
Senor Gato, the Latino community didn't want to cancel Speedy Gonzales and they don't want to be called Latinx [honestaustin.com]; but I'm sure you'll keep insisting.
Re: Not really a surprise (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, OK I see what you're doing here. Well played.
Re: (Score:2)
Please don't feed the trolls (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As I Progressive I choose to use the proper term "Latinx". Take your hate speech elsewhere.
Latino is a gender netutral term to describe a group just like "guys" is a gender neutral term to describe a group.
The only people who consider "latinx" a proper term are morons who can't speak Spanish and in my opinion have little grasp over the very real parallels to similar English constructs.
Be less SJW and more competent in languages.
Re: (Score:2)
He's not being SJW, he's OMBad using one of his many sockpuppet accounts to rile up anyone he can with his tripe.
Look how he seamlessly switches to widoko7483 in this same comment thread.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't seen someone trying to dump this much karma in a long time.
Re: (Score:2)
Since when has the religious right ever had a problem with eliminating others based on diversity of thought or physical features? That's basically been a constant for 600+ years, and only recently whitewashed over by public opinion turning in the last 30 years.
Re: Not really a surprise (Score:2)
Said the brave Anonymous Coward...
Behoooold- (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Wait you're telling me that a government can do something right?
Re: (Score:2)
Also the power of having an end goal in mind and applying government policies in a way to achieve that end goal. E.g. when the AZ blood clot issues came up many European countries decided to stop administering it pending an additional review knowing full well that it will set back the vaccination program a few weeks. End result: vaccine hesitancy *decreased* as people had more faith that the government was taking necessary precautions. I still remember Slashdotters being critical of this back in Feb but as
America 'reopened' and stopped pushing. (Score:5, Interesting)
Dropping the mask mandate also flagged to everyone that the pandemic is over. They did this too early and it makes those that still need masks feel like shamed lepers - well if you are shamed is it easier to just drop the mask or go get a vaccine?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You need to tie the vaccine to something you love. Here the economy is effectively open but you either need testing or vaccination in order to attend larger events or to travel internationally.
Tell Western Europeans you can't go to a Spanish, Italian, or Greek beach in the summer and you get people madly falling over each other trying to get vaccines, including the absurdity of paying several hundred euros to buy fake vaccine papers rather than just getting the free vaccine.
Re: (Score:3)
Dropping the mask mandate was a double edged sword. The vaccine was sold on the premise that once you were fully vaccinated, life could go back to normal. As it turns out, the delta variant and the nature of vaccination effectiveness turned out to be more complicated than that, and we're into situations nobody really expected, like the vaccine is still effective but vaccinated people can get breakthrough infections and spread high levels of virus, even when they don't get very sick.
But the problem was a l
Re: (Score:3)
You couldn't push vaccination but continue mask mandates without undermining the vaccine's payoff of returning the normal.
Sure you can, for the same reason that you can advocate for car manufacturers be required that their cars have airbags and crumple zones while also still encouraging people to continue wearing their seatbelt. Saying you should still wear a seatbelt doesn't "undermine" the payoff of airbags and crumple zones. It's just a reasonable recognition of the fact that no one solution is panacea and that the best approach is often defense in depth.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder... (Score:2)
If the vaccine is as politicized as it is here in the US? I imagine that could be part of the difference.
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously not. [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Not really. There's some populist parties that made and some still make some half-assed attempt at trying, but most notice that the backlash costs them more votes than they get from the loonies.
Re: (Score:2)
It is, but many countries here don't give the political nutjobs a podium. Every European country has a flavour of Trump, but only a couple actually elect them into a position of power.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but the idiots usually do not have a major political party behind them. So same number of idiots (education does apparently do nothing), but fewer supporters and hanger-ons. Still plenty of genuine idiots.
Re: (Score:2)
Try again [youtu.be].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I wonder... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I wonder... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I wonder... (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
From the table I cited:
Deaths within 28 days of positive specimen date:
- Total: 257
- Unknown: 2
- Single dose: 1+44
- 2 doses: 118
- Unvaccinated: 92
I'm entirely fucking confused why you think that 92 is larger than 118, let alone larger than 163.
Stop telling me reading comprehension is my problem, and try actually fucking reading what I'm saying and the reference that I've provided that completely supports it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What the fuck are you on? Which part of "More people in the UK that have been vaccinated die from the Delta variant than the unvaccinated" is talking about hospitalisation?
Stop trolling you miserable clown. You're fucking deluded.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Vaccinations in the UK prioritised the extremely vulnerable and then the elderly. Those groups are going to be disproportionately highly represented among the double vaccinated group.
Coincidentally, old people tend to die more than young people, and people with a significant medical condition die more frequently than those without.
Covid isn't killing these people because they've had the vaccine. They're dying because they're ill or old, and because they're ill or old they were prioritised to get the vaccin
Re: (Score:2)
That's 'with COVID' thing been an issue throughout.
You'll also notice that the ratio of deaths to cases is for vaccinated people over 50 a fifth of that of unvaccinated cases. The data actually does demonstrate the vaccination working.
The data also shows that the rate of death for the unvaccinated under 50 is tiny. Sufficiently small that it's entirely reasonable for 20somethings to seek greater assurance that their health is at higher risk from the virus than it is from the vaccine, especially given how ma
Europeans are older (Score:2)
When your odds are 1:100 or worse, you save your hide rather than procrastinating or listening to online cranks.
Re: (Score:2)
When your odds are 1:100 or worse, you save your hide rather than procrastinating or listening to online cranks.
There's a 4% difference in age brackets. That doesn't even remotely account for the difference in vaccine hesitancy and vaccination rates over time between Europe and the USA.
Sadly morons abound (Score:2)
I think for the most part they're ignored despite being incredibly screechy and annoying. Social media is doing a piss poor job of shutting misinfo. Twitter claims a 3 strikes policy but it is trivial to find people spamming dozens if not hundreds of bullshit stories around its pla
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. One good thing is that the talk of restrictions for the unvaccinated plague-spreaders is getting more serious. There will not be a way around that in the end.
Re: (Score:2)
You need to learn to listen. There was no such contradiction. There were additional details you apparently missed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And Canada wins! (Score:2)