99.992% of Fully Vaccinated People Have Dodged COVID, CDC Data Shows (arstechnica.com) 143
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Cases of COVID-19 are extremely rare among people who are fully vaccinated, according to a new data analysis by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Among more than 75 million fully vaccinated people in the US, just around 5,800 people reported a "breakthrough" infection, in which they became infected with the pandemic coronavirus despite being fully vaccinated. The numbers suggest that breakthroughs occur at the teeny rate of less than 0.008 percent of fully vaccinated people -- and that over 99.992 percent of those vaccinated have not contracted a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
The figures come from a nationwide database that the CDC set up to keep track of breakthrough infections and monitor for any concerning signs that the breakthroughs may be clustering by patient demographics, geographic location, time since vaccination, vaccine type, or vaccine lot number. The agency will also be keeping a close eye on any breakthrough infections that are caused by SARS-CoV-2 variants, some of which have been shown to knock back vaccine efficacy. [...] The extraordinary calculation that 99.992 percent of vaccinated people have not contracted the virus may reflect that they all simply have not been exposed to the virus since being vaccinated. Also, there are likely cases missed in reporting. Still, the data is a heartening sign. As for the "breakthroughs," the agency says many of them occurred in older people, who are more vulnerable to COVID-19. There are some scattered through every age group, but more than 40 percent were in people ages 60 and above.
"We see [breakthroughs] with all vaccines," top infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci said in a press briefing earlier this week. "No vaccine is 100 percent efficacious or effective, which means that you will always see breakthrough infections regardless of the efficacy of your vaccine."
The figures come from a nationwide database that the CDC set up to keep track of breakthrough infections and monitor for any concerning signs that the breakthroughs may be clustering by patient demographics, geographic location, time since vaccination, vaccine type, or vaccine lot number. The agency will also be keeping a close eye on any breakthrough infections that are caused by SARS-CoV-2 variants, some of which have been shown to knock back vaccine efficacy. [...] The extraordinary calculation that 99.992 percent of vaccinated people have not contracted the virus may reflect that they all simply have not been exposed to the virus since being vaccinated. Also, there are likely cases missed in reporting. Still, the data is a heartening sign. As for the "breakthroughs," the agency says many of them occurred in older people, who are more vulnerable to COVID-19. There are some scattered through every age group, but more than 40 percent were in people ages 60 and above.
"We see [breakthroughs] with all vaccines," top infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci said in a press briefing earlier this week. "No vaccine is 100 percent efficacious or effective, which means that you will always see breakthrough infections regardless of the efficacy of your vaccine."
Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compare (Score:5, Insightful)
This statistic looks encouraging, but is not really useful without knowing the rate of unvaccinated people who dodged COVID during the same time period. I'm guessing that is pretty high, as well.
Re: (Score:3)
Total U.S. Infections: 31,231,869 [cdc.gov]
Minus "around 5,800": 31,226,000
Total U.S. Population: 330,209,000 [census.gov]
Minus 75,000,000 vaccinated: 255,209,000
31,226,000 out of 255,209,000 is about 12%, or 88% non-vaccinated, non-infected.
Of course both of those numbers are factoring in things like mask-wearing, social distancing etc. So it's not like the body necessarily has a "natural" resistance to COVID at 88% vs the vaccine at 99%
Re: (Score:3)
I think I'd go with the 7 day number (since vaccines are relatively new).
So ~150 per 100,000 in the last 7 days. 300MM /100K * 150 = 450K cases last 7 days (1.5%).
CDC says 15% fully vaccinated 3/29
If we assume all breakthroughs happened in 7 days (this obviously exaggerates the number for this purpose), you'd expect 450k * .15 = 67.5K
So using assumptions skewed against the vaccine it appears to be 90% effective at total prevention.
Also, with only 1 death in the vaccinated group, it's extremely effective th
Re: (Score:2)
"In an emailed statement, a CDC spokesperson said the majority of people with breakthrough infections were not hospitalized, and 29 percent had asymptomatic infections.
In addition, 65 percent of the cases were in women, and just over 40 percent were in people ages 60 and up. Seven percent of people were hospitalized, and 74 people died."
Still strong results, but more than 1 death.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, I don't know why I remember reading 1 (recently).
I probably did something stupid like rounded it to 1 in a million, and then just forgot everything but the 1.
Re: (Score:3)
That compares vaccinated and exposed at the recent exposure levels with unvaccinated and exposed over the entire course of the epidemic, as the number of active cases (emitting virus) rose and fell a lot. It also overstates the number of unvaccinated during that period because the near availability of the first vaccine wasn't even announced until the day after the presidential election.
You can get a closer number for the unvaccinated infection rate by using the averaged new infections rate over the last m
Re: (Score:3)
Death rate always drops more slowly than infection rate, because many sick people last weeks or months in the hospital before eventually dying.
No need for conspiracies about faking data here.
Re: (Score:2)
Death rate always drops more slowly than infection rate, because many sick people last weeks or months in the hospital before eventually dying.
No need for conspiracies about faking data here.
Sounds plausible.
But then why don't we see a similar slower-than-cases drop in Germany, UK, or more than maybe a tad in Denmark? (to name three of the four I checked - Israel being too small and noisy) Their hospital care isn't so poor or overloaded, compared to that in California, or their post-vaccine drops so gradua
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compar (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Well let's see.
5,800 out of ~75 million vaccinated got infected anyway, 0.0077%
Vaccines were starting to roll out roughly 4 months ago. So for "the same time period" let's choose Dec 14th which is when the first vaccinations were being done.
Since Dec 14th, 2020, there have been 14.7M new cases. US population is ~328M, so that's 4.48%
But we should reasonably subtract everyone who had gotten COVID-19 prior to that from the population, since it's exceedingly rare anyone gets it twice, right? There were 16,565,
Re: (Score:2)
5,800 out of ~75 million vaccinated got infected anyway, 0.0077%
This also doesn't account for the fact that not everyone was vaccinated on day one. Quite a large percentage only had the second shot in the last few weeks. If you got that 5,800 number as an extrapolation from the percentage, it's likely way too high.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd double your vaccinated percent since there wasn't 75 million vaccinated December 14th.
Double because assuming a linear rate of vaccination, so the average number of vaccinated people in that range is half the current number, this assumption is false, it's probably make more sense to triple it. So 200x.
I did a very ungenerous for vaccines napkin math and got 10x, but I think I may be off by an order of magnitude looking at other numbers.
Re: (Score:2)
Also how do they know that the person didn't contact COVID but simply have no symptoms. Some younger people have reported no symptoms even after testing positive.
I'm asking because some people, like me, have auto-immune issues that react to infection. A bug that most people might not even notice can have a big effect on us.
Re: (Score:2)
It definitely seems to be the case that fully vaccinated people can not only contract the virus asymptomatically, but also spread it. I'm not sure to what degree we have groups with periodic scheduled post-vaccination COVID swabs to collect stats on this. Having an autoimmune disorder means you'll probably have a relatively strong immune response to the vaccine since your immune system is very active/overactive.
So get the vaccine but plan to feel really miserable. But then you likely will never develop a
Re: (Score:3)
Based on your own quoted study, that means that 25% of the original risk of asymptomatic transmission still remains. With enough people vaccinated, that should keep the R value below 1. But the risks associated with that 25% will remain until the virus is no longer widespread.
The CDC quotes numbers of 2/3 reduction for Pfizer and Moderna at testing given during the second vaccination dose appointment. So fully vaccinated is probably a greater than 66% reduction. Later on, there's a quoted figure of 80% [cdc.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
The first US vaccinations were given December 14. Their second shot should have been 21 days later, and full vaccination is counted 14 days after that: optimistically on January 18. CDC's latest vaccination count was 66.2 million fully vaccinated as of April 8 (80 days later). Worldometers says we had 24,717,673 cases on January 18 and 31,720,703 cases on April 8, out of a population of 332,532,050.
CDC also says that the number of vaccinations has been increasing at roughly a linear rate. Assuming it is
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compar (Score:2)
Yes and no. For some reason (probably a mix of bureaucratic CYA and residual politics from last year), natural immunity after infection does not appear to exist in the eyes of the US medical establishment, nor do individuals who had covid but did not receive a covid test result. Including those people (recovered but not vaccinated and the fraction not counted in official cases) skews the denominator.
It makes the natural infection rate appear lower (and making vaccines look worse) by raising the denominator
Re: (Score:3)
To estimate the number of unvaccinated cases you can simply use the *all* new cases, since the 5800 vaccinated cases represent only 0.1% of all new cases since the end of January.
Let's try to get a *lower bound* on the probability of being infected if you were not vaccinated. For that we will somewhat overestimate the size of the susceptible group by including everyone who did not have natural immunity at the start of our vaccination program. That means we'll lump fully and partially vaccinated people into
Re: (Score:2)
People who took the trouble to get a vaccine are less likely to put themselves at high risk of infection post-vaccination. Stats comparing infection rates of them with wild CV-denying types immersing in large crowds won't tell the full story.
Re: (Score:2)
This statistic looks encouraging, but is not really useful without knowing the rate of unvaccinated people who dodged COVID during the same time period. I'm guessing that is pretty high, as well.
Agreed. Its very difficult to improve on the robustness of the double-blind controlled phase III trial. This result is likely due to study design choices, and doesn't reflect an improvement in the vaccines' efficacy. It's just making news because the result is a very large number.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I am not sure why you are referencing a message from a different user? Who isn't on the thread, are you just pointing out that we have stupid people on Slashdot?
To be fair, back in early 2020, most of us were expecting that COVID would die down like the Flu so after a few weeks of peak problems, it would just settle down and not become a big problem.
I left my office in mid March, and after going back to my office for a PC upgrade (In December), I saw my calendar, I set ahead to April, figuring that I would
Re:Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compare (Score:5, Informative)
You were scared because you read ourworldindata and took the numbers literally and did division and concluded that COVID was a major threat. It never was.
It's killed over a half million people in the USA alone. That is a minor threat to you? Some of us care about others. Unlike you.
The other part is that is literally mostly killing people that are 80+ years old
Death is not the only negative outcome; people who act like it is are dumbfucks. New strains are also more harmful to young people. But that's new information, and you're allergic to new information.
I'm not sure what you guys are going to do with the rest of your life.
Apparently, fight trolls like you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compar (Score:2)
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compar (Score:2)
I work for a multinational 15 people I used to work with died in the last year
Go fuck yourself
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Oh look, russian troll shows up to defend russian troll.
It's a nesting troll doll.
Re: (Score:1)
Wow the guy points out that you're all using tired tropes for political purposes and the first thing you do in rebuttal is pull out the one Tired Trope To Rule Them All! Well, played sir. Well played.
I'll trust the experts, thank you. (Score:4, Insightful)
My favorite thing about people denying the severity of Covid is the shear arrogance of them. The fact that these people, typically with no medical education beyond what they got in high school or in college GE classes, think they know better than the vast majority of the entire medical establishment from doctors to medical scientists in the entire world.
"Covid's no threat!" Yeah right... I'll trust the experts thank you very much.
Re: (Score:2)
Someone sent me a YouTube video yesterday. It was an April Fools animation from some math/physics channel. In it, a guy is asked in primary school what the formula for momentum is, says p = mv, gets a gold star and it's the best day of his life. Later he goes to university and gets asked the same question in various classes and discovers, to his horror, that there's a wee bit more to it.
It's necessary to start students off with a simplified version, but it's a disservice both to them and to society to not m
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not trying to be rude at all but I have no idea how what you said applies to what I said.
Re: (Score:2)
People get a broad, very shallow overview of human knowledge in primary school, with very little education about how broad and shallow their knowledge is. It's just enough to give them a bad case of Dunning-Kruger. Throw in some word of mouth, "common sense," folk knowledge and social media, and you've got a population who thinks they know more than the experts.
Re: (Score:3)
There's so much misinformation, especially on the alt-right political fringe. My mom claimed that schools should just open up because "kids can't get sick from covid". While I agree that schools should open up, the reason there is wrong - kids do get sick, they do die, the kids can carry the disease to their relatives, teachers can get sick, etc. So open schools safely. But the idea that "kids can't get sick" is there on the alt-right and it leads to the idea to open schools with zero restrictions.
The m
Re: (Score:2)
While I agree that schools should open up, the reason there is wrong - kids do get sick, they do die
You aren't wrong.
The total number of children under the age of 17 that has died in CA is 19. That is 0.031% of all deaths in CA. This is from the CA Dept of Public Health.
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Progra... [ca.gov]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And hospitals are telling everyone to put off elective surgeries due to covid. Not because the government tells them to say that, but because the hospitals voluntarily say that. Similarly, even if we opened up everything today, you will NOT get full capacity packed restaurants because the customers who are smart are going to play it safe, either stay home or only go to restaurants where tables are spread out. There are a fraction of knuckleheads who will want to pretend that covid doesn't exist but most p
Re: (Score:2)
But those knuckleheads will shout and yell at everyone who stays home for being un-American (ie, not supporting the economy).
Thanks goodness, those knuckleheads will all die off and a wonderful utopia will develop. You and your brethren shall inherit the earth from the knuckleheads.
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compar (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Humans have a very understandable instinct to avoid dead people. In modern societies we indulge this instinct by making them disappear as efficiently as we can, and the more resources the society has, the more robust this system is. The US, Europe, etc. have lots of resources, so if you don't actually know someone who died of COVID, you probably haven't seen anything terribly unusual going on. A friend of mine travelled to a part of the US with a pretty frightening COVID rate and said "meh, seemed pretty no
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compar (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compa (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It has killed babies, toddlers, twenty somethings, and so on. Those who catch it and survive describe it as a horrible experience, not at all like the flu. Many hospitals have been at capacity, in the US and the rest of the world. It is a deadly disease, and we can indeed help our neighbors by wearing a mask. That you think it's all made up fluffery and the mask is stupid is because you only care that *you* are safe and ignore the dangers to those around you.
Extra bonus benefit, the flu season last year
Re: (Score:2)
It has killed babies, toddlers, twenty somethings, and so on.
You aren't wrong.
0.031% of all COVID-19 deaths hit people 17 and younger. That's 19 total COVID-19 deaths for Californians age 17 and under.
https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Progra... [ca.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
OMBad forgets which account he's on. Lol.
Re: Need the unvaccinated infection rate to compar (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of all the silly right wing nutter talking points this is one of them that cracks me up the most. Why, they're just miscounting, lalalala can't hear you, can't hear you.
I know your kind, I know exactly every silly fucking argument you'll make because I've seen them before on the gun forums. By all means don't get vaccinated. You should really stick it to Big Pharma and their "genetics modifying" vaccines, bro. Frankly I think we're taking the wrong tack trying to get your retards to get vaccinated. Losing a
Re: (Score:3)
American culture had an even worse impact. Hiding the truth is almost better than spreading outright disinformation.
Re: (Score:2)
The former alleged administration wasn't just hiding the truth, they were actively dissembling.
As for Chinese culture, seems to me it was the weenies in the CCP and their Chief of Weenies, Jinping. Look out, Jinping, Falun Gong might sneak up behind you and shout "boo".
Headline: less than 10% of vaxxed people get C19 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
“COVID? Gangbusters with ratings,” CNN Director Charlie Chester told a journalist in a secretly recorded video.
“Which is why we constantly have the death toll on the side,” he continued. “It would make our point better if [the COVID death toll] was higher.”
“Like, this special red phone rings and they pick it up and it’s, like, the head of the network being like, ‘There’s nothing that you’re doing right now that makes me want to stick. Put
Dodging COVID is not enough. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
for those that weren't clear, the *first* dodge in the list is moving out of the path of an incoming object, while the second refers to hiding in the trunk of a chrysler product . . .
hawk
Slashot Poster (Score:2, Insightful)
OK, but does this mean very much? (Score:1)
100% (Score:5, Informative)
99.992% of fully vaccinated people have dodged covid, and 100% have dodged covid death.
Go and get your shot.
Re: (Score:2)
Go and get your shot.
Most of the world is waiting for a shot to be available.
Even in rich countries, it's mostly old people who are vaccinated. Some countries are ahead (Israel, and to a lesser extent the UK and the USA), some are behind (Japan, Australia) and it's not because people do not trust vaccines.
Re: (Score:2)
Japan is not just behind in vaccinating the populace, but woefully behind. That's why there are protests about the Olympics going ahead. With ~1% vaccinated, it's pretty much the same as not having a vaccine at all.
Re: (Score:2)
At the present rate of vaccinations, the USA will have more supply than demand in mid to late May. That's when we'll really start worrying about people choosing to not get vaccinated.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, and that's probably when the USA will start exporting as well. These plants are not going to shutdown any time soon.
Re: (Score:2)
That's likely. I'm also expecting that's when we'll start seeing lots of advertisements for getting vaccinated.
Re: (Score:2)
Vaccine sites here have more vaccines available than appointments, especially out of the cities in Trump country. My wife and I received our first shots last week and they don’t ask if you’re in the right group or not. They just want as many folks as possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Vaccine sites here have more vaccines available than appointments, especially out of the cities in Trump country. My wife and I received our first shots last week and they don’t ask if you’re in the right group or not. They just want as many folks as possible.
Yeah I got mine from a first come first serve community site here and am now fully vaxxed, 3 weeks outside the second dose
Re: (Score:2)
99.992% of fully vaccinated people have dodged covid, and 100% have dodged covid death.
Go and get your shot.
Actually no, people did die.
(from memory) In that group of 5,800 people, about 400 were hospitalized, and of them about 77 died.
Re: (Score:2)
about 50 died. So that's still 1% death rate for those infected.
Re: (Score:2)
>"Go and get your shot."
Please, don't get shot.
Get vaccinated with an injection from a syringe :)
Accuracy at LAST!!! (Score:1)
They can't seem to accurately detect COVID, but they sure can measure how effective the vaccine is.
Need to know who already had it before (Score:2)
Interested to see more data (Score:2)
While the data is encouraging, I will be interested in:
-Breakdown by time after receiving shot
-Breakdown by vaccine type (along with percentage of overall recipients)
-Breakdown by age (also with general info about general age of recipients. More may be older, but so too more older have received than younger)
If breakthrough infection rate confirms the preliminary efficacy difference for J&J vs. the mRNA, then the figures moving forward will be even more encouraging.
Re: (Score:2)
While the data is encouraging, I will be interested in: -Breakdown by time after receiving shot -Breakdown by vaccine type (along with percentage of overall recipients) -Breakdown by age (also with general info about general age of recipients. More may be older, but so too more older have received than younger)
If breakthrough infection rate confirms the preliminary efficacy difference for J&J vs. the mRNA, then the figures moving forward will be even more encouraging.
Just FYI j&j is an mRNA vaccine, the difference is a natural vs synthetic delivery system
So Lockdowns And Masks Are Meaningless Now (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I.E.: if the vaccine is generally available (or arguably 1 month from being generally available), then all other COVID measures are unnecessary.
Hopefully soon, but not quite yet. You still need a critical mass of vaccinations to build up enough herd immunity that outbreaks will no longer occur. Also, it takes awhile for your body to respond to the vaccine and build up the appropriate defences. So it does seem we're finally tracking towards a lifting of restrictions, but are not quite there yet.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because the more the virus festers among the dimwitted the more likely dangerous mutations are. Even a sub-mongoloid dingus with an IQ of 87 who believes the virus will genetically modify or sterilize them is smart enough to breed a variant of Coronavirus with a slightly different spike protein and a 10% worse death rate.
Believe me, if it weren't for that I would 100% be for encouraging people afraid of the virus not to take it because fuck them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actual infections are 3x times number recorded (Score:2)
Stanford did a study of our county to find out how many people had been infected. Turns out they found that three times as many people had been infected as the official figures counted. Probably due to asymptomatic infections and/or people with mild infections who just didn't bother to get tested.
“We are unlikely to be able to control this infection by allowing it to just run through the population,” Dr. Parsonnet said.
Also noteworthy, those fully vaccinated had double the level of antibodies co
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Fauci basically says that the vaccine doesn't work
I think he's saying it does work.
Re: (Score:3)
Sure I would love that but it's going to have to be when we get to 70-80% vaccinated. We could use the honor system for masks and trust those not wearing one are fully vaccinated if there wasn't a large percentage of the country that have been obstinate dumbfucks the entire last year and cannot be trusted to be not be spreading things around maskless. These same people comprise the majority of people who are now refusing to vaccinate as well. They are just ruining things for everyone.
If you're mad about
Re: (Score:3)
>"If you're mad about still having to wear a mask stop blaming Fauci and the CDC about it and start harping on the crowd that has refused all guidance and dum-dums like Jim Jordan and Rand Paul who perpetuate this attitude."
Rand Paul has expressed, correctly, that there is no good medical reason to wear a mask after you are fully vaccinated or naturally immune (at least for several months). There might be OTHER reasons to continue to wear them, like virtue signaling (what he calls "theater"), or because
Re: Great! (Score:3)
Yes, wearing a mask after vaccination is 100% a virtue signal. Rand Paul is right, you shouldn't have to wear one after vaccination but he and his I'll have spent the last year casting doubt on every reasonable measure especially masking that now if I go in a store and see someone unmasked I cannot in any good faith trust that they have been vaccinated and taken the post vax time to be fully immune. The type of person to not wear a mask in public is the type of person that would lie about being vaccinated
Re: (Score:2)
I do agree with much, but not all, of your last post. But try to see things from Paul's perspective. He (and many, many others) believe, and probably rightfully so, that it is a violation of the Constitution to tell people what they have to do or not do with their own bodies, especially when NOT sick/infected. And the more bossy the government gets, the more such people will resist such control, even when complying might be the "right" thing to do. For for every person you compel to do what you think it
Re: (Score:3)
What is it with you morons that you can't distinquish between 'you can still spread it' and 'we don't yet know if you can still spread it'? The advice to continue doing those things is sound until enough data is collected to warrant changing it. And the more we get data like this, the quicker that will happen.
Re: (Score:3)
If it works, then fully vaccinated people don't need to deal with masks, social distancing, or economic turmoil.
Right, which is why the current CDC guidance says that if you're in a room where everyone has been fully vaccinated, you don't need to wear a mask. Still wearing a mask in public places like grocery stores is to protect the people who aren't fully vaccinated yet.
Re: (Score:2)
>"Right, which is why the current CDC guidance says that if you're in a room where everyone has been fully vaccinated, you don't need to wear a mask."
This makes sense
>"Still wearing a mask in public places like grocery stores is to protect the people who aren't fully vaccinated yet."
If you are fully vaccinated, wearing a mask doesn't protect anyone, because you are statistically not going to catch or spread it. That is the entire point of being vaccinated.
People in public who are NOT vaccinated shoul
Re: (Score:3)
If you are fully vaccinated, wearing a mask doesn't protect anyone, because you are statistically not going to catch or spread it.
The ability to spread the virus even if you've been vaccinated isn't well known yet, but it appears to be more than zero.
People in public who are NOT vaccinated should wear masks to protect themselves and others who are NOT vaccinated (if they are actually worn properly)
Why are you repeating this bullshit? Wearing a mask does little to prevent the wearer inhaling virus particles; the effectiveness is in preventing the wearer from expelling virus particles. This has been well known the whole time.
Re: (Score:2)
>"The ability to spread the virus even if you've been vaccinated isn't well known yet, but it appears to be more than zero."
It is probably so close to zero that it doesn't matter. If you are not infected, the viral load is negligible, thus you can't effectively infect others (the entire point of being fully vaccinated). It is *POSSIBLE*, but so is being struck by lightening or a meteor or a car.
>"Wearing a mask does little to prevent the wearer inhaling virus particles; the effectiveness is in preve
Re: (Score:2)
People in public who are NOT vaccinated should wear masks to protect themselves and others who are NOT vaccinated (if they are actually worn properly)
Why are you repeating this bullshit? Wearing a mask does little to prevent the wearer inhaling virus particles; the effectiveness is in preventing the wearer from expelling virus particles. This has been well known the whole time.
As long as there are a large number of unvaccinated everyone should be wearing a mask, but if you are wearing a good mask like one with a filter or kn95 or better you do a great deal to protect yourself. I will admit that those that don’t tend to believe in it end up wearing thin surgical masks under their noses so yeah, that doesn’t do anything to protect them
Re: (Score:2)
Fauci basically says that the vaccine doesn't work
I think he's saying it does work.
If it works, then fully vaccinated people don't need to deal with masks, social distancing, or economic turmoil.
If you are vaccinated there are still concerns that have not been fully studied that you can become a carrier for a period without actually contracting covid, this would cause a spread to unvaccinated people (who if they took the vaccine would solve some of this) so the masks are for them, and for kids since some of the variants show a higher infection and more severe cases with children. As far as economics go, you really don’t understand economics if you think not wearing a mask or standing 6’
Re: (Score:2)
Fauci basically says that the vaccine doesn't work but everyone needs to get it anyway....
That wasn't what Fauci said, but it's exactly how the conspiracy theorists could twist his words. Time to put him and his ninnyism out to pasture.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Fauci is an idiot. How this guy has any credibility at this point is beyond me. He has constantly flip flopped from the very beginning and continues to do so. Some of you might recall that back in February he specifically told everyone, on camera, to NOT wear masks in public. He later admitted that was to prevent people from hoarding masks. So this man - a medical doctor - puts political messaging ahead of sound medical advice. His job is to provide medical advice. Despite the fact that he is a career acade
Re: (Score:3)
He put hospitals and health care workers first you utter moron. If the shit paper hoarders had bought up all the masks the hospitals would have been in deep trouble. Also back in February 2020 the virus was still new and there wasn’t enough data to know how it spread or how quickly. Dr. Fauci is world class. Go read his credentials. You might learn something you ignorant smooth brain.
Re: (Score:3)
If the shit paper hoarders had bought up all the masks the hospitals would have been in deep trouble.
While that may be true, it still doesn't excuse Dr. Fauci's behavior.
Doctors are expected to give truthful advice. Lying about masks, even "for our own good" really erodes trust. Now, every statement he makes, we will wonder if he is lying (for some good cause).
Re: (Score:2)
I think he's more implying that the vaccine works but it's not 100% effective, and even a seemingly nominal reduction in infections that could be gained by mask wearing and other measures is worth the cost in saved lives.
Most hospital procedures require over-the-top measures to minimize success and post procedure infections. Still, few complain because it's their life on the line.
Re: (Score:2)