AI-Enabled Cheetos Offer Promise of the Perfect Puff (wsj.com) 66
Microsoft says in a blog post that PepsiCo is using their Project Bonsai "machine teaching" service to "help ensure its Cheetos cheese-puff snacks all have the same texture, crunch and shape," reports The Wall Street Journal. From the blog post: PepsiCo built a computer vision system that continually monitors Cheeto attributes. Data about qualities such as density and length are fed to the Project Bonsai solution, which makes adjustments to bring the product within spec. This approach reduces the time it takes to correct inconsistencies and allows operators to focus on parts of the line that require human expertise. PepsiCo is preparing to use the solution in a production plant and exploring how to use the solution with other products, including the tortilla chip manufacturing process. An out-of-spec product can't be sold, which leads to wasted resources, time, and money. Greater consistency helps PepsiCo maintain high quality products while maximizing throughput.
To make an ideal Cheeto, the solution needed examples of what wasn't ideal -- and needed to know what to do in those cases. The extruder line is self-contained and well-suited for developing and testing an autonomous system solution. Operators had been running it manually, which gave developers the opportunity to build the solution from scratch, instead of on top of other software. The AI solution has a recommendation mode and a closed loop control mode. In both modes, a computer vision system continuously measures the quality of the Cheetos. In recommendation mode, the AI will alert an operator if the product drifts out of spec, displaying on an instrument panel the attributes that are not ideal as well as a recommendation to correct it. The operator can push a button to make any or all recommended adjustments.
In control mode, the only difference is that the AI solution skips the recommendation step and adjusts the extruder line specifications independently. The company expects that running this intelligent control system will return product to acceptable attributes faster. In the current extruder line, operators measure product attributes manually at defined intervals. If the Cheetos are out of spec, the operator makes adjustments based on guidelines or experience to return the product to acceptable quality. The problem: Infrequent sampling meant that the line could be producing out-of-spec Cheetos for a longer period of time without anyone realizing. The Project Bonsai solution will monitor the product almost continuously, using sensors to oversee characteristics such as length and bulk density. That way, it knows as soon as the product strays outside a defined range.
To make an ideal Cheeto, the solution needed examples of what wasn't ideal -- and needed to know what to do in those cases. The extruder line is self-contained and well-suited for developing and testing an autonomous system solution. Operators had been running it manually, which gave developers the opportunity to build the solution from scratch, instead of on top of other software. The AI solution has a recommendation mode and a closed loop control mode. In both modes, a computer vision system continuously measures the quality of the Cheetos. In recommendation mode, the AI will alert an operator if the product drifts out of spec, displaying on an instrument panel the attributes that are not ideal as well as a recommendation to correct it. The operator can push a button to make any or all recommended adjustments.
In control mode, the only difference is that the AI solution skips the recommendation step and adjusts the extruder line specifications independently. The company expects that running this intelligent control system will return product to acceptable attributes faster. In the current extruder line, operators measure product attributes manually at defined intervals. If the Cheetos are out of spec, the operator makes adjustments based on guidelines or experience to return the product to acceptable quality. The problem: Infrequent sampling meant that the line could be producing out-of-spec Cheetos for a longer period of time without anyone realizing. The Project Bonsai solution will monitor the product almost continuously, using sensors to oversee characteristics such as length and bulk density. That way, it knows as soon as the product strays outside a defined range.
We have enough puff (Score:1)
We need the perfect orange
In other words (Score:2)
We'll have the same homogenized appearance, texture, and taste. No anomalies or variance allowed.
How dull and boring.
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand, were you ever pleasantly surprised by a noticeably different Cheeto?
Re: (Score:3)
I don't eat Cheetos (or haven't in who knows how many decades), but having a variety of sizes, tastes and textures is a good thing. Your palate becomes numb (so to speak) if the same food is eaten over and over with no break in between. This article on wine tasting [foodandwin...hetics.com] describes the effect.
Finding a crunchy Cheeto, or one slightly more or slightly less flavorful, one larger or smaller than the other, is a good thing. As someone below said, all they're doing is creating a cheesy Pringle.
Re: (Score:2)
This is why when I eat this kind of junk food, I like the stuff that's the party mix of pretzels, cheetoes, nacho chips, and a few other things. Variety is the spice of life.
Re: (Score:2)
We'll have the same homogenized appearance, texture, and taste. No anomalies or variance allowed.
How dull and boring.
Like the Pringles of cheezies.
Re: (Score:3)
This isn't about keeping each Cheeto identical (though puffs are already close to that), this keeps them within acceptable tolerance: Some big, some small, but none so dense as to be hard to eat. None so cheese-less that they have to throw them out. Keep in mind: The factory already throws all of the out-of-spec ones out. For people, variety is a great thing. For products, not so much.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be surprised if they throw the out of spec ones out, as opposed to them ending up in a bag of dollar store mixed snacks along with the broken chips and pretzels, or in a no name cheezie bin at Bulk Barn.
Oh FFS!!! (Score:1)
2. If there were AI, this would be the stupidest possible use for it.
3. There is NO AI!
I know I repeated 1 and 3, but I felt it was an important enough fact to need repeating.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, there is clearly AI. Your definition of AI does not suit this technology, however the rest of the world has moved on without you, as your definition is useless/impractical.
And no, monitoring the quality of a product to decrease defects and increase saleable yield is not a stupid use of AI.
~D
Re: Oh FFS!!! (Score:2)
No, your definition of AI has nothing to do with artificial intelligence! You are deliberately abusing the term to mean very very shitty simulations that are as close to real neural nets as a perfect sphere on a sinusoidal trajectory is to a horse race (not even exaggerating), and are nothing more than simple vector mappings with weight matrices. Which have the far more mundane name "universal functions". But that won't let you rip off your financers, now would it?
By you definition, matrix transforms of vec
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, games are a great example of what I'm talking about when I mention AI. Clearly, there are no artificially intelligent consciousnesses running the opponents in a game. But that distinction isn't helpful to the rest of the world. Yes, it's important to the game developer, but to the game reviewer? They don't care about the implementation. When they review the game for the public, they're not going to write "The finite state automata driving the animation is poorly thought through"... They're going t
Re: (Score:2)
No, your definition of AI has nothing to do with artificial intelligence! You are deliberately abusing the term to mean very very shitty simulations....
Unless there is fecal matter in those simulations, well I guess you just used the word "shit" wrong, so now I'm very angry and will go on a diatribe about it!!
Re: (Score:2)
4. Even if there were AI, despite the headline - we would still not be talking about AI-Enabled Cheetos. The purported AI is part of the manufacturing process, not the Cheeto itself.
I mean good grief, is the Cheeto going to scream when you bite down on it?
Re: (Score:2)
I mean good grief, is the Cheeto going to scream when you bite down on it?
I just had a genius idea for a product. It’s time the world had some deep fried learning. So, anyone make edible AI chipsets?
Re: Oh FFS!!! (Score:2)
Yeah, they are called fried imitation brain slices. :)
I don't know if they are sold outside of my imagination though.
Re: (Score:2)
There is NO AI!
Oh FFS, "AI" is an industry standard term for machine learning systems. "Neural nets" is another industry standard term. They're not really neural, and they're not really learning, they're just adjusting weights in matrices at huge scale. But those are what the standard terms are.
And if you think "AI" or "learning" or "neural" are bad words for them because they don't relate to the narrow subset of behaviors that are (really and rightfully) called intelligence, you're just a curmudgeon.
Re: Oh FFS!!! (Score:2)
You stole the term for your shitty marketing purposes, and now have the audacity to act like you're the normal ones too??
No, it is a venture-capitalist-rip-off-industry standard term for matrix mutiplication functions used for pattern matching that really really REALLY has fucking nothing to do with artificial intelligence, and barely even with neural nets.
By your logic, I do "AI" when I transform my 3D model's vertices with a matrix in my game engine. Which goes to ahow how wrong that definition is.
Re: (Score:2)
It seems you don't understand the difference between a mathematical construct that can hold and process information and the information stored within it. Neural networks are a mathematical approximation to biological neural systems, an extraction of the fundamental mathematical behaviour, without the biologically imperfect representation of those rules. True, some of the current networks miss certain functions, however they can approximate them. This was been mathematically proven back in the 80s (though pr
Re: (Score:2)
Mod +1 Pedantic
Re: (Score:2)
Is this really AI?
Well, it depends on how you define "AI". It involves computer vision, which 25 years ago was very much under the umbrella of "Artificial Intelligence". It may involve some sort of trained "machine learning" model.
But "AI" is the technology of the gaps. A wise man once quipped "AI is whatever hasn't been done yet." Yesterday's "AI" is no longer recognizable as AI once the software has been widely deployed and adopted. Then it's just software.
Re: Is this really AI? (Score:2)
Yeah, AI implies something that has its own intelligence, like a brain. Coming up with things on its own.
Weight matrix functioms are not that.
They are just programmed differently.
You run them, check how close the result is to what you want, and then alter the weights a bit to get closer, until it's good enough.
Th
Calling them "neurons" is nothing but a ridiculous scam.
A big scam is all it is.
It's just that there are kids nowadaysy who grew into it, and think scamming *is* what a business does. And they are t
Re: Is this really AI? (Score:2)
Scamming is not good PR.
It is just a good trap for idiots. Bit it drives non-idiots away from you.
Bzt okay, you can have an industry out if nothing but scammers and idiots. I give you that. ;)
Rice (Score:2)
Yet we eat that now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Can you imagine even the grandest emperors of ancient china demanding that each grain of rice be hand-selected?
Yes, actually, I can picture that quite readily. Historically, monarchs have made all sorts of ridiculous, exorbitant demands.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Except instead of grains of rice, its cheeseburgers.
Rejoice! As the World is now saved (Score:1, Troll)
I wonder how the AI will react if... (Score:1)
I wonder how the AI will react if you feed it pictures of Trump. "It's too puffy, it's too orange, can't correct, abort, Abort!"
Cheetos Crunchy (Score:2)
is this spoof or real? (Score:3)
I've read the article through twice. I still can't tell if it's serious or deadpan spoof.
Re:is this spoof or real? (Score:5, Funny)
I've read the article through twice. I still can't tell if it's serious or deadpan spoof.
That’s probably because all the articles are generated by an AI to have uniform consistency and texture.
Re: is this spoof or real? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: is this spoof or real? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Smoke Sir Cheeto's Genuine Turkish Cigarettes - The Perfect Puff.
Can someone please explain to me... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Krispy Kreme did it first, didn't they? (Score:2)
Personally I prefer hand-made 'craft' cheetos. The flaws and variations make them more interesting.
In all seriousness why the hell do you need a freakin' 'AI' to do this anyway? Krispy Kreme made doughnuts with an automated machine to get them exactly the same. You're actually saying that they can't make a simple mechanical Cheet
Re: (Score:2)
Wasn't the whole point of Krispy Kreme that they were, for all intents and purposes, identical? Not great (tried one back in the day, wasn't impressed) but literally identical?
Personally I prefer hand-made 'craft' cheetos. The flaws and variations make them more interesting. /s
In all seriousness why the hell do you need a freakin' 'AI' to do this anyway? Krispy Kreme made doughnuts with an automated machine to get them exactly the same. You're actually saying that they can't make a simple mechanical Cheetos machine that makes them identical? This has got to be a joke.
Krispy Kremes directly out of their fryers were delicious. Krispy Kremes sitting on a gas station shelf for a couple days, not so much.
Are you asking for the "Artisan" Cheetos?
As an orange dust delivery system, they are mostly effective.
I don't ever remember any time in my life thinking "I could go for some Cheetos right now!"
Re: (Score:2)
.."Artisan"..
Yeah, that was the word I was looking for. xD
..and NO, I don't even eat things like Cheetos. :p
Re: Krispy Kreme did it first, didn't they? (Score:2)
You Americans should try Erdnussflips.
Think Cheetos, but savory peanut flavored, and shaped like packing peanuts,
They are quite popular here in Germany.
No artificial coloring or flavoring. Just lots of peanut flour, salt and some msg over corn puffs.
Making me Hungry (Score:2)
Its as much AI as a thermostat, but it's make me Hungry!
The perfect puff (Score:1)
comes out of my pot pipe. Frequently.
Re: The perfect puff (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So 20th century... put it in a good vaporizer and pack the leftovers into gel caps to use as a trippy fiber supplement.
Really? First one? (Not the message) (Score:2)
(I'm typing with Cheeto Dust on my fingers right now. it's the same as Dune's Spice IMHO, ignoring those minor pesky differences.)
Best (Score:2)
1/3 of the solution . . . (Score:2)
OK, the crunch is critical. Having just the right texture in every bite (not byte) just right.
Americans may remember back to a time when marketers learned to sell the 'sizzle' rather than the steak. It's the same principle. Remember, Pepsi sells sugar water. Marketing is everything when you sell such a basic commodity. They are right to emphasize that interesting texture in their basic puffed corn product.
Unfortunately, more is required in this case:
1 The fake cheese flavor. Gawd, that sucks!
2 The food colo
AI-Enabled food resemblence? (Score:2)
Why don't they use their shitty weight matrices to find out how to turn Cheetos into something that at least comes anywhere close to being food? You know ... for humans.
Why now? (Score:2)
Corpus training could be bad for your health (Score:2)
They should train it on the crunch sound, not the way it looks. And maybe on the amount of powder that rises when crushed? You have to like Cheetos a LOT to train this corpus..
Skynet AI is a reality (Score:1)
This has got to be... (Score:2)
... the silliest 21st century post so far this century. Is each Cheeto AI-enabled?