Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
NASA Government United States

Former Astronaut Wins US Senate Seat Once Held By Republican John McCain (yahoo.com) 82

"Mark Kelly will soon be the fourth NASA astronaut to serve in the U.S. Congress," writes People magazine.

DevNull127 shares their report: In a tweet posted Wednesday, he said he was "deeply honored" to have been elected and to serve in the seat once held by the late Sen. John McCain. A retired U.S. Navy captain and astronaut, Kelly has flown in four space missions, including the final mission of Space Shuttle Endeavour in 2011. He is married to former Arizona Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, [who] was shot and nearly killed in 2011.

His identical twin Scott Kelly is also a retired astronaut. The two participated in NASA's landmark "twins study," in which Scott spent a year aboard the space station while scientists collected Mark's physiological data back home for comparison...

When he is sworn in, Kelly will be the only active member of Congress to have flown in space. He is preceded by three former NASA astronauts: former Sens. John Glenn and Jack Schmitt and Rep. Jack Swigert. Two other former members of Congress — Sen. Jake Garn and Rep. Bill Nelson — have flown in space as payload specialists. Apollo 13 astronaut John "Jack" Swigert was elected to the House of Representatives in 1982, but died of cancer before he could take office.

Saturday Kelly tweeted, "Congratulations to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. We've got some challenges ahead of us, and I'm looking forward to working together to tackle them."

And the same day his brother Scott Kelly tweeted a memory about the moment he left the International Space Station after 500 days, "looked out the window of our space capsule at the truss, and was struck with awe at how we came together & accomplished this great feat.

"And that if we can do this, we can do anything if we commit ourselves and work together."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Former Astronaut Wins US Senate Seat Once Held By Republican John McCain

Comments Filter:
  • by XXongo ( 3986865 ) on Saturday November 07, 2020 @06:39PM (#60697488) Homepage
    Good to see an astronaut in the Senate again.
    • by rossdee ( 243626 )

      John McCain will be happy that his senate seat us occupied by a Navy flier. Pity that Marine gal running in KY didn't get in.

  • Not enough (Score:3, Insightful)

    by I'mjusthere ( 6916492 ) on Saturday November 07, 2020 @06:41PM (#60697496)
    Moscow Mitch McConnell is still in the Senate and it looks like he will be the Majority Leader again.

    So much for the Biden Presidency! He will do to Biden what the Republicans did to Obama from 1/2009-1/2017!

    • 01/2009 is wrong I think. Didn't the dems have the Presidency, the Senate (a 60 vote filibuster proof margin) and control of the House for the first 18 months or so of the Obama Administration.
      • Re:Not enough (Score:4, Interesting)

        by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 ) on Saturday November 07, 2020 @07:12PM (#60697602)

        Only for 12 months. In January 2010, Scott Brown won the special election to replace the recently deceased Ted Kennedy. That ended the 60 seat super-majority in the Senate.

        • And yet they didn't "fix" America then. But I am sure they are gonna "fix" it now, right?
          • That what the Dems got for trying to work with the Republicans instead of ramming through their bills.
            • That what the Dems got for trying to work with the Republicans instead of ramming through their bills.

              They did no such thing. They gave lip service to Republicans while trying to convince the Blue Dog Democrats in Congress to accept their more extreme ideas (like single-payer). They literally passed the most extreme thing they could get by their own party.

          • by leptons ( 891340 )
            At least the Democrats did better than trying to break America like the Republicans have done for so many years.

            There's a famous republican saying, "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub." - so when you say that Democrats didn't "fix" America, please also be aware of the menace of the GOP they are up against.
        • Less than that (Score:2, Insightful)

          by rsilvergun ( 571051 )
          there was a lot of seat shuffling in both the House & Senate. All told they held a majority for about 2 months. They squeezed the ACA through during that time and then McConnell & the GOP took over in the mid terms and the rest is history.
          • All told they held a majority for about 2 months.

            Are you on drugs again? Even if you mean "Supermajority" you are way way wrong. Listen to ShanghaiBill. He is one of your betters.

      • because of how various Congressmen were seated and when. Look it up. It was just enough time to squeeze the ACA through and nothing else.
        • by cusco ( 717999 )

          And that only happened because Romneycare (its original name) was exactly what the Republicans were going to insist on anyway. Otherwise they wouldn't have accomplished anything at all (Nancy Pelosi's normal plan of action).

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        by ChatHuant ( 801522 )

        >Didn't the dems have the Presidency, the Senate (a 60 vote filibuster proof margin)

        The trouble is that Democrats don't vote in a block like Republicans do; a super-majority in seats doesn't translate in a super-majority number of votes. That's why even the worst Republican president can be more effective in passing his policies than the best Democrat one. At least, that's balanced by the fact that Republican policies are generally badly thought out and therefore ineffective (though I believe that's int

        • Re:Not enough (Score:5, Insightful)

          by mvdwege ( 243851 ) <mvdwege@mail.com> on Sunday November 08, 2020 @03:46AM (#60698554) Homepage Journal

          Joe Biden is all for working together, up to a point. He absolutely has a lot less patience for obstructionism than Obama. Of course, that's because he can shout "Malarkey!" and "Will you shut up, man?!" without being cast as the Angry Black Man.

        • "swept the crimes of the Bush administration under the rug" funny
          everyone is screaming at each other about ALL the rampant crimes the other side is committing.
          No one has any plans to work together now that the Right side has full control.
          Both side are 110% positive they are the moral and righteous side that never does anything wrong.
        • President-Elect Biden is a few cans short of a six pack. And I doubt anyone is pointing out the fragile state of his presidency.
          He's not going to do much except appoint his cabinet and take the oath of office.
          The real question coming early next year is how the Progressives will handle the succession to President Harris(president in name Harris).

          America is just another banana republic now.
    • by caseih ( 160668 )

      Can we just stop with the name calling? I don't like McConnell either, but we don't need to stoop to Trump's low of childish nicknames. I was disappointed in Biden referring to Trump as a crazy uncle (although it was a good comparison).

      • Trump didn't invent name calling, for the record.
        Your mama did.
      • by mvdwege ( 243851 )

        The Trumpers made their bed, now they can lie in it. After four years of unrelenting shit, you have the gall to complain about a bit of nicknaming?

        To quote Trump voters: "Fuck your feelings"

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The run-off in January is going to be an epic battle. I see Democrats already starting to get 17 year olds registered to vote in it (they can register now if they will be 18 on the day) and I expect spending on those campaigns will be astronomical.

  • Not only is his seat now occupied by a Democrat, Arizona has gone for Biden (as far as we know at this point).

    • Not only is his seat now occupied by a Democrat, Arizona has gone for Biden (as far as we know at this point).

      It is fitting that Trump loses in AZ after his complete disrespect for John McCain, and I would not be surprised if that played a part in voters minds. I'm not American and if I was I would not be a Republican, but even from far away it is safe to say McCain had more decency and integrity than Trump could ever comprehend even if he lived to be 1000.

    • by Solandri ( 704621 ) on Sunday November 08, 2020 @05:05AM (#60698676)
      McCain was a centrist. Back when the Washington Post was keeping a database of every member of Congress' votes, you could sort it by how often members voted with their own party. McCain was usually around 75%-80% (vs 90%+ for all but a handful of Democrats and Republicans, with a good chunk of them at 98%-99%). I honestly don't think he would've cared whether his seat was won by a Democrat or a Republican. (The senator with the lowest percentage I saw was Olympia Snowe - Republican from Maine. She was usually around 60%.)

      The leadership of both parties wield way too much power. If you cross them too often, they withhold party campaign financing funds from your re-election campaign, which will usually sink any candidate without enough name recognition to survive on their own. IMHO this is a bigger problem than PACs.
  • A little insight (Score:5, Informative)

    by dschnur ( 61074 ) on Saturday November 07, 2020 @07:30PM (#60697650)
    I live in Arizona and my family has for close to 100 years.

    Though Arizona is commonly refereed to as a "Red State," it doesn't fit neatly in any mold.

    For example: The current Republican administration has made it clear that it sides "against" Hispanics in most ways that count. Even if you ignore illegal border crossings, Trump has revoked emergency authorizations for Hispanics to stay legally in the United States, and has said many things to get his base fired up against them.

    Arizona has a massive Hispanic population, many of which are from families that have been here much longer than mine. Because of that, there is a sense of outrage among many Arizonians that their friends and colleagues are being treated so badly. That simple fact doesn't fit in neatly with the canned Republican dogma so common today.

    Arizona is the home of Barry Goldwater, a republican senator who believed that government had no tuck in personal matters like sexuality. It's the home of John McCain, who voted with the Republican party most of the time, but when it counted, he voted against them.

    Because of that, and many more things, it's not a surprise that Arizona would elect not one, but two right-leaning Democrats to the senate.

    McSally was appointed to her position to fill the seat left open my McCain after she lost the previous senatorial race to Kristen Sinema, a Democrat. She also ran a poor and extremely negative campaign this time too, and positioned herself *far* too close to Trump to win. Because of that, she lost this election the same way she lost the last one.

    Many Arizonans are like McCain, they will vote their hearts above party.

    It's as Democracy should be.
    • Well said.

      And in my experience, Arizonans are not alone. There are still plenty of Americans who don't put party above all else, we've just been drowned out by the rabid partisan idiots that do.

    • Re:A little insight (Score:4, Informative)

      by bjdevil66 ( 583941 ) on Sunday November 08, 2020 @09:53AM (#60699144)

      Also a 5th-6th year Arizonan. Agree with what you said. While Kelly's campaign took the same tone throughout (striking a reconciliatory tone while hitting her on her pre-existing conditions votes), some of McSally's early ads were pretty bad - straight outta 1980's politics. (The dancing astronaut ad was bad, and the used car salesman ad was worse.) Whoever approved those ads should've been fired on the spot. OR someone in a super PAC was a Kelly plant. They were that bad.

      She eventually pivoted in tone to match Mark's campaign and made up some ground, but the damage was done.

      Being an astronaut aside, the bad part about having Kelly voted in is that having two Democrat senators doesn't fit the general populace at all. We really need one senator from each party here to make sure the growing Dem crowd is covered while the rural counties are still represented.

      And Kelly's views on gun control are the exact opposite of Arizona's gun culture. Arizona is widely known as the gun friendliest state in the union. Unless he moderates quickly on that issue, he's gonna be a one term senator.

    • AZ has blue heart :)

  • Right now, his being a Democrat is given less weight than his military/technical chops. He has the same career image as Goldwater and McCain did in their times. So long as his votes in the Senate are in line with state sensibilities, this is what will count.

    Another factor in Kelly's favor is that he was just elected to a fillout of the last two years of McCain's term, rather than a full six. We will have an early opportunity to rate his performance.

  • Identical twins, one's now a congressman? Come on, the hijinx practically writes itself!

  • Do a little digging into just who Mark Kelly is and you'll find he's not so good.

To stay youthful, stay useful.

Working...