In Brazil's Amazon a COVID-19 Resurgence Dashes Herd Immunity Hopes (reuters.com) 134
Anthony Boadle, reporting for Reuters: [...] In April and May, so many Manaus residents were dying from COVID-19 that its hospitals collapsed and cemeteries could not dig graves fast enough. The city never imposed a full lockdown. Non-essential businesses were closed but many simply ignored social distancing guidelines. Then in June, deaths unexpectedly plummeted. Public health experts wondered whether so many residents had caught the virus that it had run out of new people to infect. Research posted last week to medRxiv, a website distributing unpublished papers on health science, estimated that 44% to 66% of the Manaus population was infected between the peak in mid-May and August.
The study by the University of Sao Paulo's Institute of Tropical Medicine tested newly donated banked blood for antibodies to the virus and used a mathematical model to estimate contagion levels. The high infection rate suggested that herd immunity led to the dramatic drop in cases and deaths, the study said. Scientists estimate that up to 70 pct of the population may need to be protected against coronavirus to reach herd immunity. In Manaus, daily burials and cremations fell from a peak of 277 on May 1 to just 45 in mid-September, the mayor's office said. The COVID-19 death toll that officially peaked at 60 on April 30 dropped to just two or three a day by late August. Now the numbers are on the rise again.
The study by the University of Sao Paulo's Institute of Tropical Medicine tested newly donated banked blood for antibodies to the virus and used a mathematical model to estimate contagion levels. The high infection rate suggested that herd immunity led to the dramatic drop in cases and deaths, the study said. Scientists estimate that up to 70 pct of the population may need to be protected against coronavirus to reach herd immunity. In Manaus, daily burials and cremations fell from a peak of 277 on May 1 to just 45 in mid-September, the mayor's office said. The COVID-19 death toll that officially peaked at 60 on April 30 dropped to just two or three a day by late August. Now the numbers are on the rise again.
But what about herd mentality? (Score:5, Funny)
Surely herd mentality will save us all!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bovine or ovine?
Re:But what about herd mentality? (Score:4, Funny)
Entertainment? It's like watching two girls one cup, penis bird and lemon party on a continuous loop.
Re: (Score:3)
Covid-19
cov
Covfefe-19?
Re: (Score:2)
What garbage. You should feel embarrassed at this display of weakness. I pity you.
Public health and quarantines are all (Score:5, Insightful)
All we have now is public health and cutting of infected nations behind a wall of quarantine until they get their act together. Many countries in Europe succeeded in getting rid of the disease and were under control until they opened their borders, uncontrolled, to diseased nations. Now everybody needs to follow Vietnam, Thailand, Senegal, New Zealand, Ghana and Taiwan.
These are countries, most of them not islands, most of them not mega rich. From every type of culture, with varied but mostly high levels of freedom. Nothing special, just simple competent countries which have used their knowledge of basic public health measures to almost entirely eliminate the virus.
Re:Public health and quarantines are all (Score:5, Informative)
Many countries in Europe succeeded in getting rid of the disease and were under control until they opened their borders, uncontrolled, to diseased nations.
That's quite some ignorant waffle there. Not a single country in Europe ever managed to "get rid of the disease". Nearly all countries in Europe never closed their boarders to diseased nations. Nearly all countries in Europe started getting the second wave rise of cases before any international restrictions actually changed and for most countries in Europe the changes actually were to tighten restrictions rather than lift them.
Now back in reality, the rise in cases seems to coincide with re-opening the economy, removing local restrictions, and returning kids to school, with some cases being related to inter EU travel which down to some of the more stricken countries, but that was never banned in the first place.
Re: (Score:3)
Many countries in Europe succeeded in getting rid of the disease and were under control until they opened their borders, uncontrolled, to diseased nations.
That's quite some ignorant waffle there.
let's see
Not a single country in Europe ever managed to "get rid of the disease".
As an example, Slovakia had long periods with 0 infections per day, especially in June, despite a quite wide scale testing regime. See also Norway, Slovenia and Finland
Nearly all countries in Europe never closed their boarders to diseased nations.
To count as a "diseased nation" I would a minimum definition would be e.g. 50 infections per 100,000. The entirety of Europe was below this threshold at one point and at that point they closed the boarders to most of the world, including the USA which was the one country that was clearly failing at that point.
Nearly all countries in Europe started getting the second wave rise of cases before any international restrictions actually changed and for most countries in Europe the changes actually were to tighten restrictions rather than lift them.
The EU recommendation [europa.eu]
Re: (Score:2)
If these stats are accurate [statista.com], Slovakia was testing between a couple of thousand people a day to as low as 41 people during June. It's not terribly surprising that they'd be reporting zero new cases per day on many days during June with that level of testing, especially if the tests were less than ideally targetted.
Re: (Score:2)
Scotland came pretty close too, for a few weeks over the summer. Incredible considering they have an open border with England where the virus is running rife.
Re:Public health and quarantines are all (Score:4, Insightful)
Nearly all countries in Europe never closed their boarders to diseased nations.
That is nonsense. From March till June all borders were closed.
Re: (Score:2)
Be specific about which border and which point I made you're talking about.
As someone who regularly travelled between EU countries during the pandemic I assure no borders were closed, some were controlled but non were closed.
As someone who has lots of contact with people who travel beyond the EU borders I assure you almost nothing which was previously closed is currently open and all those "closures" both then and now applied only to completely voluntarily travel and didn't actually block any kind of busine
Re: (Score:2)
All borders inside of the eu were closed for "non essential" traffic.
If you could pass them, then probably for work. Everything else was closed down.
Re: (Score:3)
So in otherwords all the borders were completely open, because no one defined or even asked about "essential traffic". Hell you're not even following your own country's policies properly. In the very middle of the pandemic I drove straight through Germany on the E30. There were zero border people to be seen where your A30 joins the Netherlands, there were police standing doing absolutely nothing on the A12 going into Poland. On the way back from Poland I got stopped and asked where I was going, I said Nethe
Re:Public health and quarantines are all (Score:4, Informative)
New Zealand has Auckland under full a lockdown again
What shit are you reading? Honestly, where do you get your news? Auckland has had zero new cases for days and has already started easing restrictions with a return to almost no restrictions expected within a bit over a week.
Overall, New Zealand now has far less restriction than the United States, simply because they took a short term restriction and in particular as the price of freedom. You have forgotten what people had to pay for your freedom and just begun to take it for granted.
Re: (Score:2)
Better living conditions? What the fuck are you smoking?
No, they're overcrowded and can't isolate--even if they want to--or reasonably quarantine cases, and inmates are at extreme risk of catching COVID.
Re: (Score:2)
Viruses don't care about rights. Neither do earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, floods, droughts, supernovas and a myriad other natural disasters. The universe doesn't hate humans, we are just utterly irrelevant. You're not special, and neither am I.
Re: (Score:2)
Viruses don't need to care about rights, but we do. You don't give up your freedom for your life, you give up your life for freedom.
Re: (Score:2)
Viruses don't care about freedom. They work by immutable natural rules built over billions of years. If you want people to get out of this thing relatively intact, the idea that any ideology, no matter how righteous, will preserve us is nothing more than infantile magical thinking. Even before we knew what caused pandemics, we knew how to deal with them. Highly communicable diseases are beaten by controlling infection. They figured that out during the Black Death, and the rules haven't changed just because
Re: (Score:3)
LOL! Auckland in "full lockdown", bah ha ha!
I actually live in Auckland, for just over TWO weeks we had the kids at home from school, then life went pretty much back to normal (that's pre-COVID normal to you foreigners) as we dropped down a lockdown level apart from having to wear masks on public transport, oh, and table service at the bars for last week and this week, which I actually prefer.
"Full lockdown", I guess that's what Fox "News" or some white male boomer on YouTube has been telling you?
Re: (Score:2)
I pretty much have full freedom *and never really entirely lost it.*
Re: (Score:2)
Here's a reality check for you:
https://ourworldindata.org/gra... [ourworldindata.org]
Re: (Score:2)
It's a pandemic. People die. You don't give up your freedom for your life, you give up your life for your freedom. Winston Churchill didn't throw in the towel because some people might die, neither has anybody with the smallest bit of a backbone.
Re: (Score:2)
It's super wierd that you think isolating and spending extra time staying on the couch and watching TV is the equivalent of surrendering to Hitler. I would encourage you to take care of yourself, this pandemic has been tough on mental healt
Summary is terrible. (Score:3)
Only the last sentence matches the title. We need more explanation for that part than the way it was before.
Re: (Score:2)
They are Number 1 in new cases in South America.
https://www.worldometers.info/... [worldometers.info]
Peru has most COVID per capita in S. America (Score:3)
Half the population of South America lives in Brazil. So let's make it fair by sorting your worldometers table by its per capita columns:
- French Guiana, Peru, and Chile have more cases per capita and more tests per capita than Brazil.
- Peru and Bolivia have more deaths per capita than Brazil.
Story not the same as the headline (Score:3)
The story doesn't really support the headline. They arguably got herd immunity, now maybe that's not good enough. They don’t know yet.
Notice that none of these news stories ever emphasize the positive possibilities? They almost always seem to cheer for the virus.
Re: (Score:3)
I believe they got herd immunity, it is just that herd immunity is not magic.
Herd immunity just means that the decrease in susceptible people lowers R to less than 1. The virus doesn't have a kill switch that triggers once 70% of the population is infected. Even with herd immunity and vaccines, the virus will continue to be with us for a very long time even when the numbers are small enough for it to stop being a major concern.
And not only that, Manaus is presumably not an isolated system. So even if it bec
Re:Story not the same as the headline (Score:5, Informative)
Why bother now that it is practically over? (Score -1, Flamebait) 110 by flyingfsck on Sunday April 26, 2020 @12:47AM (#59991538) Attached to: Should GPS Also Be Used For Contact Tracing?
About 20% of Americans already had it and about 50% or Europeans. https://www.youtube.com/watch [youtube.com]?... It is time to stop the lockdowns and go back to normal.
https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=16248186&cid=59991538
Re: (Score:3)
While we're at it, i can predict with 100% confidence that some day in the future no one will die of Covid.
I can also predict with 100% confidence that some day in the future no one will die period. And also that on some other day in the future everyone will die.
If we're very lucky the all-deaths day will come very far in the future after a large number of no-deaths day before it. But unfortunately that's not the way i'd want to bet.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately the graph of new cases [worldometers.info] shows a very different story - UK cases have surged higher than ever before in the last month. Deaths lag cases, but the deaths graph has already started its upward trend, with more than triple the deaths a month ago.
No (Score:5, Insightful)
Pure sensationalism. No definition of what rise means. Sensationalistic headline when the paper was about whether this city had gotten to herd immunity but the headline suggests herd immunity was achieved but doesn't work omggg!
Author could would not comment. Still in peer review.
Article is crap sensationalism nobody but an editor looking for clicks could love.
Re: (Score:2)
Add water to your lawn and your grass is surging.
If it's snowing outside, you get to write Snow Is Surging.
Re: (Score:2)
You are questioning the definition of "rise"? You know, more than you had previously.
"Numbers are on the rise again" is a bunch of bull (Score:3)
By how much? And why? If death toll dropped from 60 to 2-3 per day, some people will naturally stop taking precautions and get sick. And immunity doesn't have to be permanent to control the pandemic. It could be that most people will get re-exposed within 2-3 months that immunity lasts and get natural boosters. T-cell immunity could last much longer than antibodies and provide protection from severe cases. The whole article seems to be alarmism without proof.
Doesn't just dash herd immunity hopes (Score:5, Insightful)
TFA didn't touch on this but if we don't develop a long term immunity from actually contracting the disease, what does that say about the efficacy of a vaccine?
That being said, I'd first caution that "antibodies" are not synonymous with "long term immunity". You can be immune without having antibodies in your blood. Presumably the paper authors know this. I'm less certain about Reuters reporters.
Second, immune systems are complicated. I'd be pretty surprised you can make a vaccine which is more effective than an actual infection but won't go so far as to say it's impossible. I'm not a doctor, what do I know?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be pretty surprised you can make a vaccine which is more effective than an actual infection but won't go so far as to say it's impossible.
Prepared to be surprised at well-known and overwhelming science!
Smallpox has been eradicated almost entirely due to vaccinations. The vaccination campaign against polio has been almost as successful. There is an overwhelming negative correlation [wikipedia.org] between measles infection and vaccination rates.
Re: (Score:3)
COVID19 is a bit different. It initially lives and reproduces on the surface of the lungs. There are no antibodies on the lungs - but there are other means by which your body suppresses infection. Antibodies might prevent you from getting sick and can limit the infection to your lungs but you can still, in theory, contract and transmit COVID19 despite the presence of antibodies.
I am all for vaccines, but COVID19 is going to be a tough one to manage. The virus actually has to potential of being here f
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be pretty surprised you can make a vaccine which is more effective than an actual infection but won't go so far as to say it's impossible.
They are trying to create antibodies to specific proteins that might not naturally end up as targets. They do this by creating fragments of the virus from DNA sequences. This means it's a very different system from an entire virus and entirely possible that it ends up either much weaker or noticeably stronger than natural immunity. There are quite a number of different vaccines being attempted from different approaches so I'd say there's an explicit hope that they could create long term immunity even if
Re: (Score:2)
TFA didn't touch on this but if we don't develop a long term immunity from actually contracting the disease, what does that say about the efficacy of a vaccine?
Exactly the same as the efficacy of every other vaccine which is to say how vaccines work and simply having had the virus at some point are two very different things.
It means the vaccine only works (Score:2)
The summary isn't clear (Score:5, Informative)
The summary did mention one critical thing, which is that cases are going back up in the city (as on poster already noted they're leveling off in Brazil as a whole, but the spot that matters is this city because they're at the "herd immunity" numbers).
So this city is at the point where they should be seeing case drops due to H.I. but they're not. And it's very likely because immunity only lasts a short while.
This also means a vaccine is useless in countries like America where 30-40% will refuse to take it. The only way a vaccine can work is that if everybody gets it save the very, very immunocompromised. Here in the states you'll have numbskulls in their 20s that go rock climbing on the weekend claiming "I'm immunocompromised!". Doesn't help that anti-vax is a political issue here. >
TL;DR; baring a miracle America is going to be awash in pandemic for 2-4 years thanks to human stupidity.
Re:The summary isn't clear (Score:4, Insightful)
So this city is at the point where they should be seeing case drops due to H.I. but they're not. And it's very likely because immunity only lasts a short while.
Or it is because people have stopped being scared to go to the city, so you're getting new people who don't have immunity. Also, even with antibodies, immunity is not 100%. You can still get the disease even with antibodies; you're just less likely to get it and considerably less likely to have a severe case of it.
This also means a vaccine is useless in countries like America where 30-40% will refuse to take it. The only way a vaccine can work is that if everybody gets it save the very, very immunocompromised.
That depends on the mutation rate. A virus with a low mutation rate can burn itself out in a larger non-immunized subpopulation than a virus whose mutation rate is high. That's why there's at least a chance of success of using vaccines to eliminate COVID-19 in spite of the anti-vaxxers, unlike with influenza, where you'd have to basically hit 100% coverage worldwide.
That said, if the vaccine is useless in America, it's also useless in the rest of the world unless all travel from America is permanently banned.
Oh, and one other thing you missed is that immunization, even long after antibodies are gone, can have a significant impact on your body's response to a virus (for better or worse). So there's some possibility that vaccination will significantly reduce mortality among the vaccinated long after the antibodies are gone and the virus has mutated to the point that the vaccine no longer prevents infection. So even if the virus only eliminates the 70% of deaths that would occur in non-anti-vaxxers, it would still be a huge win.
If a couple of people wandering in sick from anoth (Score:2)
Worse actually, because the virus is likely to mutate, and not the good "mutate to be less lethal" way but bad as in "mutate to spread faster".
Europe & Canada are both way ahead of you on banning Americans.
One more thing (Score:2)
So we need to stop talking about just "death" and consider the ones who don't die, but are permanently maimed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because COVID-19 attacks the lungs with a sharpie.
Re: (Score:3)
I've read before, that it causes permanent lung damage. My question is, how can anyone possibly know the effects are "permanent"?
Because the tissues that are being damaged, are the kinds that the body doesn't repair?
Re: (Score:2)
No, I meant that people from the other areas could be the ones getting sick.
The study is on people from inside the city (Score:2)
The point the researchers are making is that that cases in the city are going up even though they should be at numbers that would indicate Herd Immunity.
That point wouldn't even make sense if they were talking about the country as a whole or even the surrounding area.
Re: (Score:2)
Does the study ask the sick people, "Were you living here six months ago?"
My point is that an influx of people changes the percentage of people who are immune, and those new people coming in are not immune. And they're coming into a high-density area that makes spreading a contagion extremely easy, and in particular, a high-density area where that contagion is known to be spreading.
The surrounding state as a whole isn't anywhere close to herd immunity levels:
Amazonas state population: 3.874 million
Amaz
Guinea pigs, heroes, or both? (Score:2)
We should thank Brazil for testing these theories so we don't have to...hopefully.
Re: (Score:2)
Brazil, India and USA are the world Guinea Pigs... THANK YOU !!
Re: (Score:2)
Brazil, India and USA are the world Guinea Pigs... THANK YOU !!
Don't thank them too much. These countries are also the viruses petri dish where it gets to try new mutations and eventually find ones which allow it to overcome whatever forms of immunity we develop. If all the countries in the world were as sensible as Vietnam over this virus then we simply wouldn't have a problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Vietnam recently let some business people in and now their cases are going up. It's hard to seal off a country.
Re: (Score:2)
"On the rise"? (Score:2)
Now the numbers are on the rise again.
And those numbers are... nowhere to be found anywhere in the article. So I guess we'll just have to take their word for it. Why are writers so lazy?
I dont get it.... (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't understand why people are pushing naturally acquired herd immunity as a valid valid strategy.
In order to reach immunity without a vaccine, you have to let 70 - 90% of your population catch the disease - the one we are trying to avoid. You then have to accept the fatalities and long term complications across that 70-90%, a staggering number of casualties.
A *disturbing* number of people seem to be OK with that kind of collateral damage versus just staying home and/or wearing masks for a couple of months. Has society become less compassionate, or is it a product of some countries not having a social security safety net.
Re: (Score:3)
From what I've seen, a lot of anti-mask people seem to be under the impression that the masks are supposed to protect them, so the whole moral/ethics/freedom thing is reversed in their thinking, i.e. "You can't force me to wear a mask if I don't want to!" type of thing.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand why people are pushing naturally acquired herd immunity as a valid valid strategy.
Because they think it will always be *other people* dying, and unfortunately, over 90% of them would be proven correct in the end.
It seemed that people in some countries are ok with 1-5% of their population dying, while people in some other countries are not ok with it if lockdown/quarantine/masks/social distancing can prevent it.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably because herd immunity is what would normally end a pandemic like this one, and the idea of stopping a respiratory disease with characteristics so unfavourable to any kind of containment as Covid-19 is basically completely unprecedented and untested. Staying home and/or wearing masks for a couple of months is absolutely not close to enough - most of Europe already tried that, and all it did was delay things for a few months at vast, unbelievable costs.
Re: (Score:2)
Herd Immunity is the only valid strategy, that's why.
You can vaccinate everyone (with an untested, rushed-to-market vaccine that usually takes years, if not decades to develop) and you end up with 70% of the population immune to the virus - which is herd immunity.
The idea here is that you let the people who are not going to be affected (ie the young, where we have seen in statistics that the death rate is minimal to insignificant for those under 65) "vaccinate" themselves with the live virus to get the same
Re: (Score:2)
Theere are cost/benefit studies for Covid too, like this one [unsw.edu.au], or this one [virginia.edu] that go into some detail about the broad social costs of individuals getting infected, many (though not all) finding that lockdowns save far more money than they cost.
As for the lower current death rate, this is very much why we had those earlier lockdowns - to buy time to improve our treatments and resources. Deaths were much higher then because we were unprepared - we didn't have enough knowledge or equipment so hospitals were overw
Re: (Score:2)
Old and recent numbers are difficult to compare in France because the testing strategy is very different. In March, the tests were in very limited supply and were performed according to strict criteria (strong symptoms, people with preexisting conditions, medical staff, ...). The actual number of infected people was around 10 times the official number. This is not a conspiracy theory. That fact was widely known and accepted. For instance, in May, the Institut Pasteur estimated that around 2.8 million people
Re: (Score:2)
Part of the problem is that the American press - especially the New York Times - generally glosses over how bad testing was in Europe back then and how meaningless the case numbers were in order to use the fact the US has reported more total cases to convince their readers it is doing uniquely, spectacularly worse at handling Covid-19 because of Trump. (Also that it has uniquely and spectacularly failed at testing due to Trump, when in reality it's been doing better at that than pretty much everyone else fo
This was autoposted... (Score:2)
Sorry, the Slashdot AI got confused with the mention of "Amazon"...
Could flu vaccination worsen Covid? (Score:2)
This is a bit of a long shot to explain the Manaus data, but here goes...
-- There's a strong correlation between Covid-19 lethality in a country, and that country's level of influenza vaccination (esp. among seniors, where most of the impact is). See this graphic [twitter.com] (includes link to dataset).
-- This preprint paper: "Inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine is associated with lower mortality among Covid-19 patients in Brazil" [medrxiv.org], makes the opposite assertion: "patients who received a recent influenza vaccine expe
Re:I would rather die (Score:5, Funny)
Then live like livestock being protected from sickness.
And you just may. Do you also refuse to wear oven mitts because they may you look afraid of the oven?
Re: (Score:2)
"And you just may. Do you also refuse to wear oven mitts because they may you look afraid of the oven?"
He prefers to look surprised when touching the hot metal.
Re:I would rather die (Score:5, Informative)
What people forget is that the isolation is not only because of the risk of dying from COVID, but (probably mainly) to avoid what happened in Manaus (and Spain, and Italy and NY) where hospitals were overwhelmed and people who would not otherwise die from an accident or disease end up so, it is to avoid a lot of unnecessary pain and suffering, including possible to you if you are young and healthy and unlikely to get severely ill from COVID but can get into a car accident or fall from a ladder or get food poisoning or plain old appendicitis.
Because of assholes that insist of not using PPE, keeping safe distance and minimizing their movement when possible that in a lot of places hospitals collapsed and the pandemic is taking a LOT longer to be controlled.
Cue the outrage..... (Score:3)
The reality I've seen is that the VAST majority of people I encounter where I live, even when I visit other cities around here, DO follow all the mandated precautions. They're trying to keep a social distance and they're wearing the masks.
Yet, the reports keep wavering back and forth between "numbers are declining" to "we're seeing another surge in cases". And every time the numbers go up, people start pointing fingers at "those assholes who won't wear a mask". At some point, there's just a disconnect betw
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, I just can't accept this concept that a mask only blocks the virus transmission in one direction. If it serves a real purpose at blocking water vapor being exhaled by the wearer, and therefore keeps the virus from spreading outwards from them to others? It only makes sense that it provides the same level of protective barrier against the water-borne virus droplets from being INHALED.
Think about a standing fan. If you stand just in front of it, there is a strong cooling effect. If you stand behind it, the cooling effect is very weak. This is because the fan blows air strongly in a single direction, while the air "intake" comes from any direction air can be sucked from, spread roughly evenly. So the air velocity is much higher at the output than the input.
About the same is true of masks. People eject moist breath from their mouths at high speed by talking or coughing, similar to a fan. T
Re: (Score:2)
Then live like livestock being protected from sickness.
And you just may. Do you also refuse to wear oven mitts because they may you look afraid of the oven?
He'd rather die of starvation than be as unimportant as whoever cooks his meals. So "no."
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Tard answer to a tard question
Ask yourself, "would I take a vaccine to keep from killing my elderly family members"
If the answer is no, then you are not suited to live in a society can can head for the hills any day
Re:I would rather die (Score:5, Insightful)
I would rather die then live like livestock being protected from sickness.
This isn't about you, this is about the people you will infect. So unless you are talking about eating a bullet then you're just being selfish. Wear a damn mask.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't about you, this is about the people you will infect. So unless you are talking about eating a bullet then you're just being selfish. Wear a damn mask.
Maybe you're on to something! I don't know of a study, but I think it's self-evident that bullets are more effective than masks at preventing transmission.
Re: (Score:2)
Well,
if you want to be certain, you use a flame thrower.
Re: (Score:2)
B, but mah writes!
Re: (Score:2)
This is America, I'm sure you can find a gun somewhere, LIVE YOUR DREAM!
Re: (Score:2)
Its the fault of sheep like you that I can't go to a bar. I would rather you died too
Re: (Score:2)
Its the fault of sheep like you that I can't go to a bar.
If only there were mod points for fitting the stereotype.
Re: (Score:2)
If immunity only lasts a few months, then there is no eradicating this disease. Essentially the choice is accept the current state of lockdown as just the state in which we live life now, or say "fuck it" and let the cards fall where they may.
Basically, if you want to go to a bar you'll (eventually) want to join his team. The mask and social distance crowd's tactics would basically mean that restaurants, bars, etc, are just a thing of the past.
Personally, I'm wearing my mask and social distancing. I have
Re: (Score:2)
Well, golly, too bad the only thing you had in your life was drinking yourself to a stupor at the bar.
Why don't you start a big zoom meeting group for drinkers, it will be just like you're drinking in the bar but nobody has to smell each other.
Re: (Score:2)
Than?
Or do you prefer to die and then be reincarnated as livestock being protected from sickness?
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know which question to ask first!
1) Why do you want to die and then live like livestock?
2) How can you die and then live like livestock? (Obviously it would be a lot easier to do those things in the opposite order, but you're quite explicit about the order you want, so it's clear that easiness isn't among your top priorities.)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Falling actually. Here is a graph:
The article says Manus, the Grandparent said "they are referring to Manaus", "rather than Brazil" and yet, you repeat Brazil. Do you honestly believe that Slashdotters have such a short attention and reading ability they wouldn't notice ... oh.
Carry on. Sorry I contradicted you.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The article has no current data about infections in Manaus.
Here's what it says:
1. Months ago, the daily death rate was in the hundreds.
2. The death rate then fell to 3 per day.
3. Now it is "on the rise".
On the rise to what? 4?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
WHERE?!
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, his link links to a graph of Brazil. If you go from that page and click around you can find Amazonia. That information is still not useful since we aren't talking about Amazonia, we're talking about Manaus. One specific town in Amazonia. It is fully possible for it to be true that infection is increasing in Manaus but falling in the rest of Amazonia since peak infection more recently. That means the link is useless to someone who can read.
Re: (Score:2)
As opposed to the scaremongering story that says one town in all of Brazil has seen a spike in deaths leading the implication that we're all going to die?
If you want a true picture you have to look at all the data, not throw away 99% of it because it doesn't fit what you wanted it to be.
Re: (Score:2)
As opposed to the scaremongering story that says one town in all of Brazil has seen a spike in deaths leading the implication that we're all going to die?
If you want a true picture you have to look at all the data, not throw away 99% of it because it doesn't fit what you wanted it to be.
In a sense that's a fair comment - the data of one town might be inadequate. However you have to say that and provide evidence. E.g. "this level of fluctuation has a 5% chance of happening by chance and although this is true in this town, when we look at all the other towns in Brazil no similar event has been detected. Unfortunately nobody is saying anything like that.
Re:Not on the rise, leveled off (Score:4, Interesting)
They also noted that:
In Manaus, daily burials and cremations fell from a peak of 277 on May 1 to just 45 in mid-September, the mayor's office said. The COVID-19 death toll that officially peaked at 60 on April 30 dropped to just two or three a day by late August. Now the numbers are on the rise again.
Which seems to indicate that the official counts are low, if not complete fabrications
Re: (Score:2)
Herd immunity requires over 90% to have already been infected; it is completely useless when the "immunity" is from past infection.
Useful herd immunity is when over 90% have evolved a genetic resistance to the disease. That's the type of immunity where nobody is sick anymore! The other type, public health is at a low because of all the people with ongoing side effects of the disease.
And you're illiterate. The article linked says the opposite of what you think it said, because you can't read content, you can
Re:Not on the rise, leveled off (Score:4, Informative)
Close, let me fix that for you:
The herd immunity threshold varies based on the method of transmission and properties of the specific disease. For COVID-19 it's estimated as somewhere around 60-75% must be immune; it is irrelevant whether the immunity is from past infection, vaccination, or genetic immunity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
It's also important to recognize that individuals don't evolve - evolution is something that happens to future generations because individuals without the trait start dying en-masse in this one before having kids. Or more generally, over the course of many generations, because individuals with the trait have more children that survive to adulthood than those without.
Re: (Score:2)
Herd immunity is real, it's spectacular, and requires a lot less than 70% [medrxiv.org] infection rate.
That is nonsense.
Herd immunity has a super simple principle. A infected person enters a room with e.g. 10 people. It spreads the virus, but by happen chance it only hits those who had it already. So: nothing happens. No new infection.
70% - depending on spread rate, is basically the lowest level where "herd immunity" is even remotely possible.
For ebola, herd immunity would probably be around 97% ... Go figu
Re: (Score:2)
I simplified it for ppl like you :D
And it is obviously still not simple enough for you to grasp ...