New Studies Warn of Cataclysmic Solar Superstorms (scientificamerican.com) 102
A powerful disaster-inducing geomagnetic storm is an inevitability in the near future, likely causing blackouts, satellite failures, and more. From a report: Unlike other threats to our planet, such as supervolcanoes or asteroids, the time frame for a cataclysmic geomagnetic storm -- caused by eruptions from our sun playing havoc with Earth's magnetic field -- is comparatively short. It could happen in the next decade -- or in the next century. All we know is, based on previous events, our planet will almost definitely be hit relatively soon, probably within 100 years. Geomagnetic storms are caused by sunspots, solar flares and coronal mass ejections, resulting in calamities to which our modern technological society is becoming ever more susceptible.
Most experts regard the Carrington Event, a so-called superstorm that occurred in September 1859, as the most powerful geomagnetic storm on record. But new data suggest that a later storm in May 1921 may have equaled or even eclipsed the Carrington Event in intensity, causing at least three major fires in the U.S., Canada and Sweden -- and highlighting the damaging effects these storms can have on Earth today. In a paper published in the journal Space Weather, Jeffrey Love of the U.S. Geological Survey and his colleagues reexamined the intensity of the 1921 event, known as the New York Railroad Storm, in greater detail than ever before.
Although different measures of intensity exist, geomagnetic storms are often rated on an index called disturbance storm time (Dst) -- a way of gauging global magnetic activity by averaging out values for the strength of Earth's magnetic field measured at multiple locations. Our planet's baseline Dst level is about -20 nanoteslas (nT), with a "superstorm" condition defined as occurring when levels fall below -250 nT. Studies of the very limited magnetic data from the Carrington Event peg its intensity at anywhere from -850 to -1,050 nT. According to Love's study, the 1921 storm, however, came in at about -907 nT. "The 1921 storm could have been more intense than the 1859 storm," Love says. "Prior to our paper, [the 1921 storm] was understood to be intense, but how intense wasn't really clear."
Most experts regard the Carrington Event, a so-called superstorm that occurred in September 1859, as the most powerful geomagnetic storm on record. But new data suggest that a later storm in May 1921 may have equaled or even eclipsed the Carrington Event in intensity, causing at least three major fires in the U.S., Canada and Sweden -- and highlighting the damaging effects these storms can have on Earth today. In a paper published in the journal Space Weather, Jeffrey Love of the U.S. Geological Survey and his colleagues reexamined the intensity of the 1921 event, known as the New York Railroad Storm, in greater detail than ever before.
Although different measures of intensity exist, geomagnetic storms are often rated on an index called disturbance storm time (Dst) -- a way of gauging global magnetic activity by averaging out values for the strength of Earth's magnetic field measured at multiple locations. Our planet's baseline Dst level is about -20 nanoteslas (nT), with a "superstorm" condition defined as occurring when levels fall below -250 nT. Studies of the very limited magnetic data from the Carrington Event peg its intensity at anywhere from -850 to -1,050 nT. According to Love's study, the 1921 storm, however, came in at about -907 nT. "The 1921 storm could have been more intense than the 1859 storm," Love says. "Prior to our paper, [the 1921 storm] was understood to be intense, but how intense wasn't really clear."
So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:5, Insightful)
It only mentioned a forest fire back in the days...how does such an even cause forest fires?
I was under the assumption that it would fry out electronics like an EMP...is that more the scenario?
How widespread would ti be? Is any electronic under threat or mostly like CPU's, etc?
Would it effect the whole earth or just the side that was facing the sun upon event impact?
Re:So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:5, Informative)
Would it effect the whole earth or just the side that was facing the sun upon event impact?
The Carrington even lasted two days, so it could impact the entire planet.
I think the biggest problem is the electric grid's power transformers. If these burn out on a massive scale, it will take a very long time to fix, especially when the power is out, and people start freaking out.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Alright, so here's a question. If we have a way of seeing it coming, could we theoretically shut down EVERYTHING, turn off every single power plant and transformer etc., then boot it all up a couple of days later when the storm has passed?
Those are going to be a sucky couple of days, especially in winter because you'll be without heat, but it's a short enough period that it should be survivable - food in the fridge won't have time to go bad, the freezer might thaw out but the food itself should stay edible
Re: (Score:2)
If it happens in the winter many in the mid-west wouldn't be without heat because storms cause power outages and they plan accordingly. We haven't had a bad one where I live for almost a decade and are due another big storm with multiple days of power outages so I'm already preparing.
Re: (Score:2)
At any time other than late September or late March, it's winter somewhere on Earth.
Re: (Score:2)
If it happens in the winter many in the mid-west wouldn't be without heat because storms cause power outages and they plan accordingly. We haven't had a bad one where I live for almost a decade and are due another big storm with multiple days of power outages so I'm already preparing.
But many would. I learned that lesson after ice storms in Missouri left me without power for more than a week. Gas heating is useless unless you can power the furnace. Now I keep a backup generator, 120 pounds of propane, and 25 gallons of kerosene just in case.
Re: (Score:2)
Please! Just nobody tell facebook.
Re:So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Faraday duct tape EVERYTHING!
Re: (Score:2)
Additionally, modern society simply cannot "just turn everything off" for "a couple of days".
Without refrigeration and "just in time" delivery, large urban centers (CITIES) would be in deep shit almost immediately due to supply depletion.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think shutting down grid-powered electric currents would do anything. What the solar storm will do will induce very high current through anything conductive. You need to have Faraday cages around all your electronics to protect from that.
The currents involved are not that high to cause destruction by themselves. But the common mode induced current easily drives a power transformer into saturation and that is what destroys it. Magnetic amplifiers take advantage of this mode of transformer operation to act as amplifiers.
Re: (Score:3)
Alright, so here's a question. If we have a way of seeing it coming, could we theoretically shut down EVERYTHING, turn off every single power plant and transformer etc., then boot it all up a couple of days later when the storm has passed?
We do have ways to see it coming. Solar storms take about three days to get to earth. They are often associated with coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that can be observed with a telescope as they occur on the sun.
Those are going to be a sucky couple of days, especially in winter because you'll be without heat, but it's a short enough period that it should be survivable - food in the fridge won't have time to go bad, the freezer might thaw out but the food itself should stay edible long enough etc.
You may not need to turn everything off, but certainly you would need to design hardened systems that can withstand such events, and/or disconnect widespread power-distribution systems into smaller subsystems. Riding it out in space is more challenging, because spacecraft can pick up strong deep stati
Re: (Score:2)
Ways to see it coming are getting better as well : https://www.esa.int/Our_Activi... [esa.int]
The grid can be hardened with some notice time to allow it to ride out a storm. This is important, because there are a very limited number of replacement transformers available at any one time and they take months to manufacture.
Re: (Score:2)
It may be sucky for you, but it's going to be deadly for some. Woe to you if you happened to be on a ventilator or where dependent on supplementary O2. Can you imagine how many folks are going to die?
You and I may be fine, I know me and my family would survive with the water and food and fuel we have on hand quite comfortably and I have arms and ammo enough to protect ourselves.. We might actually have some fun together with the closet full of board games and no computers to isolate ourselves with. But my
Re: (Score:1)
Doesn't stop PG&E from turning off the power for several days whenever it looks a little windy outside.
Re: (Score:3)
The 1858 Carrington event caused havoc with telegraph systems all over the world, including discharges.
Carrington was a massive nothing burger. In an era of piss poor circuit protection there were only small outages that lasted hours. Vast majority of the system was operational for the duration.
Re: (Score:1)
And everything at that point was largely nice thick wiring without active semiconductor devices all over the place. (Cat's whiskers notwithstanding, because we didn't put billions of them in a tiny space back then.)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be MORE afraid of it happening in the summer heat without air conditioning (down here, AC clicks on basically in mid to late April and doesn't really click off for any length of time till first part of November).
Food
Re: (Score:2)
Even with spoilage, if it's only two or three days most people (let's ignore the previous point about the elderly, the sick etc. because we are talking about a worst case scenario for civilization at large) should survive going without food for a couple of days.
Re: (Score:2)
A couple days sure.
I have a feeling something like this could knock things out for at least 1-2 weeks, towards the end of that, things could get messy.
And if power goes off....I'm be a bit worried about convicts breaking out of prison, and well...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
While I don't think that that's going to be nearly as much of an issue as you seem to, just remember, your best friends in such a situation are Mr Smith & Mr Wesson....
Re: (Score:2)
Unless the current gang of Dem. presidential contenders get their way and take my best self defense guns for that type of situation away.....I'd REALLY want capacity for that scenario.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:2)
Even though modern cars are shielded to some extent, a really big storm would fry a lot of the cars out there, especially electric ones with all the goodies on board.
Would be nice to find an an old pre 80's diesel VW for just such emergencies, but most have probably been crushed by now.
Re: (Score:2)
Here is how you deal with it. You retain manual systems and couriers on diesel motorbikes and in the event of a disaster, you use those the manage the bureaucracy of rebuilding the digital and power systems, with spare parts in storage. Without the management systems, to manage the repairs society will collapse in the chaos. Even diesel trucks will need to be maintained just in case.
Re: (Score:2)
Check...so, making sure to keep stocked on water, fuel, food, guns and ammo.
Re: (Score:2)
...and booze, drugs and cigarettes.
Re: (Score:2)
...and booze, drugs and cigarettes.
and toilet paper...
I'm not wiping with leaves!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:2)
Re:So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:5, Informative)
I think the biggest problem is the electric grid's power transformers. If these burn out on a massive scale, it will take a very long time to fix, especially when the power is out, and people start freaking out.
Fortunately they won't. There are circuit breakers throughout the system. There have to be, for maintenance and for dealing with the asshole colliding with a utility pole, bringing it down and shorting the conductors together. Also for dealing with wind storms tearing up poles and transmission towers.
Search YouTube for substation circuit breaker arcs. Actually breaking the circuit when you're talking about tens of thousands of volts in air is a nontrivial problem, but it is a solved problem. There are six different ways of doing it in common usage. High voltage AC circuit breakers that can break a 765 kV circuit are off the shelf. (In a manner of speaking. Almost no one buys one with that kind of capacity and literally puts it on a shelf. They're too expensive not to use.) Siemens and ABB both sell circuit breakers rated for 1200 kV.
The grid will be fine after the next Carrington event. Most transformers and generation equipment will have been isolated by their associated circuit breakers. The longest lines are also the lines that routinely carry extremely high voltages and are therefore designed for it. Once generation sources are cut off, ongoing eddy currents induced by the storm don't exceed the normal carrying capacity of the lines. Lines designed for lower voltages also tend to be shorter, so the storm has less room to induce damaging voltages. It will take some time to test everything to be sure the equipment was successfully protected by the breakers, and then a whole lot of big guys with big wrenches will be very busy driving around turning breakers back on in the right order to bring the grid back up in a stable fashion. Trivial, no, but understood. Power companies deal with this sort of thing every time there's a major ice storm or tornado.
Re: (Score:2)
Power transformers are regularly destroyed by much smaller solar storms despite active circuit protection. Alternators and induction motors are susceptible to damage also. A large induction motor used in industry with effectively DC applied across its inputs while running is better imagined than witnessed; think of where the torque is applied when the rotor locks.
Re: So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:2)
"when the power is out, and people start freaking out "
You might be underestimating the western world's dependence on refrigeration technology. If the power is universally "out" for more than say, a week or two, there are large populations (cf every major metro area) that might see critical food shortages.
Re: (Score:2)
I think the biggest problem is the electric grid's power transformers. If these burn out on a massive scale, it will take a very long time to fix, especially when the power is out, and people start freaking out.
That about sums it up. The DC currents produced in long transmission lines during a geomagnetic storm cause the power transformers at each end to go into saturation which can easily destroy them and the resulting power irregularities can destroy other things. It has happened several times due to lesser storms.
The transformers are each essentially made to custom specifications and produced on a long lead time so replacement is difficult as well as expensive. Like many things which depend on manufacturing,
Re:So, with the artilcle had.... (Score:4, Informative)
....mentioned exactly what the forecasted problems to the current earth population and societies would be should such an even occur?
It only mentioned a forest fire back in the days...how does such an even cause forest fires?
It would not cause a fire directly. There's no way that such an event could heat up the atmosphere enough to do that.
However, such an event can induce strong currents in electrical systems -- enough to cause electrical discharges that could start a fire. The 1858 Carrington event caused havoc with telegraph systems all over the world, including discharges.
I was under the assumption that it would fry out electronics like an EMP...is that more the scenario?
Yes, but not just electronics. Anything long and conducting, such as electrical power or communication lines and oil pipelines can be affected and damaged.
How widespread would ti be? Is any electronic under threat or mostly like CPU's, etc?
Potentially worldwide, per above. As I said, anything long and conducting would be at risk. CPUs might be affected by current surges in the mains, but otherwise probably wouldn't suffer damage. Electronics on satellites, on the other hand, face another risk: the satellites would pick up strong static charges due to the solar wind. Discharges of that built-up charge could cause damage.
Would it effect the whole earth or just the side that was facing the sun upon event impact?
The solar wind affects the earth's magnetic field on both sides. It's complicated, but the basics are as follows. On the dayside the solar wind compresses the geomagnetic field and a bow shock develops as the wind is turned aside by the field. The wind streams round the earth and collects for awhile in the geomagnetic tail. Wind built up in the tail separates periodically and continues in the nightward direction, sort of like drips from a faucet. All of this can cause terrestrial EM events on both sides.
Re: (Score:2)
.It only mentioned a forest fire back in the days...how does such an even cause forest fires?
The Space Weather article states "on 14 May, excessive electric currents on telephone lines caused the Union Railroad Station in Albany, New York, to catch fire; the station burned to the ground, and a “great many” Bell System cables were damaged (Telephone Review, 12, 1921, p. 130)."
I am having a hard time believing that even a major solar storm can induce enough electric current in a wire to directly cause a fire... I suspect there's some major intermediate steps missing there. Something like
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt the DC current will even warm them up appreciably in absence of AC power.
Re: (Score:3)
A solar storm won't affect your electronics. They can induce currents in very long wires, that act like antenna, and could damage insufficiently hardened satellites. Yes, if you shut off the power then most of the equipment should be fine. We have satellites to provide early warning for just that reason.
Geeks love to worry about this kind of thing though.
Re: (Score:2)
A brief survey of the article didn't justify the use of the words "near future". It's a genuine problem, and we know it's happened within the century, but this doesn't say it will happen within the coming decade....of course, it also doesn't say it won't.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
New Studies Warn of Cataclysmic Solar Superstorms (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Global Warming -- what CAN'T it do?
I'm actually curious what atmosphere composition does to impact solar EM interference. Would all the CO2 make any difference positive or negative? I know our primary protection is the magnetic fields, but do different gasses "absorb" more electromagnetic radiation than others?
Re: (Score:2)
Each gas has a different absorption spectrum, with the frequencies it absorbs related to the vibrational frequencies of the bonds. So changing the composition of the atmosphere will change the absorption at specific frequencies (which can be an issue if helps trap heat), but is unlikely to change the overall absorption significantly.
Re: (Score:1)
Ask the Democrats, they can pin anything on anybody.
If they can't find anything to pin on you then they will just make something up.
On the bright side: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
People then will have again to learn how to talk with neighbours,
And of course, looting the plasma TV store for when the power comes back.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Plasma TV? I got a few that you can take for free... NOBODY wants a plasma TV anymore...Not even Goodwill takes them anymore. It costs them money to get rid of them.
Because they cause global warming /s
Re: (Score:2)
And breaking into old people's homes looking for sets of encyclopedias.
Re: (Score:2)
Except for all the critical services that depend on IT, like hospitals, food storage, and bank databases that will also get clobbered.
This kind of scenario is my worst natural disaster type nightmare since I don't live in a tornado/hurricane/earthquake/forest fire type region.
People will go nuts without electricity for a few days: food will begin to spoil, communications will break down, transportation will be impacted.. but if the financial system collapses and people lose all their money, there is no way
Anybody remember the 1989 storm? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
About 30 years ago, my wife and I drove the Al-Can highway. It was the middle of the summer, but we still saw aurorae on several occasions. The terrestrial landscape is pretty cool too, especially once you get up into the Yukon.
I highly recommend it.
Re: (Score:2)
I got that for free 25 years ago... The Northridge earthquake shut off all power where I lived.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Anybody remember the 1989 storm? (Score:2)
There was another one on Halloween in 2003 (?) The entire sky in New England was crimson waves, it was freaky AF.
Satellites relatively cheap prevention (Score:1)
If we had an array of detection satellites orbiting the Earth and Sun, then we'd have time to warn people and shut the power off if a big flair happens our way.
Such satellites should be relatively small and cheap because they'd have only one job. (A select few might have more instruments.)
Re: (Score:2)
If we had an array of detection satellites orbiting the Earth and Sun, then we'd have time to warn people and shut the power off if a big flair happens our way.
Such satellites should be relatively small and cheap because they'd have only one job. (A select few might have more instruments.)
That certainly can help. Such satellites have been used for a long time to study and model the sun's behavior and how it interacts with the earth's magnetic field.
But if you want to predict solar storms, a cheap way to do it is just to look at the sun with a telescope. Increased sunspots, solar flares, and coronal mass ejections often are harbingers of a solar storm, and can give you three days' notice.
Re: (Score:1)
I've read it's difficult to get precise path predictions that way. Interplanetary plasma is difficult to measure and map from inside of Earth's atmosphere.
Re: (Score:3)
I've read it's difficult to get precise path predictions that way. Interplanetary plasma is difficult to measure and map from inside of Earth's atmosphere.
You're not wrong -- it is difficult. A spaceborne observation system is certainly helpful. [nasa.gov] But there is a great deal you can do from the ground. [phys.org]
Long wire problem (Score:1)
But some accounts say it can burn our power systems even if the power is off, if it's strong enough. The switches probably need to be closer together to make contiguous segments smaller.
A long wire acts like an antenna, picking up electromagnetic charges, and potentially cooking the entire length even if it's technically "off". And maybe add some kind of surge absorption capitors.
We should probably make these changes to our infrastructure anyhow in prep for "pulse weapons" intended to fry electronics.
Re: (Score:2)
But if you want to predict solar storms, a cheap way to do it is just to look at the sun with a telescope. Increased sunspots, solar flares, and coronal mass ejections often are harbingers of a solar storm, and can give you three days' notice.
.
Though if the anti-telescope movement succeeds, we won't have that option either.
Re:Satellites relatively cheap prevention (Score:4, Informative)
We have (and have had for a long time) a fleet of solar observing satellites, several of which are at Lagrange points so they can give advanced warning.
EMF-proof sleeping bag to the rescue (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Do they sell one with integrated Wi-Fi? People might need to get on the internet while protecting themselves from those terrible EMF signals.
Re: (Score:2)
In the midst of your psychotic break, could you tell me where exactly anyone said what you claim? Solar storms have nothing to do with with it,
Could be those voices in your head. Now get back to infowars.
Shut the power off? (Score:2)
Really folks, that doesn't help.
All those wires out there which are miles and miles long are the problem. Just turning off the power isn't enough, you basically have to disconnect the wires from all the "sensitive" equipment or the EMF generated will arc over and cause the same damage it would with the power on.
You basically have to unplug everything... Disconnect it from the miles and miles of wire... And it doesn't matter if the power is on or not once you do that.
Anything that can be done to mitigate? (Score:2)
Clearly we can't shield the earth. But are there things we can do to mitigate this kind of event?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Shielding Earth might not be as implausible as you expect. One idea that's been seriously proposed is to deploy a magnetic deflector at Earth-Sun Lagrange point 1 [universetoday.com]. NASA proposed a similar idea to shield Mars from the solar wind [phys.org] and prevent its atmosphere from being continually stripped away. Another idea is to place a swarm of mirrors at Lagrange point 1 [livescience.com] to reduce incoming solar radiation and mitigate climate change from human activity. Although L1, L2, and L3 are unstable [space.com], it's very feasible for spacec
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Use HVDC instead of HVAC for long distance distribution.
With HVDC the relatively tiny bit of induced power just adds or subtracts to the grid power, which wouldn't even get in the percentage range, rather than dissipating in the transformers and saturating them.
A solar storm would do fuck all to a DC grid.
The problem is magnetic effects. (Score:3)
Nation's Capital and Seven Largest Metropolitan Areas Blacked Out Indefinitely Since the devastating New York City blackout of 1977 much has been done by way of redundancy to protect entire nets from chain-reaction failures. Nevertheless the terrorists exploited a vulnerability brought to governmental attention several administrations ago (and ignored since) by Dr. Robert H. Kupperman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The terrorists did their homework very thoroughly. Kupperman's point is as follows: In order to achieve economies of scale, generated electrical power is transmitted over long distances at extremely high voltage (EHV). Think of a power line as a water pipe. In electrical terms, amperage is the flow of water through the pipe. Voltage is the pressure. The higher the pressure, the greater the amount of water a given pipe can transport. To get water under pressure requires a pump. To get electricity under pressure requires a transformer. EHV requires an EHV transformer, both to step the voltage up at the beginning of its journey and down at its destination. There are only about 500 EHV transformers in the entire nation. Their locations are shown on a map available to the public. Most are protected by no more than a chain-link fence and warning signs that serve to confirm exactly what they are. EHV transformers are sophisticated pieces of equipment not manufactured in the United States. The lead time for delivery of a new one from abroad is 18 months. They can be put out of operation by a high-powered rifle. Thus a small number of terroristsâ"a few using .458 Winchester magnum rifles (as was the woman killed by the SEALs), and the rest Israeli-made copies of our Marine Corps' new 40mm lightweight, polymer/ceramic, near-handgunâ"size grenade launchers-took out the few key EHV transformers around Washington, DC, New York City/Newark, Boston, Chicago, Dallas/Fort Worth, Atlanta, Oakland/San Francisco, and Los Angeles. San Diego was saved when an element of SEAL Team 3, on a security penetration test mission, came upon one of the terrorists who panicked and fired on them. After killing her, the SEALs grasped her mission, alerted their superiors, and in short order we had nearly half the few prisoners captured to date.
The aftermath of the EHV attack has been devastating. There is no power for the water supply pumps. The effects of arson are impossible to control. Martial law is barely able to maintain order now that the stores are looted and burned. Vigilante justice is rampant. Sanitation has broken down, and the rats are out of control in New York City It
Re: (Score:2)
Sanitation has broken down, and the rats are out of control in New York City.
I thought you said this was speculative fiction?
I've seriously forgotten html, sorry. (Score:2)
This is very badly structured; sorry about that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: G.Gordon 'Libby' :
The culprit connected with Watergate was G. Gordon Liddy. He often sparred publicly with G. Gordon Leary, so that may have bought him enough cachet to make it into Omni.
The only highly notable 'Libby' does sell a lot of beans ... which could lead some to confuse 'him' with Liddy.
How timely (Score:3)
The end of global warming (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It likely doesn't help that prominent players behind the "hockey stick graph" were caught massaging the data to fit their theory.
https://www.cfact.org/2019/10/... [cfact.org]
I'm sure someone is just jumping to hit reply to point out that the link I posted is from a biased source. Don't bother, I know it's biased. The point is that people are questioning the claims of some kind of coming climate crisis. This is merely one example of many showing the people that are pushing this "climate crisis" have taken this just a bit too far. Had they dialed the Chicken Little routine back to sane levels then they probably could have salvaged some credibility. Now we have people questioning the entire premise of global warming due to human activity.
Good job, assholes. You had data to support your claims but you couldn't leave that alone. You had to crank this up to eleven for some stupid reason. Now you are going to have an even steeper climb to get people off fossil fuels.
Telling people that they had to give up eating meat was also likely to get massive push back. That was just too much and too soon. All you "the sky is falling" types have no one to blame but yourselves.
But wait... There's more...
https://www.washingtontimes.co... [washingtontimes.com]
Lost amid the coverage of Swedish teen activist Greta Thunberg at last weekâ(TM)s U.N. Global Climate Summit were the 500 international scientists, engineers and other stakeholders sounding a very different message: âoeThere is no climate emergency.â
The declaration made six points:
 âoeNature as well as anthropogenic factors cause warmingâ
 âoeWarming is far slower than predictedâ
 âoeClimate policy relies on inadequate modelsâ
 Carbon dioxide is âoeplant food, the basis of all life on Earthâ
 âoeGlobal warming has not increased natural disastersâ
 âoeClimate policy must respect scientific and economic realitiesâ
With the global warming scare falling apart "they" have to find something to get people worried. Who are "they"? The people that want to raise our taxes, limit our freedom, and decide what we can buy, eat, and watch on TV. If this was about global warming then they'd have solved it by now. But they can't stay on the track of addressing CO2 emissions without raising our taxes, limiting our freedom, etc.
Is there really a problem? (Score:2)
This video tells me that there isn't a whole lot to fear.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Such storms are rare and the effects when they do hit is something that many have already prepared for. We have detectors to give early warning and measures to address such issues.
Thank god for electric cars! (Score:2)
I know! Let's push for everything to be electric!! Airplanes, transport and delivery trucks, and everything. You can't store a multi day/week/month supply but don't worry about silly details like that...
Re: (Score:1)
"We have all stopped eating meat. We have all sacrificed all of our technological comforts. We all live in environment-friendly mud huts, eating only wild nuts and berries that we gather by hand each day. We have finally saved the Earth and ensured the long term survival of our species for the future. Yay us for all being miserable! We won!"
Then, the universe replies with this. [youtube.com]
Thinking Back to The Maze Runner Series (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
It makes me think of the Hitchhiker series.
All these silly humans are going on about global climate change when the Earth is scheduled for demolition so the new hyperspatial express route can be built. What are they even going on about?
Let me see if I understand (Score:2)
...this is something that happens unpredictably but generally cynically, so we should be frightened/concerned.
Yet...paleoclimate studies show a sudden spike of warming/co2 abundance every 120,000-or-so years (last one about 140,000, so we're well past due) and when we see it start to happen again, THIS TIME it's clearly human-caused?
Re: (Score:3)
I've been saying this for years. We can't keep expecting to run around hyperpolluthing the Earth without nature getting back at us.
As serious as climate change is, this study really has nothing to do with it. The Sun certainly plays a principal role in climate, but whether EM fields from solar winds interacting with the earth's magnetosphere affect climate is undetermined, AFAIK.
The problem is that modern technology, on earth and in space, is susceptible to EM disturbances caused by solar eruptions. The point of TFS is that, like earthquakes, they can vary in intensity, and have been exceptionally large on an average of about one per c
Re: (Score:3)
Turns out ... solar storms burn off excess CO2. Who knew. ;-)