Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine News

India Bans E-cigarettes as Global Vaping Backlash Grows (theguardian.com) 105

India has announced a ban on electronic cigarettes, as a backlash gathers pace worldwide about a technology promoted as less harmful than smoking tobacco. From a report: The announcement by India on Wednesday came a day after New York became the second US state to ban flavored e-cigarettes following a string of vaping-linked deaths. "The decision was made keeping in mind the impact that e-cigarettes have on the youth of today," India's finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, told reporters in the capital, New Delhi. E-cigarettes heat up a liquid -- tasting of anything from bourbon to bubble gum or just tobacco, and which usually contains nicotine -- into vapor, which is inhaled. The vapor does not contain the estimated 7,000 chemicals present in tobacco smoke but does contain a number of substances that could potentially be harmful. They have been pushed by producers, and also by some governments, including in Europe, as a safer alternative to cigarette smoking -- and as a way to kick the habit.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

India Bans E-cigarettes as Global Vaping Backlash Grows

Comments Filter:
  • He sounds a notovious cvinimal.

  • by RightSaidFred99 ( 874576 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:29PM (#59210460)
    Only the best decisions come from reading the lies, omissions, and distortions of the media in the midst of a moral panic!
    • by LostMyAccount ( 5587552 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:35PM (#59210500)

      Moral panic indeed.

      It's so funny how many people are literally *angry* about vaping, like it's some horrible crime.

      I can understand the people who complain about walking through someone's giant vapor clouds, but honestly, how often do you actually see that?

      But most of the time it's the kind of hollow ranting, where they just don't like the *idea* of it, are deeply concerned about some elusive long term risks that are only suggested by "unknown chemicals".

      • I can understand the people who complain about walking through someone's giant vapor clouds, but honestly, how often do you actually see that?

        I recently walked through someone's vapor cloud. It was nice, it smelled like candy. I almost went and bought a bag of Starburst.

        • by RightSaidFred99 ( 874576 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:57PM (#59210598)
          Yeah, I'm far more concerned walking behind a bus or going running next to the road with all the cars spewing exhaust. If anything a vape cloud might be healthy in that it could displace far more poisonous shit, lol.
          • by rtb61 ( 674572 )

            I thought of a great marketing for selling e-cigarettes, like comparing it to other stuff on the market, "E-Cigarettes, selling addiction without the fun, buy one now and make someone else rich". At least with the other illegal addictive substances people are having some fun, addiction without the fun is just really mean ;D.

      • I'm more concerned about the known chemicals that are causing issues. If some ass hat decides to over vape and kills himself, well, Darwin is hard at work. You can kill yourself by drinking too much water, and no not drowning or bursting an organ, just drinking too much water. Too much of anything will kill you, might take a while and probably won't be pleasant. We are a delicate bag of chemical reactions, mess that up too much and you are going to die.
      • That is because it is an attempt by companies to get young kids addicted to nicotine. That is why it is so "sweet smelling". The fact that you are too stupid to understand it isn't our problem.

        • Adults don't like flavors? Wtf makes you think that?

        • If you are going to complain about "candy flavors" being appealing to kids, I hope you are also onboard banning colorful packaging and flavors for craft brews and the myriad malternative beverages selling a rainbow of flavors.

          I don't even vape, but find this sudden hysteria over vaping to be totally ridiculous. Yes, regulate and certify the making of the juices, but there is nothing inherently wrong with the technology. There are vaping devices that allow you to control the temperature, and the various juic

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        If people were not being considerate with their cigarette smoke, why would they be considerate with their vape clouds?

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:31PM (#59210476)
    He credits vaping [youtube.com] with the thing that let him quit. It let him easily draw down the amount of nicotine while maintaining the habit.

    I can understand the need for regulation (as the saying goes, "Legal, Taxed and Regulated") but this just sounds like Big Tobacco [youtube.com] got to the politicians. They've been going after vaping, rolling your own and small pipe tobacco sellers for a little over a decade now.
    • Big Tobacco is something a time traveler from 1986 would say. There is no Big Tobacco anymore, and I'm pretty sure even the dullest tobacco company knows their days are numbered, vaping or not. Many are probably jumping on the vaping bandwagon.
      • by PolygamousRanchKid ( 1290638 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @05:01PM (#59210610)

        There is no Big Tobacco anymore, and I'm pretty sure even the dullest tobacco company knows their days are numbered, vaping or not.

        Oh, never underestimate the level of corruption in India.

        Who is the biggest cigarette manufacturer in India? Maybe an Indian company the producer, that in addition farms tobacco?

        Who are the biggest vape players in India? Are they big international heavyweights, who import all their vaping liquid.

        It might make sense in India to ban vaping, to protect some local bribe-paying local businesses.

        • Like many poor and dysfunctional countries, India gets a big proportion of revenue from taxes on tobacco.

          Vaping is a direct threat to that.

          • by spitzak ( 4019 )

            You (or somebody) has said this many times, but it seems doubtful, as the government could fix it far easier by slapping a matching tax on vaping products than by trying to ban them.

            • You (or somebody) has said this many times, but it seems doubtful, as the government could fix it far easier by slapping a matching tax on vaping products than by trying to ban them.

              Vaping fluid contains common chemicals, and a one ounce bottle can last for months. It is way easier to sell tax-free on the black market than a bulk product like tobacco.

        • Could not agree more.
          Clearly the poster does not have ANY idea about smoking outside of the west.

          There is no Big Tobacco anymore

          Of course there is, it's just not advertised. Smoking is still very big in non Western countries. A multi trillion dollar industry.
          More than 70% of males in India smoke.
          More than 50% of males in China smoke.
          I stopped looking there, but I believe it's even worse in other eastern and African countries.
          That's a LOT of money.

      • by ufgrat ( 6245202 )
        Obviously, a company worth $55 billion USD, that made a mere $25 billion in revenue last year, primarily from tobacco products, is a doomed company, with no influence among politicians. Sure. Keep telling yourself Big Tobacco doesn't exist. Oh, and Altria owns Juul as of last year.
      • Jesus with a name of RightSaidFred99 you are complaining about time travel? How about picking a decent taste in music.
        I suppose the sad part there is I know who they are :-(
        Big tobacco still exists, or did you think all those cigarettes people smoke just appeared out of nowhere. Someone grows it, someone rolls its and someone sells it for billions of dollars. Unless of course you think billions of dollars is not enough to buy a politician?
      • You are a moron. Altria has a market cap of $349 billion dollars. And they are one of many Big Tobacco companies. Christ.

    • Ohh, careful there. Kulenski is a progressive and you know what they say... one hit of altruism and you're addicted. Once your addicted, you become an ax-wielding Robin Hood stealing from the ultra rich and giving the poor and middle classes their fare share. They even believe in treating people right whom they don't even know (some even have brown skin!). Be carful, someone might try to slip some progressivism in your tea or cigarette.
      • Actually if I recall the story, Robin Hood stole from the TAX COLLECTOR and gave the money back to the people ...

        • Annnddd if you dig a bit deeper, the tax collector was putting an unfair burden on the lower classes to benefit a greedy scumbag that corrupted the system to line his pockets. When the king (ideal altruistic rulership) showed up, it was set right. But yes, I draw no parallels to todays plight of the pedestrian public nor appreciated the reefer madness wordplay.
        • by iwbcman ( 603788 )

          ROFL

          Actually if I recall the story, Robin Hood stole from the TAX COLLECTOR and gave the money back to the people ...

          Reading comprehension fail, time to go back to the third grade....

    • Your info is wildly out of date. Big tobacco companies dominate the vaping world and have for some time now.

      Yet an industry that emerged as a potential alternative to traditional tobacco, and was once populated with smaller independent manufacturers, is now dominated by Big Tobacco.

      The reason is clear: E-cigarettes are now a multi-billion dollar industry and present a massive growth potential of double digits annually. By controlling this business, Big Tobacco effectively controls its own competition.

      Toda

    • by indytx ( 825419 )

      I can understand the need for regulation (as the saying goes, "Legal, Taxed and Regulated") but this just sounds like Big Tobacco [youtube.com] got to the politicians.

      JUUL is partly owned by Altria which owns Philip Morris and produces Marlboro cigarettes. Altria [wikipedia.org].

      JUUL is "Big Tobacco."

    • Why would I care that someone who obviously knew the inherent dangers of smoking and chose to do so anyway then found a way to quit by blowing annoying vaporous fumes in public places. Anyone who decided to start smoking in the last 30 or so years is just a self destructive individual. I have no obligation to want to indulge whatever new vice they take on so they can be healthier after their years of disregard for others reaction to the secondhand smoke they've been spewing. Boo Hoo. I just can't quit on m

  • by MikeDataLink ( 536925 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:33PM (#59210486) Homepage Journal

    LOL! I mean seriously, everyone is calling these things dangerous and then completely ignoring cigarettes which have killed millions!

    • What about people smoking weed? Or smoking a pipe?

      Or even chewing on a pen? Or biting a drinking straw. Some people need to always have something in their mouth.

      Some people don't seem to worry that it is dangerous. (Although they should)
    • Who has completely ignored cigarettes? There have been anti-cigarette efforts in place for decades. But I agree, we should ban smoking. Stupid people need to be protected from themselves so we don't have to pay for their stupid decisions.

    • The reason is that flavored vaping provides a Very Special Vector toward getting children addicted to nicotine. So the Michigan law (temporarily) bans flavored cartridges, not vaping altogether. It's all For The Children, which you surely will agree with unless you are some kind of monster.

      Selling this stuff to children was already against the law but the unwatched little darlings always seem to find a way!
  • So... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by burtosis ( 1124179 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:39PM (#59210522)
    Cigarettes kill 1,300 people a day and 480,000 people per year [cdc.gov] yet seven people die in the entire history of vaping [nbcnews.com] and it's a permanent ban. In America they are keeping tobacco and menthol "flavors" which haven't been "proven safe" for no reason apparently. Research we do have shows it's 95% safer than cigarettes [independent.co.uk]. It's insane because the deaths are likely due to no regulation where home "chemists" mix up batches of fluid with insane things like vitamin E oil which is poisonous to inhale, then sell it with rebranded containers bought off Amazon and EBay. So this ban is only going to make this problem worse and increase deaths overall. Why can't we just take some steps to ensure all carts or liquid sold is scientifically batch tested and age limits enforced? Is this a corporate conspiracy to force citizens around the world to be criminals when they just want to quit smoking or try a somewhat safer alternative? Have we learned nothing at all from the war on drugs (other than the $cam from abusing citizens)??
    • Statistically, it's also rare for cigarette smoking to kill people in 5-15 years, which is how long e-cigarettes have been popular. Most people haven't been "vaping" that long.

      And the level of vaping is probably a factor; I've seen people dial their units up to the point where they exhale a thick cloud of "smoke", much denser than a tobacco cigarette outputs. Some times it looks like their cars are on fire as they go down the road. Maybe it's a status thing.

      • Most people haven't been "vaping" that long.

        Not entirely true though - People have been smoking hookah pipes for centuries (aka "hubbly-bubbly" or "shisha")

        https://c8.alamy.com/comp/GG3H... [alamy.com]

        Pretty similar.

        • Re:So... (Score:4, Informative)

          by fred911 ( 83970 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @06:22PM (#59210866) Journal

          People have been smoking hookah pipes for centuries (aka "hubbly-bubbly" or "shisha"...Pretty similar.

          Actually it's not. Hookah is tobacco, flavored with a coal ember to keep it light. Multiple chemical reactions creating substances we don't really understand the net effect of.

          Take away the flavoring, you have nicotine, glycerin and propylene glycol in vapor. Most of the flavorings are food additives. There's no ban on the fluids, just the flavoring which is simple for anyone to add.

      • Re:So... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @06:08PM (#59210824)

        And the level of vaping is probably a factor; I've seen people dial their units up to the point where they exhale a thick cloud of "smoke"

        But with vaping, you can turn on the device, take just a single puff, and then put it away.

        With a cigarette, once a smoker lights up, they are going to finish the cigarette, which can mean a dozen puffs.

        So vaping makes it easier to inhale "just enough" nicotine to relieve the craving, making it easier to quit.

        much denser than a tobacco cigarette outputs.

        The vapor is an aerosol mist of water, propylene glycol, and glycerin. It looks denser than cigarette smoke, but is much less harmful.

        • On the flip side, I've seen things like solder flux in areas prone to heating and manufacturing residues on or around the coils in a very few the carts and flavorings can be anything crazy, there have been problems with ones like butter. Baby and bath water here because some simple regulation would fix these problems.
    • No one dies form ciggarrtes the first 5 years they were on the market. It takes decades to kill someone with cigarettes. And yet with vape we have people who just started dropping dead. MIght want to rethink your statistics.

      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        by burtosis ( 1124179 )
        7 in a million is rare. If it were a craze to dip your cig in vitamin E we would have hit many more than this. It's like dipping your cig in PCP then blaming the cigarette for your penis getting ripped off when you copulate with a cop car you're handcuffed to.
        • ANd now thalidomide is used safely and recent evidence indicates it may be wonder drug of unprecedented activity. Yet we did not anticipate what happened with pregancy because we knew it was generally safe and didn't know the mechansim of action. Same with vitamin E and other addatives and thermal reaction products. THe combinations of irritants and microbial food can under the wrong circimstances cause problems. But Vitamin E oil is considered a safe food addative which is why people assumed it would b

          • Eating something and breathing something are completely different. Vitimin E necessary for nutrition and is healthy when eaten, deadly when inhaled. Diacetyl is yummy on fake popcorn, but workers at the popcorn factory who breathed small amounts of it in daily destroyed their lungs permanently. Water is needed to live, deadly when inhaled - ETC. Only untrained armchair idiot "chemists" would think something that's safe to eat would be fine to inhale. That's why we need regulation and scientifically batc
          • by burtosis ( 1124179 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @08:46PM (#59211222)
            On the drug side I'd agree. Cannabis has many medical uses including treating a rare kind of seizure far better than any other drug. Ecstasy has great benefits for healing from PTSD. Shrooms can help with depression. Cocaine has many medical uses like facial surgery. Basically we have been lied to about the schedule status and the entire war on drugs was a scam to oppress the population.
      • by Sark666 ( 756464 )

        I guess you haven't read about this further. The 7 that died were cannabis vaping oils. And what they believe is the culprit is they were cut with vitamin E.

        Every time you see an article about vaping, realize they are melding both together under the same narrative to push this agenda.

      • Except the 2 main ingredients in vape juice have been used in asthma inhalers for 60+years now, there goes your theory...
        I am all for some regulation, we need to be sure what we buy is safe, ( why I mix my own juice) , when the truth comes out about this batch of people with lung probs, I will put my money they were all using dodgy THC based refills, and most are underage, and therefore reluctant to admit it.
        No one will die from vaping unless they do something really stupid.
        No one will go home from going ou

        • And with a bit of regulation about having at least a minimal redundant lithium battery protection requirements (over voltage, over/under charge, over temp, over current charge/discharge, faulty cell detection and disconnect) we can stop the maiming of people's faces, penises and Louis Vuitton wearable artwork.
      • People have been vaping for decades. Vaping is not a problem. It never has been. Putting unknown chemicals into your body, on the other hand, has always been a known issue. That's what's happening here. If teens all started putting bleach into cups and drinking it, we would not try to ban cups.

    • by spitzak ( 4019 )

      I know anecdotes are not data, but I am really starting to doubt vaping is a good thing based on a renter we have in our house. A year ago she would go out to the designated smoking area in the back yard about twice a day and smoke. Then she started vaping, keeping it to the non-oil based ones which really have no detectable output for us so we said she could use it inside. She is now sucking on that thing *continuously* inside, going through more than one cartridge a day. These are nicotine vapes (the warn

      • It's arguably less bad than cigarettes. Some people chain smoke three packs a day.

        I just wanted to thank you for being reasonable. I don't vape, but vaping barely smells at all and I don't mind being around it nor do I feel at risk from any second hand exposure vapes or cigs. Cigarettes I can't stand the smell of and it stinks up the place bad if they smoke inside. Sounds like you don't even vape, don't approve, and yet treat your tenant right. If every landlord was like that they wouldn't have a b
      • What right do you have to dictate your version of "healthy behavior" on anyone? It's none of your business.

    • If you haven't figured it out yet, the likelihood of a ban is proportional to:
      • The danger posed by a product
      • divided by how much those supporting the product are willing to fight a ban.

      Cigarettes are water under the bridge. There's been enough time for a 3/4 trillion dollar industry selling them to develop. That's bigger than the GDP of all but the top 18 biggest economies. Any ban will be opposed by a mountain of lawyers and most of the billion addicted smokers, the legal roadblocks likely won't be r

  • by NotTheSame ( 6161704 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:43PM (#59210534)

    "The entire legal cigarette value chain is presently reeling under penalising taxation on account of continuous increases in excise duties and compensation cess on cigarettes, which have cumulatively gone up by 202 per cent between 2011/12 and 2017/18 leading to shrinkage of cigarette volumes by more than 25 per cent since 2012/13, FAIFA has said."

    Cigarette taxes [business-standard.com]

    Are they concerned about public health or tax revenues?

  • by DigitalisAkujin ( 846133 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:43PM (#59210536) Homepage

    > India is the world’s second-largest consumer of traditional tobacco products, which are not covered by the new ban, killing nearly 900,000 people every year.

    Godfrey Phillips up 8% and Golden tobacco up 4.5% minutes after the announcement.

  • by CaptainDork ( 3678879 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:52PM (#59210580)

    They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re vapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

  • Hilarious (Score:5, Insightful)

    by TJHook3r ( 4699685 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @04:54PM (#59210588)
    A few people die from contaminated product and suddenly a safer alternative to smoking is banned overnight. Almost like there is big money in cigarettes or something!
    • meanwhile 8 million died from smoking in the past year and millions more maimed. yeah, vaping is the scary thing.

      children who can't get sweet flavored vape will vape unsweetened vape (or go back to nabbing cigarettes)

      unbelievable the amount of media-driven hype monkeys who look like functioning adults

    • That's just how people are. Anything 'cool' and 'new' gets held to ridiculous standards. It's not enough that it's less harmful, it has to be completely harmless and any misuse of the technology by assholes and the blame falls on the technology itself.
      I see a direct parallel with another 'cool and new' technology; e-scooters. Less dangerous than cars and never any more dangerous than bicycles? Not good enough; some people still get hurt largely because of someone doing something illegal, so it's BAN BAN B
  • Just advertise them accurately now, right? I don't see a reason to ban them for being not as healthy as someone claimed when selling it.

  • New things are scary. Ban new things.
  • We should have banned leaded petrol 30 years ago so to prevent the mental retardation of the current generation of powerful adults... and I use the term "adults" loosely given what is going on in the world.

  • I have tried vaping myself, but find that the nicotine fix wasn't helping me quit anything. I went back to gum, and found it much easier to quit entirely. The lack of standards among vape makers from company to company, and even from batch to batch make it a bit of a crap shoot as to what you are really getting in that juice. The product needs some standards to keep what is going in your lungs from becoming a bigger problem than giving up tobacco. The more standardized the product, the risks and rewards
    • "The product needs some standards"

      Yup. The huge majority of vape users would welcome quality reasonable regulations on the vape machines and chemicals. I prefer the term "quality control" regulation over "health & safety", just because the latter is so broad it's likely to be abused by prohibitionists.

  • by JBMcB ( 73720 ) on Wednesday September 18, 2019 @05:17PM (#59210666)

    The alternative to vaping isn't not vaping, it's cigarettes. This is getting stupid.

  • How are nicotine gummies not a thing when THC gummies (and other edibles), are??
    • Uh... Nicotine gum is readily available on the market. So aren't patches.

      The problem being that when you're used to inhaling your nicotine the onset is quite different with gum or edibles than what you're used to. That can cause issues with replacing smoking with it.

      I know of people who only use the gum/patches when they're going on a flight or such and need a crutch when not going to be in an area they can smoke in for an extended period.

      • all i know is, when i went to quit smoking, i went with the lozenges.

        The first time i had one it tasted absolutely horrible. But by the end of the first week, they were the most delicious god damn candy i'd ever tasted.

  • ...assault style rifles are still perfectly legal??? Where are your values India?

  • All those vapers can just switch back to cigarettes. As they die the acute overpopulation problem in India can be solved as well. Two birds with one blunt, so to speak.

  • That's a huge vote bank which has to be pandered.

    Big tobacco loves it when the govt raises taxes on cigarettes - they raise the base price at the same time and blame the govt.

    Hypocrisy at its finest to ban vaping and leaving tobacco alone.

  • The country where you can shit in the public streets has banned e-cigs? Is this their priority instead of combating leprosy and cholera?
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • If vaping had been marketed as a way to quit smoking first, and not as a "new cool thing to do" then I think it would have been less likely that this had happened.

    New ways of ingesting nicotine and other addictive drugs in recreational ways have been invented and marketed many times throughout the last seventyfive-ish years, and they have always been banned by authorities.
    Only aids for quitting smoking have been allowed, and after having gone through a testing process like pharmaceuticals. Vaping had not go

  • Vaping is not less annoying than smoking. Why do they have to emit huge clouds of vapor? Drowning in a cloud of raspberry-scented smoke - is that really necessary?

    • Personally, I think the impact on society cannot be understated. The huge clouds of smoke/vapor these things emit are highly annoying and in some cases dangerous (visibility). As a side note, I have yet to meet someone who vaped who was not a douchebag, so maybe it would be more effective to ban douchbags and then the problem would solve itself...

"The vast majority of successful major crimes against property are perpetrated by individuals abusing positions of trust." -- Lawrence Dalzell

Working...