Scientists Are Using Subatomic Particles To Search For a Mirror Universe (nbcnews.com) 212
An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News: At Oak Ridge National Laboratory in eastern Tennessee, physicist Leah Broussard is trying to open a portal to a parallel universe. She calls it an "oscillation" that would lead her to "mirror matter," but the idea is fundamentally the same. In a series of experiments she plans to run at Oak Ridge this summer, Broussard will send a beam of subatomic particles down a 50-foot tunnel, past a ring-shaped magnet and into an impenetrable wall. If the setup is just right -- and if the universe cooperates -- some of those particles will transform into mirror-image versions of themselves, allowing them to tunnel right through the wall. And if that happens, Broussard will have uncovered the first evidence of a mirror world right alongside our own.
The mirror world, assuming it exists, would have its own laws of mirror-physics and its own mirror-history. You wouldn't find a mirror version of yourself there (and no evil Spock with a goatee -- sorry "Star Trek" fans). But current theory allows that you might find mirror atoms and mirror rocks, maybe even mirror planets and stars. Collectively, they could form an entire shadow world, just as real as our own but almost completely cut off from us. Broussard says her initial search for the mirror world won't be especially difficult. But if she unequivocally detects even a single mirror particle, it would prove that the visible universe is only half of what is out there -- and that the known laws of physics are only half of a much broader set of rules.
The mirror world, assuming it exists, would have its own laws of mirror-physics and its own mirror-history. You wouldn't find a mirror version of yourself there (and no evil Spock with a goatee -- sorry "Star Trek" fans). But current theory allows that you might find mirror atoms and mirror rocks, maybe even mirror planets and stars. Collectively, they could form an entire shadow world, just as real as our own but almost completely cut off from us. Broussard says her initial search for the mirror world won't be especially difficult. But if she unequivocally detects even a single mirror particle, it would prove that the visible universe is only half of what is out there -- and that the known laws of physics are only half of a much broader set of rules.
there's a universe (Score:1)
where I am young, slim, rich, handsome, and not a virgin?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't wait to see what I look like with a goatee.
Re: (Score:2)
where I am young, slim, rich, handsome, and not a virgin?
And cannot interact with normal women? I am sure there is.
Re: (Score:2)
No, you don't. You're a loser in each and every universe. People shun and deride you. The difference is that most of of the parallel "you" have had the good sense to commit suicide and rid their world of their pestilential presence.
You should stop looking in the mirror.
Mirror you performing experiment (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It would be as if you attempted to clap with one hand, and there was another hand clapping back.
Not sure how to make that into a car analogy.
Re: (Score:2)
One could imagine parity reversal, so that in this other universe they drive (in the alternate America, say) on the left-hand side of the road.
It was a dark and stormy night. You're driving along a two lane road, when suddenly you see headlights in your lane coming towards you. Your doppelganger has decided to gang up on you (and you on him).
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, wasn't that a classic Twilight Zone episode?
Re: (Score:2)
Great minds travel in the same ruts. At least old minds. (I'm assuming you must be about my age--roughly that of Methuselah--if you remember the classic Twilight Zone.)
After I posted, I went looking for a Twilight Zone episode I thought I remembered; or maybe it was One Step Beyond. Not exactly this one (I found one with doppelgangers), but one in which a former movie star saw in a mirror people she had acted with. They were the same age as they had been in the movie, but she was now aged. I couldn't f
Re: (Score:2)
I'm probably younger than most of the people in that rut, but I grew up poor in the 80s and my family had a modified cable box that gave us all the channels for the price of basic cable. (Best Christmas present ever, that box!)
So my childhood was mostly just TV reruns, and one box of generic lego. I'd hang out at the public library for computer access.
Then I grew up and spent 15 years reminding people that I don't have a TV. So those old reruns are most of what I know as television. Now I watch Korean TV on
No good can come from this (Score:5, Funny)
Video game and movie theorists tell us that all such portals open into hell dimensions.
Re: (Score:3)
Clearly it's the upside down.
Re: (Score:2)
To be safe, we better have both a grizzled space marine and some plucky '80s kids on standby. Not a goateed scientist with a crowbar though, trouble seems to follow those types around...
Re: (Score:2)
The crowbar guy just breaks everything anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Or maybe it's that mirror dimension that Dr. Strange used so that he could have an all out fight in NYC without anyone noticing.
Re: (Score:3)
That's all relative. Maybe we are the hell dimension. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Once you go there, well. Quantum Verse, Normal Verse, Multi verse, Macro Verse, Chaos Verse.
Chaos verse, everything, everywhere, everywhen or more accurately, the expressed quantum potential of all possible outcomes. From that expressed quantum potential, through an act of life the quatum ability to alter future quantum potential to altered outcomes, forms a normative bubble, a continued effort to alter future normative, normal space, outcomes through the continued perception of future expressed quantum po
Re: (Score:2)
On the other hand, it's easy to tell which subatomic particles are from the mirror universe, because they have beards.
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on the video game, in mario 64, parallel universes are just an 16bit integer overflow of the collision map you can reach by sending mario into insane speeds by abusing the backward long jump or the ramp to the water physics.
Re: (Score:2)
In Stargate that was only about half the time, though.
Re: (Score:2)
One being's hell dimension is another one's vacation paradise. Don't judge.
Ant-man and Wasp? (Score:2)
Didn't we see this "tunnel" in the movies?
Buckaroo Banzai (Score:5, Insightful)
I was thinking it was more like Buckaroo Banzai and his oscillation overthruster.
Re: (Score:2)
I was thinking it was more like Buckaroo Banzai and his oscillation overthruster.
No, that's the new Fleshlight.
Tunnel (Score:2)
One side of the tunnel is blue, and the other side is orange, I assume.
And there's cake.
Re:Tunnel (Score:4, Informative)
Theory of Mirror Matter (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I favor a theory that postulates about 9 alternative universes, enough to account for almost all the dark matter. They would each seem normal to themselves. And there would be a leakage of gravitation between the universes, explaining part of why gravity is such a weak force. This would cause most of the large masses in the parallel universes to tend to cluster near each other, but since there'd be essentially no inter-universal friction, they'd keep oscillating rather than slow down.
I'd elab
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, but that's not clear at all. If you have 9 clumps of non-interacting matter oscillating around their common center of gravity, and the clumps of mass are not tightly bound (i.e., they are extended in space), then it's not clear that you wouldn't see something that looked fuzzily distributed. It would, however, predict that there was no strongly consistent relationship between observable matter and the "dark matter", but only a weak relationship. I.e., observations much more probabilistic than det
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but that wouldn't disagree with my proposal at all...or if it would, the reason why is not at all clear to me.
Re: (Score:2)
The bullet cluster is a good illustration of how this "dark matter" is cold after a collision I.e. Weakly interacting. They use this as the premise for thier models and attempt to explain the results through modeling.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but the place I start disagreeing is with the first supposition. If there's any evidence that it's "just symmetry", then I don't know what it is. I'll agree that the "just symmetry" model has been well developed, but the evidence seems sketchy enough that while there's good evidence that something is there, the evidence of what's there is just about absent. We can tell "it sort of acts like matter" and "we can't see it", and "it tends to cluster where mass that we can see clusters", and this is an e
Re: (Score:2)
We can tell "it sort of acts like matter" and "we can't see it", and "it tends to cluster where mass that we can see clusters", and this is an example of why "tend" is the correct word to use.
Correct except the see it part
Re: (Score:2)
Mirror neutrinos, maybe.
Re: (Score:2)
Which is why they're testing for it.
Re: (Score:2)
Curse you, Buckaroo! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Required watching for parallel universe scientists (Score:2)
- Stranger things
- The mist
It'll never work (Score:2)
without a jet car and oscillation overthruster. Beware the red Lectoids. They'll follow you home.
Do you want demogorgons? (Score:4, Funny)
... because this is how you get demogorgons.
Science as Promotion (Score:2)
It's almost magical how these types of stories just happen to break in synch with some thematically-related media property's promotion cycle.
Also: Watch for Stranger Things Season 3, on Netflix starting tomorrow!
Spock-with-a goatee was not evil (Score:2)
He was rigorously ethical, but believed himself powerless to save his own universe. Kirk tried to convince him otherwise at the end.
Spock can never be evil.
Also, Flexo was actually the *good* Bender.
The Bitch Will Make a Hole in the Universe! (Score:2)
We're doomed!
don't they ever learn? (Score:2)
this never ends well.
"Fringe" did that years ago, natch (Score:2)
#dream_on
Fascinating (Score:2)
IANAS, but there is the unresolved issue of dark energy and dark matter in order for physics models to explain how galaxies maintain their shape and not fling apart. We're also only just beginning to study gravity waves. What if gravity that distorts our space-time also has an effect on parallel universes? What if these distortions are what led to star formation in the same place and at the same time, which could lead to nearly identical but separate universes? What if this experiment could lead the way int
Re: (Score:2)
What if these distortions are what led to star formation in the same place and at the same time, which could lead to nearly identical but separate universes?
We already know that dark matter is only weakly interacting with itself ruling that out. It does not clump the way normal matter does but instead passed through itself.
Sounds like the movie "Us" (Score:2)
Is this how it all ends? (Score:2)
What if every black hole in the universe is just the leftover results of life forms poking into things like this?
there is no mirror universe (Score:2)
Stop this bullshit
Re:News about planning? - avoids publication bias (Score:3)
Actually, in some ways it's nice. That (especially done systematically with pre-registration of studies) mitigates "publication bias" - that only studies finding a positive (or, in some cases, other forms of "desired") result (for any reason, including chance) will be published. Granted, this may be a larger problem in medical science than physics, but still.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As an alternative to simply flaunting your ignorance, do a minimal amount of basic investigation. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
"We?" Please don't tar the rest of us with your knuckledragger brush.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It is highly unlikely that there is an impenetrable wall in the mirror universe at that exact same spot as well.
It's really not that hard to understand, surely?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A single particle would prove nothing. At this level, statistics are what matters.
Re: (Score:2)
Weren't we just reading about the bar for statistical significance is arbitrary and so in the face of thousands of senseless and dysfunctional statistics based results people were LOWERING to get more published instead of raising to get more meaningful results?
Re: (Score:2)
Just one is enough. There may BE only one that makes the double transition. There may be a few but since detection is imperfect, only one detected. Nut one detected means it DID tunnel to the other universe and back, so one is enough.
Re: (Score:2)
Do we need to detect every gravity wave to know that gravity waves are real?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
OK, you run along now and detect some to be sure it's real. Thxbai.
Re: (Score:2)
For the same reason that a lump of Uranium doesn't fission all at once (even inside a nuclear bomb: because turning into a mirror particle (if it happens at all) is a quantum event, and like most quantum events, it doesn't happen to every particle at the same time. Now that's impenatrability for you!
Re: (Score:2)
It's a wall which is designed to be impenetrable to the neutrons according to current physics. The point of the experiment is to see if some neutrons will tunnel through the wall, thus establishing new physics, proposed to be particles slipping in and out of this mirror universe thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Insert 'otherwise' if it makes you feel better. Seems more like loose wording on the journalist's part than a problem with the scientists.
Buckaroo Bonzai (Score:2)
They pierce an impenetrable wall in buckaroo bonzai.
I see this research is funded by John Smallberries and John Bigbootey.
Re: (Score:2)
How can it be called an "impenetrable wall"
That's dumbed down speak for "high energy barrier". Dumbed down for you.
Re: (Score:3)
It's no wonder people are getting increasingly skeptical of science and scientists.
But it's not the scientists themselves creating the breathless, superlative headlines. It's journalists.
Of course, trust in journalism is at a low point as well.
Re: How's it an "impenetrable wall"? (Score:3)
To be fair, discussing physics with people having no math is like describing impressionist painting to a blind person.
Re: How's it an "impenetrable wall"? (Score:5, Insightful)
Have you ever tired to explain the details of your program to your boss? (Well, I'm assuming your boss is not also a programmer.) You end up doing a lot of hand-waving, and what they end up understanding is so different from what your were trying to communicate, that you quickly decide that explaining in detail was a bad idea.
I have a friend who tries to keep explaining about "vector fields" to me. It's been 40 years, and he still hasn't given up. But it's been about 50 years since I studied tensors and prime number theory, and I've no real intention of relearning the basics of what he's trying to tell me. So he ends up hand-waving a lot. I remember 40 years ago when I understood the theories enough to help him develop them, but my interests lay in programming, not abstract math. So I *remember* understanding an earlier version of his theory. But I don't understand it any more.
Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean the person talking about it doesn't understand it. You may be missing a lot of the basics needed for the understanding to operate...and unwilling to learn them.
Re: (Score:2)
No. If you can't understand because you don't have the math, the defect is not in the scientist. As long as he can explain to someone who has the math to follow, his understanding is not the defective one, steel balls on rubber sheets notwithstanding.
Re: (Score:2)
Carl Sagan used them to demonstrate gravity warping space in Cosmos [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
That's funnier than you think.
Re: (Score:2)
You don't have to, and shouldn't, trust scientists. Scientists support their claims with evidence. If their evidence doesn't stand up to scrutiny, or fails to be repeatable, their claims can be rejected.
Trust has nothing to do with it.
Re: (Score:2)
no claims are being made. A theoretical model is being tested by experiment.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure that's the correct interpretation. This is talking about "a parallel universe", so it's possible that she's expecting some fraction of the particles to move over into that other universe, alter their nature, and then some fraction of those to move back. So they wouldn't be penetrating the wall, they'd be sidestepping it. It also seems likely to me that she's expecting the ones that make the double trip to revert to their normal state as they return to this universe.
Re: (Score:2)
The "a parallel universe" part was pure journalistic hyperbole. Invisible part of our one and only universe, more like it.
Re: (Score:2)
The author is relying on people to use basic reading comprehension and deductive reasoning skills. Since you're a fucking moron lacking in basic reading comprehension and deductive reasoning skills, let me fill in the missing words for you: The wall should normally be impenetrable by normal subatomic particles. If the experiment is correct in it's hypothesis, "mirror" subatomic particles which are able to penetrate this normally impenetrable wall will be detected. Do you understand now, or do you need someone to explain it to you with sockpuppets?
Very nice digest of the subject matter and characterization of the original poster. It might be worth adding, mirror matter, if it exists, interacts with normal matter through gravity. Making it a good candidate for dark matter.
Re: (Score:2)
I know being a grammar troll is a growing concern but I just don't get it. Language is a tool and its purpose is to communicate. In order to correct him, you had to understand what he meant, which meant he successfully communicated to you. So where is the value in the correction? Is it all just about having some common and pointless topic you can use to lift up your own ego at the expense of others?
Re: (Score:2)
Are you trying to look stupid, or is this your natural look?
'They've a temper, some of them — particularly verbs: they're the proudest — adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs — however, I can manage the whole lot of them! Impenetrability! That's what I say!' --Humpty Dumpty
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, I'm afraid this is what you get for responding to a moron AC: abuse.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Temporal anomalies do that sometimes. This one is nearly a month old. Way to go guys. Temporal anomalies do that sometimes.
Captain Janeway is responsible for that mess.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Temporal anomalies do that sometimes. This one is nearly a month old. Way to go guys. Temporal anomalies do that sometimes.
So what is it?
Re: (Score:3)
"sometimes that do anomalies Temporal .guys go to Way"
or should that be
".semitemos taht od seilamona laropmeT .syug og ot yaW"
?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Weird, I was once again finding myself thinking about how awesome it would be if we could somehow connect to a parallel universe this morning.
Unless it was actually a mirror universe, made of antimatter where ours was made out of matter. Then, somehow connecting to it might be the ultimate bad idea.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't researching parallel universes the initial premise for both the Doom and Half-Life games? Everyone get your crowbars ready!