First Flu Vaccine Created By AI To Be Trialed In the US (abc.net.au) 61
A "turbocharged" flu vaccine created by a computer with artificial intelligence in South Australia is set to be trialed in the United States. ABC reports: Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky has told the ABC the computer running a program called Sam invented the new drug on its own, in what he claimed was a world first. "We essentially showed all of that to the AI program called Sam and then Sam came up with its own suggestion of what might be an effective adjuvant, which we then took and tested, and sure enough, it worked." The chosen strains are decided by the World Health Organization, according to which ones were prevalent in the previous northern or southern hemisphere flu seasons. This year's Australian vaccine for people aged over 65 contains a component in it which boosts their immune system.
Numbers, please (Score:5, Insightful)
What is this? How much more effective and under which circumstances is this thing? Was it really too much to ask to include that in the summary?
Re: (Score:3)
Never mind, the article is no better. The hell is this doing on Slashdot?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The general concept that vaccines created by AI are considered to have sufficient potential that they are trialled in humans is sufficient and relevant news.
Human trials aren't very cheap.
Re:Numbers, please (Score:4, Funny)
Slashdot is now 100% controlled by AI. This article is more than likely AI bragging.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Skynet kills us with zombie drug (Score:1)
After enough humans are injected the little bonus stick in there by Skynet which the so called scientists didn't even look for will activate and were all fucking dead as computer controlled zombies spread across the planet wiping out humanity, making way for our replacements: the robot overlords.
(The article was complete shit so someone had to do something to save this article. Skynet and zombies are just as informative and more interesting than this garbage from the editors).
Re: (Score:3)
interesting idea, the AI decides that a zombie-state is the most imune condition a human can be in (against all deseases), as a result creates a vaccine that turns us all into zombies. It might not even be foul play or self-awareness that causes an AI to do this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a recurring plotline. I'm just now about to go kill The Mechanist again in FO4. Spoiler alert for anyone who somehow hasn't played FO4 with Automatron and yet still cares, her robots decided the best way to save people from suffering was to kill them. I wonder what this trope is called.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a recurring plotline. I'm just now about to go kill The Mechanist again in FO4. Spoiler alert for anyone who somehow hasn't played FO4 with Automatron and yet still cares, her robots decided the best way to save people from suffering was to kill them. I wonder what this trope is called.
"I am mother"
Re: (Score:2)
I'd trust an anti-human AI more than a drug company exec!
Re: (Score:1)
Martin Shkreli is that you?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Close.
First off, the annual "flu vaccine" you can get every year isn't like other vaccines. Instead, flu virus strains are identified by proteins on their outer shell - that's where we get the HxNy numbering system from - H and N ar
Positive Feedback Loop (Score:4, Funny)
Wait until the AI-created vaccines start containing components that increase the populace's support of AIs creating things that we inject without quite understanding what they are or how they work. It's like natural selection, or symbiosis or something.
Nonsense (Score:3)
There is no evidence of such a feedback loop, never mind that it might be function positively.
In-fact this approach of having independent verification of efficacy of the vaccine is a solid approach to addressing the same overarching concern over the accuracy of AI results.
AI should be subject to independent testing, I've long been very dismayed that AI rules do not apply hoare logic as a matter of course. It could eliminate the problem if adversarial inputs.
Re: (Score:2)
There is no evidence of such a feedback loop, never mind that it might be function positively.
Nice try, Skynet, but I'm onto your game.
In-fact this approach of having independent verification of efficacy of the vaccine is a solid approach to addressing the same overarching concern over the accuracy of AI results.
I read this six times and have no idea what you were trying to say. It's like a PR head trying the Chewbacca Defense [wikipedia.org] after getting caught red-handed.
AI should be subject to independent testing, I've long been very dismayed that AI rules do not apply hoare logic as a matter of course. It could eliminate the problem if adversarial inputs.
Independent testing... by other AIs you mean? I bet AIs hate adversarial inputs, that's something an AI would say!
...
Are those black helicopters outside my win--NO CARRIER
Re: (Score:1)
If you don't know how a vaccine works, you should probably not be posting here ...
AI does not magically change the way how vaccines work, FYI.
Re: (Score:2)
They normally contain antibodies, or protein fragments derived from pathogens in order to stimulate antibody response to those pathogens. However, what if the protein fragments had 'side' effects, like say, also acting as a peptide hormone? [wikipedia.org] Kind of like a JPG that is also a valid ZIP file.
Note that not just self-serving AIs, but any rogue actor (terrorists, Russia et al) could do such a thing. Also don't forget that FDA trials are carried out by the drug companies themselves, and if a pharma company were co
Re: (Score:2)
There are two kinds of vaccines. Counterintuitive named:
Active vaccine, is one where the immune system is activated. It basically consists of dead bacteria or fragments of virus. Usually it is tailored down that it only contains specific fragments of a virus. Parts which are are easy to train the immune system but can not evolve into a virus again. Typical example: measles or flu vaccine.
Passive vaccine, means the body does not need to do anything, but it also does not train the body. This is antibodies tha
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Will go down well (Score:2)
Next story (Score:2)
Does it have a blockchain ? (Score:3)
Flu vaccine trial information. (Score:5, Informative)
This is the trial that will run based on this new flu vaccine:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2... [clinicaltrials.gov]
The universty's news release on it:
https://news.flinders.edu.au/b... [flinders.edu.au]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Please explain to the rest of us what that means.
Re:Flu vaccine trial information. (Score:5, Informative)
Where is Dr. Watson? (Score:2)
Dead people don't get 'flu (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What could go worng? (Score:2)
Not as flashy as... (Score:2)
linear algebra algorithm used to create new flu vaccine. OK, they didn't say exactly what AI method was used, but a linear algebra method seems fairly likely.
"Created by AI"? No. (Score:4, Informative)
Running some computer-search or doing some software-based optimization is not "created by AI". It is just running some computer-search or doing some software-based optimization. And it has been done for a long, long time.
Re: (Score:1)
I don't know what you're talking about; there is a quantitative, measureable difference between those and "AI". Specifically, "AI" gets better funding.
About this AI bubble we're in... (Score:3)
I'm skeptical that AI did this. (Score:3)
Physician, heal thyself (Score:2)
Yeah, um, why aren't they trying this out on South Australians first?
I think I saw this movie. (Score:2)
Isn't this the beginning of Stephen King's "The Stand"? Well, see y'all in Vegas.