'Partly Alive': Scientists Revive Cells in Brains From Dead Pigs (nytimes.com) 128
In a study that raises profound questions about the line between life and death, researchers have restored some cellular activity to brains removed from slaughtered pigs. From a report: The brains did not regain anything resembling consciousness: There were no signs indicating coordinated electrical signaling, necessary for higher functions like awareness and intelligence. But in an experimental treatment, blood vessels in the pigs' brains began functioning, flowing with a blood substitute, and certain brain cells regained metabolic activity, even responding to drugs [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source]. When the researchers tested slices of treated brain tissue, they discovered electrical activity in some neurons.
The work is very preliminary and has no immediate implications for treatment of brain injuries in humans. But the idea that parts of the brain may be recoverable after death, as conventionally defined, contradicts everything medical science believes about the organ and poses metaphysical riddles. "We had clear lines between 'this is alive' and 'this is dead,'" said Nita A. Farahany, a bioethicist and law professor at Duke University. "How do we now think about this middle category of 'partly alive'? We didn't think it could exist." For decades, doctors and grieving family members have wondered if it might ever be possible to restore function to a person who suffered extensive brain injury because of a severe stroke or heart attack. Were these brains really beyond salvage?
The work is very preliminary and has no immediate implications for treatment of brain injuries in humans. But the idea that parts of the brain may be recoverable after death, as conventionally defined, contradicts everything medical science believes about the organ and poses metaphysical riddles. "We had clear lines between 'this is alive' and 'this is dead,'" said Nita A. Farahany, a bioethicist and law professor at Duke University. "How do we now think about this middle category of 'partly alive'? We didn't think it could exist." For decades, doctors and grieving family members have wondered if it might ever be possible to restore function to a person who suffered extensive brain injury because of a severe stroke or heart attack. Were these brains really beyond salvage?
Great, let's make pig zombies now (Score:2, Insightful)
That can only end well.
Re: Great, let's make pig zombies now (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Whoo-hoo-hoo, look who knows so much... There's a big difference between mostly dead and all dead. Mostly dead is slightly alive. With all dead, well, with all dead there's usually only one thing you can do: go through his clothes and look for loose change.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Be careful what you wish for [youtube.com].
Do you want zombies? (Score:5, Funny)
Because that's how you get zombies.
Re: (Score:2)
Arghh. You beat me to it.
Miracle Max was on to something! (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I came here to say... "All you can do is go through his pockets and look for loose change."
Re: (Score:2)
Well, actually it is a pig. So like bacon and pork loin and ribs and ham and ....
Of course, if it were a sheep then you could make yourself a nice MLT - mutton lettuce and tomato - where the mutton is all nice and crisp and ...
Re: (Score:2)
... then bring it back to life.
Inconceivable!
Re: (Score:2)
You using that word....
I do not think it means what you think it means....
Re: (Score:2)
"thdead"
I see a sci-fi movie on the horizon (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Source Code? [imdb.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I remember one that I saw as a kid where they had a pilots brain kept alive in a jar
In real life, he would just have to go back to his job at Allegiant.
Re: (Score:2)
Chemical machine (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In theory you could, just like you could rebuild a bombed city by piecing the debris together.
Re: (Score:2)
A lot of cells in a dead body can function fine or be revived and repaired and continue to function fine, or we wouldn't have organ transplants. Unfortunately the brain passes the point or repair relatively quickly. We even have the term brain dead to refer to those kinds of edge cases.
But if we did develop the ability
Re:Chemical machine (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Cryonicists have been banking on this for decades. They* have a not-entirely unreasonable faith that scientific progress will keep pushing that line far beyond where it is today.
* I am one of them. I'm a life-insurance funded member of the Cryonics institute.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is this surprising to non-biologists? Cells are like machines made of chemicals. You can run electrical current through a dead frog to make its leg jump... until it finishes breaking down. Doesn't mean you could 'repair' the frog back to life.
But is the machine broken or is it stopped? How much of us survive death, for example I have a bunch of memories chemically stored in my brain. Could you read them from my dead brain? Can you read out my neural patterns and build a machine that thinks like me? Basically, how much of "me" actually dies when the synapses stop firing? And yes, technically what would it take to "reboot" me like am I the running state of the machine or can "I" mostly reboot like I've been in a deep coma? These questions are stil
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So... if you're very recently brain dead some of cells may still work but enough of them are gone that the connections between them - where your memories are stored - have degraded and are also gone.
Have they really? Do axons and dendrites break down that quickly? I suspect that the structural elements actually stay intact for some time, until other processes (drying out, decay, etc.) start to disrupt them. I'm only guessing here, I have no actual knowledge. Do you? If so, could you elaborate on what breaks down and how?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The very medical definition of "dead" has been argued over by doctors for decades. Is it heart death, brain death, but people occasionally seem to come back from "brain death" so how dead does the brain have to be? The article isn't written for people with in depth knowledge of chemistry or biology or etc. It's written to shock and clickbait people that aren't that. "What's dead really like, is dead a
Who said biology was digital -- or magic? (Score:2)
Re:Who said biology was digital -- or magic? (Score:4, Informative)
Why not. Biology is just applied physics and applied chemistry after all
Chemistry is actually just applied physics. Obligatory XKCD [xkcd.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Have scientists not seen zombie movies ? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but I don't wanna depend on rim fire ammo for my life.
I"m going 9mm and 45 for handguns, and .556 I think for rifle (let's hit them longer distance if possible)...and of course 12ga for shotguns.
I think I"ll go .308 for when you really wanna reach out and "touch someone".
There are some better calibers, but then again, when the zombie apocalyp
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Forget the "Barbie" guns - stick with something that packs a punch. Put 'em down, don't tickle 'em.
(See Under a Graveyard Sky for the reference)
Rifle, mags, 500 rounds ammo - 10 pounds (Score:2)
Is 22LR good enough for zombies? I'm thinking double aught buck.
The movies also teach that cardio is important, so I'm thinking a ten pound budget on rifle, five 10 round magazines, and 500 rounds of ammunition. Oh, the movies also teach about noise, so less noise too. :-)
Abby Normal Bacon (Score:1)
I heard the strangest music in the dumb waiter and I just followed it down. Call it...a Lunch!
Look who knows so much... (Score:2)
Cryonicists have been saying this for decades (Score:2)
There NEVER were clear lines! Jeez! ... Aliveness always has been a gradient!
Cryonicists have been saying things like this for decades, even before the first confirmed cases of resuscitation of heart attack victims, or of drowning victims and the discovery of the "mammalian diving reflex", (which, when the back of the neck is cold when oxygen runs out, causes the metering valves in the blood vessels to stick OPEN, allowing the brain to revive if circulation is restored as much as a half hour later.)
One catc
Correction: Face, not back of neck: (Score:2)
I said: ... the discovery of the "mammalian diving reflex", (which, when the back of the neck is cold when oxygen runs out, causes the metering valves in the blood vessels to stick OPEN, allowing the brain to revive if circulation is restored as much as a half hour later.)
Oops! Wikipeida is your friend:
It's not a new state.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
's not a new state between life and death; it's a new state between death and decomposition.
Even if it can actually be returned life? What if your brain could be restarted but you were left only partially intact, with significant deficits... as is the case for many stroke victims. We consider them to be alive, and to be the "original person" in most senses.
Re: (Score:1)
Even if it can actually be returned life? What if your brain could be restarted but you were left only partially intact, with significant deficits... as is the case for many stroke victims. We consider them to be alive, and to be the "original person" in most senses.
But what if they come back evil?
Re: (Score:2)
Glass half full version: What if this or a future version of this process enables us to more fully restore said stroke victims so they have fewer or even no deficits?
Let's just say I don't want to be in the beta trial but version 2.0 or 3.0 could be pretty spectacular assuming we survive version 1.3 creating zombies...
When asked for a comment (Score:1)
the lead Scientist stated
"I was classed as a madman, a charlatan, outlawed in the world of science which had previously honored me as a genius. Now, here in this forsaken jungle hell, I have proved that I am alright!"
The mind is not in the neurons (Score:2)
The mind is in the microtubules. And those, are stable molecules. If they can get the cells to work again then they will find the mind mostly intact.
Is my expectation.
I think they suspect this, also, which is why they are digging around in dead brains.
I leave it to the reader to guess where all this goes after they find the mind intact.
Re: (Score:2)
The microtubule "theory" has no substance.
Wrong definition of death (Score:1)
http://www.merkle.com/definiti... [merkle.com]
WRT these pig brains, they're experiencing iscemic damage that may result in infodeath, but it's a slide into that vs a singular moment of death. Of course some cells still work, only 4 hours passed from loss of blood flow.
An explanation for NDE's? (Score:2)
We think we know definitively when brain death occurs, but what if some consciousness survives for a time after that? You could be conscious of people around you talking about your death, be they surgeons or bystanders. If unusual circumstances, such as having your supposedly dead body fished out of very cold water, lead you your revival, that consciousness could be the near-death experience that some people live to tell about.
One step closer (Score:2)
We are now one step closer to immortal heads in jars...
Re: (Score:1)
Scary (Score:2)
Trump (Score:2)
They are grunting for the fjords (Score:2)
They are ex-pigs.
Now they have the souls of crows inhabiting them, and they are not friendly.
Metaphysics and religion confuses people (Score:5, Interesting)
People are all messed up in how they think about this because we are so misguided by metaphysics and religion. Consciousness is not a real thing. "You" are a story that your brain tells itself. The way your brain and body actually work have little to do with that story.
Nobody would blink an eye at restarting a machine after it was long idle and rotted parts were repaired. But when they consider it happening to a human being, they get tripped up in metaphysical stuff that isn't real.
Re:Metaphysics and religion confuses people (Score:4, Insightful)
Consciousness exists because I can perceive myself. It is as simple as that. "We" may or may not exist, I perceive others and they seem to be self-aware like me but that could well be a self-reinforcing delusion.
The big issue that stands in the way of your assertion is our inability to actually create anything with even a minimal sense of self. We can build abstraction on top of systems and complex ordered systems so that those pieces come out in ways that match the "code" for desired outcomes. We have made some level of progress toward making that behave in a way that shifts around pieces semi-autonomously toward some result. The problem is that everything we build is merely a logical abstraction on top of something and given meaning by our own consciousness and not innate to the actual medium.
'"You" are a story that your brain tells itself.'
There simply is no direct evidence to support this claim. We can't even successfully model it at this point, let alone prove that the observer is manifested by the medium rather than the medium being a tool of the observer. Sure we can alter perceptions to some extent via physical processes but we can also do that with a broken scale, fake image, or any number of blatantly external mechanisms. It is very easy to forget that science is an applied philosophic model which provides results we perceive as useful but it is just a model. Just as geometry is useful even though there aren't really any circles, points, lines, or squares... those are just ideas we made up and then ran with.
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody would blink an eye at restarting a machine after it was long idle and rotted parts were repaired. But when they consider it happening to a human being, they get tripped up in metaphysical stuff that isn't real.
The metaphysical stuff doesn't bother me (since, like you, I think everything is implemented entirely via physical processes); rather it's the physical stuff. Any biological body that has been "dead" for more than a short while is going to be physically deteriorated to the point where you really wouldn't want to inhabit it any more.
Re: (Score:2)
So you do agree that its possible to live again after being dead, its just a matter of arguing about the duration of the "short while"
And of course blood transfusions would like to have a word.
We already know "mostly dead" people (Score:2)
Will this work on politicians? (Score:1)
In the eventually sense? Probably not. (Score:2)
This will go through lots of phases, including (a very long while from this) we'll be able to reanimate the cells but find that their former electrical state is too degraded to recover the person. Eventually through some laborious side channel technique we'll be able to recover that state. Some day you'll be able to do it and upload an entire graveyard of consciousnesses onto the galactic quanta-net just by thinking about a code word that is information entangled to a chain of sequences that unfold into the
Zombie bacon, eh? (Score:1)
Welcome to the party! (Score:1)
Every time I see this headline I read "Party Alive"...
Re: (Score:1)
Then, when I get it (again), I think "Does that mean he's just MOSTLY dead?"
Reanimator (Score:2)
We already have a number of stories describing this phenomenon:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Also, I recommend my favorite tag for this story: "whatcouldpossiblygowrong"
This could explain (Score:1)
... Flat Earth YouTube videos.
Because nobody else has posted this yet... (Score:2)
"No, you're not. You'll be stone dead in a moment."
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently WE missed taking or paying attention to civics class, did we?
You know, in this day in age of google and everything online, you needn't even take a formal class, get online and look it up.
Its simple and was a brilliant way to get all the various states to unite under banner and allow a what was supposed to be a limited Federal Govt. over them.
It is important to remem