Death Metal Music Inspires Joy Not Violence, Study Finds (bbc.com) 170
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the BBC: I've had one desire since I was born; to see my body ripped and torn. The lyrics of death metal band Bloodbath's cannibalism-themed track, Eaten, do not leave much to the imagination. But neither this song -- nor the gruesome lyrics of others of the genre -- inspire violence. That is the conclusion of Macquarie University's music lab, which used the track in a psychological test. It revealed that death metal fans are not "desensitized" to violent imagery. The findings are published in the Royal Society journal Open Science. How do scientists test people's sensitivity to violence? With a classic psychological experiment that probes people's subconscious responses; and by recruiting death metal fans to take part. The test involved asking 32 fans and 48 non-fans listen to death metal or to pop whilst looking at some pretty unpleasant images.
Lead researcher Yanan Sun explained that the aim of the experiment was to measure how much participants' brains noticed violent scenes, and to compare how their sensitivity was affected by the musical accompaniment. To test the impact of different types of music, they also used a track they deemed to be the opposite of Eaten. "We used 'Happy' by Pharrell Williams as a [comparison]," said Dr Sun. Each participant was played Happy or Eaten through headphones, while they were shown a pair of images -- one to each eye. One image showed a violent scene, such as someone being attacked in a street. The other showed something innocuous -- a group of people walking down that same street, for example. "If fans of violent music were desensitized to violence, which is what a lot of parent groups, religious groups and censorship boards are worried about, then they wouldn't show this same bias. "But the fans showed the very same bias towards processing these violent images as those who were not fans of this music."
Lead researcher Yanan Sun explained that the aim of the experiment was to measure how much participants' brains noticed violent scenes, and to compare how their sensitivity was affected by the musical accompaniment. To test the impact of different types of music, they also used a track they deemed to be the opposite of Eaten. "We used 'Happy' by Pharrell Williams as a [comparison]," said Dr Sun. Each participant was played Happy or Eaten through headphones, while they were shown a pair of images -- one to each eye. One image showed a violent scene, such as someone being attacked in a street. The other showed something innocuous -- a group of people walking down that same street, for example. "If fans of violent music were desensitized to violence, which is what a lot of parent groups, religious groups and censorship boards are worried about, then they wouldn't show this same bias. "But the fans showed the very same bias towards processing these violent images as those who were not fans of this music."
Re:"The test involved asking 32 fans and 48 non-fa (Score:5, Informative)
That is what statistics is for. Mathematics can tell you whether 80 is a sufficient sample size better than intuition.
Imagine instead of 80 subjects, you had a million. And suppose you managed to falsify the null hypothesis, and showed that death metal fans *do* have higher rates of desensitization than non-fans. One of two cases holds; either (a) the rate difference is too tiny to care about or (b) you could achieve a statistically significant positive result with a smaller sample size.
For this reason most well-designed social science experiments have moderate sample sizes. Experiments with a moderate number of subjects are affordable, practical, and are biased to false negatives; that means you are less likely to get statistically significant but practically insignificant results. Typical sample sizes (when they can be gotten) are in the 20-50 range. 80 is on the high end, but a *negative* result from a largish sample size is actually pretty robust. Either the differences between fans is non-existent, or it's very small, which is practically speaking the same thing.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't get the feeling that they were only complaining about the n=80 sample size, so I'm just going to leave this [metalinjection.net] over here.
Re:"The test involved asking 32 fans and 48 non-fa (Score:5, Interesting)
For this reason most well-designed social science experiments have moderate sample sizes. Experiments with a moderate number of subjects are affordable, practical, and are biased to false negatives; that means you are less likely to get statistically significant but practically insignificant results. Typical sample sizes (when they can be gotten) are in the 20-50 range. 80 is on the high end, but a *negative* result from a largish sample size is actually pretty robust. Either the differences between fans is non-existent, or it's very small, which is practically speaking the same thing.
Most social science experiments, well actually probably the overwhelming majority, are not well-designed. Have you heard of the replication crisis? [theatlantic.com]
The problem is that most social scientists do not understand mathematics, let alone statistics (a complicated subject with many caveats and nuances) very well. They rote-learn the equations and methods without fully understanding them (or understanding them at all) - I've seen in this practice.
Therefore, whenever you see a study with a sample of 80 (or a few hundred) claiming this or that, the default reaction should be extreme doubt in the results.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that most social scientists do not understand mathematics, let alone statistics...
Let alone reality.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Most social science experiments, well actually probably the overwhelming majority, are not well-designed.
That is true, but that can not usually be fixed with a larger sample size. If your experiment's testing procedure is bunk, then increasing the sample size is not going to help one bit. Only very, very rarely can a poorly designed experiment be saved by throwing more samples at it.
There are ten thousand different ways to get misleading results out of a poorly designed experiment. One of those ways is interpreting noise in your data as a meaningful signal, where by the barest chance you get a bunch of data
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think this follows at all.
Let me rephrase: when you see any social science or psychology study claiming anything, the first reaction should be extreme doubt in the results.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I did pretty well when I took the course as an MIT student, thirty-five years ago. The practice of statistics has changed because of SPSS and R, but the principles are the same -- in fact the same principles that allowed the US to beat the Axis Powers in WW2 in production by using statistical sampling. You obviously can't test *every* bomb in a manufacturing lot.
Re:"The test involved asking 32 fans and 48 non-fa (Score:5, Informative)
You're a complete fraud if you think 80 models millions in a psychological human-reaction experimentation.
Minimum sample size doesn't increase linearly with population size; it asymptotically approaches a fixed value. So what you do is assume the population is arbitrarily large and size your sample accordingly. Yes, for very small populations, say hundreds, you could get away with smaller samples. But the sample size you need for a population of a million and a hundred billion aren't different at all.
The minimum sample size is *extremely* sensitive to effect size. So what you do is look up the minimum size in a table indexed by the smallest effect size you want to detect. Even if the population of the Earth has doubled since the time the table was published, the numbers are still good.
Re: (Score:2)
Your explanations are probably a waste of time. Regular people are not equipped or educated to understand statistical methods, but they do not understand that either. The Dunning-Kruger effect is particularly strong in this area.
Re: (Score:2)
No, I have education in statistical methods. You obviously do not. That makes you uneducated, incompetent and arrogant. In actual reality, it depends entirely on the border-conditions.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're a complete fraud if you think 80 models millions in a psychological human-reaction experimentation.
You can model millions with 80. Of course you can't do it well, but you can do it a lot better than with 8...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually that's a good, but different point. I actually started to make the point that large samples increase the effect of sampling defects but I thought it would be too confusing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You and hey! are both right, and the AC is trolling you, and you should stop arguing with it. But there are still real questions about the validity of this study. The sample size of 80 may be appropriate, but the paper includes no power analysis or other explanation of how they came up with 80 participants. I'm not saying it's too small a sample; I'm just saying the paper offers no rationale for the sample size.
There's a fair amount of self-reporting on participant behavior. The subjects were all Australian
Re: (Score:2)
Music fans (Score:2)
Yes... (Score:5, Funny)
The joy of violence!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Everyone who ever exercised to music could tell you that.
If you want to push through the pain you go for metal.
Yes Humans Love Violence (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Hope You Like Fucking Ashes (Score:2)
Aggretsuko's Retsuko is right about death metal (Score:1)
Playing the music during the test? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Higher pitch sounds can cause tension. Happy is awfully high I imagine the extra tension may skew the results. Also the decibel level needs to be considered as well, low pitch high decibel sound can cause drowsiness.
It makes sense (Score:2)
Being forced to listen to Pharrell Williams would enrage me too.
science ! (Score:2)
Who knew that science could be so sophisticated? Here, just look at the title of the study: "Implicit violent imagery processing among fans and non-fans of music with violent themes", isn't that impressive? And here's a snippet of the data analysis: "...ratings of arousal to the song Eaten (XÂ=4.03, s.e. = 0.33) than to the song Happy (XÂ=3.34, s.e. = 0.27; F1,31 = 4.15, p = 0.050, ÎG2=0.046; figure 3b)." [Of course Slashdot cannot reproduce this text correctly, but please trust me, it looks
Share your favorites for joy (Score:2)
Since death metal inspires joy, can we start a little thread of our favorite death metal songs?
I'm not a regular death metal listener, but I have to admit that when I hear it I get unreasonably giddy. Here's Cannibal Corpse, who I like because they remind me of a real live version of Deathklok.
https://youtu.be/482tDopNzoc [youtu.be]
I listen to this shit and I'm ready to go put my head through some drywall. In next life, I want to come back as a death metal bass player, but hopefully not Murderface.
Re: (Score:2)
Zero the Hero [youtube.com] - not technically a Cannibal Corpse song, but a Black Sabbath cover found on the Hammer Smashed Face [youtube.com] EP. ( Ace Ventura cameo [youtube.com])
I haven't really kept up. Sirius/XM has a more-or-less death metal channel that I sometimes flip to when there is a commercial on another channel. I occasionally hear something I like, but rarely. Even more rare is hearing classic death metal that I'm already familiar with.
P.S. Evisceration Plague sounds, to my ears, a lot like old Deicide.
Re: (Score:2)
Deicide was good. I had a kid in class some years back and he was a metal head and made me a CD mix of some stuff and Deicide was on it.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, Deicide's most consistent trait is mediocrity. While they have put out some really good stuff, probably more of their output is pretty lacking, at this point. Lineup changes and uninspired songwriting have taken their toll over the years.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Considering myself a multi-pronged metal fan, I have listened to so much metal of all types that lines between genres are now very blurred to me. I can recognize pure black metal from pure death metal, for example, but none of the "technical melodic death metal" or "epic viking black metal" definitions make sense to me.
I enjoy "MONO, Inc." and "Agathocles", "Out Of Norm" and "Anal Cunt", "In The Woods" and "Six Feet Under" and don't think of one genre or subgenre as better than another. The whole metal scen
Re: (Score:2)
I think the wonderful thing about metal is that it's generally far more risky and experimental than most other genres. That's what makes it so damn hard to categorize. Unlike you, I can't and don't care to try to parse death metal from black metal. I really have stopped trying to categorize, especially with bands who put more than one album of styles out, or who shift between styles within an album or even a song. It's either good or it's not. If it's good, it goes on rotation.
And I find what makes me smile
Re: (Score:3)
I always assumed that Nathan Explosion was based on Johan Hegg of Amon Amarth.
My favorite metal bands:
Ensiferum (one-stop-shop for workout music)
Opeth
Ayreon
Star One
Therion
Amon Amarth
In Flames
Pantera
Megadeth
Disturbed
Re: (Score:2)
Man, this thread is great! I need to revisit Soilwork. I listened to the hell out of them up through Natural Born Chaos. I wasn't as much of a fan of Living Infinite, but I'm realizing now that I've missed like a half dozen albums on either side of that one. What should I absolutely pick up?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, no death metal without Death [youtube.com]!
Re: (Score:1)
Always been more of a goth/doom fan. So Type O Negative, particularly Xero Tolerance, if we're going violent.
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't listened to Type O Negative in years. I really should go back and jam to that a bit. Such a great band. Wish they could have gone on forever.
Re: (Score:2)
Alright, I used to listen to Death Metal in the past, today not so much any more. But there are still songs I could listen to on occasions. I always found the concept of a favourite song a bit weird. At least for me these things are very temporary.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] - Opeth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com] - Meshuggah
Listening to that kind of music certainly desensitized me a bit to electronic distortion and the whole Loudness War. While some of my friends hat
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I personally think that everyone likes metal, and if they don't they just haven't found the right band yet. Metal spans everything from screaming thrash metal to melodic bands with opera singers as the lead to bands with piano playing and multi-part minor-key harmonies.
What do you like and what don't you like? I bet someone can recommend a metal band that might tickle your fancy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You would like Ayreon
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That describes a lot of northern European metal. Off the top of my head Nightwish (especially their older stuff), Leaves Eyes, and Opeth (although they can get really heavy, they tend to break it up with a capella minor harmonies, a trickle of piano, etc.).
For a real trip try Mago de Oz. They're Spanish Jethro Tull meets metal. Accordions, flutes, upbeat folk music done with a metal undertone.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Since death metal inspires joy, can we start a little thread of our favorite death metal songs?
I'm not a regular death metal listener, but I have to admit that when I hear it I get unreasonably giddy. Here's Cannibal Corpse, who I like because they remind me of a real live version of Deathklok.
https://youtu.be/482tDopNzoc [youtu.be]
I listen to this shit and I'm ready to go put my head through some drywall. In next life, I want to come back as a death metal bass player, but hopefully not Murderface.
A couple of years ago I was driving to work, and was in a particularly foul mood (don't remember why exactly). I was flipping through the SiriusXM stations and when I reached Liquid Metal they were playing Cannibal Corpse's "Kill or Become". It was so cathartic, it just pulled that dark mood right out of me.
Re: (Score:2)
Metal Kitchen (Score:2)
Linzey Rae's Metal Kitchen never fails to make me smile:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
There's only a handful, but it's taking death metal songs, and changing the lyrics to cooking lessons.
I'm more of a heavy metal / thrash metal person, though ... Ministry, Gwar, and Prong are typically the closest to death metal that I regularly listen to. (although I *do* have Napalm Death's Utopia Banished in my library)
They asked the wrong people (Score:2)
It makes me want to kill, not the fans.
Music inspires Joy in any Genre (Score:2)
Death Metal and Disco are the same.
Re: (Score:2)
Death Metal and Disco are the same.
"Death Disco!"
I could get behind that.
Re: (Score:2)
Oblig: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Dig up Andy Rehfeldt. His specialty is dubbing over music videos with very-well-done incorrect styles. If you can find his Taylor Swift Signs Polka Metal, it's fucking legendary. Swift's lawyers have been on a crusade to crush it, despite it being clearly parody. If you get desperate, give him $1 on his patreon account, and dig through there for it. Mary Poppins sings Death Metal is likewise amazing, and still on his youtube channel last I knew.
I don't know if he's done Death Disco, but if anyone would, it
Re: (Score:2)
Not for me. (Score:1)
Death metal produces headaches. Find a good singer you talentless hacks.
Even Dave Mustaine's vocals would be an improvement to all these bands.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, metal screaming definitely doesn't need talent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Slayer and Megadeth!!!! (Score:4, Insightful)
I've been listening to 1990s Slayer and Megadeth lately, and it not only takes me back to another time but it's really good music. Dave Mustain is awesome on guitar and Slayer's drummer is a freak of nature (I can hardly tap multiple fingers to some of his rolls). The lyrics are funny as well ("growing madness as my mind dissolves").
Good stuff. I don't like their more recent stuff though. Biased due to original listening period.
On and on south of heaven!
Re: (Score:3)
Bah! If you want some good music, listen to some Beethoven [wordpress.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Good movie, but I prefer Motzart (mostly to fall asleep to since I'm listing to Medadeth otherwise...).
Re: (Score:2)
Lombardo really is amazing. The first time I saw Slayer live was when he was out of the band, and I was like "yeah, not bad, but not the best".
Then, the next year, Lombardo was back. And I saw them again.
And you had to wipe me off the floor with a rag.
Seriously, that man is a God among drummers. Listening to Slayer with him on drums was just a different, life altering experience. He really hammers out Slayer's place in the history of metal.
Mustaine is a whole other chapter. There is so much to say there. He
Re: (Score:1)
Those are thrash bands, not death.
To be fair though, they did inspire death.
I think Slayer's album God Hates Us All rates up there with Reign In Blood. Probably why they've been opening shows with Disciple for years. I may be middle-aged now, but god damn it's a thrill to be in the pit when Araya starts screaming "God hates us all!".
Slayer is calling it quits and are wrapping up their farewell tour. They just haven't been the same since Jeff Hanneman died, since he wrote all their good material.
Re: (Score:2)
the moment I read that verse my mind played "merely secret in my dreams." I don't even know if that's the correct lyrics.
Re: (Score:2)
Secrets, that is.
Re: (Score:2)
Megadeth has a special place in my heart as that was my gateway into metal, but yeah, not really death metal.
Re: (Score:2)
Neither band I mentioned are really death metal. But they were important contributors to what would become death metal (I don't really like "true" death metal).
I did enjoy Ministry, another parent of the style (which also contributed to Nine Inch Nails later albums in my opinion).
Re: (Score:2)
It was his drinking (how we acted, not by volume), not his skills.
https://loudwire.com/dave-must... [loudwire.com]
Hammet is certainly not bad but I ignore the band after the whole Napster stuff.
Junkiest of junk science (Score:2)
If this experiment were proposed by my master's student, I wouldn't allow them to proceed to perform it based upon the lack of control of the uncountably various factors unaccounted for in the methods. Based upon the limited nature of the experiment, the results are utterly ungeneralizable, and there's no suggestion that they're even repeatable. If sitting on a thesis committee hearing a defense of this paper, I would vote against the student based upon not only their failure to address these issues, but al
Re: (Score:2)
Aiming for an Ig Nobel prize? (Score:1)
Wait a minute... (Score:2)
only a (small?) portion of the population sees in 3 dimensions because one eye dominates. If you're showing two different images to the eyes, won't the dominant eye see whatever is in front of it while the brain tends to ignore the image seen by the other eye?
You mean to tell me (Score:1)
Somebody Contact the Ig-Nobel Committee ! (Score:2)
My favorite Death-Metal band - Brainkreig (Score:2)
Den-tist, jugga-jigga-wugga!
Deli-Style jugga-jigga-wugga!
Dela-Soul jugga-jigga-wugga!
I think it's about being uplifted by "dark" music (Score:1)
Inspires joy? (Score:2)
It inspires me to want to poke my eardrums out with a pencil.
Finally, someone gets it! (Score:2)
It reminds me of how my mother hated the music I listened to until she saw me play on stage back in '94. She had the best way of describing us and the crowd: "That gives a whole new meaning to 'flipping your wig!'"
One of the secrets of extreme metal (be it death, black, thrash, or anything requiring high energy and stamina) is most of us are nerds showing off how far they can push their limits on their instruments. One of my sources of joy is trying my "Sub-Bass" out on other bassists. Once they get past th
Trump inspires illiteracy, treason, being hanged? (Score:1, Interesting)
"Someone" ought to read Paine, Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau and then realize half of what they're talking about is socialism in the societal contract context. But you won't, because in Trump's America the illiterates are the patriots, lol?
Good luck with the rope, nazis usually struggle on the gallows. We'll see I guess!
Re: (Score:1)
Yes to a lot of Rousseau's points.
The fundamental axiom of social contract theory is:
"I promise not to kill you and take your stuff if you promise not to kill me and take mine."
That axiom is antithetical to socialism.
Progressivism altered the social contract to be
"I promise to force you to not eat meat if you promise to force me to not eat wheat."
Re: (Score:2)
Hooker,
Hobbes,
Locke - Madison, Jefferson
Diderot,
Montesquieu
And, of course, enshrined in Blackstone.
It started being altered in the 19th C with the Counter-Enlightenment theorists.
Just as liberals appropriated the term "liberal" meaning individual liberty- it flipped the concept of rights around from that which you have by being born to that given to you by governments. Here's how you know what a right