Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Space Japan Robotics Technology

Japan's Two Hopping Rovers Successfully Land On Asteroid Ryugu (space.com) 76

sharkbiter shares a report from Space.com: The suspense is over: Two tiny hopping robots have successfully landed on an asteroid called Ryugu -- and they've even sent back some wild postcards from their new home. The tiny rovers are part of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's Hayabusa2 asteroid sample-return mission. Engineers with the agency deployed the robots early Friday (Sept. 21), but JAXA waited until today (Sept. 22) to confirm the operation was successful and both rovers made the landing safely.

In order to complete the deployment, the main spacecraft of the Hayabusa2 mission lowered itself carefully down toward the surface until it was just 180 feet (55 meters) up. After the rovers were on their way, the spacecraft raised itself back up to its typical altitude of about 12.5 miles above the asteroid's surface (20 kilometers). The agency still has two more deployments yet to accomplish before it can rest easy: Hayabusa2 is scheduled to deploy a larger rover called MASCOT in October and another tiny hopper next year. And of course, the main spacecraft has a host of other tasks to accomplish during its stay at Ryugu -- most notably, to collect a sample of the primitive world to bring home to Earth for laboratory analysis.
JAXA tweeted on Saturday: "We are sorry we have kept you waiting! MINERVA-II1 consists of two rovers, 1a & 1b. Both rovers are confirmed to have landed on the surface of Ryugu. They are in good condition and have transmitted photos & data. We also confirmed they are moving on the surface."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Japan's Two Hopping Rovers Successfully Land On Asteroid Ryugu

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    when you don't waste all your disposable income policing the world and 'liberating' third world shitholes.
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

      Yeah, it would be cool if they could land probes on Mars and stuff.
    • Imagine where we would be and what we could have done... interstellar by now.
      • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

        Comment removed based on user account deletion
        • Maybe life is just like that...
        • by Anonymous Coward

          Imagine the people we could have lifted out of poverty while creating a stronger nation, economy, and safer world. With the money we are spending on war shit we could have turned this planet into a garden of peace and prosperity a few times over.

          I'd like to see your math on that.

          Here's mine.
          The USA spent about $600 billion for the military in 2017.
          We could use that money to feed people in Africa instead buying bombs and guns.
          $600 billion would buy about $1.25 of food a day for every person in Africa. I'm not seeing prosperity there.

          • Considering most of the regions touched by famine have opulation wit $10/month of income, that's already 4x what they earn.

          • by Bert64 ( 520050 ) <.moc.eeznerif.todhsals. .ta. .treb.> on Monday September 24, 2018 @02:09AM (#57366344) Homepage

            And if you buy food for people in africa or other starving places, you do two things...

            1, make them dependent on your handouts
            2, cause them to have more kids - thus requiring larger handouts in future

            African countries like Zimbabwe used to have no trouble feeding themselves, in fact they used to export a lot of food.
            Proper education is needed, not handouts of food, and they need to actually want the education and learn from it.

            • Insightful mod?

              Not Offtopic?

            • by TheDarkMaster ( 1292526 ) on Monday September 24, 2018 @08:28AM (#57367088)
              To be more exact you need both. Provide food for the person not to starve immediately, and when the person is no longer at risk of starvation then you go to the part of educating him.
              • then you go to the part of educating him.

                Education only works for people with cocks, but not pussies? Well, that's certainly cleared up a couple of centuries of error.

                • A bit of (Brazilian) Portuguese for you: In Portuguese a "pessoa" (person) can be either "he" or "her," for purposes of verbal agreement is used more "her" (person is a "feminine" word in portuguese). You american guys in English apparently use "it" in this case, but in Portuguese "it" is "coisa" (thing), and I do not think it's right to call a person a "thing". As the literal translation seems to use "it" then I preferred to use "her" as it is used in Brazilian Portuguese so I can make it clear that I am t
                  • Correction: I mean "him", not "her" on the last part. I should have used "her" (for "person"), but since I don't think Americans would understand the use of Portuguese verbal agreement then I decided to use a middle ground and use "him" since the Google literal translation insists on switching "him" to "it".
                  • You american guys in English apparently use

                    Please don't insult people by assuming they are American.

                    Gendered versus non-gendered languages are definitely confusing. Almost as confusing as two-gender versus three-gender languages. Or, for that matter, languages with versus without articles.

                    "It" or "one" is perfectly acceptable English, even if it may (or may not) be unacceptable in American. I don't know, because I don't speak American.

              • by Bert64 ( 520050 )

                Once they're no longer at risk of starvation, the motivation to do anything goes away...
                You give freebies and people will become lazy, not bother to learn anything and just wait for more freebies.

            • More people to kill, More spent on the military... win-win for everybody. :)
          • I'd like to see your math on that.

            Here's mine. The USA spent about $600 billion for the military in 2017. We could use that money to feed people in Africa instead buying bombs and guns. $600 billion would buy about $1.25 of food a day for every person in Africa. I'm not seeing prosperity there.

            Why Africa? Start with your own poor before sorting out other entire continents.

            • I read that US school teachers are buying supplies with their own money. That's just crazy.

              https://www.reuters.com/articl... [reuters.com]

        • You missed the real story here. The detail, which we know from direct empirical evidence, is what kind of shirt was the spokesman wearing when heade the announcement?
      • Imagine where we would be and what we could have done... interstellar by now.

        Like the voyager probes? Well, kind of anyway.

    • by Gavagai80 ( 1275204 ) on Sunday September 23, 2018 @08:50PM (#57365818) Homepage

      The Japanese space agency's budget, or at least the last known report listed at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org] since budgets aren't public info, is far less than that of NASA, Roscosmos and the ESA. This mission is a remarkably ambitious example of doing more with less.

    • Its as if humanity is being held back from going interstellar... I cant imagine any human wanting this tech being held back.
  • new name (Score:5, Funny)

    by meglon ( 1001833 ) on Sunday September 23, 2018 @09:07PM (#57365866)
    Given the first photo, the Minerva-II1A rover will now be know as the JJ Abrams rover.
  • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Sunday September 23, 2018 @11:34PM (#57366104)

    It sounds like they will have material from an asteroid back some two years earlier than NASA!

    Pretty exciting though that potentially we could have material from two different asteroids to compare. I've not looked into the NASA mission, hopefully they are also getting a ways down inside the asteroid... would be interesting to see a comparison of the two missions and what capabilities each had.

  • ..by claiming the scientists and engineers were misogynists?

  • It would be interesting to see such technology used to explore Phobos and get some nice close up pics of that interestingly shaped rock.

Some people manage by the book, even though they don't know who wrote the book or even what book.

Working...