Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
Stats Businesses Science

The Most Productive Days and Times In 2017 (rescuetime.com) 31

Posted by BeauHD from the on-the-clock dept.
In a blog post, personal analytics service RescueTime revealed exactly what days and times we were most productive in 2017, by studying the anonymized data of how people spent their time on their computers and phones over the past 12 months. From the report: Simply put, our data shows that people were the most productive on November 14th. In fact, that entire week ranked as the most productive of the year. Which makes sense. With American Thanksgiving the next week and the mad holiday rush shortly after, mid-November is a great time for people to cram in a few extra work hours and get caught up before gorging on Turkey dinner. On the other side of the spectrum, we didn't get a good start to the year. January 6th -- the first Friday of the year -- was the least productive day of 2017.

One of the biggest mistakes so many of us make when planning out our days is to assume we have 8+ hours to do productive work. This couldn't be further from the truth. What we found is that, on average, we only spend 5 hours a day working on a digital device. And with an average productivity pulse of 53% for the year, that means we only have 12.5 hours a week to do productive work. Our data showed that we do our most productive work between 10 and noon and then again from 2-5pm each day. However, breaking it down to the hour, we do our most productive work on Wednesdays at 3pm. RescueTime has a separate blog post detailing how they calculate their productivity scores.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

The Most Productive Days and Times In 2017 More

The Most Productive Days and Times In 2017

Comments Filter:

  • we only spend 5 hours a day working on a digital device

    I don't think anyone who only spends that amount of time in front of a digital device.

    • It said working. It doesn't include watching cat videos, playing solitaire, or attending virtual meetings.

      • Re: (Score:2)

        by rtb61 ( 674572 )

        I suppose it would also not include, spreadsheets, cad/cam machines, animation, coding et al. Lots of people spend twelve hours a day in front of computers, lots as in large numbers, not lots as in large percentages but when you start with 7 billion, even a tiny percentage is millions.

        However there measure is not a measure of productivity but a measure of technological based time wasting, definitely not one of producing some thing other than perhaps large measures of social angst https://en.wikipedia.org/w [wikipedia.org]

  • One size fits all is almost never appropriate. I know I'm most productive at the start of the morning before people start interrupting me for questions, and usually through a good part of the afternoon before 4 PM.
    • I won't eat the clickbait, but you can tell from the summary that they started with a narrow, non-representative sample of office workers, and the methodology probably just gets worse from there.

    • Re: (Score:3)

      by Kjella ( 173770 )

      One size fits all is almost never appropriate. I know I'm most productive at the start of the morning before people start interrupting me for questions, and usually through a good part of the afternoon before 4 PM.

      You realize that "people start interrupting" because that's when they're working, right? I understand your perspective, except I'm the polar opposite who usually gets things done in the late afternoon but I'm under no illusion that's when most work is done company-wide. I get work done because it's quiet. And to be honest I think you are the exception, most people seem to take a long time to "boot" to get into work again. That goes for Mondays, mornings and just coming back from lunch. Or they're procrastin

      • This is a double edged sword.
        If management would take it at face value and say "okay, this is when people are productive, so lets make that time easier for them" it'd be okay.

        We all know management instead will say: "Shit! they're only 'working' 12.5 hours a week but we're paying 40?" ignoring that a lot of the not work time is meetings/overhead and the games/social media time is often a case of "This problem is thorny, I'm going to take a break and come back to it." and while on said break our brain is act

    • One size fits all is almost never appropriate. I know I'm most productive at the start of the morning before people start interrupting me for questions, and usually through a good part of the afternoon before 4 PM.

      Not me. I work for an international company with the main office being in EMEA and with our team being global. Which means that the majority of my mornings (afternoons in Europe) are taken up by early morning meetings, usually from 8:00am to noon. Tuesday's and Thursdays are completely taken up by meetings.

      I am the most productive on Wednesdays as it's one of the only full days that I have no meetings scheduled. Friday comes in second place. So, for me, it's pretty close.

      The results may not exactly fit

  • Before I retired (early), I *often* outproduced my co-workers because I took more time to think and much less time to "do".

    Spending time learning is also productivity. I would often know a way of doing things which took 1% (or less) as long as co-workers.

    So you really need to watch the questions you are asking and the assumptions you are making about what is work, what is productivity, and so on.

    Sometimes, the best thing you can do for your productivity is to take a break and go for a walk.

    You just have to

  • I'm not on RescueTime; I'm on, like, Boulder Golden Durban Goat Poison Oh Jesus Chem Kush got-any-crackers time. I can't imagine trying to flip my neurons to a new thread 300 times a week, much less 300 times a day. Isn't there some research [uci.edu] that says that it takes people 20+ minutes [nytimes.com] to get fully engaged after an interrupt or task switch?

    • This.
      For quite a while I have been tasked with customer support for *one* customer and primary QA at my current gig.

      "But it's only one customer!" -management
      "Yeah and when they interrupt the super complex test case I was running I have to very nearly start over." -me

      6 months later I have an offer at a new company on the way, where I can focus on what I'm genuinely good at.

  • After 8 hours of work, productivity drops precipitously. Accrue too much overtime, and you'll be so tired your productivity is negative: you'll just be introducing errors you'll have to fix later.

    • Eh, with version control, you won't go negative in productivity. Your breadcrumbs will help the next day. Now, it's probably not worth the loss of free time and mental strain*, but at least you won't move backwards.

      * Or it can be. I have no idea what your compensation structure looks like.

  • ...this is what this kind of "studies" actually say. And they measure people in a way 100% consistent with this view: the only metric is how many hours the slaves actually sweat at the workplace. Because slaves are little more than animals, they don't think, they do not talk among themseves while working, they do not eat much, all they do is handle the tools in a more or less productive way. I say, there is a solution for this problem: use a a longer whip!

    • and the smart slaves use out of band devices for comms, social media, etc. all while remaining logged in at their proscribed station.

Slashdot Top Deals

No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.

Close