Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Medicine Science

Plants 'Hijacked' To Make Polio Vaccine (bbc.com) 59

Plants have been "hijacked" to make polio vaccine in a breakthrough with the potential to transform vaccine manufacture, say scientists. From a report: The team at the John Innes Centre, in Norfolk, says the process is cheap, easy and quick. As well as helping eliminate polio, the scientists believe their approach could help the world react to unexpected threats such as Zika virus or Ebola. Experts said the achievement was both impressive and important. The vaccine is an "authentic mimic" of poliovirus called a virus-like particle. Outwardly it looks almost identical to poliovirus but -- like the difference between a mannequin and person -- it is empty on the inside. It has all the features needed to train the immune system, but none of the weapons to cause an infection.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Plants 'Hijacked' To Make Polio Vaccine

Comments Filter:
  • by goombah99 ( 560566 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @06:46PM (#55021487)

    I assume they have tested this but to be a good antigen often you need to also have the proper decoration of the particle with lipids and sugars. I would doubt that plants could provide the right version of these for animal antigens. But it's possible this shows it's not neccessary or they have a way around it in the case of polio.

    Even more intriguing is the potential for a flu vaccine. What makes that intriguing is that flu vaccine is often raised in eggs. And birds (hence eggs) are the natural resevoir of flu. So there's some risks associated with the use of the native host as the agent for growing the intentionally harmelss vaccine. And there might even be some selectivity on the animals part for things that are more bird adapted than others. With plants one presumably avoids that and the risk of a human catching a plant virus seem negligible.

    • by arth1 ( 260657 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @09:56PM (#55022625) Homepage Journal

      With plants one presumably avoids that and the risk of a human catching a plant virus seem negligible.

      It's rare, but not unheard of that viruses jump entire kingdoms. A tobacco ringspot virus jumped to bees, for example.

    • by Whibla ( 210729 )

      I assume they have tested this but ...

      You can stop there. From the article "The virus-like particles prevented polio in animal experiments". So, not tested in humans yet (understandably) but, yes, tested. Additional upsides, beyond time and cost, are that this eliminates the risk of vaccine derived polio.

      Even more intriguing is the potential for a flu vaccine. What makes that intriguing is that flu vaccine is often raised in eggs.

      And not just flu vaccines. Vaccines against any viral threat. This is a game changing technology!

  • by intellitech ( 1912116 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @06:54PM (#55021527)

    I think this might be it:

    https://www.eurekalert.org/pub... [eurekalert.org]

  • by Applehu Akbar ( 2968043 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @07:02PM (#55021591)

    If this proves to be generally applicable, it will be a fast way of making a vaccine against whatever new disease strain may happen to break out. No more guesswork over which viral strains to include in this year's flu vaccine.

    And because it's a vaccine made by genetically modifying a plant, deploying it will automatically eliminate Luddites from the population. Scientific progress will become possible again, even in Europe and California. I think GMO labeling is a rotten idea, but just this once, let's put a big red USES THE GMO PROCESS label in each vial to make sure.

    • by alvinrod ( 889928 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @07:16PM (#55021669)

      And because it's a vaccine made by genetically modifying a plant, deploying it will automatically eliminate Luddites from the population. Scientific progress will become possible again, even in Europe and California. I think GMO labeling is a rotten idea, but just this once, let's put a big red USES THE GMO PROCESS label in each vial to make sure.

      Yeah, but it's still Vegan friendly. Can we find a way to do this with cows instead?

    • There are lots of press releases hyping breakthroughs that are anything but. However, this looks like it might very well be the real thing.

  • by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @07:05PM (#55021617)

    Now if only we could convince idiots to let doctors inoculate their children.

  • How is this a breakthrough? We know how to efficiently produce biological structures by genetically modified bacteria, why using a plant would be more efficient?
    • Well for starters, you never know exactly how a given technological process might be used in the future.

    • I assume that a plant can produce more complex biological structures than a bacteria.

    • Viruses have traditionally been incubated by using the live virus in living creatures, allowing them to reproduce, and harvesting living samples. That meant keeping live, reproducing copies of the virus around, where they are fully capable of reproducing and even of mutating to a more dangerous form. By not actually creating a full virus that can reproduce, and never having to handle the full organism, it makes vaccine creation _far_ safer and cheaper.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Of all the vaccines to do this with, why polio?

    We have darn near eradicated this surge from the face of the earth, in fact 1 of the three strains actually HAS been eradicated so far and one strain is nearly so. The infection rate for polio is down to double digits world wide, in fact we are seeing almost as many oral vaccine caused cases of polio than actual cases. If we can sustain the vaccination rates for just a bit longer and get the last few pockets of unvaccinated people taken care of, this could a

    • by Jarik C-Bol ( 894741 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @08:17PM (#55022115)
      Because we know what an effective polio vaccine looks like. If we are able to replicate an effective polio vaccine using this new technique, the knowledge obtained creating it produces a framework around which to build the process of making vaccines for diseases that we currently do NOT have vaccines for.
      Much the same as how there are many proofs for the Pythagorean theorem. The more ways to the correct answer, the more thoroughly the problem is solved, and the understanding gained developing those proofs lends itself to being able to solve other more complex problems.
      • My guess is because the original Polio vaccine was given away to the world with no patents. When this new means of developing the Polio vaccine becomes ready to go into full production, whichever pharmaceutical company working on it can then lock it down and fund measures to eradicate the original vaccine that only saves lives, but does not produce huge revenues.

  • by Michael Woodhams ( 112247 ) on Tuesday August 15, 2017 @08:19PM (#55022137) Journal

    I've been following the polio numbers week by week for some years now. (Polio eradication will be one of the great achievements of human history.)

    This news is particularly important because this year for the first time ever "circulating vaccine derived polio virus" (cVDPV, where live weakened polio in vaccines has mutated back to virulence) is causing more polio cases than wild polio virus (WPV).
    Here are the full-year numbers for the last few years:
          WPV cVDPV
    2011 583 67
    2012 202 68
    2013 416 65
    2014 359 56
    2015 74 32
    2016 37 5

    (2017 missing because the year hasn't yet finished.) Here are the numbers for start of year to approx 9 August:
              WPV cVDPV
    2014 138 31
    2015 29 10
    2016 19 3
    2017 8 37
    (I only have 2014 onwards ready to hand in week-by-week breakdown.) Mostly this is due to a major outbreak of cVDPV in Syria (30 cases).

    (There is a delay of up to about 2 months between a polio case in the field and it getting reported to central authorities and added to the official numbers, but the numbers above are all what was reported at that time of year, so the comparison is fair.)

    It is looking reasonable to hope that the last ever WPV case will be this year or next year, but cVDPV eradication is looking harder. Polio is a disease that can lurk asymptomatically in a population, so it will be three years after the last detection of WPV before it is declared eradicated. (Nigeria had over two years of being apparently polio free before a few cases re-emerged.)

    There were three strains of WPV. WPV2 and WPV3 have been eradicated, but until recently vaccines were still vaccinating against WPV2, and it is this vaccine strain (cVDPV2) which is causing most of the problems (all of the cVDPV cases so far this year are cVDPV2.) Now WPV2 vaccine is not in the standard vaccinations, and is only used in response to a cVDPV2 outbreak.

    The countries still with WPV endemic are Pakistan and Afghanistan, and Nigeria has had cases recently enough that we can't safely say it is free of WPV.

    The countries which have had cVDPV cases in 2015 or later are Syria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Pakistan, Madagascar, Lao, Guinea, Ukraine, Myanmar, Nigeria.

    Find more at
    http://polioeradication.org/po... [polioeradication.org]

    • by lannocc ( 568669 )
      People forget about this when dismissing anti-vaxxers as having no case. I'm not saying the anti-vaxxers are correct or completely justified, but there is a provable non-zero individual risk with vaccines that we must not forget about.
      • In this case it is a non-individual risk. Getting vaccinated makes you less likely to get cVDPV, but makes it (very slightly) more likely that people around you will get cVDPV.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    From the article [bbc.com]:

    Prof Lomonossoff told the BBC: "In an experiment with a Canadian company, they showed you could actually identify a new strain of virus and produce a candidate vaccine in three to four weeks.

    Suppose the bird flu mutated, so that it spread easily between humans. Would making "a candidate vaccine in three to four weeks" be fast enough to prevent a disastrous pandemic?

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Will this create a generation of autistic plants? Is this why my ficus ignores me?

  • Outwardly it looks almost identical to poliovirus but -- like the difference between a mannequin and person -- it is empty on the inside. It has all the features needed to train the immune system, but none of the weapons to cause an infection.

    That's just what the plants WANT us to think. Today it's a vaccine, tomorrow it's a plant-borne pandemic. The Happening was a warning, people!

  • like the difference between a mannequin and person -- it is empty on the inside

    I am a mannequin, you insensitive clod!

  • Let's hope there are no "hermit crab" viruses out there that would use the shell for home.
  • As anyone who studied at UEA knows the real work of the John Innes centre is triffid research.

  • Am only looking at 'outstanding' answers but good mix of experts providing informed answers.

    Just wish there was upvoted facility here.

  • ...a plant-born disease crosses over and becomes the next pandemic.

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...